Commit f05b558d authored by Lai Jiangshan's avatar Lai Jiangshan Committed by Tejun Heo

workqueue: clear POOL_DISASSOCIATED in rebind_workers()

The commit a9ab775b ("workqueue: directly restore CPU affinity of
workers from CPU_ONLINE") moved the pool->lock into rebind_workers()
without also moving "pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED".

There is nothing wrong with "pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED" not
being moved together, but there isn't any benefit either. We move it
into rebind_workers() and achieve these benefits:

1) Better readability.  POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared in
   rebind_workers() as expected.

2) When POOL_DISASSOCIATED is cleared, we can ensure that all the
   running workers of the pool are on the local CPU (pool->cpu).

tj: Cosmetic updates to the code and description.
Signed-off-by: default avatarLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
parent fb009e3a
......@@ -4542,6 +4542,7 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool) {
unsigned int worker_flags = worker->flags;
......@@ -4643,15 +4644,10 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
if (pool->cpu == cpu)
rebind_workers(pool);
} else if (pool->cpu < 0) {
else if (pool->cpu < 0)
restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
}
mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment