Commit f0a23883 authored by Paolo Bonzini's avatar Paolo Bonzini

Merge tag 'kvm-s390-next-6.11-1' of...

Merge tag 'kvm-s390-next-6.11-1' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux into HEAD

Assortment of tiny fixes which are not time critical:
- Rejecting memory region operations for ucontrol mode VMs
- Rewind the PSW on host intercepts for VSIE
- Remove unneeded include
parents 60d2b2f3 7816e589
......@@ -1403,6 +1403,12 @@ Instead, an abort (data abort if the cause of the page-table update
was a load or a store, instruction abort if it was an instruction
fetch) is injected in the guest.
S390:
^^^^^
Returns -EINVAL if the VM has the KVM_VM_S390_UCONTROL flag set.
Returns -EINVAL if called on a protected VM.
4.36 KVM_SET_TSS_ADDR
---------------------
......@@ -6273,6 +6279,12 @@ state. At VM creation time, all memory is shared, i.e. the PRIVATE attribute
is '0' for all gfns. Userspace can control whether memory is shared/private by
toggling KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE via KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES as needed.
S390:
^^^^^
Returns -EINVAL if the VM has the KVM_VM_S390_UCONTROL flag set.
Returns -EINVAL if called on a protected VM.
4.141 KVM_SET_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES
-------------------------------
......
......@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/kvm_types.h>
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
#include <linux/kvm.h>
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
......
......@@ -5748,6 +5748,9 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
{
gpa_t size;
if (kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm))
return -EINVAL;
/* When we are protected, we should not change the memory slots */
if (kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm))
return -EINVAL;
......
......@@ -1304,10 +1304,24 @@ static int vsie_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
if (rc == -EAGAIN)
rc = 0;
if (rc || scb_s->icptcode || signal_pending(current) ||
/*
* Exit the loop if the guest needs to process the intercept
*/
if (rc || scb_s->icptcode)
break;
/*
* Exit the loop if the host needs to process an intercept,
* but rewind the PSW to re-enter SIE once that's completed
* instead of passing a "no action" intercept to the guest.
*/
if (signal_pending(current) ||
kvm_s390_vcpu_has_irq(vcpu, 0) ||
kvm_s390_vcpu_sie_inhibited(vcpu))
kvm_s390_vcpu_sie_inhibited(vcpu)) {
kvm_s390_rewind_psw(vcpu, 4);
break;
}
cond_resched();
}
......@@ -1426,8 +1440,10 @@ int kvm_s390_handle_vsie(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
if (signal_pending(current) || kvm_s390_vcpu_has_irq(vcpu, 0) ||
kvm_s390_vcpu_sie_inhibited(vcpu))
kvm_s390_vcpu_sie_inhibited(vcpu)) {
kvm_s390_rewind_psw(vcpu, 4);
return 0;
}
vsie_page = get_vsie_page(vcpu->kvm, scb_addr);
if (IS_ERR(vsie_page))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment