Commit ffd1f609 authored by Wu Fengguang's avatar Wu Fengguang

writeback: introduce max-pause and pass-good dirty limits

The max-pause limit helps to keep the sleep time inside
balance_dirty_pages() within MAX_PAUSE=200ms. The 200ms max sleep means
per task rate limit of 8pages/200ms=160KB/s when dirty exceeded, which
normally is enough to stop dirtiers from continue pushing the dirty
pages high, unless there are a sufficient large number of slow dirtiers
(eg. 500 tasks doing 160KB/s will still sum up to 80MB/s, exceeding the
write bandwidth of a slow disk and hence accumulating more and more dirty
pages).

The pass-good limit helps to let go of the good bdi's in the presence of
a blocked bdi (ie. NFS server not responding) or slow USB disk which for
some reason build up a large number of initial dirty pages that refuse
to go away anytime soon.

For example, given two bdi's A and B and the initial state

	bdi_thresh_A = dirty_thresh / 2
	bdi_thresh_B = dirty_thresh / 2
	bdi_dirty_A  = dirty_thresh / 2
	bdi_dirty_B  = dirty_thresh / 2

Then A get blocked, after a dozen seconds

	bdi_thresh_A = 0
	bdi_thresh_B = dirty_thresh
	bdi_dirty_A  = dirty_thresh / 2
	bdi_dirty_B  = dirty_thresh / 2

The (bdi_dirty_B < bdi_thresh_B) test is now useless and the dirty pages
will be effectively throttled by condition (nr_dirty < dirty_thresh).
This has two problems:
(1) we lose the protections for light dirtiers
(2) balance_dirty_pages() effectively becomes IO-less because the
    (bdi_nr_reclaimable > bdi_thresh) test won't be true. This is good
    for IO, but balance_dirty_pages() loses an important way to break
    out of the loop which leads to more spread out throttle delays.

DIRTY_PASSGOOD_AREA can eliminate the above issues. The only problem is,
DIRTY_PASSGOOD_AREA needs to be defined as 2 to fully cover the above
example while this patch uses the more conservative value 8 so as not to
surprise people with too many dirty pages than expected.

The max-pause limit won't noticeably impact the speed dirty pages are
knocked down when there is a sudden drop of global/bdi dirty thresholds.
Because the heavy dirties will be throttled below 160KB/s which is slow
enough. It does help to avoid long dirty throttle delays and especially
will make light dirtiers more responsive.
Signed-off-by: default avatarWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
parent c42843f2
...@@ -7,6 +7,27 @@ ...@@ -7,6 +7,27 @@
#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/fs.h> #include <linux/fs.h>
/*
* The 1/16 region above the global dirty limit will be put to maximum pauses:
*
* (limit, limit + limit/DIRTY_MAXPAUSE_AREA)
*
* The 1/16 region above the max-pause region, dirty exceeded bdi's will be put
* to loops:
*
* (limit + limit/DIRTY_MAXPAUSE_AREA, limit + limit/DIRTY_PASSGOOD_AREA)
*
* Further beyond, all dirtier tasks will enter a loop waiting (possibly long
* time) for the dirty pages to drop, unless written enough pages.
*
* The global dirty threshold is normally equal to the global dirty limit,
* except when the system suddenly allocates a lot of anonymous memory and
* knocks down the global dirty threshold quickly, in which case the global
* dirty limit will follow down slowly to prevent livelocking all dirtier tasks.
*/
#define DIRTY_MAXPAUSE_AREA 16
#define DIRTY_PASSGOOD_AREA 8
struct backing_dev_info; struct backing_dev_info;
/* /*
......
...@@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ ...@@ -36,6 +36,11 @@
#include <linux/pagevec.h> #include <linux/pagevec.h>
#include <trace/events/writeback.h> #include <trace/events/writeback.h>
/*
* Sleep at most 200ms at a time in balance_dirty_pages().
*/
#define MAX_PAUSE max(HZ/5, 1)
/* /*
* Estimate write bandwidth at 200ms intervals. * Estimate write bandwidth at 200ms intervals.
*/ */
...@@ -399,6 +404,11 @@ unsigned long determine_dirtyable_memory(void) ...@@ -399,6 +404,11 @@ unsigned long determine_dirtyable_memory(void)
return x + 1; /* Ensure that we never return 0 */ return x + 1; /* Ensure that we never return 0 */
} }
static unsigned long hard_dirty_limit(unsigned long thresh)
{
return max(thresh, global_dirty_limit);
}
/* /*
* global_dirty_limits - background-writeback and dirty-throttling thresholds * global_dirty_limits - background-writeback and dirty-throttling thresholds
* *
...@@ -723,6 +733,29 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping, ...@@ -723,6 +733,29 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
io_schedule_timeout(pause); io_schedule_timeout(pause);
trace_balance_dirty_wait(bdi); trace_balance_dirty_wait(bdi);
dirty_thresh = hard_dirty_limit(dirty_thresh);
/*
* max-pause area. If dirty exceeded but still within this
* area, no need to sleep for more than 200ms: (a) 8 pages per
* 200ms is typically more than enough to curb heavy dirtiers;
* (b) the pause time limit makes the dirtiers more responsive.
*/
if (nr_dirty < dirty_thresh +
dirty_thresh / DIRTY_MAXPAUSE_AREA &&
time_after(jiffies, start_time + MAX_PAUSE))
break;
/*
* pass-good area. When some bdi gets blocked (eg. NFS server
* not responding), or write bandwidth dropped dramatically due
* to concurrent reads, or dirty threshold suddenly dropped and
* the dirty pages cannot be brought down anytime soon (eg. on
* slow USB stick), at least let go of the good bdi's.
*/
if (nr_dirty < dirty_thresh +
dirty_thresh / DIRTY_PASSGOOD_AREA &&
bdi_dirty < bdi_thresh)
break;
/* /*
* Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous * Increase the delay for each loop, up to our previous
* default of taking a 100ms nap. * default of taking a 100ms nap.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment