Commit ffeccda4 authored by Rajmohan Mani's avatar Rajmohan Mani Committed by Luis Henriques

xhci: Workaround to get Intel xHCI reset working more reliably

commit a5964396 upstream.

Existing Intel xHCI controllers require a delay of 1 mS,
after setting the CMD_RESET bit in command register, before
accessing any HC registers. This allows the HC to complete
the reset operation and be ready for HC register access.
Without this delay, the subsequent HC register access,
may result in a system hang, very rarely.

Verified CherryView / Braswell platforms go through over
5000 warm reboot cycles (which was not possible without
this patch), without any xHCI reset hang.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@intel.com>
Tested-by: default avatarJoe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarLuis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
parent 8d9f2f38
......@@ -176,6 +176,16 @@ int xhci_reset(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
command |= CMD_RESET;
writel(command, &xhci->op_regs->command);
/* Existing Intel xHCI controllers require a delay of 1 mS,
* after setting the CMD_RESET bit, and before accessing any
* HC registers. This allows the HC to complete the
* reset operation and be ready for HC register access.
* Without this delay, the subsequent HC register access,
* may result in a system hang very rarely.
*/
if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_INTEL_HOST)
udelay(1000);
ret = xhci_handshake(xhci, &xhci->op_regs->command,
CMD_RESET, 0, 10 * 1000 * 1000);
if (ret)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment