Commit faead41c authored by Johannes Berg's avatar Johannes Berg Committed by Luca Coelho

iwlwifi: pcie: mark command queue lock with separate lockdep class

Emmanuel reports that when CMD_WANT_ASYNC_CALLBACK is used by mvm,
the callback will be called with the command queue lock held, and
mvm will try to stop all (other) TX queues, which acquires their
locks - this caused a false lockdep recursive locking report.

Suppress this report by marking the command queue lock with a new,
separate, lock class so lockdep can tell the difference between
the two types of queues.

Fixes: 156f92f2 ("iwlwifi: block the queues when we send ADD_STA for uAPSD")
Reported-by: default avatarEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
parent 1ea26439
......@@ -592,6 +592,7 @@ static int iwl_pcie_txq_alloc(struct iwl_trans *trans,
static int iwl_pcie_txq_init(struct iwl_trans *trans, struct iwl_txq *txq,
int slots_num, u32 txq_id)
{
struct iwl_trans_pcie *trans_pcie = IWL_TRANS_GET_PCIE_TRANS(trans);
int ret;
txq->need_update = false;
......@@ -606,6 +607,13 @@ static int iwl_pcie_txq_init(struct iwl_trans *trans, struct iwl_txq *txq,
return ret;
spin_lock_init(&txq->lock);
if (txq_id == trans_pcie->cmd_queue) {
static struct lock_class_key iwl_pcie_cmd_queue_lock_class;
lockdep_set_class(&txq->lock, &iwl_pcie_cmd_queue_lock_class);
}
__skb_queue_head_init(&txq->overflow_q);
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment