Commit f54bb2ec authored by Frederic Weisbecker's avatar Frederic Weisbecker Committed by Ingo Molnar

locking/lockdep: Add IRQs disabled/enabled assertion APIs: lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled()/disabled()

Checking whether IRQs are enabled or disabled is a very common sanity
check, however not free of overhead especially on fastpath where such
assertion is very common.

Lockdep is a good host for such concurrency correctness check and it
even already tracks down IRQs disablement state. Just reuse its
machinery. This will allow us to get rid of the flags pop and check
overhead from fast path when kernel is built for production.
Suggested-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: David S . Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509980490-4285-2-git-send-email-frederic@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent 11752adb
......@@ -725,9 +725,24 @@ do { \
lock_acquire(&(lock)->dep_map, 0, 0, 1, 1, NULL, _THIS_IP_); \
lock_release(&(lock)->dep_map, 0, _THIS_IP_); \
} while (0)
#define lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled() do { \
WARN_ONCE(debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion && \
!current->hardirqs_enabled, \
"IRQs not enabled as expected\n"); \
} while (0)
#define lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() do { \
WARN_ONCE(debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion && \
current->hardirqs_enabled, \
"IRQs not disabled as expected\n"); \
} while (0)
#else
# define might_lock(lock) do { } while (0)
# define might_lock_read(lock) do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled() do { } while (0)
# define lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() do { } while (0)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment