Commit ff7a68d0 authored by Matti Gottlieb's avatar Matti Gottlieb Committed by Luca Coelho

iwlwifi: mvm: Do not open aggregations for null data packets

Currently we try to open an aggregation for every packet (given that one
is not already open).

This causes redundant overhead (addba/delba) for null data packets.

Do not open an aggregation for null data packets.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatti Gottlieb <matti.gottlieb@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
parent d7fdd0e5
......@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int iwl_hwrate_to_plcp_idx(u32 rate_n_flags)
static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta,
int tid);
int tid, bool ndp);
static void rs_fill_lq_cmd(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta,
......@@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ static u8 rs_get_tid(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr)
}
void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
int tid, struct ieee80211_tx_info *info)
int tid, struct ieee80211_tx_info *info, bool ndp)
{
int legacy_success;
int retries;
......@@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
done:
/* See if there's a better rate or modulation mode to try. */
if (sta->supp_rates[info->band])
rs_rate_scale_perform(mvm, sta, lq_sta, tid);
rs_rate_scale_perform(mvm, sta, lq_sta, tid, ndp);
}
/*
......@@ -1407,7 +1407,8 @@ static void rs_mac80211_tx_status(void *mvm_r,
info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_NO_ACK)
return;
iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(mvm, sta, rs_get_tid(hdr), info);
iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(mvm, sta, rs_get_tid(hdr), info,
ieee80211_is_qos_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control));
}
/*
......@@ -2213,7 +2214,7 @@ static bool rs_tpc_perform(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
struct iwl_lq_sta *lq_sta,
int tid)
int tid, bool ndp)
{
int low = IWL_RATE_INVALID;
int high = IWL_RATE_INVALID;
......@@ -2512,7 +2513,7 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
(lq_sta->tx_agg_tid_en & (1 << tid)) &&
(tid != IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT)) {
tid_data = &sta_priv->tid_data[tid];
if (tid_data->state == IWL_AGG_OFF) {
if (tid_data->state == IWL_AGG_OFF && !ndp) {
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm,
"try to aggregate tid %d\n",
tid);
......
......@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ void iwl_mvm_rs_rate_init(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
/* Notify RS about Tx status */
void iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
int tid, struct ieee80211_tx_info *info);
int tid, struct ieee80211_tx_info *info, bool ndp);
/**
* iwl_rate_control_register - Register the rate control algorithm callbacks
......
......@@ -1660,7 +1660,7 @@ void iwl_mvm_rx_ba_notif(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, struct iwl_rx_cmd_buffer *rxb)
iwl_mvm_tx_info_from_ba_notif(&ba_info, ba_notif, tid_data);
IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(mvm, "No reclaim. Update rs directly\n");
iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(mvm, sta, tid, &ba_info);
iwl_mvm_rs_tx_status(mvm, sta, tid, &ba_info, false);
}
out:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment