Commit f1c9eed7 authored by Daniel Borkmann's avatar Daniel Borkmann Committed by David S. Miller

bpf, arm64: take advantage of stack_depth tracking

Make use of recently implemented stack_depth tracking for arm64 JIT,
so that stack usage can be reduced heavily for programs not using
tail calls at least.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 66e037ca
......@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ struct jit_ctx {
int epilogue_offset;
int *offset;
u32 *image;
u32 stack_size;
};
static inline void emit(const u32 insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
......@@ -145,16 +146,11 @@ static inline int epilogue_offset(const struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* Stack must be multiples of 16B */
#define STACK_ALIGN(sz) (((sz) + 15) & ~15)
#define _STACK_SIZE \
(MAX_BPF_STACK \
+ 4 /* extra for skb_copy_bits buffer */)
#define STACK_SIZE STACK_ALIGN(_STACK_SIZE)
#define PROLOGUE_OFFSET 8
static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
const struct bpf_prog *prog = ctx->prog;
const u8 r6 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_6];
const u8 r7 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_7];
const u8 r8 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_8];
......@@ -176,9 +172,9 @@ static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
* | |
* | ... | BPF prog stack
* | |
* +-----+ <= (BPF_FP - MAX_BPF_STACK)
* +-----+ <= (BPF_FP - prog->aux->stack_depth)
* |RSVD | JIT scratchpad
* current A64_SP => +-----+ <= (BPF_FP - STACK_SIZE)
* current A64_SP => +-----+ <= (BPF_FP - ctx->stack_size)
* | |
* | ... | Function call stack
* | |
......@@ -202,8 +198,12 @@ static int build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* Initialize tail_call_cnt */
emit(A64_MOVZ(1, tcc, 0, 0), ctx);
/* 4 byte extra for skb_copy_bits buffer */
ctx->stack_size = prog->aux->stack_depth + 4;
ctx->stack_size = STACK_ALIGN(ctx->stack_size);
/* Set up function call stack */
emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, STACK_SIZE), ctx);
emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
cur_offset = ctx->idx - idx0;
if (cur_offset != PROLOGUE_OFFSET) {
......@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static void build_epilogue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
const u8 fp = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_FP];
/* We're done with BPF stack */
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, STACK_SIZE), ctx);
emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
/* Restore fs (x25) and x26 */
emit(A64_POP(fp, A64_R(26), A64_SP), ctx);
......@@ -732,7 +732,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
return -EINVAL;
}
emit_a64_mov_i64(r3, size, ctx);
emit(A64_SUB_I(1, r4, fp, STACK_SIZE), ctx);
emit(A64_SUB_I(1, r4, fp, ctx->stack_size), ctx);
emit_a64_mov_i64(r5, (unsigned long)bpf_load_pointer, ctx);
emit(A64_BLR(r5), ctx);
emit(A64_MOV(1, r0, A64_R(0)), ctx);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment