sched/deadline: Fix double accounting of rq/running bw in push & pull

{push,pull}_dl_task() always calls {de,}activate_task() with .flags=0
which sets p->on_rq=TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING.

{push,pull}_dl_task()->{de,}activate_task()->{de,en}queue_task()->
{de,en}queue_task_dl() calls {sub,add}_{running,rq}_bw() since
p->on_rq==TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING.
So {sub,add}_{running,rq}_bw() in {push,pull}_dl_task() is
double-accounting for that task.

Fix it by removing rq/running bw accounting in [push/pull]_dl_task().

Fixes: 7dd77884 ("sched/core: Unify p->on_rq updates")
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190802145945.18702-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com

kernel/sched/deadline.c

@@ -2088,17 +2088,13 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq)
 	}
 
 	deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
-	sub_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl);
-	sub_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl);
 	set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu);
-	add_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl);
 
 	/*
 	 * Update the later_rq clock here, because the clock is used
 	 * by the cpufreq_update_util() inside __add_running_bw().
 	 */
 	update_rq_clock(later_rq);
-	add_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl);
 	activate_task(later_rq, next_task, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
 	ret = 1;
 
@@ -2186,11 +2182,7 @@ static void pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq)
 			resched = true;
 
 			deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0);
-			sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &src_rq->dl);
-			sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &src_rq->dl);
 			set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
-			add_rq_bw(&p->dl, &this_rq->dl);
-			add_running_bw(&p->dl, &this_rq->dl);
 			activate_task(this_rq, p, 0);
 			dmin = p->dl.deadline;