Commit fb710dde authored by Thomas Richter's avatar Thomas Richter Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf test record_probe_libc_inet_pton: Fix test on s/390 where...

perf test record_probe_libc_inet_pton: Fix test on s/390 where 'text_to_binary_address' now appears on the backtrace

perf test '84: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping' fails on
s390. Debugging revealed a changed stack trace for the ping command
using probes:

  ping 35729 [002]  8006.365063: probe_libc:inet_pton: (3ff9603e7c0)
                    13e7c0 __GI___inet_pton+0x0 (/usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
            --->    104371 text_to_binary_address+0xef1 (inlined)
                    104371 gaih_inet+0xef1 (inlined)
                    104371 __GI_getaddrinfo+0xef1 (inlined)
                      5d4b main+0x139b (/usr/bin/ping)

The line "---> text_to_binary_address ..." is new. It was introduced
with glibc version 2.36.7.2 released with Fedora 37 for s390.

Output before

  # perf test inet_pton
  84: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping   : FAILED!
  #

Output after:

  # perf test inet_pton
  84: probe libc's inet_pton & backtrace it with ping   : Ok
  #
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sumanth Korikkar <sumanthk@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221228145704.2702487-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent d8d85ce8
......@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ trace_libc_inet_pton_backtrace() {
case "$(uname -m)" in
s390x)
eventattr='call-graph=dwarf,max-stack=4'
echo "text_to_binary_address.*\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
echo "gaih_inet.*\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
echo "(__GI_)?getaddrinfo\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\($libc|inlined\)$" >> $expected
echo "main\+0x[[:xdigit:]]+[[:space:]]\(.*/bin/ping.*\)$" >> $expected
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment