Commit ff140fea authored by Zhang Rui's avatar Zhang Rui

Thermal: handle thermal zone device properly during system sleep

Current thermal code does not handle system sleep well because
1. the cooling device cooling state may be changed during suspend
2. the previous temperature reading becomes invalid after resumed because
   it is got before system sleep
3. updating thermal zone device during suspending/resuming
   is wrong because some devices may have already been suspended
   or may have not been resumed.

Thus, the proper way to do this is to cancel all thermal zone
device update requirements during suspend/resume, and after all
the devices have been resumed, reset and update every registered
thermal zone devices.

This also fixes a regression introduced by:
Commit 19593a1f ("ACPI / fan: convert to platform driver")
Because, with above commit applied, all the fan devices are attached
to the acpi_general_pm_domain, and they are turned on by the pm_domain
automatically after resume, without the awareness of thermal core.

CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.18+
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78201
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91411Tested-by: default avatarManuel Krause <manuelkrause@netscape.net>
Tested-by: default avatarszegad <szegadlo@poczta.onet.pl>
Tested-by: default avatarprash <prash.n.rao@gmail.com>
Tested-by: default avataramish <ammdispose-arch@yahoo.com>
Tested-by: default avatarMatthias <morpheusxyz123@yahoo.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJavi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
parent bb431ba2
......@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <net/netlink.h>
#include <net/genetlink.h>
#include <linux/suspend.h>
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/thermal.h>
......@@ -59,6 +60,8 @@ static LIST_HEAD(thermal_governor_list);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_list_lock);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_governor_lock);
static atomic_t in_suspend;
static struct thermal_governor *def_governor;
static struct thermal_governor *__find_governor(const char *name)
......@@ -554,6 +557,9 @@ void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
{
int count;
if (atomic_read(&in_suspend))
return;
if (!tz->ops->get_temp)
return;
......@@ -2155,6 +2161,36 @@ static void thermal_unregister_governors(void)
thermal_gov_power_allocator_unregister();
}
static int thermal_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long mode, void *_unused)
{
struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
switch (mode) {
case PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE:
case PM_RESTORE_PREPARE:
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
atomic_set(&in_suspend, 1);
break;
case PM_POST_HIBERNATION:
case PM_POST_RESTORE:
case PM_POST_SUSPEND:
atomic_set(&in_suspend, 0);
list_for_each_entry(tz, &thermal_tz_list, node) {
thermal_zone_device_reset(tz);
thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
}
break;
default:
break;
}
return 0;
}
static struct notifier_block thermal_pm_nb = {
.notifier_call = thermal_pm_notify,
};
static int __init thermal_init(void)
{
int result;
......@@ -2175,6 +2211,11 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void)
if (result)
goto exit_netlink;
result = register_pm_notifier(&thermal_pm_nb);
if (result)
pr_warn("Thermal: Can not register suspend notifier, return %d\n",
result);
return 0;
exit_netlink:
......@@ -2194,6 +2235,7 @@ static int __init thermal_init(void)
static void __exit thermal_exit(void)
{
unregister_pm_notifier(&thermal_pm_nb);
of_thermal_destroy_zones();
genetlink_exit();
class_unregister(&thermal_class);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment