btrfs: fix pinned underflow after transaction aborted

When running generic/475, we may get the following warning in dmesg:

[ 6902.102154] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 18013 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9776 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2af/0x3b0 [btrfs]
[ 6902.109160] CPU: 3 PID: 18013 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W  O      4.19.0-rc8+ #8
[ 6902.110971] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
[ 6902.112857] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x2af/0x3b0 [btrfs]
[ 6902.118921] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000459bdb0 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 6902.120315] RAX: ffff880175050bb0 RBX: ffff8801124a8000 RCX: 0000000000170007
[ 6902.121969] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 0000000000170007 RDI: ffffffff8125fb74
[ 6902.123716] RBP: ffff880175055d10 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 6902.125417] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff880175055d88
[ 6902.127129] R13: ffff880175050bb0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dead000000000100
[ 6902.129060] FS:  00007f4507223780(0000) GS:ffff88017ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 6902.130996] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 6902.132558] CR2: 00005623599cac78 CR3: 000000014b700001 CR4: 00000000003606e0
[ 6902.134270] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 6902.135981] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 6902.137836] Call Trace:
[ 6902.138939]  close_ctree+0x171/0x330 [btrfs]
[ 6902.140181]  ? kthread_stop+0x146/0x1f0
[ 6902.141277]  generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100
[ 6902.142517]  kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
[ 6902.143554]  btrfs_kill_super+0x13/0x100 [btrfs]
[ 6902.144790]  deactivate_locked_super+0x2f/0x70
[ 6902.146014]  cleanup_mnt+0x3b/0x70
[ 6902.147020]  task_work_run+0x9e/0xd0
[ 6902.148036]  do_syscall_64+0x470/0x600
[ 6902.149142]  ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[ 6902.150375]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[ 6902.151640] RIP: 0033:0x7f45077a6a7b
[ 6902.157324] RSP: 002b:00007ffd589f3e68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[ 6902.159187] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000055e8eec732b0 RCX: 00007f45077a6a7b
[ 6902.160834] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055e8eec73490
[ 6902.162526] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000055e8eec734b0 R09: 00007ffd589f26c0
[ 6902.164141] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055e8eec73490
[ 6902.165815] R13: 00007f4507ac61a4 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffd589f40d8
[ 6902.167553] irq event stamp: 0
[ 6902.168998] hardirqs last  enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>]           (null)
[ 6902.170731] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff810cd810>] copy_process.part.55+0x3b0/0x1f00
[ 6902.172773] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff810cd810>] copy_process.part.55+0x3b0/0x1f00
[ 6902.174671] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>]           (null)
[ 6902.176407] ---[ end trace 463138c2986b275c ]---
[ 6902.177636] BTRFS info (device dm-3): space_info 4 has 273465344 free, is not full
[ 6902.179453] BTRFS info (device dm-3): space_info total=276824064, used=4685824, pinned=18446744073708158976, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=65536

In the above line there's "pinned=18446744073708158976" which is an
unsigned u64 value of -1392640, an obvious underflow.

When transaction_kthread is running cleanup_transaction(), another
fsstress is running btrfs_commit_transaction(). The
btrfs_finish_extent_commit() may get the same range as
btrfs_destroy_pinned_extent() got, which causes the pinned underflow.

Fixes: d4b450cd ("Btrfs: fix race between transaction commit and empty block group removal")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

fs/btrfs/disk-io.c

@@ -4359,13 +4359,23 @@ static int btrfs_destroy_pinned_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 	unpin = pinned_extents;
 again:
 	while (1) {
+		/*
+		 * The btrfs_finish_extent_commit() may get the same range as
+		 * ours between find_first_extent_bit and clear_extent_dirty.
+		 * Hence, hold the unused_bg_unpin_mutex to avoid double unpin
+		 * the same extent range.
+		 */
+		mutex_lock(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex);
 		ret = find_first_extent_bit(unpin, 0, &start, &end,
 					    EXTENT_DIRTY, NULL);
-		if (ret)
+		if (ret) {
+			mutex_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex);
 			break;
+		}
 
 		clear_extent_dirty(unpin, start, end);
 		btrfs_error_unpin_extent_range(fs_info, start, end);
+		mutex_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex);
 		cond_resched();
 	}