Commit f7c79f30 authored by Chris Mason's avatar Chris Mason

Btrfs: adjust the write_lock_level as we unlock

btrfs_search_slot sometimes needs write locks on high levels of
the tree.  It remembers the highest level that needs a write lock
and will use that for all future searches through the tree in a given
call.

But, very often we'll just cow the top level or the level below and we
won't really need write locks on the root again after that.  This patch
changes things to adjust the write lock requirement as it unlocks
levels.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
parent a098d8e8
......@@ -1395,7 +1395,8 @@ static noinline int reada_for_balance(struct btrfs_root *root,
* if lowest_unlock is 1, level 0 won't be unlocked
*/
static noinline void unlock_up(struct btrfs_path *path, int level,
int lowest_unlock)
int lowest_unlock, int min_write_lock_level,
int *write_lock_level)
{
int i;
int skip_level = level;
......@@ -1427,6 +1428,11 @@ static noinline void unlock_up(struct btrfs_path *path, int level,
if (i >= lowest_unlock && i > skip_level && path->locks[i]) {
btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(t, path->locks[i]);
path->locks[i] = 0;
if (write_lock_level &&
i > min_write_lock_level &&
i <= *write_lock_level) {
*write_lock_level = i - 1;
}
}
}
}
......@@ -1650,6 +1656,7 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
/* everything at write_lock_level or lower must be write locked */
int write_lock_level = 0;
u8 lowest_level = 0;
int min_write_lock_level;
lowest_level = p->lowest_level;
WARN_ON(lowest_level && ins_len > 0);
......@@ -1677,6 +1684,8 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
if (cow && (p->keep_locks || p->lowest_level))
write_lock_level = BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL;
min_write_lock_level = write_lock_level;
again:
/*
* we try very hard to do read locks on the root
......@@ -1808,7 +1817,8 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
goto again;
}
unlock_up(p, level, lowest_unlock);
unlock_up(p, level, lowest_unlock,
min_write_lock_level, &write_lock_level);
if (level == lowest_level) {
if (dec)
......@@ -1870,7 +1880,8 @@ int btrfs_search_slot(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
}
}
if (!p->search_for_split)
unlock_up(p, level, lowest_unlock);
unlock_up(p, level, lowest_unlock,
min_write_lock_level, &write_lock_level);
goto done;
}
}
......@@ -4108,7 +4119,7 @@ int btrfs_search_forward(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_key *min_key,
path->slots[level] = slot;
if (level == path->lowest_level) {
ret = 0;
unlock_up(path, level, 1);
unlock_up(path, level, 1, 0, NULL);
goto out;
}
btrfs_set_path_blocking(path);
......@@ -4119,7 +4130,7 @@ int btrfs_search_forward(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_key *min_key,
path->locks[level - 1] = BTRFS_READ_LOCK;
path->nodes[level - 1] = cur;
unlock_up(path, level, 1);
unlock_up(path, level, 1, 0, NULL);
btrfs_clear_path_blocking(path, NULL, 0);
}
out:
......@@ -4355,7 +4366,7 @@ int btrfs_next_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_path *path)
}
ret = 0;
done:
unlock_up(path, 0, 1);
unlock_up(path, 0, 1, 0, NULL);
path->leave_spinning = old_spinning;
if (!old_spinning)
btrfs_set_path_blocking(path);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment