- 07 Sep, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When trying to get a new fs root for a snapshot during the transaction at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(), if btrfs_get_new_fs_root() fails we leave "pending->snap" pointing to an error pointer, and then later at ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we dereference that pointer, resulting in a crash: [12264.614689] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000007c4 [12264.615650] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [12264.616487] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [12264.617436] PGD 0 P4D 0 [12264.618328] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [12264.619150] CPU: 0 PID: 2310635 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-btrfs-next-67 #1 [12264.619960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [12264.621769] RIP: 0010:btrfs_mksubvol+0x438/0x4a0 [btrfs] [12264.622528] Code: bc ef ff ff (...) [12264.624092] RSP: 0018:ffffaa6fc7277cd8 EFLAGS: 00010282 [12264.624669] RAX: 00000000fffffff4 RBX: ffff9d3e8f151a60 RCX: 0000000000000000 [12264.625249] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9d56c9be RDI: fffffffffffffff4 [12264.625830] RBP: ffff9d3e8f151b48 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [12264.626413] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000fffffff4 [12264.626994] R13: ffff9d3ede380538 R14: ffff9d3ede380500 R15: ffff9d3f61b2eeb8 [12264.627582] FS: 00007f140d5d8200(0000) GS:ffff9d3fb5e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [12264.628176] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [12264.628773] CR2: 00000000000007c4 CR3: 000000020f8e8004 CR4: 00000000003706f0 [12264.629379] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [12264.629994] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [12264.630594] Call Trace: [12264.631227] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs] [12264.631840] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs] [12264.632458] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] [12264.633078] btrfs_ioctl+0x1864/0x3130 [btrfs] [12264.633689] ? do_sys_openat2+0x1a7/0x2d0 [12264.634295] ? kmem_cache_free+0x147/0x3a0 [12264.634899] ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [12264.635488] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [12264.636058] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [12264.636616] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 (gdb) list *(btrfs_mksubvol+0x438) 0x7c7b8 is in btrfs_mksubvol (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:858). 853 ret = 0; 854 pending_snapshot->anon_dev = 0; 855 fail: 856 /* Prevent double freeing of anon_dev */ 857 if (ret && pending_snapshot->snap) 858 pending_snapshot->snap->anon_dev = 0; 859 btrfs_put_root(pending_snapshot->snap); 860 btrfs_subvolume_release_metadata(root, &pending_snapshot->block_rsv); 861 free_pending: 862 if (pending_snapshot->anon_dev) So fix this by setting "pending->snap" to NULL if we get an error from the call to btrfs_get_new_fs_root() at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(). Fixes: 2dfb1e43 ("btrfs: preallocate anon block device at first phase of snapshot creation") Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
While testing a weird problem with -o degraded, I noticed I was getting leaked root errors BTRFS warning (device loop0): writable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices BTRFS error (device loop0): open_ctree failed BTRFS error (device loop0): leaked root -9-0 refcount 1 This is the DATA_RELOC root, which gets read before the other fs roots, but is included in the fs roots radix tree. Handle this by adding a btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root() on the data reloc root if it exists. This is ok to do here if we fail further up because we will only drop the ref if we delete the root from the radix tree, and all other cleanup won't be duplicated. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] A completely sane converted fs will cause kernel warning at balance time: [ 1557.188633] BTRFS info (device sda7): relocating block group 8162107392 flags data [ 1563.358078] BTRFS info (device sda7): found 11722 extents [ 1563.358277] BTRFS info (device sda7): leaf 7989321728 gen 95 total ptrs 213 free space 3458 owner 2 [ 1563.358280] item 0 key (7984947200 169 0) itemoff 16250 itemsize 33 [ 1563.358281] extent refs 1 gen 90 flags 2 [ 1563.358282] ref#0: tree block backref root 4 [ 1563.358285] item 1 key (7985602560 169 0) itemoff 16217 itemsize 33 [ 1563.358286] extent refs 1 gen 93 flags 258 [ 1563.358287] ref#0: shared block backref parent 7985602560 [ 1563.358288] (parent 7985602560 is NOT ALIGNED to nodesize 16384) [ 1563.358290] item 2 key (7985635328 169 0) itemoff 16184 itemsize 33 ... [ 1563.358995] BTRFS error (device sda7): eb 7989321728 invalid extent inline ref type 182 [ 1563.358996] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1563.359005] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 2930 at 0xffffffff9f231766 Then with transaction abort, and obviously failed to balance the fs. [CAUSE] That mentioned inline ref type 182 is completely sane, it's BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY, it's some extra check making kernel to believe it's invalid. Commit 64ecdb64 ("Btrfs: add one more sanity check for shared ref type") introduced extra checks for backref type. One of the requirement is, parent bytenr must be aligned to node size, which is not correct. One example is like this: 0 1G 1G+4K 2G 2G+4K | |///////////////////|//| <- A chunk starts at 1G+4K | | <- A tree block get reserved at bytenr 1G+4K Then we have a valid tree block at bytenr 1G+4K, but not aligned to nodesize (16K). Such chunk is not ideal, but current kernel can handle it pretty well. We may warn about such tree block in the future, but should not reject them. [FIX] Change the alignment requirement from node size alignment to sector size alignment. Also, to make our lives a little easier, also output @iref when btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type() failed, so we can locate the item easier. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205475 Fixes: 64ecdb64 ("Btrfs: add one more sanity check for shared ref type") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> [ update comments and messages ] Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Nikolay reported a lockdep splat in generic/476 that I could reproduce with btrfs/187. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Tainted: G W ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9e8ef38b6268 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x3a/0x1a0 btrfs_alloc_device+0x43/0x210 add_missing_dev+0x20/0x90 read_one_chunk+0x301/0x430 btrfs_read_sys_array+0x17b/0x1b0 open_ctree+0xa62/0x1896 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xea legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x10d/0x379 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 vfs_rmdir.part.0+0x149/0x160 do_rmdir+0x136/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffffa9d74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa9d65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9e8e9da260e0 (&type->s_umount_key#48){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc2+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x92/0xc8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1184/0x1fa0 lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa4/0x3d0 ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x11e/0x500 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x60 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This is because we are holding the chunk_mutex when we call btrfs_alloc_device, which does a GFP_KERNEL allocation. We don't want to switch that to a GFP_NOFS lock because this is the only place where it matters. So instead use memalloc_nofs_save() around the allocation in order to avoid the lockdep splat. Reported-by:Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 27 Aug, 2020 7 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The error message for inode transid is the same as for inode generation, which makes us unable to detect the real problem. Reported-by:
Tyler Richmond <t.d.richmond@gmail.com> Fixes: 496245ca ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify inode item") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
These are special extent buffers that get rewound in order to lookup the state of the tree at a specific point in time. As such they do not go through the normal initialization paths that set their lockdep class, so handle them appropriately when they are created and before they are locked. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
When flipping over to the rw_semaphore I noticed I'd get a lockdep splat in replace_path(), which is weird because we're swapping the reloc root with the actual target root. Turns out this is because we're using the root->root_key.objectid as the root id for the newly allocated tree block when setting the lockdep class, however we need to be using the actual owner of this new block, which is saved in owner. The affected path is through btrfs_copy_root as all other callers of btrfs_alloc_tree_block (which calls init_new_buffer) have root_objectid == root->root_key.objectid . CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I got the following lockdep splat while testing: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs/229626 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff828513f0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 but task is already holding lock: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #7 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #6 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x49/0x480 commit_cowonly_roots+0xb5/0x2a0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x516/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #5 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4bb/0xa60 sync_filesystem+0x6b/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x29/0x60 cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140 task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1cc/0x1e0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #4 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x43/0x70 start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x42/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 perf_read+0x141/0x2c0 vfs_read+0xad/0x1b0 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x88/0x150 perf_event_init+0x1db/0x20b start_kernel+0x3ae/0x53c secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 -> #1 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 perf_event_init_cpu+0x4f/0x150 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb1/0x900 _cpu_up.constprop.26+0x9f/0x130 cpu_up+0x7b/0xc0 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x4f/0x60 smp_init+0x26/0x71 kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x258 kernel_init+0xa/0x103 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> &fs_devs->device_list_mutex --> &fs_info->scrub_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->scrub_lock); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by btrfs/229626: #0: ffff88bfe8bb86e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0xbd/0x630 #1: ffff889dd3889518 (&fs_info->scrub_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_scrub_dev+0x11c/0x630 stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 229626 Comm: btrfs Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00172-g021118712e59 #932 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 cpus_read_lock+0x39/0xb0 ? alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 alloc_workqueue+0x378/0x450 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x80 __btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x15d/0x200 btrfs_alloc_workqueue+0x51/0x160 scrub_workers_get+0x5a/0x170 btrfs_scrub_dev+0x18c/0x630 ? start_transaction+0xd1/0x5d0 btrfs_dev_replace_by_ioctl.cold.21+0x10a/0x1d4 btrfs_ioctl+0x2799/0x30a0 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xca/0x160 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30 ? do_sigaction+0x102/0x250 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happens because we're allocating the scrub workqueues under the scrub and device list mutex, which brings in a whole host of other dependencies. Because the work queue allocation is done with GFP_KERNEL, it can trigger reclaim, which can lead to a transaction commit, which in turns needs the device_list_mutex, it can lead to a deadlock. A different problem for which this fix is a solution. Fix this by moving the actual allocation outside of the scrub lock, and then only take the lock once we're ready to actually assign them to the fs_info. We'll now have to cleanup the workqueues in a few more places, so I've added a helper to do the refcount dance to safely free the workqueues. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock: ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 but task is already holding lock: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70 __btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120 btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4 __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270 btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230 btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570 process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930 btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440 btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0 btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0 touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0 btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60 mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640 do_mmap+0x376/0x580 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-fs-00); lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by compsize/11122: #0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 stack backtrace: CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 ? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90 __might_fault+0x68/0x90 ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80 copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300 ? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360 search_ioctl+0x106/0x200 btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0 btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0 ? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70 ? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks, which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user(). This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed. Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then copy_to_user_nofault for the copying. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc7-00167-g0d7ba0c5b375-dirty #925 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-uuid/7955 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88bfbafec0f8 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 but task is already holding lock: ffff88bfbafef2a8 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}: down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990 btrfs_uuid_tree_add+0x89/0x2d0 btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x330/0x390 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990 btrfs_find_root+0x45/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x100 btrfs_get_root_ref.part.50+0x143/0x630 btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate+0x207/0x314 btrfs_uuid_rescan_kthread+0x12/0x50 kthread+0x133/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-uuid-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); lock(btrfs-uuid-00); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by btrfs-uuid/7955: #0: ffff88bfbafef2a8 (btrfs-uuid-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 stack backtrace: CPU: 73 PID: 7955 Comm: btrfs-uuid Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00167-g0d7ba0c5b375-dirty #925 Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x165/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310 lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 ? btrfs_root_node+0x1c/0x1d0 down_read_nested+0x3e/0x140 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x4bd/0x990 btrfs_find_root+0x45/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x100 btrfs_get_root_ref.part.50+0x143/0x630 btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate+0x207/0x314 ? btree_readpage+0x20/0x20 btrfs_uuid_rescan_kthread+0x12/0x50 kthread+0x133/0x150 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This problem exists because we have two different rescan threads, btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread which creates the uuid tree, and btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate that goes through and updates or deletes any out of date roots. The problem is they both do things in different order. btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread() reads the tree_root, and then inserts entries into the uuid_root. btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate() scans the uuid_root, but then does a btrfs_get_fs_root() which can read from the tree_root. It's actually easy enough to not be holding the path in btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread() when we add a uuid entry, as we already drop it further down and re-start the search when we loop. So simply move the path release before we add our entry to the uuid tree. This also fixes a problem where we're holding a path open after we do btrfs_end_transaction(), which has it's own problems. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: -
Marcos Paulo de Souza authored
[BUG] After commit 9afc6649 ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one block group item"), cache->length is being assigned after calling btrfs_create_block_group_cache. This causes a problem since set_free_space_tree_thresholds calculates the free-space threshold to decide if the free-space tree should convert from extents to bitmaps. The current code calls set_free_space_tree_thresholds with cache->length being 0, which then makes cache->bitmap_high_thresh zero. This implies the system will always use bitmap instead of extents, which is not desired if the block group is not fragmented. This behavior can be seen by a test that expects to repair systems with FREE_SPACE_EXTENT and FREE_SPACE_BITMAP, but the current code only created FREE_SPACE_BITMAP. [FIX] Call set_free_space_tree_thresholds after setting cache->length. There is now a WARN_ON in set_free_space_tree_thresholds to help preventing the same mistake to happen again in the future. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/251 Fixes: 9afc6649 ("btrfs: block-group: refactor how we read one block group item") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by:
-
- 21 Aug, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Boris Burkov authored
can_nocow_extent and btrfs_cross_ref_exist both rely on a heuristic for detecting a must cow condition which is not exactly accurate, but saves unnecessary tree traversal. The incorrect assumption is that if the extent was created in a generation smaller than the last snapshot generation, it must be referenced by that snapshot. That is true, except the snapshot could have since been deleted, without affecting the last snapshot generation. The original patch claimed a performance win from this check, but it also leads to a bug where you are unable to use a swapfile if you ever snapshotted the subvolume it's in. Make the check slower and more strict for the swapon case, without modifying the general cow checks as a compromise. Turning swap on does not seem to be a particularly performance sensitive operation, so incurring a possibly unnecessary btrfs_search_slot seems worthwhile for the added usability. Note: Until the snapshot is competely cleaned after deletion, check_committed_refs will still cause the logic to think that cow is necessary, so the user must until 'btrfs subvolu sync' finished before activating the swapfile swapon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Suggested-by:
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com> Signed-off-by:
Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
With my new locking code dbench is so much faster that I tripped over a transaction abort from ENOSPC. This turned out to be because btrfs_del_dir_entries_in_log was checking for ret == -ENOSPC, but this function sets err on error, and returns err. So instead of properly marking the inode as needing a full commit, we were returning -ENOSPC and aborting in __btrfs_unlink_inode. Fix this by checking the proper variable so that we return the correct thing in the case of ENOSPC. The ENOENT needs to be checked, because btrfs_lookup_dir_item_index() can return -ENOENT if the dir item isn't in the tree log (which would happen if we hadn't fsync'ed this guy). We actually handle that case in __btrfs_unlink_inode, so it's an expected error to get back. Fixes: 4a500fd1 ("Btrfs: Metadata ENOSPC handling for tree log") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
- 19 Aug, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
If a transaction aborts it can cause a memory leak of the pages array of a block group's io_ctl structure. The following steps explain how that can happen: 1) Transaction N is committing, currently in state TRANS_STATE_UNBLOCKED and it's about to start writing out dirty extent buffers; 2) Transaction N + 1 already started and another task, task A, just called btrfs_commit_transaction() on it; 3) Block group B was dirtied (extents allocated from it) by transaction N + 1, so when task A calls btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(), at the very beginning of the transaction commit, it starts writeback for the block group's space cache by calling btrfs_write_out_cache(), which allocates the pages array for the block group's io_ctl with a call to io_ctl_init(). Block group A is added to the io_list of transaction N + 1 by btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(); 4) While transaction N's commit is writing out the extent buffers, it gets an IO error and aborts transaction N, also setting the file system to RO mode; 5) Task A has already returned from btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(), is at btrfs_commit_transaction() and has set transaction N + 1 state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START. Immediately after that it checks that the filesystem was turned to RO mode, due to transaction N's abort, and jumps to the "cleanup_transaction" label. After that we end up at btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction() which calls btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs(). That helper finds block group B in the transaction's io_list but it never releases the pages array of the block group's io_ctl, resulting in a memory leak. In fact at the point when we are at btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs(), the pages array points to pages that were already released by us at __btrfs_write_out_cache() through the call to io_ctl_drop_pages(). We end up freeing the pages array only after waiting for the ordered extent to complete through btrfs_wait_cache_io(), which calls io_ctl_free() to do that. But in the transaction abort case we don't wait for the space cache's ordered extent to complete through a call to btrfs_wait_cache_io(), so that's why we end up with a memory leak - we wait for the ordered extent to complete indirectly by shutting down the work queues and waiting for any jobs in them to complete before returning from close_ctree(). We can solve the leak simply by freeing the pages array right after releasing the pages (with the call to io_ctl_drop_pages()) at __btrfs_write_out_cache(), since we will never use it anymore after that and the pages array points to already released pages at that point, which is currently not a problem since no one will use it after that, but not a good practice anyway since it can easily lead to use-after-free issues. So fix this by freeing the pages array right after releasing the pages at __btrfs_write_out_cache(). This issue can often be reproduced with test case generic/475 from fstests and kmemleak can detect it and reports it with the following trace: unreferenced object 0xffff9bbf009fa600 (size 512): comm "fsstress", pid 38807, jiffies 4298504428 (age 22.028s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 a0 7c 4d 3d ed ff ff 40 a0 7c 4d 3d ed ff ff ..|M=...@.|M=... 80 a0 7c 4d 3d ed ff ff c0 a0 7c 4d 3d ed ff ff ..|M=.....|M=... backtrace: [<00000000f4b5cfe2>] __kmalloc+0x1a8/0x3e0 [<0000000028665e7f>] io_ctl_init+0xa7/0x120 [btrfs] [<00000000a1f95b2d>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x86/0x4a0 [btrfs] [<00000000207ea1b0>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x7f/0xf0 [btrfs] [<00000000af21f534>] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x27b/0x580 [btrfs] [<00000000c3c23d44>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa6f/0xe70 [btrfs] [<000000009588930c>] create_subvol+0x581/0x9a0 [btrfs] [<000000009ef2fd7f>] btrfs_mksubvol+0x3fb/0x4a0 [btrfs] [<00000000474e5187>] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x119/0x1a0 [btrfs] [<00000000708ee349>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] [<00000000ea60106f>] btrfs_ioctl+0x12c/0x3130 [btrfs] [<000000005c923d6d>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [<0000000043ace2c9>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [<00000000904efbce>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Reviewed-by: -
David Sterba authored
The build robot reports compiler: h8300-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 In file included from fs/btrfs/tests/extent-map-tests.c:8: >> fs/btrfs/tests/../ctree.h:2166:8: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type [-Wignored-qualifiers] 2166 | size_t __const btrfs_get_num_csums(void); | ^~~~~~~ The function attribute for const does not follow the expected scheme and in this case is confused with a const type qualifier. Reported-by:kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Marcos Paulo de Souza authored
Currently a user can set mount "-o compress" which will set the compression algorithm to zlib, and use the default compress level for zlib (3): relatime,compress=zlib:3,space_cache If the user remounts the fs using "-o compress=lzo", then the old compress_level is used: relatime,compress=lzo:3,space_cache But lzo does not expose any tunable compression level. The same happens if we set any compress argument with different level, also with zstd. Fix this by resetting the compress_level when compress=lzo is specified. With the fix applied, lzo is shown without compress level: relatime,compress=lzo,space_cache CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Btrfs' async submit mechanism is able to handle errors in the submission path and the meta-data async submit function correctly passes the error code to the caller. In btrfs_submit_bio_start() and btrfs_submit_bio_start_direct_io() we're not handling the errors returned by btrfs_csum_one_bio() correctly though and simply call BUG_ON(). This is unnecessary as the caller of these two functions - run_one_async_start - correctly checks for the return values and sets the status of the async_submit_bio. The actual bio submission will be handled later on by run_one_async_done only if async_submit_bio::status is 0, so the data won't be written if we encountered an error in the checksum process. Simply return the error from btrfs_csum_one_bio() to the async submitters, like it's done in btree_submit_bio_start(). Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 12 Aug, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] The following script can lead to tons of beyond device boundary access: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev -b 10G mount $dev $mnt trimfs $mnt btrfs filesystem resize 1:-1G $mnt trimfs $mnt [CAUSE] Since commit 929be17a ("btrfs: Switch btrfs_trim_free_extents to find_first_clear_extent_bit"), we try to avoid trimming ranges that's already trimmed. So we check device->alloc_state by finding the first range which doesn't have CHUNK_TRIMMED and CHUNK_ALLOCATED not set. But if we shrunk the device, that bits are not cleared, thus we could easily got a range starts beyond the shrunk device size. This results the returned @start and @end are all beyond device size, then we call "end = min(end, device->total_bytes -1);" making @end smaller than device size. Then finally we goes "len = end - start + 1", totally underflow the result, and lead to the beyond-device-boundary access. [FIX] This patch will fix the problem in two ways: - Clear CHUNK_TRIMMED | CHUNK_ALLOCATED bits when shrinking device This is the root fix - Add extra safety check when trimming free device extents We check and warn if the returned range is already beyond current device. Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/282 Fixes: 929be17a ("btrfs: Switch btrfs_trim_free_extents to find_first_clear_extent_bit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
- 11 Aug, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Pavel Machek authored
btrfs_get_extent() sets variable ret, but out: error path expect error to be in variable err so the error code is lost. Fixes: 6bf9e4bd ("btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereference") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de> Reviewed-by:
-
- 10 Aug, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] Unmounting a btrfs filesystem with quota disabled will cause the following NULL pointer dereference: BTRFS info (device dm-5): has skinny extents BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page CPU: 7 PID: 637 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-next-20200731-custom #76 RIP: 0010:kobject_del+0x6/0x20 Call Trace: btrfs_sysfs_del_qgroups+0xac/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_free_qgroup_config+0x63/0x70 [btrfs] close_ctree+0x1f5/0x323 [btrfs] btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x72/0x110 kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x17/0x30 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0xa0 deactivate_super+0x40/0x50 cleanup_mnt+0x135/0x190 __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 task_work_run+0x64/0xb0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x18a/0x190 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x4f/0x270 do_syscall_64+0x45/0x50 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 ---[ end trace 37b7adca5c1d5c5d ]--- [CAUSE] Commit 079ad2fb ("kobject: Avoid premature parent object freeing in kobject_cleanup()") changed kobject_del() that it no longer accepts NULL pointer. Before that commit, kobject_del() and kobject_put() all accept NULL pointers and just ignore such NULL pointers. But that mentioned commit needs to access the parent node, killing the old NULL pointer behavior. Unfortunately btrfs is relying on that hidden feature thus we will trigger such NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] Instead of just saving several lines, do proper fs_info->qgroups_kobj check before calling kobject_del() and kobject_put(). Reviewed-by:
-
Boleyn Su authored
The `if (!ret)` check will always be false and it may result in ret->path being dereferenced while it is a NULL pointer. Fixes: a37f232b ("btrfs: backref: introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by:
Boleyn Su <boleynsu@google.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
There's some inconsistency around SB_I_VERSION handling with mount and remount. Since we don't really want it to be off ever just work around this by making sure we don't get the flag cleared on remount. There's a tiny cpu cost of setting the bit, otherwise all changes to i_version also change some of the times (ctime/mtime) so the inode needs to be synced. We wouldn't save anything by disabling it. Reported-by:
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
While logging an inode, at copy_items(), if we fail to lookup the checksums for an extent we release the destination path, free the ins_data array and then return immediately. However a previous iteration of the for loop may have added checksums to the ordered_sums list, in which case we leak the memory used by them. So fix this by making sure we iterate the ordered_sums list and free all its checksums before returning. Fixes: 3650860b ("Btrfs: remove almost all of the BUG()'s from tree-log.c") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Chris Murphy reported a problem where rpm ostree will bind mount a bunch of things for whatever voodoo it's doing. But when it does this /proc/mounts shows something like /dev/sda /mnt/test btrfs rw,relatime,subvolid=256,subvol=/foo 0 0 /dev/sda /mnt/test/baz btrfs rw,relatime,subvolid=256,subvol=/foo/bar 0 0 Despite subvolid=256 being subvol=/foo. This is because we're just spitting out the dentry of the mount point, which in the case of bind mounts is the source path for the mountpoint. Instead we should spit out the path to the actual subvol. Fix this by looking up the name for the subvolid we have mounted. With this fix the same test looks like this /dev/sda /mnt/test btrfs rw,relatime,subvolid=256,subvol=/foo 0 0 /dev/sda /mnt/test/baz btrfs rw,relatime,subvolid=256,subvol=/foo 0 0 Reported-by:
Chris Murphy <chris@colorremedies.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Reported by Forza on IRC that remounting with compression options does not reflect the change in level, or at least it does not appear to do so according to the messages: mount -o compress=zstd:1 /dev/sda /mnt mount -o remount,compress=zstd:15 /mnt does not print the change to the level to syslog: [ 41.366060] BTRFS info (device vda): use zstd compression, level 1 [ 41.368254] BTRFS info (device vda): disk space caching is enabled [ 41.390429] BTRFS info (device vda): disk space caching is enabled What really happens is that the message is lost but the level is actualy changed. There's another weird output, if compression is reset to 'no': [ 45.413776] BTRFS info (device vda): use no compression, level 4 To fix that, save the previous compression level and print the message in that case too and use separate message for 'no' compression. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
In try_to_merge_free_space we attempt to find entries to the left and right of the entry we are adding to see if they can be merged. We search for an entry past our current info (saved into right_info), and then if right_info exists and it has a rb_prev() we save the rb_prev() into left_info. However there's a slight problem in the case that we have a right_info, but no entry previous to that entry. At that point we will search for an entry just before the info we're attempting to insert. This will simply find right_info again, and assign it to left_info, making them both the same pointer. Now if right_info _can_ be merged with the range we're inserting, we'll add it to the info and free right_info. However further down we'll access left_info, which was right_info, and thus get a use-after-free. Fix this by only searching for the left entry if we don't find a right entry at all. The CVE referenced had a specially crafted file system that could trigger this use-after-free. However with the tree checker improvements we no longer trigger the conditions for the UAF. But the original conditions still apply, hence this fix. Reference: CVE-2019-19448 Fixes: 96303081 ("Btrfs: use hybrid extents+bitmap rb tree for free space") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] There is a bug report of NULL pointer dereference caused in compress_file_extent(): Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_delalloc_helper [btrfs] NIP [c008000006dd4d34] compress_file_range.constprop.41+0x75c/0x8a0 [btrfs] LR [c008000006dd4d1c] compress_file_range.constprop.41+0x744/0x8a0 [btrfs] Call Trace: [c000000c69093b00] [c008000006dd4d1c] compress_file_range.constprop.41+0x744/0x8a0 [btrfs] (unreliable) [c000000c69093bd0] [c008000006dd4ebc] async_cow_start+0x44/0xa0 [btrfs] [c000000c69093c10] [c008000006e14824] normal_work_helper+0xdc/0x598 [btrfs] [c000000c69093c80] [c0000000001608c0] process_one_work+0x2c0/0x5b0 [c000000c69093d10] [c000000000160c38] worker_thread+0x88/0x660 [c000000c69093db0] [c00000000016b55c] kthread+0x1ac/0x1c0 [c000000c69093e20] [c00000000000b660] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x7c ---[ end trace f16954aa20d822f6 ]--- [CAUSE] For the following execution route of compress_file_range(), it's possible to hit NULL pointer dereference: compress_file_extent() |- pages = NULL; |- start = async_chunk->start = 0; |- end = async_chunk = 4095; |- nr_pages = 1; |- inode_need_compress() == false; <<< Possible, see later explanation | Now, we have nr_pages = 1, pages = NULL |- cont: |- ret = cow_file_range_inline(); |- if (ret <= 0) { |- for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) { |- WARN_ON(pages[i]->mapping); <<< Crash To enter above call execution branch, we need the following race: Thread 1 (chattr) | Thread 2 (writeback) --------------------------+------------------------------ | btrfs_run_delalloc_range | |- inode_need_compress = true | |- cow_file_range_async() btrfs_ioctl_set_flag() | |- binode_flags |= | BTRFS_INODE_NOCOMPRESS | | compress_file_range() | |- inode_need_compress = false | |- nr_page = 1 while pages = NULL | | Then hit the crash [FIX] This patch will fix it by checking @pages before doing accessing it. This patch is only designed as a hot fix and easy to backport. More elegant fix may make btrfs only check inode_need_compress() once to avoid such race, but that would be another story. Reported-by:Luciano Chavez <chavez@us.ibm.com> Fixes: 4d3a800e ("btrfs: merge nr_pages input and output parameter in compress_pages") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14.x: cecc8d90: btrfs: Move free_pages_out label in inline extent handling branch in compress_file_range CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Signed-off-by:
-
- 27 Jul, 2020 13 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
When removing an extent map at try_release_extent_mapping(), called through the page release callback (btrfs_releasepage()), we always set the full sync flag on the inode, which forces the next fsync to use a slower code path. This hurts performance for workloads that dirty an amount of data that exceeds or is very close to the system's RAM memory and do frequent fsync operations (like database servers can for example). In particular if there are concurrent fsyncs against different files, by falling back to a full fsync we do a lot more checksum lookups in the checksums btree, as we do it for all the extents created in the current transaction, instead of only the new ones since the last fsync. These checksums lookups not only take some time but, more importantly, they also cause contention on the checksums btree locks due to the concurrency with checksum insertions in the btree by ordered extents from other inodes. We actually don't need to set the full sync flag on the inode, because we only remove extent maps that are in the list of modified extents if they were created in a past transaction, in which case an fsync skips them as it's pointless to log them. So stop setting the full fsync flag on the inode whenever we remove an extent map. This patch is part of a patchset that consists of 3 patches, which have the following subjects: 1/3 btrfs: fix race between page release and a fast fsync 2/3 btrfs: release old extent maps during page release 3/3 btrfs: do not set the full sync flag on the inode during page release Performance tests were ran against a branch (misc-next) containing the whole patchset. The test exercises a workload where there are multiple processes writing to files and fsyncing them (each writing and fsyncing its own file), and in total the amount of data dirtied ranges from 2x to 4x the system's RAM memory (16GiB), so that the page release callback is invoked frequently. The following script, using fio, was used to perform the tests: $ cat test-fsync.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdk MNT=/mnt/sdk MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o ssd" MKFS_OPTIONS="-d single -m single" if [ $# -ne 3 ]; then echo "Use $0 NUM_JOBS FILE_SIZE FSYNC_FREQ" exit 1 fi NUM_JOBS=$1 FILE_SIZE=$2 FSYNC_FREQ=$3 cat <<EOF > /tmp/fio-job.ini [writers] rw=write fsync=$FSYNC_FREQ fallocate=none group_reporting=1 direct=0 bs=64k ioengine=sync size=$FILE_SIZE directory=$MNT numjobs=$NUM_JOBS thread EOF echo "Using config:" echo cat /tmp/fio-job.ini echo mkfs.btrfs -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $DEV &> /dev/null mount $MOUNT_OPTIONS $DEV $MNT fio /tmp/fio-job.ini umount $MNT The tests were performed for different numbers of jobs, file sizes and fsync frequency. A qemu VM using kvm was used, with 8 cores (the host has 12 cores, with cpu governance set to performance mode on all cores), 16GiB of ram (the host has 64GiB) and using a NVMe device directly (without an intermediary filesystem in the host). While running the tests, the host was not used for anything else, to avoid disturbing the tests. The obtained results were the following, and the last line printed by fio is pasted (includes aggregated throughput and test run time). ***************************************************** **** 1 job, 32GiB file, fsync frequency 1 **** ***************************************************** Before patchset: WRITE: bw=29.1MiB/s (30.5MB/s), 29.1MiB/s-29.1MiB/s (30.5MB/s-30.5MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=1127557-1127557msec After patchset: WRITE: bw=29.3MiB/s (30.7MB/s), 29.3MiB/s-29.3MiB/s (30.7MB/s-30.7MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=1119042-1119042msec (+0.7% throughput, -0.8% run time) ***************************************************** **** 2 jobs, 16GiB files, fsync frequency 1 **** ***************************************************** Before patchset: WRITE: bw=33.5MiB/s (35.1MB/s), 33.5MiB/s-33.5MiB/s (35.1MB/s-35.1MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=979000-979000msec After patchset: WRITE: bw=39.9MiB/s (41.8MB/s), 39.9MiB/s-39.9MiB/s (41.8MB/s-41.8MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=821283-821283msec (+19.1% throughput, -16.1% runtime) ***************************************************** **** 4 jobs, 8GiB files, fsync frequency 1 **** ***************************************************** Before patchset: WRITE: bw=52.1MiB/s (54.6MB/s), 52.1MiB/s-52.1MiB/s (54.6MB/s-54.6MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=629130-629130msec After patchset: WRITE: bw=71.8MiB/s (75.3MB/s), 71.8MiB/s-71.8MiB/s (75.3MB/s-75.3MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=456357-456357msec (+37.8% throughput, -27.5% runtime) ***************************************************** **** 8 jobs, 4GiB files, fsync frequency 1 **** ***************************************************** Before patchset: WRITE: bw=76.1MiB/s (79.8MB/s), 76.1MiB/s-76.1MiB/s (79.8MB/s-79.8MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=430708-430708msec After patchset: WRITE: bw=133MiB/s (140MB/s), 133MiB/s-133MiB/s (140MB/s-140MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=245458-245458msec (+74.7% throughput, -43.0% run time) ***************************************************** **** 16 jobs, 2GiB files, fsync frequency 1 **** ***************************************************** Before patchset: WRITE: bw=74.7MiB/s (78.3MB/s), 74.7MiB/s-74.7MiB/s (78.3MB/s-78.3MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=438625-438625msec After patchset: WRITE: bw=184MiB/s (193MB/s), 184MiB/s-184MiB/s (193MB/s-193MB/s), io=32.0GiB (34.4GB), run=177864-177864msec (+146.3% throughput, -59.5% run time) ***************************************************** **** 32 jobs, 2GiB files, fsync frequency 1 **** ***************************************************** Before patchset: WRITE: bw=72.6MiB/s (76.1MB/s), 72.6MiB/s-72.6MiB/s (76.1MB/s-76.1MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=902615-902615msec After patchset: WRITE: bw=227MiB/s (238MB/s), 227MiB/s-227MiB/s (238MB/s-238MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=288936-288936msec (+212.7% throughput, -68.0% run time) ***************************************************** **** 64 jobs, 1GiB files, fsync frequency 1 **** ***************************************************** Before patchset: WRITE: bw=98.8MiB/s (104MB/s), 98.8MiB/s-98.8MiB/s (104MB/s-104MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=663126-663126msec After patchset: WRITE: bw=294MiB/s (308MB/s), 294MiB/s-294MiB/s (308MB/s-308MB/s), io=64.0GiB (68.7GB), run=222940-222940msec (+197.6% throughput, -66.4% run time) Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
When removing an extent map at try_release_extent_mapping(), called through the page release callback (btrfs_releasepage()), we never release an extent map that is in the list of modified extents. This is to prevent races with a concurrent fsync using the fast path, which could lead to not logging an extent created in the current transaction. However we can safely remove an extent map created in a past transaction that is still in the list of modified extents (because no one fsynced yet the inode after that transaction got commited), because such extents are skipped during an fsync as it is pointless to log them. This change does that. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When releasing an extent map, done through the page release callback, we can race with an ongoing fast fsync and cause the fsync to miss a new extent and not log it. The steps for this to happen are the following: 1) A page is dirtied for some inode I; 2) Writeback for that page is triggered by a path other than fsync, for example by the system due to memory pressure; 3) When the ordered extent for the extent (a single 4K page) finishes, we unpin the corresponding extent map and set its generation to N, the current transaction's generation; 4) The btrfs_releasepage() callback is invoked by the system due to memory pressure for that no longer dirty page of inode I; 5) At the same time, some task calls fsync on inode I, joins transaction N, and at btrfs_log_inode() it sees that the inode does not have the full sync flag set, so we proceed with a fast fsync. But before we get into btrfs_log_changed_extents() and lock the inode's extent map tree: 6) Through btrfs_releasepage() we end up at try_release_extent_mapping() and we remove the extent map for the new 4Kb extent, because it is neither pinned anymore nor locked. By calling remove_extent_mapping(), we remove the extent map from the list of modified extents, since the extent map does not have the logging flag set. We unlock the inode's extent map tree; 7) The task doing the fast fsync now enters btrfs_log_changed_extents(), locks the inode's extent map tree and iterates its list of modified extents, which no longer has the 4Kb extent in it, so it does not log the extent; 8) The fsync finishes; 9) Before transaction N is committed, a power failure happens. After replaying the log, the 4K extent of inode I will be missing, since it was not logged due to the race with try_release_extent_mapping(). So fix this by teaching try_release_extent_mapping() to not remove an extent map if it's still in the list of modified extents. Fixes: ff44c6e3 ("Btrfs: do not hold the write_lock on the extent tree while logging") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
When we're (re)mounting a btrfs filesystem we set the BTRFS_FS_STATE_REMOUNTING state in fs_info to serialize against async reclaim or defrags. This flag is set in btrfs_remount_prepare() called by btrfs_remount(). As btrfs_remount_prepare() does nothing but setting this flag and doesn't have a second caller, we can just open-code the flag setting in btrfs_remount(). Similarly do for so clearing of the flag by moving it out of btrfs_remount_cleanup() into btrfs_remount() to be symmetrical. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Previously we depended on some weird behavior in our chunk allocator to force the allocation of new stripes, so by the time we got to doing the reduce we would usually already have a chunk with the proper target. However that behavior causes other problems and needs to be removed. First however we need to remove this check to only restripe if we already have those available profiles, because if we're allocating our first chunk it obviously will not be available. Simply use the target as specified, and if that fails it'll be because we're out of space. Tested-by:
Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
btrfs/061 has been failing consistently for me recently with a transaction abort. We run out of space in the system chunk array, which means we've allocated way too many system chunks than we need. Chris added this a long time ago for balance as a poor mans restriping. If you had a single disk and then added another disk and then did a balance, update_block_group_flags would then figure out which RAID level you needed. Fast forward to today and we have restriping behavior, so we can explicitly tell the fs that we're trying to change the raid level. This is accomplished through the normal get_alloc_profile path. Furthermore this code actually causes btrfs/061 to fail, because we do things like mkfs -m dup -d single with multiple devices. This trips this check alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(fs_info, cache->flags); if (alloc_flags != cache->flags) { ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, alloc_flags, CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE); in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro. Because we're balancing and scrubbing, but not actually restriping, we keep forcing chunk allocation of RAID1 chunks. This eventually causes us to run out of system space and the file system aborts and flips read only. We don't need this poor mans restriping any more, simply use the normal get_alloc_profile helper, which will get the correct alloc_flags and thus make the right decision for chunk allocation. This keeps us from allocating a billion system chunks and falling over. Tested-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
When running with -o enospc_debug you can get the following splat if one of the dump_space_info's trip ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc5+ #20 Tainted: G OE ------------------------------------------------------ dd/563090 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9e7dbf4f1e18 (&ctl->tree_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff9e7e2284d428 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0xaa/0x120 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 btrfs_add_reserved_bytes+0x3c/0x3c0 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x7ef/0x13b0 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x340 [btrfs] alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs] __btrfs_cow_block+0x122/0x530 [btrfs] btrfs_cow_block+0x106/0x210 [btrfs] commit_cowonly_roots+0x55/0x300 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4ed/0xac0 [btrfs] sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0x70 cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160 task_work_run+0x5f/0x90 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bd/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x5e/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&space_info->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x1a6/0x3f0 [btrfs] btrfs_inode_rsv_release+0x4f/0x170 [btrfs] btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent+0x155/0x480 [btrfs] clear_state_bit+0x81/0x1a0 [btrfs] __clear_extent_bit+0x25c/0x5d0 [btrfs] clear_extent_bit+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_invalidatepage+0x2b7/0x3c0 [btrfs] truncate_cleanup_page+0x47/0xe0 truncate_inode_pages_range+0x238/0x840 truncate_pagecache+0x44/0x60 btrfs_setattr+0x202/0x5e0 [btrfs] notify_change+0x33b/0x490 do_truncate+0x76/0xd0 path_openat+0x687/0xa10 do_filp_open+0x91/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x215/0x2d0 do_sys_open+0x44/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&tree->lock#2){+.+.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 find_first_extent_bit+0x32/0x150 [btrfs] write_pinned_extent_entries.isra.0+0xc5/0x100 [btrfs] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x172/0x480 [btrfs] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x7a/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x286/0x3b0 [btrfs] commit_cowonly_roots+0x245/0x300 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4ed/0xac0 [btrfs] close_ctree+0xf9/0x2f5 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0x70 cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160 task_work_run+0x5f/0x90 __prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x1bd/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x5e/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&ctl->tree_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: __lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460 lock_acquire+0xab/0x360 _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_dump_space_info+0xf4/0x120 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x176/0x180 [btrfs] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x145/0x550 [btrfs] cache_save_setup+0x28d/0x3b0 [btrfs] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1fc/0x4f0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcc/0xac0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x162/0x4c0 [btrfs] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_buffered_write.isra.0+0x19b/0x740 [btrfs] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x3cf/0x610 [btrfs] new_sync_write+0x11e/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x1c9/0x200 ksys_write+0x68/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &ctl->tree_lock --> &space_info->lock --> &cache->lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&cache->lock); lock(&space_info->lock); lock(&cache->lock); lock(&ctl->tree_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 6 locks held by dd/563090: #0: ffff9e7e21d18448 (sb_writers#14){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: vfs_write+0x195/0x200 #1: ffff9e7dd0410ed8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#19){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_file_write_iter+0x86/0x610 [btrfs] #2: ffff9e7e21d18638 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5b0 [btrfs] #3: ffff9e7e1f05d688 (&cur_trans->cache_write_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x158/0x4f0 [btrfs] #4: ffff9e7e2284ddb8 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0x69/0x120 [btrfs] #5: ffff9e7e2284d428 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_dump_space_info+0xaa/0x120 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 563090 Comm: dd Tainted: G OE 5.8.0-rc5+ #20 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./890FX Deluxe5, BIOS P1.40 05/03/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x96/0xd0 check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460 ? wake_up_klogd.part.0+0x30/0x40 lock_acquire+0xab/0x360 ? btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30 ? btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_dump_free_space+0x2b/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_dump_space_info+0xf4/0x120 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x176/0x180 [btrfs] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x145/0x550 [btrfs] ? btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data+0x1d/0x60 [btrfs] cache_save_setup+0x28d/0x3b0 [btrfs] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x1fc/0x4f0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xcc/0xac0 [btrfs] ? start_transaction+0xe0/0x5b0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x162/0x4c0 [btrfs] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_buffered_write.isra.0+0x19b/0x740 [btrfs] ? ktime_get_coarse_real_ts64+0xa8/0xd0 ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x1c/0xe0 btrfs_file_write_iter+0x3cf/0x610 [btrfs] new_sync_write+0x11e/0x1b0 vfs_write+0x1c9/0x200 ksys_write+0x68/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This is because we're holding the block_group->lock while trying to dump the free space cache. However we don't need this lock, we just need it to read the values for the printk, so move the free space cache dumping outside of the block group lock. Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
We are currently getting this lockdep splat in btrfs/161: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc5+ #20 Tainted: G E ------------------------------------------------------ mount/678048 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9b769f15b6e0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff9b76abdb08d0 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x6a/0x800 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x8b/0x8f0 btrfs_init_new_device+0x2d2/0x1240 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x1de/0x2d20 [btrfs] ksys_ioctl+0x87/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460 lock_acquire+0xab/0x360 __mutex_lock+0x8b/0x8f0 clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x330/0x800 [btrfs] open_ctree+0xb7c/0x18ce [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x13/0xfa [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 fc_mount+0xe/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 do_mount+0x7de/0xb30 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by mount/678048: #0: ffff9b75ff5fb0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#63/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xb5/0x380 #1: ffffffffc0c2fbc8 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x54/0x800 [btrfs] #2: ffff9b76abdb08d0 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x6a/0x800 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 678048 Comm: mount Tainted: G E 5.8.0-rc5+ #20 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./890FX Deluxe5, BIOS P1.40 05/03/2011 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x96/0xd0 check_noncircular+0x162/0x180 __lock_acquire+0x1240/0x2460 ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 lock_acquire+0xab/0x360 ? clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0x8b/0x8f0 ? clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x60 ? cpumask_next+0x16/0x20 ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0x14/0x40 ? __module_address+0x28/0xf0 ? clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] ? static_obj+0x4f/0x60 ? lockdep_init_map_waits+0x43/0x200 ? clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] clone_fs_devices+0x4d/0x170 [btrfs] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x330/0x800 [btrfs] open_ctree+0xb7c/0x18ce [btrfs] ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0 btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x13/0xfa [btrfs] ? vfs_parse_fs_string+0x84/0xb0 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x60 ? kfree+0x2b5/0x310 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 fc_mount+0xe/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs] ? cred_has_capability+0x7c/0x120 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x52/0x60 ? legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 do_mount+0x7de/0xb30 ? memdup_user+0x4e/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This is because btrfs_read_chunk_tree() can come upon DEV_EXTENT's and then read the device, which takes the device_list_mutex. The device_list_mutex needs to be taken before the chunk_mutex, so this is a problem. We only really need the chunk mutex around adding the chunk, so move the mutex around read_one_chunk. An argument could be made that we don't even need the chunk_mutex here as it's during mount, and we are protected by various other locks. However we already have special rules for ->device_list_mutex, and I'd rather not have another special case for ->chunk_mutex. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
There's long existed a lockdep splat because we open our bdev's under the ->device_list_mutex at mount time, which acquires the bd_mutex. Usually this goes unnoticed, but if you do loopback devices at all suddenly the bd_mutex comes with a whole host of other dependencies, which results in the splat when you mount a btrfs file system. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-0.rc3.1.fc33.x86_64+debug #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ systemd-journal/509 is trying to acquire lock: ffff970831f84db0 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff97083144d598 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x59/0x560 [btrfs] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}: __sb_start_write+0x13e/0x220 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x59/0x560 [btrfs] do_page_mkwrite+0x4f/0x130 do_wp_page+0x3b0/0x4f0 handle_mm_fault+0xf47/0x1850 do_user_addr_fault+0x1fc/0x4b0 exc_page_fault+0x88/0x300 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 -> #5 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x60/0x80 _copy_from_user+0x20/0xb0 get_sg_io_hdr+0x9a/0xb0 scsi_cmd_ioctl+0x1ea/0x2f0 cdrom_ioctl+0x3c/0x12b4 sr_block_ioctl+0xa4/0xd0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 ksys_ioctl+0x82/0xc0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #4 (&cd->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820 sr_block_open+0xa2/0x180 __blkdev_get+0xdd/0x550 blkdev_get+0x38/0x150 do_dentry_open+0x16b/0x3e0 path_openat+0x3c9/0xa00 do_filp_open+0x75/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x8a/0x140 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820 __blkdev_get+0x6a/0x550 blkdev_get+0x85/0x150 blkdev_get_by_path+0x2c/0x70 btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] open_fs_devices+0x88/0x240 [btrfs] btrfs_open_devices+0x92/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root+0x250/0x490 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 btrfs_mount+0x119/0x380 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 do_mount+0x8c6/0xca0 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820 btrfs_run_dev_stats+0x36/0x420 [btrfs] commit_cowonly_roots+0x91/0x2d0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x4e6/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_sync_file+0x38a/0x480 [btrfs] __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x47/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->tree_log_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x48e/0x9f0 [btrfs] btrfs_sync_file+0x38a/0x480 [btrfs] __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x47/0x80 do_syscall_64+0x52/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x20c0 lock_acquire+0xb0/0x400 __mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs] start_transaction+0xd2/0x500 [btrfs] btrfs_dirty_inode+0x44/0xd0 [btrfs] file_update_time+0xc6/0x120 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0xda/0x560 [btrfs] do_page_mkwrite+0x4f/0x130 do_wp_page+0x3b0/0x4f0 handle_mm_fault+0xf47/0x1850 do_user_addr_fault+0x1fc/0x4b0 exc_page_fault+0x88/0x300 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &fs_info->reloc_mutex --> &mm->mmap_lock#2 --> sb_pagefaults Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(sb_pagefaults); lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); lock(sb_pagefaults); lock(&fs_info->reloc_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by systemd-journal/509: #0: ffff97083bdec8b8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: do_user_addr_fault+0x12e/0x4b0 #1: ffff97083144d598 (sb_pagefaults){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x59/0x560 [btrfs] #2: ffff97083144d6a8 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x3f8/0x500 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 509 Comm: systemd-journal Not tainted 5.8.0-0.rc3.1.fc33.x86_64+debug #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x92/0xc8 check_noncircular+0x134/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1241/0x20c0 lock_acquire+0xb0/0x400 ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0xb0/0x400 ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0x7b/0x820 ? btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x30 ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xc/0xb0 btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x44/0x70 [btrfs] start_transaction+0xd2/0x500 [btrfs] btrfs_dirty_inode+0x44/0xd0 [btrfs] file_update_time+0xc6/0x120 btrfs_page_mkwrite+0xda/0x560 [btrfs] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 do_page_mkwrite+0x4f/0x130 do_wp_page+0x3b0/0x4f0 handle_mm_fault+0xf47/0x1850 do_user_addr_fault+0x1fc/0x4b0 exc_page_fault+0x88/0x300 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7fa3972fdbfe Code: Bad RIP value. Fix this by not holding the ->device_list_mutex at this point. The device_list_mutex exists to protect us from modifying the device list while the file system is running. However it can also be modified by doing a scan on a device. But this action is specifically protected by the uuid_mutex, which we are holding here. We cannot race with opening at this point because we have the ->s_mount lock held during the mount. Not having the ->device_list_mutex here is perfectly safe as we're not going to change the devices at this point. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
