When in a low memory situation, we do want rpciod to kick off direct
reclaim in the case where that helps, however we don't want it looping
forever in mempool_alloc().
So first try allocating from the slab using GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY,
and then fall back to a GFP_NOWAIT allocation from the mempool.

Ditto for rpc_alloc_task()
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

The current code checks for whether or not the socket is in a writeable
state after we get an EAGAIN. That is racy, since we've dropped the
socket lock, so the amount of free buffer may have changed.

Instead, let's check whether the socket is writeable before we try to
write to it. If that was the case, we do expect the message to be at
least partially sent unless we're in a low memory situation.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

The socket's SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE can be cleared by various actors in
the socket layer, so replace it with our own flag in the transport
sock_state field.
Reported-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

The socket layer requires that we use the socket lock to protect changes
to the sock->sk_write_pending field and others.
Reported-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Since the RPC client uses a non-blocking connect(), we do not expect to
see it return '0' under normal circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Avoid socket state races due to repeated calls to ->connect() using the
same socket. If connect() returns 0 due to the connection having
completed, but we are in fact in a closing state, then we may leave the
XPRT_CONNECTING flag set on the transport.
Reported-by: Enrico Scholz <enrico.scholz@sigma-chemnitz.de>
Fixes: 3be232f1 ("SUNRPC: Prevent immediate close+reconnect")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If the page is empty, we need to check the array->last_cookie instead of
the first entry. Add a helper for the cases where we care.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

In the very rare case where the readdir reply contains multiple cookies
that map to the same hash value, we can end up deadlocking waiting for a
page lock that we already hold. In this case we should fail the page
lock by using grab_cache_page_nowait().
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Introduce a new mount option -- trunkdiscovery,notrunkdiscovery -- to
toggle whether or not the client will engage in actively discovery
of trunking locations.

v2 make notrunkdiscovery default
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Fixes: 1976b2b3 ("NFSv4.1 query for fs_location attr on a new file system")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

It is not in general safe to wait for XPRT_LOCKED to clear.
A wakeup is only sent when
 - connection completes
 - sock close completes
so during normal operations, this can wait indefinitely.

The event we need to protect against is ->inet being set to NULL, and
that happens under the recv_mutex lock.

So drop the handlign of XPRT_LOCKED and use recv_mutex instead.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

The commit handling code is not safe against memory-pressure deadlocks
when writing to swap.  In particular, nfs_commitdata_alloc() blocks
indefinitely waiting for memory, and this can consume all available
workqueue threads.

swap-out most likely uses STABLE writes anyway as COND_STABLE indicates
that a stable write should be used if the write fits in a single
request, and it normally does.  However if we ever swap with a small
wsize, or gather unusually large numbers of pages for a single write,
this might change.

For safety, make it explicit in the code that direct writes used for swap
must always use FLUSH_STABLE.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

1/ Taking the i_rwsem for swap IO triggers lockdep warnings regarding
   possible deadlocks with "fs_reclaim".  These deadlocks could, I believe,
   eventuate if a buffered read on the swapfile was attempted.

   We don't need coherence with the page cache for a swap file, and
   buffered writes are forbidden anyway.  There is no other need for
   i_rwsem during direct IO.  So never take it for swap_rw()

2/ generic_write_checks() explicitly forbids writes to swap, and
   performs checks that are not needed for swap.  So bypass it
   for swap_rw().
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If we are swapping over NFSv4, we may not be able to allocate memory to
start the state-manager thread at the time when we need it.
So keep it always running when swap is enabled, and just signal it to
start.

This requires updating and testing the cl_swapper count on the root
rpc_clnt after following all ->cl_parent links.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

rpc tasks can be marked as RPC_TASK_SWAPPER.  This causes GFP_MEMALLOC
to be used for some allocations.  This is needed in some cases, but not
in all where it is currently provided, and in some where it isn't
provided.

Currently *all* tasks associated with a rpc_client on which swap is
enabled get the flag and hence some GFP_MEMALLOC support.

GFP_MEMALLOC is provided for ->buf_alloc() but only swap-writes need it.
However xdr_alloc_bvec does not get GFP_MEMALLOC - though it often does
need it.

xdr_alloc_bvec is called while the XPRT_LOCK is held.  If this blocks,
then it blocks all other queued tasks.  So this allocation needs
GFP_MEMALLOC for *all* requests, not just writes, when the xprt is used
for any swap writes.

Similarly, if the transport is not connected, that will block all
requests including swap writes, so memory allocations should get
GFP_MEMALLOC if swap writes are possible.

So with this patch:
 1/ we ONLY set RPC_TASK_SWAPPER for swap writes.
 2/ __rpc_execute() sets PF_MEMALLOC while handling any task
    with RPC_TASK_SWAPPER set, or when handling any task that
    holds the XPRT_LOCKED lock on an xprt used for swap.
    This removes the need for the RPC_IS_SWAPPER() test
    in ->buf_alloc handlers.
 3/ xprt_prepare_transmit() sets PF_MEMALLOC after locking
    any task to a swapper xprt.  __rpc_execute() will clear it.
 3/ PF_MEMALLOC is set for all the connect workers.

Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> (for xprtrdma parts)
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

NFS_RPC_SWAPFLAGS is only used for READ requests.
It sets RPC_TASK_SWAPPER which gives some memory-allocation priority to
requests.  This is not needed for swap READ - though it is for writes
where it is set via a different mechanism.

RPC_TASK_ROOTCREDS causes the 'machine' credential to be used.
This is not needed as the root credential is saved when the swap file is
opened, and this is used for all IO.

So NFS_RPC_SWAPFLAGS isn't needed, and as it is the only user of
RPC_TASK_ROOTCREDS, that isn't needed either.

Remove both.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Currently, tasks marked as "swapper" tasks get put to the front of
non-priority rpc_queues, and are sorted earlier than non-swapper tasks on
the transport's ->xmit_queue.

This is pointless as currently *all* tasks for a mount that has swap
enabled on *any* file are marked as "swapper" tasks.  So the net result
is that the non-priority rpc_queues are reverse-ordered (LIFO).

This scheduling boost is not necessary to avoid deadlocks, and hurts
fairness, so remove it.  If there were a need to expedite some requests,
the tk_priority mechanism is a more appropriate tool.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

When memory is short, new worker threads cannot be created and we depend
on the minimum one rpciod thread to be able to handle everything.  So it
must not block waiting for memory.

xprt_dynamic_alloc_slot can block indefinitely.  This can tie up all
workqueue threads and NFS can deadlock.  So when called from a
workqueue, set __GFP_NORETRY.

The rdma alloc_slot already does not block.  However it sets the error
to -EAGAIN suggesting this will trigger a sleep.  It does not.  As we
can see in call_reserveresult(), only -ENOMEM causes a sleep.  -EAGAIN
causes immediate retry.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

When memory is short, new worker threads cannot be created and we depend
on the minimum one rpciod thread to be able to handle everything.  So it
must not block waiting for memory.

mempools are particularly a problem as memory can only be released back
to the mempool by an async rpc task running.  If all available workqueue
threads are waiting on the mempool, no thread is available to return
anything.

lookup_cred() can block on a mempool or kmalloc - and this can cause
deadlocks.  So add a new RPCAUTH_LOOKUP flag for async lookups and don't
block on memory.  If the -ENOMEM gets back to call_refreshresult(), wait
a short while and try again.  HZ>>4 is chosen as it is used elsewhere
for -ENOMEM retries.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

When memory is short, new worker threads cannot be created and we depend
on the minimum one rpciod thread to be able to handle everything.
So it must not block waiting for memory.

mempools are particularly a problem as memory can only be released back
to the mempool by an async rpc task running.  If all available
workqueue threads are waiting on the mempool, no thread is available to
return anything.

rpc_malloc() can block, and this might cause deadlocks.
So check RPC_IS_ASYNC(), rather than RPC_IS_SWAPPER() to determine if
blocking is acceptable.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

This code is pointless as IS_SWAPFILE is always defined.
So remove it.
Suggested-by: Mark Hemment <markhemm@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

The fscache cookie APIs including fscache_acquire_cookie() and
fscache_relinquish_cookie() now have very good tracing.  Thus,
there is no real need for dfprintks in the NFS fscache interface.

