- 22 Aug, 2021 8 commits
-
-
Gal Pressman authored
The vector field naming is quite confusing, it is better referred to as irqn. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811151131.39138-4-galpress@amazon.comReviewed-by: Firas JahJah <firasj@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Yossi Leybovich <sleybo@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Gal Pressman authored
The cpu field in efa_irq struct is unused, remove it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811151131.39138-3-galpress@amazon.comReviewed-by: Firas JahJah <firasj@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Yossi Leybovich <sleybo@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Gioh Kim authored
Casting to (void) does nothing, remove them. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806112112.124313-7-haris.iqbal@ionos.comSuggested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@ionos.com> Reviewed-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Gioh Kim authored
There are mis-match at counting inflight IO after changing the multipath policy. For example, we started fio test with round-robin policy and then we changed the policy to min-inflight. IOs created under the RR policy is finished under the min-inflight policy and inflight counter only decreased. So the counter would be negative value. And also we started fio test with min-inflight policy and changed the policy to the round-robin. IOs created under the min-inflight policy increased the inflight IO counter but the inflight IO counter was not decreased because the policy was the round-robin when IO was finished. So it should count IOs only if the IO is created under the min-inflight policy. It should not care the policy when the IO is finished. This patch adds a field mp_policy in struct rtrs_clt_io_req and stores the multipath policy when an object of rtrs_clt_io_req is created. Then rtrs-clt checks the mp_policy of only struct rtrs_clt_io_req instead of the struct rtrs_clt. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806112112.124313-6-haris.iqbal@ionos.comSigned-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Gioh Kim authored
The IO performance test with fio after swapping the likely and unlikely macros in all if-statement shows no difference. They do not help for the performance of rtrs. Thanks to Haakon Bugge for the test scenario. The fio test did random read on 32 rnbd devices and 64 processes. Test environment: - Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6130 CPU @ 2.10GHz - 376G memory - kernel version: 5.4.86 - gcc version: gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 - Infiniband controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27800 Family [ConnectX-5] Test result: - before swapping: IOPS=829k, BW=3239MiB/s - after swapping: IOPS=829k, BW=3238MiB/s - remove all (un)likely: IOPS=829k, BW=3238MiB/s Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806112112.124313-5-haris.iqbal@ionos.comSigned-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Jack Wang authored
The two functions are unused, so just remove them. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806112112.124313-3-haris.iqbal@ionos.comSigned-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> Reviewed-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Md Haris Iqbal authored
When all the paths are removed for a session, the addition of the first path is like a new session for the storage server. Hence, for_new_clt has to be set to 1. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210806112112.124313-2-haris.iqbal@ionos.comSigned-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linuxJason Gunthorpe authored
Saeed Mahameed says: ==================== This pulls mlx5-next branch which includes patches already reviewed on net-next and rdma mailing lists. 1) mlx5 single E-Switch FDB for lag 2) IB/mlx5: Rename is_apu_thread_cq function to is_apu_cq 3) Add DCS caps & fields support We need this in net-next as multiple features are dependent on the single FDB feature. ==================== Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> * mellanox/mlx5-next: net/mlx5: Lag, Create shared FDB when in switchdev mode net/mlx5: E-Switch, add logic to enable shared FDB net/mlx5: Lag, move lag destruction to a workqueue net/mlx5: Lag, properly lock eswitch if needed net/mlx5: Add send to vport rules on paired device net/mlx5: E-Switch, Add event callback for representors net/mlx5e: Use shared mappings for restoring from metadata net/mlx5e: Add an option to create a shared mapping net/mlx5: E-Switch, set flow source for send to uplink rule RDMA/mlx5: Add shared FDB support {net, RDMA}/mlx5: Extend send to vport rules RDMA/mlx5: Fill port info based on the relevant eswitch net/mlx5: Lag, add initial logic for shared FDB net/mlx5: Return mdev from eswitch IB/mlx5: Rename is_apu_thread_cq function to is_apu_cq
-
- 19 Aug, 2021 5 commits
-
-
Håkon Bugge authored
ib_sa_service_rec_query() was introduced in kernel v2.6.13 by commit cbae32c5 ("[PATCH] IB: Add Service Record support to SA client") in 2005. It was not used then and have never been used since. Removing it and related functions/structs. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1628702736-12651-1-git-send-email-haakon.bugge@oracle.comSigned-off-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Prabhakar Kushwaha authored
Qedr code is tightly coupled with existing both INIT transitions. Here, during first INIT transition all variables are reset and the RESET state is checked in post_recv() before any posting. Commit dc70f7c3 ("RDMA/cma: Remove unnecessary INIT->INIT transition") exposed this bug. So moving variables reset to qedr_set_common_qp_params() and also avoid RESET state check for post_recv(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210811051650.14914-1-pkushwaha@marvell.comSigned-off-by: Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Shai Malin <smalin@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha <pkushwaha@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Just use seq_write to copy the stats into the seq_file buffer instead of poking holes into the seq_file abstraction. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210810151711.1795374-1-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com> Tested-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Christophe JAILLET authored
'sess->rbufs' is known to be NULL here, so there is no point in kfree'ing it. Fixes: 6a98d71d ("RDMA/rtrs: client: main functionality") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9a57c9f837fa2c6f0070578a1bc4840688f62962.1628185335.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.frSigned-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Acked-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
YueHaibing authored
If re-registering an MR in hns_roce_rereg_user_mr(), we should return NULL instead of passing 0 to ERR_PTR for clarity. Fixes: 4e9fc1da ("RDMA/hns: Optimize the MR registration process") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210804125939.20516-1-yuehaibing@huawei.comSigned-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
- 05 Aug, 2021 14 commits
-
-
Mark Bloch authored
If both eswitches are in switchdev mode and the uplink representors are enslaved to the same bond device create a shared FDB configuration. When moving to shared FDB mode not only the hardware needs be configured but the RDMA driver needs to reconfigure itself. When such change is done, unload the RDMA devices, configure the hardware and load the RDMA representors. When destroying the lag (can happen if a PCI function is unbinded, driver is unloaded or by just removing a netdev from the bond) make sure to restore the system to the previous state only if possible. For example, if a PCI function is unbinded there is no need to load the representors as the device is going away. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
Shared FDB allows to direct traffic from all the vports in the HCA to a single eswitch. In order to do that three things are needed. 1) Point the ingress ACL of the slave uplink to that of the master. With this, wire traffic from both uplinks will reach the same eswitch with the same metadata where a single steering rule can catch traffic from both ports. 2) Set the FDB root flow table of the slave's eswitch to that of the master. As this flow table can change dynamically make sure to sync it on any set root flow table FDB command. This will make sure traffic from SFs, VFs, ECPFs and PFs reach the master eswitch. 3) Split wire traffic at the eswitch manager egress ACL so that it's directed to the native eswitch manager. We only treat wire traffic from both ports the same at the eswitch level. If such traffic wasn't handled in the eswitch it needs to reach the right representor to be processed by software. For example LACP packets should *always* reach the right uplink representor for correct operation. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
If a netdev is removed from the lag the lag should be destroyed. With downstream patches this might trigger a reconfiguration of representors on a different eswitch and such we don't have the proper locking to so from this path. Move the destruction to be done by the workqueue. As the destruction won't affect the netdev side it okay to do so. The RDMA side will be reconfigured and it already coded to handle such reconfiguration. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
Currently when doing hardware lag we check the eswitch mode but as this isn't done under a lock the check isn't valid. As the code needs to sync between two different devices an extra care is needed. - When going to change eswitch mode, if hardware lag is active destroy it. - While changing eswitch modes block any hardware bond creation. - Delay handling bonding events until there are no mode changes in progress. - When attaching a new mdev to lag, block until there is no mode change in progress. In order for the mode change to finish the interface lock will have to be taken. Release the lock and sleep for 100ms to allow forward progress. As this is a very rare condition (can happen if the user unbinds and binds a PCI function while also changing eswitch mode of the other PCI function) it has no real world impact. As taking multiple eswitch mode locks is now required lockdep will complain about a possible deadlock. Register a key per eswitch to make lockdep happy. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
When two mlx5 devices are paired in switchdev mode, always offload the send-to-vport rule to the peer E-Switch. This allows to abstract the logic when this is really necessary (single FDB) and combine the logic of both cases into one. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
This callback will allow to notify representors about relevant events when in OFFLOADS mode. In downstream patches, this will be used to notify about PAIR/UNPAIR devcom events. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Roi Dayan authored
FTEs are added with mapped metadata which is saved per eswitch. When uplink reps are bonded and we are in a single FDB mode, we could fail to find metadata which was stored on one eswitch mapping but not the other or with a different id. To resolve this issue use shared mapping between eswitch ports. We do not have any conflict using a single mapping, for a type, between the ports. Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Roi Dayan authored
The shared mapping is identified by an id and type. Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Ariel Levkovich authored
Set the flow source param to local vport for the uplink rep send-to-vport rule. This will comply with the recent changes in SW steering that use the flow source as an indication for the rule type - rx or tx. Since the uplink send-to-vport rule is forwarding traffic to the wire it has to indicate that it is an sx rule and can't use the any port value in the flow source. Signed-off-by: Ariel Levkovich <lariel@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
Shared FDB allows to create a single RDMA device that holds representors from both eswitches. As shared FDB is only active when both uplink representors are enslaved there is a single RDMA port that represents both uplinks. The number of ports is the number of vports on both eswitches minus one as we only need 1 port for both uplinks. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
In shared FDB there is only one eswitch which is active and it receives traffic from all representors and all vports in the HCA. While the Ethernet representor will always reside on its native PF the IB representor will not. Extend send to vport rule creation to support such flows. Need to account for source vport that sends the traffic (on which the representors resides) and the target eswitch the traffic which reach. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
In shared FDB a single RDMA device can have representors that are connected to two different eswitches. Use the right eswitch when preparing the response to userspace. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
As shared FDB requires changes in two subsystems first expose the needed core functions so the RDMA side can be changed. mlx5_lag_is_master(): return true if a given mlx5 device is the lag master. mlx5_lag_is_shared_fdb(): Returns true if the lag mode is shared FDB. mlx5_lag_get_peer_mdev(): Return the peer mdev in lag. The mentioned functions will be used by downstream patches in order to add support for shared FDB for the RDMA side. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
Mark Bloch authored
Export a function so users can retrieve the mellanox device that manages the eswitch from the eswitch device. Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
-
- 03 Aug, 2021 13 commits
-
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
Unify create QP creation interface to make clean approach to create XRC_TGT and regular QPs. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5cd50e7d8ad9112545a1a61dea62799a5cb3224a.1628014762.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
The QP usecnts were incremented through QP attributes structure while decreased through QP itself. Rely on the ib_creat_qp_user() code that initialized all QP parameters prior returning to the user and increment exactly like destroy does. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/25d256a3bb1fc480b77d7fe439817b993de48610.1628014762.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
All QP creation flows called ib_create_qp_security(), but differently. This caused to the need to provide exclusion conditions for the XRC_TGT, because such QP already had selinux configuration call. In order to fix it, move ib_create_qp_security() to the general QP creation routine. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4d7cd6f5828aca37fb62283e6b126b73ab86b18c.1628014762.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
The low-level create QP function grew to be larger than any sensible inline function should be. The inline attribute is not really needed for that function and can be implemented as exported symbol. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2c08709d86f876c3dfb77684357b2a939e570ca4.1628014762.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
The ib_create_named_qp() is kernel verb that is not used for user supplied attributes. In such case, it is ULP responsibility to provide valid QP attributes. In-kernel API shouldn't check it, exactly like other functions that don't check device capabilities. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b9b9e981d1af148b750750196e686199dbbf61f8.1628014762.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
The ib_create_named_qp() is kernel verb and no kernel users exist that use XRC_INI QP. Hence such QP path is not reachable. In addition, delete duplicated assignments of QP attributes from the initialization structure. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1b4c0d1def5f8f6d26839e14d19da950cc4a0b05.1628014762.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
XRC_TGT QPs are created through kernel verbs and don't have udata at all. Fixes: 6eefa839 ("RDMA/mlx5: Protect from kernel crash if XRC_TGT doesn't have udata") Fixes: e383085c ("RDMA/mlx5: Set ECE options during QP create") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b68228597e730675020aa5162745390a2d39d3a2.1628014762.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
There is no real value in bypassing IB/core APIs for creating standard objects with standard types. The open-coded variant didn't have any restrack task management calls and caused to such objects to be not present when running rdmatoool. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f745590e5fb7d56f90fdb25f64ee3983ba17e1e4.1627040189.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
Convert QP object to follow IB/core general allocation scheme. That change allows us to make sure that restrack properly kref the memory. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/48e767124758aeecc433360ddd85eaa6325b34d9.1627040189.git.leonro@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com> #efa Tested-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com> #rdma and core Tested-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Tatyana Nikolova <tatyana.e.nikolova@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
The rdmavt QP has fields that are both needed for the control and data path. Such mixed declaration caused to the very specific allocation flow with kzalloc_node and SGE list embedded into the struct rvt_qp. This patch separates QP creation to two: regular memory allocation for the control path and specific code for the SGE list, while the access to the later is performed through derefenced pointer. Such pointer and its context are expected to be in the cache, so performance difference is expected to be negligible, if any exists. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f66c1e20ccefba0db3c69c58ca9c897f062b4d1c.1627040189.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
Starting from commit 2b1f7470 ("RDMA/core: Allow drivers to disable restrack DB") the restrack is able to handle non-standard QP types either. That change allows us to rewrite custom QP calls to their IB/core counterparts, so we will use general QP creation flow even for the driver QP types. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/51682ab82298748941f38bd23ee3bf77ef1cab7b.1627040189.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
The dev->devr.mutex was intended to protect GSI QP pointer change in the struct mlx5_ib_port_resources when it is accessed from the pkey_change_work. However that pointer isn't changed during the runtime and once IB/core adds MAD, it stays stable. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6e338c561033df20d92e1371fc6a7a0d93aad945.1627040189.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-
Leon Romanovsky authored
In the driver release flow, we are ensuring that notifier is disabled and no new works can be added to pkey_change_handler. It means that we can cancel that handler before destroying resources to make sure that our unwind routine is symmetrical to the allocation one. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f2b1ea1bad952e4e7a48a6f731de9e0344986b29.1627040189.git.leonro@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
-