Dave hit this splat during testing btrfs/078: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.8.0-rc6-default+ #1191 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/75 is trying to acquire lock: ffffa040e9d04ff8 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8b0c8040 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 __kmalloc_track_caller+0x49/0x330 kstrdup+0x2e/0x60 __kernfs_new_node.constprop.0+0x44/0x250 kernfs_new_node+0x25/0x50 kernfs_create_link+0x34/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x65/0x100 [btrfs] btrfs_init_new_device+0x44c/0x12b0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xc3c/0x25c0 [btrfs] ksys_ioctl+0x68/0xa0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x137/0x3e0 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0xb44/0xfb0 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x9b/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xc1/0x350 [btrfs] alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 [btrfs] __btrfs_cow_block+0x143/0x7a0 [btrfs] btrfs_cow_block+0x15f/0x310 [btrfs] push_leaf_right+0x150/0x240 [btrfs] split_leaf+0x3cd/0x6d0 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0xd14/0xf70 [btrfs] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xc0 [btrfs] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xb2/0x840 [btrfs] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x10e/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x2f9/0x650 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x22c/0x600 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x98/0xa20 validate_chain+0xa8c/0x2a00 __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3bf/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x175/0x420 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x192/0x600 balance_pgdat+0x31f/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x510 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> &fs_info->chunk_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/75: #0: ffffffff8b0c8040 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8b0b50b8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0 #2: ffffa040e057c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 75 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.8.0-rc6-default+ #1191 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x78/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x16f/0x190 check_prev_add+0x98/0xa20 validate_chain+0xa8c/0x2a00 __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] ? __lock_acquire+0x56f/0xaa0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] ? lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x138/0x560 [btrfs] ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x2fe/0x560 [btrfs] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3bf/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x175/0x420 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x192/0x600 balance_pgdat+0x31f/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x510 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x50 ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750 kthread+0x137/0x150 ? kthread_stop+0x2a0/0x2a0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This is because we're holding the chunk_mutex while adding this device and adding its sysfs entries. We actually hold different locks in different places when calling this function, the dev_replace semaphore for instance in dev replace, so instead of moving this call around simply wrap it's operations in NOFS. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reported-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
Eric reported seeing this message while running generic/475 BTRFS: error (device dm-3) in btrfs_sync_log:3084: errno=-117 Filesystem corrupted Full stack trace: BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2323: errno=-5 IO failure (Error while writing out transaction) BTRFS info (device dm-0): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device dm-0): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in cleanup_transaction:1894: errno=-5 IO failure BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -117) BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6480 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6488 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6490 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c6498 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64a0 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64a8 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64b0 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64b8 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3555 rw 0,0 sector 0x1c64c0 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3572 rw 0,0 sector 0x1b85e8 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3572 rw 0,0 sector 0x1b85f0 len 4096 err no 10 WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 23985 at fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:3084 btrfs_sync_log+0xbc8/0xd60 [btrfs] BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4288 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4290 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d4298 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42a0 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42a8 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42b0 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42b8 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42c0 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42c8 len 4096 err no 10 BTRFS warning (device dm-0): direct IO failed ino 3548 rw 0,0 sector 0x1d42d0 len 4096 err no 10 CPU: 3 PID: 23985 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W L 5.8.0-rc4-default+ #1181 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_sync_log+0xbc8/0xd60 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffff909a44d17bd0 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: ffff8f3be41cb940 RSI: ffffffffb0108d2b RDI: ffffffffb0108ff7 RBP: ffff909a44d17e70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000037988 R12: ffff8f3bd20e4000 R13: ffff8f3bd20e4428 R14: 00000000ffffff8b R15: ffff909a44d17c70 FS: 00007f6a6ed3fb80(0000) GS:ffff8f3c3dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f6a6ed3e000 CR3: 00000000525c0003 CR4: 0000000000160ee0 Call Trace: ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x45/0x2a0 ? lock_acquire+0xa3/0x440 ? lockref_put_or_lock+0x9/0x30 ? dput+0x20/0x4a0 ? dput+0x20/0x4a0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xc0 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x30 btrfs_sync_file+0x335/0x490 [btrfs] do_fsync+0x38/0x70 __x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x50/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f6a6ef1b6e3 Code: Bad RIP value. RSP: 002b:00007ffd01e20038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000007a120 RCX: 00007f6a6ef1b6e3 RDX: 00007ffd01e1ffa0 RSI: 00007ffd01e1ffa0 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffd01e2004c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000009f R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb007fe0b>] copy_process+0x67b/0x1b00 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb007fe0b>] copy_process+0x67b/0x1b00 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ---[ end trace af146e0e38433456 ]--- BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in btrfs_sync_log:3084: errno=-117 Filesystem corrupted This ret came from btrfs_write_marked_extents(). If we get an aborted transaction via EIO before, we'll see it in btree_write_cache_pages() and return EUCLEAN, which gets printed as "Filesystem corrupted". Except we shouldn't be returning EUCLEAN here, we need to be returning EROFS because EUCLEAN is reserved for actual corruption, not IO errors. We are inconsistent about our handling of BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR elsewhere, but we want to use EROFS for this particular case. The original transaction abort has the real error code for why we ended up with an aborted transaction, all subsequent actions just need to return EROFS because they may not have a trans handle and have no idea about the original cause of the abort. After patch "btrfs: don't WARN if we abort a transaction with EROFS" the stacktrace will not be dumped either. Reported-by:
Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We've had some discussions about what to do in certain scenarios for error codes, specifically EUCLEAN and EROFS. Document these near the error handling code so its clear what their intentions are. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
If we got some sort of corruption via a read and call btrfs_handle_fs_error() we'll set BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR on the fs and complain. If a subsequent trans handle trips over this it'll get EROFS and then abort. However at that point we're not aborting for the original reason, we're aborting because we've been flipped read only. We do not need to WARN_ON() here. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by:
-
