1. 27 Sep, 2022 8 commits
  2. 26 Sep, 2022 3 commits
  3. 24 Sep, 2022 6 commits
  4. 23 Sep, 2022 3 commits
  5. 22 Sep, 2022 20 commits
    • Martin KaFai Lau's avatar
      Merge branch 'Fix resource leaks in test_maps' · ee9bb9b4
      Martin KaFai Lau authored
      Hou Tao says:
      
      ====================
      
      From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      
      Hi,
      
      It is just a tiny patch set aims to fix the resource leaks in test_maps
      after test case succeeds or is skipped. And these leaks are spotted by
      using address sanitizer and checking the content of /proc/$pid/fd.
      
      Please see indiviual patch for more details.
      
      Change Log:
      v2:
       * Add the missing header file unistd.h for close() (From kernel-patches/bpf)
         The reason Why I miss that is that -Werror is removed from Makefile
         when enabling clang address sanitizer.
      
      v1:
       * https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220921025855.115463-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/T/
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
      ee9bb9b4
    • Hou Tao's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Free the allocated resources after test case succeeds · 103d002f
      Hou Tao authored
      Free the created fd or allocated bpf_object after test case succeeds,
      else there will be resource leaks.
      
      Spotted by using address sanitizer and checking the content of
      /proc/$pid/fd directory.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921070035.2016413-3-houtao@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
      103d002f
    • Hou Tao's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Destroy the skeleton when CONFIG_PREEMPT is off · f5eb23b9
      Hou Tao authored
      Destroy the created skeleton when CONFIG_PREEMPT is off, else will be
      resource leak.
      
      Fixes: 73b97bc7 ("selftests/bpf: Test concurrent updates on bpf_task_storage_busy")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921070035.2016413-2-houtao@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
      f5eb23b9
    • Yauheni Kaliuta's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add liburandom_read.so to TEST_GEN_FILES · b780d167
      Yauheni Kaliuta authored
      Added urandom_read shared lib is missing from the list of installed
      files what makes urandom_read test after `make install` or `make
      gen_tar` broken.
      
      Add the library to TEST_GEN_FILES. The names in the list do not
      contain $(OUTPUT) since it's added by lib.mk code.
      
      Fixes: 00a0fa2d ("selftests/bpf: Add urandom_read shared lib and USDTs")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarYauheni Kaliuta <ykaliuta@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220920161409.129953-1-ykaliuta@redhat.com
      b780d167
    • Alexei Starovoitov's avatar
      Merge branch 'veristat: CSV output, comparison mode, filtering' · 020e2176
      Alexei Starovoitov authored
      Andrii Nakryiko says:
      
      ====================
      
      Add three more critical features to veristat tool, which make it sufficient
      for a practical work on BPF verifier:
      
        - CSV output, which allows easier programmatic post-processing of stats;
      
        - building upon CSV output, veristat now supports comparison mode, in which
          two previously captured CSV outputs from veristat are compared with each
          other in a convenient form;
      
        - flexible allow/deny filtering using globs for BPF object files and
          programs, allowing to narrow down target BPF programs to be verified.
      
      See individual patches for more details and examples.
      
      v1->v2:
      - split out double-free fix into patch #1 (Yonghong);
      - fixed typo in verbose flag (Quentin);
      - baseline and comparison stats were reversed in output table, fixed that.
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      020e2176
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      selftests/bpf: add ability to filter programs in veristat · bde4a96c
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      Add -f (--filter) argument which accepts glob-based filters for
      narrowing down what BPF object files and programs within them should be
      processed by veristat. This filtering applies both to comparison and
      main (verification) mode.
      
      Filter can be of two forms:
        - file (object) filter: 'strobemeta*'; in this case all the programs
          within matching files are implicitly allowed (or denied, depending
          if it's positive or negative rule, see below);
        - file and prog filter: 'strobemeta*/*unroll*' will further filter
          programs within matching files to only allow those program names that
          match '*unroll*' glob.
      
      As mentioned, filters can be positive (allowlisting) and negative
      (denylisting). Negative filters should start with '!': '!strobemeta*'
      will deny any filename which basename starts with "strobemeta".
      
      Further, one extra special syntax is supported to allow more convenient
      use in practice. Instead of specifying rule on the command line,
      veristat allows to specify file that contains rules, both positive and
      negative, one line per one filter. This is achieved with -f @<filepath>
      use, where <filepath> points to a text file containing rules (negative
      and positive rules can be mixed). For convenience empty lines and lines
      starting with '#' are ignored. This feature is useful to have some
      pre-canned list of object files and program names that are tested
      repeatedly, allowing to check in a list of rules and quickly specify
      them on the command line.
      
      As a demonstration (and a short cut for nearest future), create a small
      list of "interesting" BPF object files from selftests/bpf and commit it
      as veristat.cfg. It currently includes 73 programs, most of which are
      the most complex and largest BPF programs in selftests, as judged by
      total verified instruction count and verifier states total.
      
      If there is overlap between positive or negative filters, negative
      filter takes precedence (denylisting is stronger than allowlisting). If
      no allow filter is specified, veristat implicitly assumes '*/*' rule. If
      no deny rule is specified, veristat (logically) assumes no negative
      filters.
      
      Also note that -f (just like -e and -s) can be specified multiple times
      and their effect is cumulative.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921164254.3630690-5-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      bde4a96c
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      selftests/bpf: add comparison mode to veristat · 394169b0
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      Add ability to compare and contrast two veristat runs, previously
      recorded with veristat using CSV output format.
      
      When veristat is called with -C (--compare) flag, veristat expects
      exactly two input files specified, both should be in CSV format.
      Expectation is that it's output from previous veristat runs, but as long
      as column names and formats match, it should just work. First CSV file
      is designated as a "baseline" provided, and the second one is
      comparison (experiment) data set. Establishing baseline matters later
      when calculating difference percentages, see below.
      
      Veristat parses these two CSV files and "reconstructs" verifier stats
      (it could be just a subset of all possible stats). File and program
      names are mandatory as they are used as joining key (these two "stats"
      are designated as "key stats" in the code).
      
      Veristat currently enforces that the set of stats recorded in both CSV
      has to exactly match, down to exact order. This is just a simplifying
      condition which can be lifted with a bit of additional pre-processing to
      reorded stat specs internally, which I didn't bother doing, yet.
      
      For all the non-key stats, veristat will output three columns: one for
      baseline data, one for comparison data, and one with an absolute and
      relative percentage difference. If either baseline or comparison values
      are missing (that is, respective CSV file doesn't have a row with
      *exactly* matching file and program name), those values are assumed to
      be empty or zero. In such case relative percentages are forced to +100%
      or -100% output, for consistency with a typical case.
      
      Veristat's -e (--emit) and -s (--sort) specs still apply, so even if CSV
      contains lots of stats, user can request to compare only a subset of
      them (and specify desired column order as well). Similarly, both CSV and
      human-readable table output is honored. Note that input is currently
      always expected to be CSV.
      
      Here's an example shell session, recording data for biosnoop tool on two
      different kernels and comparing them afterwards, outputting data in table
      format.
      
        # on slightly older production kernel
        $ sudo ./veristat biosnoop_bpf.o
        File            Program                   Verdict  Duration (us)  Total insns  Total states  Peak states
        --------------  ------------------------  -------  -------------  -----------  ------------  -----------
        biosnoop_bpf.o  blk_account_io_merge_bio  success             37           24             1            1
        biosnoop_bpf.o  blk_account_io_start      failure              0            0             0            0
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_complete         success             76          104             6            6
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_insert           success             83           85             7            7
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_issue            success             79           85             7            7
        --------------  ------------------------  -------  -------------  -----------  ------------  -----------
        Done. Processed 1 object files, 5 programs.
        $ sudo ./veristat ~/local/tmp/fbcode-bpf-objs/biosnoop_bpf.o -o csv > baseline.csv
        $ cat baseline.csv
        file_name,prog_name,verdict,duration,total_insns,total_states,peak_states
        biosnoop_bpf.o,blk_account_io_merge_bio,success,36,24,1,1
        biosnoop_bpf.o,blk_account_io_start,failure,0,0,0,0
        biosnoop_bpf.o,block_rq_complete,success,82,104,6,6
        biosnoop_bpf.o,block_rq_insert,success,78,85,7,7
        biosnoop_bpf.o,block_rq_issue,success,74,85,7,7
      
        # on latest bpf-next kernel
        $ sudo ./veristat biosnoop_bpf.o
        File            Program                   Verdict  Duration (us)  Total insns  Total states  Peak states
        --------------  ------------------------  -------  -------------  -----------  ------------  -----------
        biosnoop_bpf.o  blk_account_io_merge_bio  success             31           24             1            1
        biosnoop_bpf.o  blk_account_io_start      failure              0            0             0            0
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_complete         success             76          104             6            6
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_insert           success             83           91             7            7
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_issue            success             74           91             7            7
        --------------  ------------------------  -------  -------------  -----------  ------------  -----------
        Done. Processed 1 object files, 5 programs.
        $ sudo ./veristat biosnoop_bpf.o -o csv > comparison.csv
        $ cat comparison.csv
        file_name,prog_name,verdict,duration,total_insns,total_states,peak_states
        biosnoop_bpf.o,blk_account_io_merge_bio,success,71,24,1,1
        biosnoop_bpf.o,blk_account_io_start,failure,0,0,0,0
        biosnoop_bpf.o,block_rq_complete,success,82,104,6,6
        biosnoop_bpf.o,block_rq_insert,success,83,91,7,7
        biosnoop_bpf.o,block_rq_issue,success,87,91,7,7
      
        # now let's compare with human-readable output (note that no sudo needed)
        # we also ignore verification duration in this case to shortned output
        $ ./veristat -C baseline.csv comparison.csv -e file,prog,verdict,insns
        File            Program                   Verdict (A)  Verdict (B)  Verdict (DIFF)  Total insns (A)  Total insns (B)  Total insns (DIFF)
        --------------  ------------------------  -----------  -----------  --------------  ---------------  ---------------  ------------------
        biosnoop_bpf.o  blk_account_io_merge_bio  success      success      MATCH                        24               24         +0 (+0.00%)
        biosnoop_bpf.o  blk_account_io_start      failure      failure      MATCH                         0                0       +0 (+100.00%)
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_complete         success      success      MATCH                       104              104         +0 (+0.00%)
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_insert           success      success      MATCH                        91               85         -6 (-6.59%)
        biosnoop_bpf.o  block_rq_issue            success      success      MATCH                        91               85         -6 (-6.59%)
        --------------  ------------------------  -----------  -----------  --------------  ---------------  ---------------  ------------------
      
      While not particularly exciting example (it turned out to be kind of hard to
      quickly find a nice example with significant difference just because of kernel
      version bump), it should demonstrate main features.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921164254.3630690-4-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      394169b0
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      selftests/bpf: add CSV output mode for veristat · e5eb08d8
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      Teach veristat to output results as CSV table for easier programmatic
      processing. Change what was --output/-o argument to now be --emit/-e.
      And then use --output-format/-o <fmt> to specify output format.
      Currently "table" and "csv" is supported, table being default.
      
      For CSV output mode veristat is using spec identifiers as column names.
      E.g., instead of "Total states" veristat uses "total_states" as a CSV
      header name.
      
      Internally veristat recognizes three formats, one of them
      (RESFMT_TABLE_CALCLEN) is a special format instructing veristat to
      calculate column widths for table output. This felt a bit cleaner and
      more uniform than either creating separate functions just for this.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921164254.3630690-3-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      e5eb08d8
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      selftests/bpf: fix double bpf_object__close() in veristate · f338ac91
      Andrii Nakryiko authored
      bpf_object__close(obj) is called twice for BPF object files with single
      BPF program in it. This causes crash. Fix this by not calling
      bpf_object__close() unnecessarily.
      
      Fixes: c8bc5e05 ("selftests/bpf: Add veristat tool for mass-verifying BPF object files")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921164254.3630690-2-andrii@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      f338ac91
    • Alexei Starovoitov's avatar
      Merge branch 'Introduce bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc helper' · 2d863b14
      Alexei Starovoitov authored
      Lorenzo Bianconi says:
      
      ====================
      
      Introduce bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc helper in order to set source and
      destination nat addresses/ports in a new allocated ct entry not inserted
      in the connection tracking table yet.
      Introduce support for per-parameter trusted args.
      
      Changes since v2:
      - use int instead of a pointer for port in bpf_ct_set_nat_info signature
      - modify KF_TRUSTED_ARGS definition in order to referenced pointer constraint
        just for PTR_TO_BTF_ID
      - drop patch 2/4
      
      Changes since v1:
      - enable CONFIG_NF_NAT in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
      
      Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (1):
        bpf: Tweak definition of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      2d863b14
    • Lorenzo Bianconi's avatar
      selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc · b06b45e8
      Lorenzo Bianconi authored
      Introduce self-tests for bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc used to set the
      source or destination nat addresses/ports.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/803e33294e247744d466943105879414344d3235.1663778601.git.lorenzo@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      b06b45e8
    • Lorenzo Bianconi's avatar
      net: netfilter: add bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc helper · 0fabd2aa
      Lorenzo Bianconi authored
      Introduce bpf_ct_set_nat_info kfunc helper in order to set source and
      destination nat addresses/ports in a new allocated ct entry not inserted
      in the connection tracking table yet.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9567db2fdfa5bebe7b7cc5870f7a34549418b4fc.1663778601.git.lorenzo@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      0fabd2aa
    • Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi's avatar
      bpf: Tweak definition of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS · eed807f6
      Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi authored
      Instead of forcing all arguments to be referenced pointers with non-zero
      reg->ref_obj_id, tweak the definition of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS to mean that
      only PTR_TO_BTF_ID (and socket types translated to PTR_TO_BTF_ID) have
      that constraint, and require their offset to be set to 0.
      
      The rest of pointer types are also accomodated in this definition of
      trusted pointers, but with more relaxed rules regarding offsets.
      
      The inherent meaning of setting this flag is that all kfunc pointer
      arguments have a guranteed lifetime, and kernel object pointers
      (PTR_TO_BTF_ID, PTR_TO_CTX) are passed in their unmodified form (with
      offset 0). In general, this is not true for PTR_TO_BTF_ID as it can be
      obtained using pointer walks.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cdede0043c47ed7a357f0a915d16f9ce06a1d589.1663778601.git.lorenzo@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      eed807f6
    • Hou Tao's avatar
      bpf: Always use raw spinlock for hash bucket lock · 1d8b82c6
      Hou Tao authored
      For a non-preallocated hash map on RT kernel, regular spinlock instead
      of raw spinlock is used for bucket lock. The reason is that on RT kernel
      memory allocation is forbidden under atomic context and regular spinlock
      is sleepable under RT.
      
      Now hash map has been fully converted to use bpf_map_alloc, and there
      will be no synchronous memory allocation for non-preallocated hash map,
      so it is safe to always use raw spinlock for bucket lock on RT. So
      removing the usage of htab_use_raw_lock() and updating the comments
      accordingly.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220921073826.2365800-1-houtao@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      1d8b82c6
    • Jiri Olsa's avatar
      bpf: Prevent bpf program recursion for raw tracepoint probes · 05b24ff9
      Jiri Olsa authored
      We got report from sysbot [1] about warnings that were caused by
      bpf program attached to contention_begin raw tracepoint triggering
      the same tracepoint by using bpf_trace_printk helper that takes
      trace_printk_lock lock.
      
       Call Trace:
        <TASK>
        ? trace_event_raw_event_bpf_trace_printk+0x5f/0x90
        bpf_trace_printk+0x2b/0xe0
        bpf_prog_a9aec6167c091eef_prog+0x1f/0x24
        bpf_trace_run2+0x26/0x90
        native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x1c6/0x2b0
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x50
        bpf_trace_printk+0x3f/0xe0
        bpf_prog_a9aec6167c091eef_prog+0x1f/0x24
        bpf_trace_run2+0x26/0x90
        native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x1c6/0x2b0
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x50
        bpf_trace_printk+0x3f/0xe0
        bpf_prog_a9aec6167c091eef_prog+0x1f/0x24
        bpf_trace_run2+0x26/0x90
        native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x1c6/0x2b0
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x50
        bpf_trace_printk+0x3f/0xe0
        bpf_prog_a9aec6167c091eef_prog+0x1f/0x24
        bpf_trace_run2+0x26/0x90
        native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x1c6/0x2b0
        _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x44/0x50
        __unfreeze_partials+0x5b/0x160
        ...
      
      The can be reproduced by attaching bpf program as raw tracepoint on
      contention_begin tracepoint. The bpf prog calls bpf_trace_printk
      helper. Then by running perf bench the spin lock code is forced to
      take slow path and call contention_begin tracepoint.
      
      Fixing this by skipping execution of the bpf program if it's
      already running, Using bpf prog 'active' field, which is being
      currently used by trampoline programs for the same reason.
      
      Moving bpf_prog_inc_misses_counter to syscall.c because
      trampoline.c is compiled in just for CONFIG_BPF_JIT option.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
      Reported-by: syzbot+2251879aa068ad9c960d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
      [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YxhFe3EwqchC%2FfYf@krava/T/#tSigned-off-by: default avatarJiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071914.7156-1-jolsa@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      05b24ff9
    • Alexei Starovoitov's avatar
      Merge branch 'bpf: Add kfuncs for PKCS#7 signature verification' · 66d6a4bf
      Alexei Starovoitov authored
      Roberto Sassu says:
      
      ====================
      One of the desirable features in security is the ability to restrict import
      of data to a given system based on data authenticity. If data import can be
      restricted, it would be possible to enforce a system-wide policy based on
      the signing keys the system owner trusts.
      
      This feature is widely used in the kernel. For example, if the restriction
      is enabled, kernel modules can be plugged in only if they are signed with a
      key whose public part is in the primary or secondary keyring.
      
      For eBPF, it can be useful as well. For example, it might be useful to
      authenticate data an eBPF program makes security decisions on.
      
      After a discussion in the eBPF mailing list, it was decided that the stated
      goal should be accomplished by introducing four new kfuncs:
      bpf_lookup_user_key() and bpf_lookup_system_key(), for retrieving a keyring
      with keys trusted for signature verification, respectively from its serial
      and from a pre-determined ID; bpf_key_put(), to release the reference
      obtained with the former two kfuncs, bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(), for
      verifying PKCS#7 signatures.
      
      Other than the key serial, bpf_lookup_user_key() also accepts key lookup
      flags, that influence the behavior of the lookup. bpf_lookup_system_key()
      accepts pre-determined IDs defined in include/linux/verification.h.
      
      bpf_key_put() accepts the new bpf_key structure, introduced to tell whether
      the other structure member, a key pointer, is valid or not. The reason is
      that verify_pkcs7_signature() also accepts invalid pointers, set with the
      pre-determined ID, to select a system-defined keyring. key_put() must be
      called only for valid key pointers.
      
      Since the two key lookup functions allocate memory and one increments a key
      reference count, they must be used in conjunction with bpf_key_put(). The
      latter must be called only if the lookup functions returned a non-NULL
      pointer. The verifier denies the execution of eBPF programs that don't
      respect this rule.
      
      The two key lookup functions should be used in alternative, depending on
      the use case. While bpf_lookup_user_key() provides great flexibility, it
      seems suboptimal in terms of security guarantees, as even if the eBPF
      program is assumed to be trusted, the serial used to obtain the key pointer
      might come from untrusted user space not choosing one that the system
      administrator approves to enforce a mandatory policy.
      
      bpf_lookup_system_key() instead provides much stronger guarantees,
      especially if the pre-determined ID is not passed by user space but is
      hardcoded in the eBPF program, and that program is signed. In this case,
      bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() will always perform signature verification
      with a key that the system administrator approves, i.e. the primary,
      secondary or platform keyring.
      
      Nevertheless, key permission checks need to be done accurately. Since
      bpf_lookup_user_key() cannot determine how a key will be used by other
      kfuncs, it has to defer the permission check to the actual kfunc using the
      key. It does it by calling lookup_user_key() with KEY_DEFER_PERM_CHECK as
      needed permission. Later, bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(), if called,
      completes the permission check by calling key_validate(). It does not need
      to call key_task_permission() with permission KEY_NEED_SEARCH, as it is
      already done elsewhere by the key subsystem. Future kfuncs using the
      bpf_key structure need to implement the proper checks as well.
      
