Commit f833ca29 authored by Vladimir Oltean's avatar Vladimir Oltean Committed by David S. Miller

net: mscc: ocelot: stop returning IRQ_NONE in ocelot_xtr_irq_handler

Since the xtr (extraction) IRQ of the ocelot switch is not shared, then
if it fired, it means that some data must be present in the queues of
the CPU port module. So simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: default avatarVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 14026192
......@@ -604,10 +604,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ocelot_xtr_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
int i = 0, grp = 0;
int err = 0;
if (!(ocelot_read(ocelot, QS_XTR_DATA_PRESENT) & BIT(grp)))
return IRQ_NONE;
do {
while (ocelot_read(ocelot, QS_XTR_DATA_PRESENT) & BIT(grp)) {
struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *shhwtstamps;
struct ocelot_port_private *priv;
struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port;
......@@ -702,7 +699,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ocelot_xtr_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
netif_rx(skb);
dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
dev->stats.rx_packets++;
} while (ocelot_read(ocelot, QS_XTR_DATA_PRESENT) & BIT(grp));
}
if (err)
while (ocelot_read(ocelot, QS_XTR_DATA_PRESENT) & BIT(grp))
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment