Commit fece9c87 authored by Bryan O'Donoghue's avatar Bryan O'Donoghue Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

greybus: Ensure gb->mutex is held when adding timer

Currently in loopback on the async path we issue an operation and then add
a timer to time-out that operation should it fail to complete. Looking at a
backtrace given in its feasible op_async->pending can be true and
del_timer() can run before add_timer() has run. In the callback handler we
already hold gb->mutex. This patch fixes that potential race by ensuring we
hold gb->mutex both when we are adding and when we are removing the
relevant timer.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Reported-and-tested-by: default avatarAxel Haslam <ahaslam@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@google.com>
parent 1dc8d3d7
......@@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ static int gb_loopback_async_operation(struct gb_loopback *gb, int type,
do_gettimeofday(&op_async->ts);
op_async->pending = true;
atomic_inc(&gb->outstanding_operations);
mutex_lock(&gb->mutex);
ret = gb_operation_request_send(operation,
gb_loopback_async_operation_callback,
GFP_KERNEL);
......@@ -637,9 +638,11 @@ static int gb_loopback_async_operation(struct gb_loopback *gb, int type,
op_async->timer.data = (unsigned long)operation->id;
add_timer(&op_async->timer);
return ret;
goto done;
error:
gb_loopback_async_operation_put(op_async);
done:
mutex_unlock(&gb->mutex);
return ret;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment