Commit f891b7cd authored by Shay Drory's avatar Shay Drory Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5: Enable single IRQ for PCI Function

Prior to this patch the driver requires two IRQs to function properly,
one required IRQ for control and at least one required IRQ for IO.

This requirement can be relaxed to one as the driver now allows
sharing of IRQs, so control and IO EQs can share the same irq.

This is needed for high scale amount of VFs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarShay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMoshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
parent 3663ad34
......@@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ static void irq_sf_set_name(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, char *name, int vecidx)
static void irq_set_name(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, char *name, int vecidx)
{
if (!pool->xa_num_irqs.max) {
/* in case we only have a single irq for the device */
snprintf(name, MLX5_MAX_IRQ_NAME, "mlx5_combined%d", vecidx);
return;
}
if (vecidx == pool->xa_num_irqs.max) {
snprintf(name, MLX5_MAX_IRQ_NAME, "mlx5_async%d", vecidx);
return;
......@@ -204,6 +210,11 @@ static void irq_set_name(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, char *name, int vecidx)
snprintf(name, MLX5_MAX_IRQ_NAME, "mlx5_comp%d", vecidx);
}
static bool irq_pool_is_sf_pool(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool)
{
return !strncmp("mlx5_sf", pool->name, strlen("mlx5_sf"));
}
static struct mlx5_irq *irq_request(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, int i)
{
struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = pool->dev;
......@@ -215,7 +226,7 @@ static struct mlx5_irq *irq_request(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, int i)
if (!irq)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
irq->irqn = pci_irq_vector(dev->pdev, i);
if (!pool->name[0])
if (!irq_pool_is_sf_pool(pool))
irq_set_name(pool, name, i);
else
irq_sf_set_name(pool, name, i);
......@@ -385,6 +396,9 @@ irq_pool_request_vector(struct mlx5_irq_pool *pool, int vecidx,
if (IS_ERR(irq) || !affinity)
goto unlock;
cpumask_copy(irq->mask, affinity);
if (!irq_pool_is_sf_pool(pool) && !pool->xa_num_irqs.max &&
cpumask_empty(irq->mask))
cpumask_set_cpu(0, irq->mask);
irq_set_affinity_hint(irq->irqn, irq->mask);
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&pool->lock);
......@@ -577,6 +591,8 @@ void mlx5_irq_table_cleanup(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
int mlx5_irq_table_get_num_comp(struct mlx5_irq_table *table)
{
if (!table->pf_pool->xa_num_irqs.max)
return 1;
return table->pf_pool->xa_num_irqs.max - table->pf_pool->xa_num_irqs.min;
}
......@@ -592,19 +608,15 @@ int mlx5_irq_table_create(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
if (mlx5_core_is_sf(dev))
return 0;
pf_vec = MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, num_ports) * num_online_cpus() +
MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE;
pf_vec = MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, num_ports) * num_online_cpus() + 1;
pf_vec = min_t(int, pf_vec, num_eqs);
if (pf_vec <= MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE)
return -ENOMEM;
total_vec = pf_vec;
if (mlx5_sf_max_functions(dev))
total_vec += MLX5_IRQ_CTRL_SF_MAX +
MLX5_COMP_EQS_PER_SF * mlx5_sf_max_functions(dev);
total_vec = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(dev->pdev, MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE + 1,
total_vec, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
total_vec = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(dev->pdev, 1, total_vec, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
if (total_vec < 0)
return total_vec;
pf_vec = min(pf_vec, total_vec);
......
......@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
#ifndef MLX5_CORE_EQ_H
#define MLX5_CORE_EQ_H
#define MLX5_IRQ_VEC_COMP_BASE 1
#define MLX5_NUM_CMD_EQE (32)
#define MLX5_NUM_ASYNC_EQE (0x1000)
#define MLX5_NUM_SPARE_EQE (0x80)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment