- 01 Mar, 2010 40 commits
-
-
Jan Kiszka authored
Make sure DR4 and DR5 are aliased to DR6 and DR7, respectively, if CR4.DE is not set. Signed-off-by:
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> Signed-off-by:
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
-
Jan Kiszka authored
Injecting GP without an error code is a bad idea (causes unhandled guest exits). Moreover, we must not skip the instruction if we injected an exception. Signed-off-by:
-
Takuya Yoshikawa authored
The return values from x86_emulate_ops are defined in kvm_emulate.h as macros X86EMUL_*. But in emulate.c, we are comparing the return values from these ops with 0 to check if they're X86EMUL_CONTINUE or not: X86EMUL_CONTINUE is defined as 0 now. To avoid possible mistakes in the future, this patch substitutes "X86EMUL_CONTINUE" for "0" that are being compared with the return values from x86_emulate_ops. We think that there are more places we should use these macros, but the meanings of rc values in x86_emulate_insn() were not so clear at a glance. If we use proper macros in this function, we would be able to follow the flow of each emulation more easily and, maybe, more securely. Signed-off-by:
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by:
-
Marcelo Tosatti authored
cleanup_srcu_struct on VM destruction remains broken: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff IP: [<ffffffff802533d2>] srcu_read_lock+0x16/0x21 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff802533d2>] [<ffffffff802533d2>] srcu_read_lock+0x16/0x21 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa05354c4>] kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit+0x1b/0x48 [kvm] [<ffffffffa05339c6>] kvm_vcpu_uninit+0x9/0x15 [kvm] [<ffffffffa0569f7d>] vmx_free_vcpu+0x7f/0x8f [kvm_intel] [<ffffffffa05357b5>] kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x78/0x111 [kvm] [<ffffffffa053315b>] kvm_put_kvm+0xd4/0xfe [kvm] Move it to kvm_arch_destroy_vm. Signed-off-by:
-
Gleb Natapov authored
Fix compilation warnings and wrong mask value. Signed-off-by:
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Sheng Yang authored
As Avi noted: >There are two problems with the kernel failure report. First, it >doesn't report enough data - registers, surrounding instructions, etc. >that are needed to explain what is going on. Second, it can flood >dmesg, which is a pretty bad thing to do. So we remove the emulation failure report in handle_invalid_guest_state(), and would inspected the guest using userspace tool in the future. Signed-off-by:
Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Avi Kivity authored
Needed by <asm/kvm_para.h>. Signed-off-by:Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
Takuya Yoshikawa authored
There are two spellings of "writable" in arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c and paging_tmpl.h . This patch renames is_writeble_pte() to is_writable_pte() and makes grepping easy. New name is consistent with the definition of itself: return pte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK; Signed-off-by:
-
Gleb Natapov authored
Windows issues this hypercall after guest was spinning on a spinlock for too many iterations. Signed-off-by:
Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Gleb Natapov authored
Implement HYPER-V apic MSRs. Spec defines three MSRs that speed-up access to EOI/TPR/ICR apic registers for PV guests. Signed-off-by:
-
Gleb Natapov authored
Minimum HYPER-V implementation should have GUEST_OS_ID, HYPERCALL and VP_INDEX MSRs. [avi: fix build on i386] Signed-off-by:
-
Gleb Natapov authored
Provide HYPER-V related defines that will be used by following patches. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
We keep a copy of the MSR around that we use when we go into the guest context. That copy is basically the normal process MSR flags OR some allowed guest specified MSR flags. We also AND the external providers into this, so we get traps on FPU usage when we haven't activated it on the host yet. Currently this calculation is part of the set_msr function that we use whenever we set the guest MSR value. With the external providers, we also have the case that we don't modify the guest's MSR, but only want to update the shadow MSR. So let's move the shadow MSR parts to a separate function that we then use whenever we only need to update it. That way we don't accidently kvm_vcpu_block within a preempt notifier context. Signed-off-by:
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
SRR1 stores more information that just the MSR value. It also stores valuable information about the type of interrupt we received, for example whether the storage interrupt we just got was because of a missing htab entry or not. We use that information to speed up the exit path. Now if we get preempted before we can interpret the shadow_msr values, we get into vcpu_put which then calls the MSR handler, which then sets all the SRR1 information bits in shadow_msr to 0. Great. So let's preserve the SRR1 specific bits in shadow_msr whenever we set the MSR. They don't hurt. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
Commit 7d01b4c3ed2bb33ceaf2d270cb4831a67a76b51b introduced PACA backed vcpu values. With this patch, when a userspace app was setting GPRs before it was actually first loaded, the set values get discarded. This is because vcpu_load loads them from the vcpu backing store that we use whenever we're not owning the PACA. That behavior is not really a major problem, because we don't need it for qemu. Other users (like kvmctl) do have problems with it though, so let's better do it right. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
When our guest starts using either the FPU, Altivec or VSX we need to make sure Linux knows about it and sneak into its process switching code accordingly. This patch makes accesses to the above parts of the system work inside the VM. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
Linux contains quite some bits of code to load FPU, Altivec and VSX lazily for a task. It calls those bits in real mode, coming from an interrupt handler. For KVM we better reuse those, so let's wrap a bit of trampoline magic around them and then we can call them from normal module code. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
We need to explicitly only giveup VSX in KVM, so let's export that specific function to module space. Signed-off-by:
-
Roel Kluin authored
kvm_get_exit_data() cannot return a NULL pointer. Signed-off-by:
Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Avi Kivity authored
Now that we can allow the guest to play with cr0 when the fpu is loaded, we can enable lazy fpu when npt is in use. Acked-by:
Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Avi Kivity authored
If two conditions apply: - no bits outside TS and EM differ between the host and guest cr0 - the fpu is active then we can activate the selective cr0 write intercept and drop the unconditional cr0 read and write intercept, and allow the guest to run with the host fpu state. This reduces cr0 exits due to guest fpu management while the guest fpu is loaded. Acked-by:
-
Avi Kivity authored
Currently we don't intercept cr0 at all when npt is enabled. This improves performance but requires us to activate the fpu at all times. Remove this behaviour in preparation for adding selective cr0 intercepts. Acked-by:
-
Avi Kivity authored
init_vmcb() sets up the intercepts as if the fpu is active, so initialize it there. This avoids an INIT from setting up intercepts inconsistent with fpu_active. Acked-by:
-
Avi Kivity authored
Instead of selecting TS and MP as the comments say, the macro included TS and PE. Luckily the macro is unused now, but fix in order to save a few hours of debugging from anyone who attempts to use it. Acked-by:
-
Avi Kivity authored
Follow the hardware. Signed-off-by: -
Avi Kivity authored
If the guest fpu is loaded, there is nothing interesing about cr0.ts; let the guest play with it as it will. This makes context switches between fpu intensive guest processes faster, as we won't trap the clts and cr0 write instructions. [marcelo: fix cr0 read shadow update on fpu deactivation; kills F8 install] Signed-off-by:
-
Avi Kivity authored
Defer fpu deactivation as much as possible - if the guest fpu is loaded, keep it loaded until the next heavyweight exit (where we are forced to unload it). This reduces unnecessary exits. We also defer fpu activation on clts; while clts signals the intent to use the fpu, we can't be sure the guest will actually use it. Signed-off-by: -
Avi Kivity authored
We will use this later to give the guest ownership of cr0.ts. Signed-off-by: -
Avi Kivity authored
Since we'd like to allow the guest to own a few bits of cr0 at times, we need to know when we access those bits. Signed-off-by: -
Avi Kivity authored
clts writes cr0.ts; lmsw writes cr0[0:15] - record that in ftrace. Signed-off-by: -
Alexander Graf authored
An SLB entry contains two pieces of information related to size: 1) PTE size 2) SLB size The L bit defines the PTE be "large" (usually means 16MB), SLB_VSID_B_1T defines that the SLB should span 1 GB instead of the default 256MB. Apparently I messed things up and just put those two in one box, shaked it heavily and came up with the current code which handles large pages incorrectly, because it also treats large page SLB entries as "1TB" segment entries. This patch splits those two features apart, making Linux guests boot even when they have > 256MB. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
When we get a program interrupt in guest kernel mode, we try to emulate the instruction. If that doesn't fail, we report to the user and try again - at the exact same instruction pointer. So if the guest kernel really does trigger an invalid instruction, we loop forever. So let's better go and forward program exceptions to the guest when we don't know the instruction we're supposed to emulate. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
When we need to reinject a program interrupt into the guest, we also need to reinject the corresponding flags into the guest. Signed-off-by:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
The code to unset HID5.dcbz32 is broken. This patch makes it do the right rotate magic. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
Book3S needs some flags in SRR1 to get to know details about an interrupt. One such example is the trap instruction. It tells the guest kernel that a program interrupt is due to a trap using a bit in SRR1. This patch implements above behavior, making WARN_ON behave like WARN_ON. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
Currently we're racy when doing the transition from IR=1 to IR=0, from the module memory entry code to the real mode SLB switching code. To work around that I took a look at the RTAS entry code which is faced with a similar problem and did the same thing: A small helper in linear mapped memory that does mtmsr with IR=0 and then RFIs info the actual handler. Thanks to that trick we can safely take page faults in the entry code and only need to be really wary of what to do as of the SLB switching part. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
Using an RFI in IR=1 is dangerous. We need to set two SRRs and then do an RFI without getting interrupted at all, because every interrupt could potentially overwrite the SRR values. Fortunately, we don't need to RFI in at least this particular case of the code, so we can just replace it with an mtmsr and b. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
To fetch the last instruction we were interrupted on, we enable DR in early exit code, where we are still in a very transitional phase between guest and host state. Most of the time this seemed to work, but another CPU can easily flush our TLB and HTAB which makes us go in the Linux page fault handler which totally breaks because we still use the guest's SLB entries. To work around that, let's introduce a second KVM guest mode that defines that whenever we get a trap, we don't call the Linux handler or go into the KVM exit code, but just jump over the faulting instruction. That way a potentially bad lwz doesn't trigger any faults and we can later on interpret the invalid instruction we fetched as "fetch didn't work". Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
We're being horribly racy right now. All the entry and exit code hijacks random fields from the PACA that could easily be used by different code in case we get interrupted, for example by a #MC or even page fault. After discussing this with Ben, we figured it's best to reserve some more space in the PACA and just shove off some vcpu state to there. That way we can drastically improve the readability of the code, make it less racy and less complex. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexander Graf authored
We now have helpers for the GPRs, so let's also add some for CR and XER. Having them in the PACA simplifies code a lot, as we don't need to care about where to store CC or not to overflow any integers. Signed-off-by:
-
