Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 14 Jan, 2003 3 commits
    • Andrew Morton's avatar
      [PATCH] fix ext3 memory leak · 2a6cb303
      Andrew Morton authored 
      This is the leak which Con found.  Long story...

- If a dirty page is fed into ext3_writepage() during truncate,
  block_write_full_page() will reutrn -EIO (it's outside i_size) and will
  leave the buffers dirty.  In the expectation that discard_buffer() will
  clean them.

- ext3_writepage() then adds the still-dirty buffers to the journal's
  "async data list".  These are buffers which are known to have had IO
  started.  All we need to do is to wait on them in commit.

- meanwhile, truncate will chop the pages off the address_space.  But
  truncate cannot invalidate the buffers (in journal_unmap_buffer()) because
  the buffers are attached to the committing transaction.  (hm.  This
  behaviour in journal_unmap_buffer() is bogus.  We just never need to write
  these buffers.)

- ext3 commit will "wait on writeout" of these writepage buffers (even
  though it was never started) and will then release them from the
  journalling system.

So we end up with pages which are attached to no mapping, which are clean and
which have dirty buffers.  These are unreclaimable.


Aside:

  ext3-ordered has two buffer lists: the "sync data list" and the "async
  data list".

  The sync list consists of probably-dirty buffers which were dirtied in
  commit_write().  Transaction commit must write all thee out and wait on
  them.

  The async list supposedly consists of clean buffers which were attached
  to the journal in ->writepage.  These have had IO started (by writepage) so
  commit merely needs to wait on them.

  This is all designed for the 2.4 VM really.  In 2.5, tons of writeback
  goes via writepage (instead of the buffer lru) and these buffers end up
  madly hpooing between the async and sync lists.

  Plus it's arguably incorrect to just wait on the writes in commit - if
  the buffers were set dirty again (say, by zap_pte_range()) then perhaps we
  should write them again before committing.


So what the patch does is to remove the async list.  All ordered-data buffers
are now attached to the single "sync data list".  So when we come to commit,
those buffers which are dirty will have IO started and all buffers are waited
upon.

This means that the dirty buffers against a clean page which came about from
block_write_full_page()'s -EIO will be written to disk in commit - this
cleans them, and the page is now reclaimable.  No leak.

It seems bogus to write these buffers in commit, and indeed it is.  But ext3
will not allow those blocks to be reused until the commit has ended so there
is no corruption risk.  And the amount of data involved is low - it only
comes about as a race between truncate and writepage().
      2a6cb303
    • Andrew Morton's avatar
      [PATCH] factor free memory into max_sane_readahead() · daebe5ee
      Andrew Morton authored 
      max_sane_readahead() permits the user to readahead up to
half-the-inactive-list's worth of pages.  Which is totally wrong if most of
memory is free.

So make the limit be

	(nr_inactive + nr_free) / 2
      daebe5ee
    • Andrew Morton's avatar
      [PATCH] ext3 ino_t removal · 42f834c3
      Andrew Morton authored 
      Patch from Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>

This patch against 2.5.53 removes my erronous use of ino_t in a couple of
places in the ext3 code.  This has been replaced with unsigned long (the same
as is used for inode->i_ino).  This patch matches the fix submitted to 2.4
for fixing 64-bit compiler warnings, and also replaces a couple of %ld with
%lu to forestall output wierdness with filesystems with a few billion inodes.
      42f834c3
  3. 13 Jan, 2003 37 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7