      Finally, the last kfunc, bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(), accepts the data and
      signature to verify as eBPF dynamic pointers, to minimize the number of
      kfunc parameters, and the keyring with keys for signature verification as a
      bpf_key structure, returned by one of the two key lookup functions.
      
      bpf_lookup_user_key() and bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() can be called only
      from sleepable programs, because of memory allocation and crypto
      operations. For example, the lsm.s/bpf attach point is suitable,
      fexit/array_map_update_elem is not.
      
      The correctness of implementation of the new kfuncs and of their usage is
      checked with the introduced tests.
      
      The patch set includes a patch from another author (dependency) for sake of
      completeness. It is organized as follows.
      
      Patch 1 from KP Singh allows kfuncs to be used by LSM programs. Patch 2
      exports the bpf_dynptr definition through BTF. Patch 3 splits
      is_dynptr_reg_valid_init() and introduces is_dynptr_type_expected(), to
      know more precisely the cause of a negative result of a dynamic pointer
      check. Patch 4 allows dynamic pointers to be used as kfunc parameters.
      Patch 5 exports bpf_dynptr_get_size(), to obtain the real size of data
      carried by a dynamic pointer. Patch 6 makes available for new eBPF kfuncs
      and programs some key-related definitions. Patch 7 introduces the
      bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put() kfuncs. Patch 8 introduces the
      bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc. Patch 9 changes the testing kernel
      configuration to compile everything as built-in. Finally, patches 10-13
      introduce the tests.
      
      Changelog
      
      v17:
       - Remove unnecessary typedefs in test_verify_pkcs7_sig.c (suggested by KP)
       - Add patch to export bpf_dynptr through BTF (reported by KP)
       - Rename u{8,16,32,64} variables to __u{8,16,32,64} in the tests, for
         consistency with other eBPF programs (suggested by Yonghong)
      
      v16:
       - Remove comments in include/linux/key.h for KEY_LOOKUP_*
       - Change kmalloc() flag from GFP_ATOMIC to GFP_KERNEL in
         bpf_lookup_user_key(), as the kfunc needs anyway to be sleepable
         (suggested by Kumar)
       - Test passing a dynamic pointer with NULL data to
         bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() (suggested by Kumar)
      
      v15:
       - Add kfunc_dynptr_param test to deny list for s390x
      
      v14:
       - Explain that is_dynptr_type_expected() will be useful also for BTF
         (suggested by Joanne)
       - Rename KEY_LOOKUP_FLAGS_ALL to KEY_LOOKUP_ALL (suggested by Jarkko)
       - Swap declaration of spi and dynptr_type in is_dynptr_type_expected()
         (suggested by Joanne)
       - Reimplement kfunc dynptr tests with a regular eBPF program instead of
         executing them with test_verifier (suggested by Joanne)
       - Make key lookup flags as enum so that they are automatically exported
         through BTF (suggested by Alexei)
      
      v13:
       - Split is_dynptr_reg_valid_init() and introduce is_dynptr_type_expected()
         to see if the dynamic pointer type passed as argument to a kfunc is
         supported (suggested by Kumar)
       - Add forward declaration of struct key in include/linux/bpf.h (suggested
         by Song)
       - Declare mask for key lookup flags, remove key_lookup_flags_check()
         (suggested by Jarkko and KP)
       - Allow only certain dynamic pointer types (currently, local) to be passed
         as argument to kfuncs (suggested by Kumar)
       - For each dynamic pointer parameter in kfunc, additionally check if the
         passed pointer is to the stack (suggested by Kumar)
       - Split the validity/initialization and dynamic pointer type check also in
         the verifier, and adjust the expected error message in the test (a test
         for an unexpected dynptr type passed to a helper cannot be added due to
         missing suitable helpers, but this case has been tested manually)
       - Add verifier tests to check the dynamic pointers passed as argument to
         kfuncs (suggested by Kumar)
      
      v12:
       - Put lookup_key and verify_pkcs7_sig tests in deny list for s390x (JIT
         does not support calling kernel function)
      
      v11:
       - Move stringify_struct() macro to include/linux/btf.h (suggested by
         Daniel)
       - Change kernel configuration options in
         tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config* from =m to =y
      
      v10:
       - Introduce key_lookup_flags_check() and system_keyring_id_check() inline
         functions to check parameters (suggested by KP)
       - Fix descriptions and comment of key-related kfuncs (suggested by KP)
       - Register kfunc set only once (suggested by Alexei)
       - Move needed kernel options to the architecture-independent configuration
         for testing
      
      v9:
       - Drop patch to introduce KF_SLEEPABLE kfunc flag (already merged)
       - Rename valid_ptr member of bpf_key to has_ref (suggested by Daniel)
       - Check dynamic pointers in kfunc definition with bpf_dynptr_kern struct
         definition instead of string, to detect structure renames (suggested by
         Daniel)
       - Explicitly say that we permit initialized dynamic pointers in kfunc
         definition (suggested by Daniel)
       - Remove noinline __weak from kfuncs definition (reported by Daniel)
       - Simplify key lookup flags check in bpf_lookup_user_key() (suggested by
         Daniel)
       - Explain the reason for deferring key permission check (suggested by
         Daniel)
       - Allocate memory with GFP_ATOMIC in bpf_lookup_system_key(), and remove
         KF_SLEEPABLE kfunc flag from kfunc declaration (suggested by Daniel)
       - Define only one kfunc set and remove the loop for registration
         (suggested by Alexei)
      
      v8:
       - Define the new bpf_key structure to carry the key pointer and whether
         that pointer is valid or not (suggested by Daniel)
       - Drop patch to mark a kfunc parameter with the __maybe_null suffix
       - Improve documentation of kfuncs
       - Introduce bpf_lookup_system_key() to obtain a key pointer suitable for
         verify_pkcs7_signature() (suggested by Daniel)
       - Use the new kfunc registration API
       - Drop patch to test the __maybe_null suffix
       - Add tests for bpf_lookup_system_key()
      
      v7:
       - Add support for using dynamic and NULL pointers in kfunc (suggested by
         Alexei)
       - Add new kfunc-related tests
      
      v6:
       - Switch back to key lookup helpers + signature verification (until v5),
         and defer permission check from bpf_lookup_user_key() to
         bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature()
       - Add additional key lookup test to illustrate the usage of the
         KEY_LOOKUP_CREATE flag and validate the flags (suggested by Daniel)
       - Make description of flags of bpf_lookup_user_key() more user-friendly
         (suggested by Daniel)
       - Fix validation of flags parameter in bpf_lookup_user_key() (reported by
         Daniel)
       - Rename bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() keyring-related parameters to
         user_keyring and system_keyring to make their purpose more clear
       - Accept keyring-related parameters of bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() as
         alternatives (suggested by KP)
       - Replace unsigned long type with u64 in helper declaration (suggested by
         Daniel)
       - Extend the bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() test by calling the helper
         without data, by ensuring that the helper enforces the keyring-related
         parameters as alternatives, by ensuring that the helper rejects
         inaccessible and expired keyrings, and by checking all system keyrings
       - Move bpf_lookup_user_key() and bpf_key_put() usage tests to
         ref_tracking.c (suggested by John)
       - Call bpf_lookup_user_key() and bpf_key_put() only in sleepable programs
      
      v5:
       - Move KEY_LOOKUP_ to include/linux/key.h
         for validation of bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() parameter
       - Remove bpf_lookup_user_key() and bpf_key_put() helpers, and the
         corresponding tests
       - Replace struct key parameter of bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() with the
         keyring serial and lookup flags
       - Call lookup_user_key() and key_put() in bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature()
         code, to ensure that the retrieved key is used according to the
         permission requested at lookup time
       - Clarified keyring precedence in the description of
         bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() (suggested by John)
       - Remove newline in the second argument of ASSERT_
       - Fix helper prototype regular expression in bpf_doc.py
      
      v4:
       - Remove bpf_request_key_by_id(), don't return an invalid pointer that
         other helpers can use
       - Pass the keyring ID (without ULONG_MAX, suggested by Alexei) to
         bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature()
       - Introduce bpf_lookup_user_key() and bpf_key_put() helpers (suggested by
         Alexei)
       - Add lookup_key_norelease test, to ensure that the verifier blocks eBPF
         programs which don't decrement the key reference count
       - Parse raw PKCS#7 signature instead of module-style signature in the
         verify_pkcs7_signature test (suggested by Alexei)
       - Parse kernel module in user space and pass raw PKCS#7 signature to the
         eBPF program for signature verification
      
      v3:
       - Rename bpf_verify_signature() back to bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() to
         avoid managing different parameters for each signature verification
         function in one helper (suggested by Daniel)
       - Use dynamic pointers and export bpf_dynptr_get_size() (suggested by
         Alexei)
       - Introduce bpf_request_key_by_id() to give more flexibility to the caller
         of bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() to retrieve the appropriate keyring
         (suggested by Alexei)
       - Fix test by reordering the gcc command line, always compile sign-file
       - Improve helper support check mechanism in the test
      
      v2:
       - Rename bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() to a more generic
         bpf_verify_signature() and pass the signature type (suggested by KP)
       - Move the helper and prototype declaration under #ifdef so that user
         space can probe for support for the helper (suggested by Daniel)
       - Describe better the keyring types (suggested by Daniel)
       - Include linux/bpf.h instead of vmlinux.h to avoid implicit or
         redeclaration
       - Make the test selfcontained (suggested by Alexei)
      
      v1:
       - Don't define new map flag but introduce simple wrapper of
         verify_pkcs7_signature() (suggested by Alexei and KP)
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      66d6a4bf
    • Roberto Sassu's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add tests for dynamic pointers parameters in kfuncs · b94fa9f9
      Roberto Sassu authored
      Add tests to ensure that only supported dynamic pointer types are accepted,
      that the passed argument is actually a dynamic pointer, that the passed
      argument is a pointer to the stack, and that bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature()
      correctly handles dynamic pointers with data set to NULL.
      
      The tests are currently in the deny list for s390x (JIT does not support
      calling kernel function).
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-14-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      b94fa9f9
    • Roberto Sassu's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc · fc975906
      Roberto Sassu authored
      Perform several tests to ensure the correct implementation of the
      bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc.
      
      Do the tests with data signed with a generated testing key (by using
      sign-file from scripts/) and with the tcp_bic.ko kernel module if it is
      found in the system. The test does not fail if tcp_bic.ko is not found.
      
      First, perform an unsuccessful signature verification without data.
      
      Second, perform a successful signature verification with the session
      keyring and a new one created for testing.
      
      Then, ensure that permission and validation checks are done properly on the
      keyring provided to bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(), despite those checks were
      deferred at the time the keyring was retrieved with bpf_lookup_user_key().
      The tests expect to encounter an error if the Search permission is removed
      from the keyring, or the keyring is expired.
      
      Finally, perform a successful and unsuccessful signature verification with
      the keyrings with pre-determined IDs (the last test fails because the key
      is not in the platform keyring).
      
      The test is currently in the deny list for s390x (JIT does not support
      calling kernel function).
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-13-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      fc975906
    • Roberto Sassu's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add additional tests for bpf_lookup_*_key() · ecce368d
      Roberto Sassu authored
      Add a test to ensure that bpf_lookup_user_key() creates a referenced
      special keyring when the KEY_LOOKUP_CREATE flag is passed to this function.
      
      Ensure that the kfunc rejects invalid flags.
      
      Ensure that a keyring can be obtained from bpf_lookup_system_key() when one
      of the pre-determined keyring IDs is provided.
      
      The test is currently blacklisted for s390x (JIT does not support calling
      kernel function).
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-12-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      ecce368d
    • Roberto Sassu's avatar
      selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put() · 7c036ed9
      Roberto Sassu authored
      Add verifier tests for bpf_lookup_*_key() and bpf_key_put(), to ensure that
      acquired key references stored in the bpf_key structure are released, that
      a non-NULL bpf_key pointer is passed to bpf_key_put(), and that key
      references are not leaked.
      
      Also, slightly modify test_verifier.c, to find the BTF ID of the attach
      point for the LSM program type (currently, it is done only for TRACING).
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRoberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-11-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.comSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      7c036ed9