Commit f1b83255 authored by Kai Huang's avatar Kai Huang Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: x86/mmu: Fix TDP MMU page table level

TDP MMU iterator's level is identical to page table's actual level.  For
instance, for the last level page table (whose entry points to one 4K
page), iter->level is 1 (PG_LEVEL_4K), and in case of 5 level paging,
the iter->level is mmu->shadow_root_level, which is 5.  However, struct
kvm_mmu_page's level currently is not set correctly when it is allocated
in kvm_tdp_mmu_map().  When iterator hits non-present SPTE and needs to
allocate a new child page table, currently iter->level, which is the
level of the page table where the non-present SPTE belongs to, is used.
This results in struct kvm_mmu_page's level always having its parent's
level (excpet root table's level, which is initialized explicitly using
mmu->shadow_root_level).

This is kinda wrong, and not consistent with existing non TDP MMU code.
Fortuantely sp->role.level is only used in handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page()
and kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(), and they are already aware of this and behave
correctly.  However to make it consistent with legacy MMU code (and fix
the issue that both root page table and its child page table have
shadow_root_level), use iter->level - 1 in kvm_tdp_mmu_map(), and change
handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page() and kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp() accordingly.
Reviewed-by: default avatarBen Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Message-Id: <bcb6569b6e96cb78aaa7b50640e6e6b53291a74e.1623717884.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 857f8474
......@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static void handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, tdp_ptep_t pt,
for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++) {
sptep = rcu_dereference(pt) + i;
gfn = base_gfn + (i * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level - 1));
gfn = base_gfn + i * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level);
if (shared) {
/*
......@@ -379,12 +379,12 @@ static void handle_removed_tdp_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, tdp_ptep_t pt,
WRITE_ONCE(*sptep, REMOVED_SPTE);
}
handle_changed_spte(kvm, kvm_mmu_page_as_id(sp), gfn,
old_child_spte, REMOVED_SPTE, level - 1,
old_child_spte, REMOVED_SPTE, level,
shared);
}
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(kvm, gfn,
KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level));
KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(level + 1));
call_rcu(&sp->rcu_head, tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback);
}
......@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
if (is_removed_spte(iter.old_spte))
break;
sp = alloc_tdp_mmu_page(vcpu, iter.gfn, iter.level);
sp = alloc_tdp_mmu_page(vcpu, iter.gfn, iter.level - 1);
child_pt = sp->spt;
new_spte = make_nonleaf_spte(child_pt,
......
......@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id,
}
static inline bool kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
gfn_t end = sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level);
gfn_t end = sp->gfn + KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level + 1);
/*
* Don't allow yielding, as the caller may have a flush pending. Note,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment