- 22 Apr, 2023 35 commits
-
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
This allows to drop the .remove() function as it only exists to unregister the watchdog device which is now done in a callback registered by devm_watchdog_register_device(). Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307070404.2256308-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Wang Wensheng authored
If the sbsa_gwdt is enabled by BIOS, the kernel set WDOG_HW_RUNNING bit and keep it alive before anyone else would open it. When system suspend, the sbsa_gwdt would not be disabled because WDOG_ACTIVE is not set. Then the sbsa_gwdt would reach timeout since no one touch it during system suspend. To solve this, just test WDOG_HW_RUNNING bit in suspend and disable the sbsa_gwdt if the bit is set, then reopen it accordingly in resume process. Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301113702.76437-1-wangwensheng4@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-34-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-33-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-32-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-31-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-30-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-28-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-26-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Uwe Kleine-König authored
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns void. Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove callback to the void returning variant. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230303213716.2123717-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.deSigned-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Guenter Roeck authored
Use devm_add_action_or_reset() to disable the watchdog when the driver is removed to simplify the code. With this in place, we can use devm_watchdog_register_device() to register the watchdog, and the removal function is no longer necessary. Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304165653.2179835-2-linux@roeck-us.netSigned-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Guenter Roeck authored
The devm_clk_get[_optional]_enabled() helpers: - call devm_clk_get[_optional]() - call clk_prepare_enable() and register what is needed in order to call clk_disable_unprepare() when needed, as a managed resource. This simplifies the code and avoids the calls to clk_disable_unprepare(). While at it, use dev_err_probe consistently, and use its return value to return the error code. Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304165653.2179835-1-linux@roeck-us.netSigned-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Guenter Roeck authored
The use of WDOG_HW_RUNNING is currently inconsistent: If set by the driver, it will remain set until the watchdog device is opened and then closed. If set by the watchdog core, it is only set if the watchdog can not be stopped when closed. Subsequenty it is always only set while the watchdog is closed and the hardware watchdog is running. This is both misleading and inconsistent: The API states that watchdog_hw_running() indicates that the hardware watchdog is running. This is currently not always the case. Set WDOG_HW_RUNNING whenever a watchdog is successfully started for consistent behavior and to accurately report its status. This means that we no longer have to check for both watchdog_active() and watchdog_hw_running() to check if the watchdog is running because watchdog_hw_running() now implies watchdog_active(). Simplify the code accordingly where warranted. Cc: Wang Wensheng <wangwensheng4@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230304161607.1418952-1-linux@roeck-us.netSigned-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
Guenter Roeck authored
0-day complains: drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c:442:22: sparse: symbol 'imx_wdt' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/watchdog/imx2_wdt.c:446:22: sparse: symbol 'imx_wdt_legacy' was not declared. Should it be static? Declare as static variables. Fixes: e42c73f1 ("watchdog: imx2_wdg: suspend watchdog in WAIT mode") Cc: Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@norik.com> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230228151648.4087637-1-linux@roeck-us.netSigned-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
-
- 09 Apr, 2023 5 commits
-
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tipLinus Torvalds authored
Pull perf fixes from Borislav Petkov: - Fix "same task" check when redirecting event output - Do not wait unconditionally for RCU on the event migration path if there are no events to migrate * tag 'perf_urgent_for_v6.3_rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: perf/core: Fix the same task check in perf_event_set_output perf: Optimize perf_pmu_migrate_context()
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tipLinus Torvalds authored
Pull x86 fixes from Borislav Petkov: - Add a new Intel Arrow Lake CPU model number - Fix a confusion about how to check the version of the ACPI spec which supports a "online capable" bit in the MADT table which lead to a bunch of boot breakages with Zen1 systems and VMs * tag 'x86_urgent_for_v6.3_rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/cpu: Add model number for Intel Arrow Lake processor x86/acpi/boot: Correct acpi_is_processor_usable() check x86/ACPI/boot: Use FADT version to check support for online capable
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cxl/cxlLinus Torvalds authored
Pull compute express link (cxl) fixes from Dan Williams: "Several fixes for driver startup regressions that landed during the merge window as well as some older bugs. The regressions were due to a lack of testing with what the CXL specification calls Restricted CXL Host (RCH) topologies compared to the testing with Virtual Host (VH) CXL topologies. A VH topology is typical PCIe while RCH topologies map CXL endpoints as Root Complex Integrated endpoints. The impact is some driver crashes on startup. This merge window also added compatibility for range registers (the mechanism that CXL 1.1 defined for mapping memory) to treat them like HDM decoders (the mechanism that CXL 2.0 defined for mapping Host-managed Device Memory). That work collided with the new region enumeration code that was tested with CXL 2.0 setups, and fails with crashes at startup. Lastly, the DOE (Data Object Exchange) implementation for retrieving an ACPI-like data table from CXL devices is being reworked for v6.4. Several fixes fell out of that work that are suitable for v6.3. All of this has been in linux-next for a while, and all reported issues [1] have been addressed. Summary: - Fix several issues with region enumeration in RCH topologies that can trigger crashes on driver startup or shutdown. - Fix CXL DVSEC range register compatibility versus region enumeration that leads to startup crashes - Fix CDAT endiannes handling - Fix multiple buffer handling boundary conditions - Fix Data Object Exchange (DOE) workqueue usage vs CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS warn splats" Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405075704.33de8121@canb.auug.org.au [1] * tag 'cxl-fixes-6.3-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cxl/cxl: cxl/hdm: Extend DVSEC range register emulation for region enumeration cxl/hdm: Limit emulation to the number of range registers cxl/region: Move coherence tracking into cxl_region_attach() cxl/region: Fix region setup/teardown for RCDs cxl/port: Fix find_cxl_root() for RCDs and simplify it cxl/hdm: Skip emulation when driver manages mem_enable cxl/hdm: Fix double allocation of @cxlhdm PCI/DOE: Fix memory leak with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y PCI/DOE: Silence WARN splat with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS=y cxl/pci: Handle excessive CDAT length cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT entries cxl/pci: Handle truncated CDAT header cxl/pci: Fix CDAT retrieval on big endian
-
git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6Linus Torvalds authored
Pull cifs client fixes from Steve French: "Two cifs/smb3 client fixes, one for stable: - double lock fix for a cifs/smb1 reconnect path - DFS prefixpath fix for reconnect when server moved" * tag '6.3-rc5-smb3-cifs-client-fixes' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6: cifs: double lock in cifs_reconnect_tcon() cifs: sanitize paths in cifs_update_super_prepath.
-