Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 09 Dec, 2015 2 commits
  3. 08 Dec, 2015 9 commits
  5. 07 Dec, 2015 6 commits
  7. 04 Dec, 2015 9 commits
  9. 03 Dec, 2015 14 commits
    • Maarten Lankhorst's avatar
      drm/i915: Handle cdclk limits on broadwell. · 63ba534e
      Maarten Lankhorst authored 
      As the comment indicates this can only fail gracefully when
called from compute_config. Fortunately this is now what's happening,
so the fixme can be removed and the DRM_ERROR downgraded.

Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1448360945-5723-3-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      63ba534e
    • Alex Goins's avatar
      i915: wait for fence in prepare_plane_fb · 3c28ff22
      Alex Goins authored 
      In intel_prepare_plane_fb, if fb is backed by dma-buf, wait for exclusive
fence

v2: First commit
v3: Remove object_name_lock acquire
    Move wait from intel_atomic_commit() to intel_prepare_plane_fb()
v4: Wait only on exclusive fences, interruptible with no timeout
v5: Style tweaks to more closely match rest of file
v6: Properly handle interrupted waits
v7: No change
v8: No change

Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7704181/Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Goins <agoins@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      3c28ff22
    • Alex Goins's avatar
      i915: wait for fence in mmio_flip_work_func · fd8e058a
      Alex Goins authored 
      If a buffer is backed by dmabuf, wait on its reservation object's exclusive
fence before flipping.

v2: First commit
v3: Remove object_name_lock acquire
v4: Move wait ahead of mark_page_flip_active
    Use crtc->primary->fb to get GEM object instead of pending_flip_obj
    use_mmio_flip() return true when exclusive fence is attached
    Wait only on exclusive fences, interruptible with no timeout
v5: Move wait from do_mmio_flip to mmio_flip_work_func
    Style tweaks to more closely match rest of file
v6: Change back to unintteruptible wait to match __i915_wait_request due to
    inability to properly handle interrupted wait.
    Warn on error code from waiting.
v7: No change
v8: Test for !reservation_object_signaled_rcu(test_all=FALSE) instead of
    obj->base.dma_buf->resv->fence_excl

Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7704181/Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Goins <agoins@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
      fd8e058a
    • Nick Hoath's avatar
      drm/i915: Extend LRC pinning to cover GPU context writeback · 6d65ba94
      Nick Hoath authored 
      Use the first retired request on a new context to unpin
the old context. This ensures that the hw context remains
bound until it has been written back to by the GPU.
Now that the context is pinned until later in the request/context
lifecycle, it no longer needs to be pinned from context_queue to
retire_requests.
This fixes an issue with GuC submission where the GPU might not
have finished writing back the context before it is unpinned. This
results in a GPU hang.

v2: Moved the new pin to cover GuC submission (Alex Dai)
    Moved the new unpin to request_retire to fix coverage leak
v3: Added switch to default context if freeing a still pinned
    context just in case the hw was actually still using it
v4: Unwrapped context unpin to allow calling without a request
v5: Only create a switch to idle context if the ring doesn't
    already have a request pending on it (Alex Dai)
    Rename unsaved to dirty to avoid double negatives (Dave Gordon)
    Changed _no_req postfix to __ prefix for consistency (Dave Gordon)
    Split out per engine cleanup from context_free as it
    was getting unwieldy
    Corrected locking (Dave Gordon)
v6: Removed some bikeshedding (Mika Kuoppala)
    Added explanation of the GuC hang that this fixes (Daniel Vetter)
v7: Removed extra per request pinning from ring reset code (Alex Dai)
    Added forced ring unpin/clean in error case in context free (Alex Dai)
Signed-off-by: default avatarNick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@intel.com>
Issue: VIZ-4277
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Alex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      6d65ba94
    • Alex Dai's avatar
      drm/i915/guc: Clean up locks in GuC · 5a843307
      Alex Dai authored 
      For now, remove the spinlocks that protected the GuC's
statistics block and work queue; they are only accessed
by code that already holds the global struct_mutex, and
so are redundant (until the big struct_mutex rewrite!).

The specific problem that the spinlocks caused was that
if the work queue was full, the driver would try to
spinwait for one jiffy, but with interrupts disabled the
jiffy count would not advance, leading to a system hang.
The issue was found using test case igt/gem_close_race.

The new version will usleep() instead, still holding
the struct_mutex but without any spinlocks.

v4: Reorganize commit message (Dave Gordon)
v3: Remove unnecessary whitespace churn
v2: Clean up wq_lock too
v1: Clean up host2guc lock as well
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Dai <yu.dai@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1449104189-27591-1-git-send-email-yu.dai@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      5a843307
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: only recompress FBC after flushing a drawing operation · ee7d6cfa
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      There's no need to stop and restart FBC, which is quite expensive as
we have to revalidate the CRTC state. After flushing a drawing
operation we know the CRTC state hasn't changed, so a nuke
(recompress) should be fine.

v2: Make it simpler (Chris).
v3: Rewrite the patch again due to patch order changes.
v4: Rewrite commit message (Chris).
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      ee7d6cfa
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: get rid of FBC {,de}activation messages · 820bcabb
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      When running Cinnamon I see way too many pairs of these messages: many
per second. Get rid of them as they're just telling us FBC is working
as expected. We already have the messages for enable/disable, so we
don't really need messages for activation/deactivation.

v2: Rebase after changing the patch order.
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      820bcabb
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: kill fbc.uncompressed_size · 559d9135
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      Directly call intel_fbc_calculate_cfb_size() in the only place that
actually needs it, and use the proper check before removing the stolen
node. IMHO, this change makes our code easier to understand.

v2: Use drm_mm_node_allocated() (Chris).
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      559d9135
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: use a single intel_fbc_work struct · 128d7356
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      This was already on my TODO list, and was requested both by Chris and
Ville, for different reasons. The advantages are avoiding a frequent
malloc/free pair, and the locality of having the work structure
embedded in dev_priv. The maximum used memory is also smaller since
previously we could have multiple allocated intel_fbc_work structs at
the same time, and now we'll always have a single one - the one
embedded on dev_priv. Of course, we're now using a little more memory
on the cases where there's nothing scheduled.

The biggest challenge here is to keep everything synchronized the way
it was before.

Currently, when we try to activate FBC, we allocate a new
intel_fbc_work structure. Then later when we conclude we must delay
the FBC activation a little more, we allocate a new intel_fbc_work
struct, and then adjust dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work to point to the new
struct. So when the old work runs - at intel_fbc_work_fn() - it will
check that dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work points to something else, so it does
nothing. Everything is also protected by fbc.lock.

Just cancelling the old delayed work doesn't work because we might
just cancel it after the work function already started to run, but
while it is still waiting to grab fbc.lock. That's why we use the
"dev_priv->fbc.fbc_work == work" check described in the paragraph
above.

So now that we have a single work struct we have to introduce a new
way to synchronize everything. So we're making the work function a
normal work instead of a delayed work, and it will be responsible for
sleeping the appropriate amount of time itself. This way, after it
wakes up it can grab the lock, ask "were we delayed or cancelled?" and
then go back to sleep, enable FBC or give up.

v2:
  - Spelling fixes.
  - Rebase after changing the patch order.
  - Fix ms/jiffies confusion.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      128d7356
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: check for FBC planes in the same place as the pipes · e6cd6dc1
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      This moves the pre-gen4 check from update() to enable(). The HAS_DDI
in the original code is not needed since only gen 2/3 have the plane
swapping code.

v2: Rebase.
v3: Extract fbc_on_plane_a_only() (Chris).
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      e6cd6dc1
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: alloc/free the FBC CFB during enable/disable · c5ecd469
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      One of the problems with the current code is that it frees the CFB and
releases its drm_mm node as soon as we flip FBC's enable bit. This is
bad because after we disable FBC the hardware may still use the CFB
for the rest of the frame, so in theory we should only release the
drm_mm node one frame after we disable FBC. Otherwise, a stolen memory
allocation done right after an FBC disable may result in either
corrupted memory for the new owner of that memory region or corrupted
screen/underruns in case the new owner changes it while the hardware
is still reading it. This case is not exactly easy to reproduce since
we currently don't do a lot of stolen memory allocations, but I see
patches on the mailing list trying to expose stolen memory to user
space, so races will be possible.

I thought about three different approaches to solve this, and they all
have downsides.

The first approach would be to simply use multiple drm_mm nodes and
freeing the unused ones only after a frame has passed. The problem
with this approach is that since stolen memory is rather small,
there's a risk we just won't be able to allocate a new CFB from stolen
if the previous one was not freed yet. This could happen in case we
quickly disable FBC from pipe A and decide to enable it on pipe B, or
just if we change pipe A's fb stride while FBC is enabled.

The second approach would be similar to the first one, but maintaining
a single drm_mm node and keeping track of when it can be reused. This
would remove the disadvantage of not having enough space for two
nodes, but would create the new problem where we may not be able to
enable FBC at the point intel_fbc_update() is called, so we would have
to add more code to retry updating FBC after the time has passed. And
that can quickly get too complex since we can get invalidate, flush,
disable and other calls in the middle of the wait.

Both solutions above - and also the current code - have the problem
that we unnecessarily free+realloc FBC during invalidate+flush
operations even if the CFB size doesn't change.

The third option would be to move the allocation/deallocation to
enable/disable. This makes sure that the pipe is always disabled when
we allocate/deallocate the CFB, so there's no risk that the FBC
hardware may read or write to the memory right after it is freed from
drm_mm. The downside is that it is possible for user space to change
the buffer stride without triggering a disable/enable - only
deactivate/activate -, so we'll have to handle this case somehow - see
igt's kms_frontbuffer_tracking test, fbc-stridechange subtest. It
could be possible to implement a way to free+alloc the CFB during said
stride change, but it would involve a lot of book-keeping - exactly as
mentioned above - just for on case, so for now I'll keep it simple and
just deactivate FBC. Besides, we may not even need to disable FBC
since we do CFB over-allocation.

Note from Chris: "Starting a fullscreen client that covers a single
monitor in a multi-monitor setup will trigger a change in stride on
one of the CRTCs (the monitors will be flipped independently).". It
shouldn't be a huge problem if we lose FBC on multi-monitor setups
since these setups already have problems reaching deep PC states
anyway.

v2: Rebase after changing the patch order.
v3:
  - Remove references to the stride change case being "uncommon" and
    paste Chris' example.
  - Rebase after a change in a previous patch.
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      c5ecd469
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: introduce intel_fbc_{enable,disable} · d029bcad
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      The goal is to call FBC enable/disable only once per modeset, while
activate/deactivate/update will be called multiple times.

The enable() function will be responsible for deciding if a CRTC will
have FBC on it and then it will "lock" FBC on this CRTC: it won't be
possible to change FBC's CRTC until disable(). With this, all checks
and resource acquisition that only need to be done once per modeset
can be moved from update() to enable(). And then the update(),
activate() and deactivate() code will also get simpler since they
won't need to worry about the CRTC being changed.

The disable() function will do the reverse operation of enable(). One
of its features is that it should only be called while the pipe is
already off. This guarantees that FBC is stopped and nothing is
using the CFB.

With this, the activate() and deactivate() functions just start and
temporarily stop FBC. They are the ones touching the hardware enable
bit, so HW state reflects dev_priv->crtc.active.

The last function remaining is update(). A lot of times I thought
about renaming update() to activate() or try_to_activate() since it's
called when we want to activate FBC. The thing is that update() may
not only decide to activate FBC, but also deactivate or keep it on the
same state, so I'll leave this name for now.

Moving code to enable() and disable() will also help in case we decide
to move FBC to pipe_config or something else later.

The current patch only puts the very basic code on enable() and
disable(). The next commits will take care of moving more stuff from
update() to the new functions.

v2:
  - Rebase.
  - Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
v4: Rebase again after upstream changes.
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      d029bcad
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: introduce is_active/activate/deactivate to the FBC terminology · 0e631adc
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      The long term goal is to have enable/disable as the higher level
functions and activate/deactivate as the lower level functions, just
like we do for PSR and for the CRTC. This way, we'll run enable and
disable once per modeset, while update, activate and deactivate will
be run many times. With this, we can move the checks and code that
need to run only once per modeset to enable(), making the code simpler
and possibly a little faster.

This patch is just the first step on the conversion: it starts by
converting the current low level functions from enable/disable to
activate/deactivate. This patch by itself has no benefits other than
making review and rebase easier. Please see the next patches for more
details on the conversion.

v2:
  - Rebase.
  - Improve commit message (Chris).
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      0e631adc
    • Paulo Zanoni's avatar
      drm/i915: pass the crtc as an argument to intel_fbc_update() · 754d1133
      Paulo Zanoni authored 
      There's no need to reevaluate the status of every single crtc when a
single crtc changes its state.

With this, we're cutting the case where due to a change in pipe B,
intel_fbc_update() is called, then intel_fbc_find_crtc() concludes FBC
should be enabled on pipe A, then it completely rechecks the state of
pipe A only to conclude FBC should remain enabled on pipe A. If any
change on pipe A triggers a need to recompute whether FBC is valid on
pipe A, then at some point someone is going to call
intel_fbc_update(PIPE_A).

The addition of intel_fbc_deactivate() is necessary so we keep track
of the previously selected CRTC when we do invalidate/flush. We're
also going to continue the enable/disable/activate/deactivate concept
in the next patches.

v2: Rebase.
v3: Rebase after changing the patch order.
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/
      754d1133
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7