The NFS fscache interface has removed all dfprintks so remove the
NFSDBG_FSCACHE defines.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Most of fscache and other NFS IO paths are now using tracepoints.
Remove the dfprintks in the NFS fscache read/write page functions
and replace with tracepoints at the begin and end of the functions.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Rename NFS fscache functions in a more consistent fashion
to better reflect when we read from and write to fscache.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

A number of places in the fscache interface used nfs_inode when inode could
be used, simplifying the code.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

In the presence of trunking transports, it's helpful to make sure
that during the migration event, the GETATTR for fs_location attribute
happens on the main transport.
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

[You don't often get email from khoroshilov@ispras.ru. Learn why this is important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]

Overflow check in not needed anymore after we switch to kmalloc_array().
Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>
Fixes: a4f743a6 ("NFSv4.1: Convert open-coded array allocation calls to kmalloc_array()")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Even if we're not able to cache all the entries in the readdir buffer,
let's ensure that we do prime the dcache.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Replace the 'previous cookie' field in struct nfs_entry with the
array->last_cookie.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Avoid clearing the entire readdir page cache if we're just doing forced
readdirplus for the 'ls -l' heuristic.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Instead of using a linear index to address the pages, use the cookie of
the first entry, since that is what we use to match the page anyway.

This allows us to avoid re-reading the entire cache on a seekdir() type
of operation. The latter is very common when re-exporting NFS, and is a
major performance drain.

The change does affect our duplicate cookie detection, since we can no
longer rely on the page index as a linear offset for detecting whether
we looped backwards. However since we no longer do a linear search
through all the pages on each call to nfs_readdir(), this is less of a
concern than it was previously.
The other downside is that invalidate_mapping_pages() no longer can use
the page index to avoid clearing pages that have been read. A subsequent
patch will restore the functionality this provides to the 'ls -l'
heuristic.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Enable tracking of when the readdirplus heuristic causes a page cache
invalidation.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Trace the effects of readdirplus on attribute and dentry revalidation.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Add tracing to track how often the client goes to the server for updated
readdir information.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If the revalidation was forced, due to the presence of a LOOKUP_EXCL or
a LOOKUP_REVAL flag, then readdirplus won't help. It also can't help
when we're doing a path component lookup.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If the filesystem is case insensitive, then readdirplus can't help with
cache misses, since it won't return case folded variants of the filename.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Instead of pretending that we know the ratio of directory info vs
readdirplus attribute info, just set the 'dircount' field to the same
value as the 'maxcount' field.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

If attribute caching is turned off, then use of readdirplus is not going
to help stat() performance.
Readdirplus also doesn't help if a file is being written to, since we
will have to flush those writes in order to sync the mtime/ctime.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

The heuristic for readdirplus is designed to try to detect 'ls -l' and
similar patterns. It does so by looking for cache hit/miss patterns in
both the attribute cache and in the dcache of the files in a given
directory, and then sets a flag for the readdirplus code to interpret.

The problem with this approach is that a single attribute or dcache miss
can cause the NFS code to force a refresh of the attributes for the
entire set of files contained in the directory.

To be able to make a more nuanced decision, let's sample the number of
hits and misses in the set of open directory descriptors. That allows us
to set thresholds at which we start preferring READDIRPLUS over regular
READDIR, or at which we start to force a re-read of the remaining
readdir cache using READDIRPLUS.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

When reading a very large directory, we want to try to keep the page
cache up to date if doing so is inexpensive. With the change to allow
readdir to continue reading even when the cache is incomplete, we no
longer need to fall back to uncached readdir in order to scale to large
directories.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>