When creating a subvolume, at create_subvol(), we allocate an anonymous
device and later call btrfs_get_new_fs_root(), which in turn just calls
btrfs_get_root_ref(). There we call btrfs_init_fs_root() which assigns
the anonymous device to the root, but if after that call there's an error,
when we jump to 'fail' label, we call btrfs_put_root(), which frees the
anonymous device and then returns an error that is propagated back to
create_subvol(). Than create_subvol() frees the anonymous device again.

When this happens, if the anonymous device was not reallocated after
the first time it was freed with btrfs_put_root(), we get a kernel
message like the following:

  (...)
  [13950.282466] BTRFS: error (device dm-0) in create_subvol:663: errno=-5 IO failure
  [13950.283027] ida_free called for id=65 which is not allocated.
  [13950.285974] BTRFS info (device dm-0): forced readonly
  (...)

If the anonymous device gets reallocated by another btrfs filesystem
or any other kernel subsystem, then bad things can happen.

So fix this by setting the root's anonymous device to 0 at
btrfs_get_root_ref(), before we call btrfs_put_root(), if an error
happened.

Fixes: 2dfb1e43 ("btrfs: preallocate anon block device at first phase of snapshot creation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Line 1169 (#3) allocates a memory chunk for victim_name by kmalloc(),
but  when the function returns in line 1184 (#4) victim_name allocated
by line 1169 (#3) is not freed, which will lead to a memory leak.
There is a similar snippet of code in this function as allocating a memory
chunk for victim_name in line 1104 (#1) as well as releasing the memory
in line 1116 (#2).

We should kfree() victim_name when the return value of backref_in_log()
is less than zero and before the function returns in line 1184 (#4).

1057 static inline int __add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
1058 				  struct btrfs_root *root,
1059 				  struct btrfs_path *path,
1060 				  struct btrfs_root *log_root,
1061 				  struct btrfs_inode *dir,
1062 				  struct btrfs_inode *inode,
1063 				  u64 inode_objectid, u64 parent_objectid,
1064 				  u64 ref_index, char *name, int namelen,
1065 				  int *search_done)
1066 {

1104 	victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS);
	// #1: kmalloc (victim_name-1)
1105 	if (!victim_name)
1106 		return -ENOMEM;

1112	ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key,
1113			parent_objectid, victim_name,
1114			victim_name_len);
1115	if (ret < 0) {
1116		kfree(victim_name); // #2: kfree (victim_name-1)
1117		return ret;
1118	} else if (!ret) {

1169 	victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS);
	// #3: kmalloc (victim_name-2)
1170 	if (!victim_name)
1171 		return -ENOMEM;

1180 	ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key,
1181 			parent_objectid, victim_name,
1182 			victim_name_len);
1183 	if (ret < 0) {
1184 		return ret; // #4: missing kfree (victim_name-2)
1185 	} else if (!ret) {

1241 	return 0;
1242 }

Fixes: d3316c82 ("btrfs: Properly handle backref_in_log retval")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I hit the BUG_ON() with generic/475 test case, and to my surprise, all
callers of btrfs_del_root_ref() are already aborting transaction, thus
there is not need for such BUG_ON(), just go to @out label and caller
will properly handle the error.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When finishing a zone that is used by a dedicated data relocation
block group, also remove its reference from fs_info, so we're not trying
to use a full block group for allocations during data relocation, which
will always fail.

The result is we're not making any forward progress and end up in a
deadlock situation.

Fixes: c2707a25 ("btrfs: zoned: add a dedicated data relocation block group")
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fstests runs on my VMs have show several kmemleak reports like the following.

  unreferenced object 0xffff88811ae59080 (size 64):
    comm "xfs_io", pid 12124, jiffies 4294987392 (age 6.368s)
    hex dump (first 32 bytes):
      00 c0 1c 00 00 00 00 00 ff cf 1c 00 00 00 00 00  ................
      90 97 e5 1a 81 88 ff ff 90 97 e5 1a 81 88 ff ff  ................
    backtrace:
      [<00000000ac0176d2>] ulist_add_merge+0x60/0x150 [btrfs]
      [<0000000076e9f312>] set_state_bits+0x86/0xc0 [btrfs]
      [<0000000014fe73d6>] set_extent_bit+0x270/0x690 [btrfs]
      [<000000004f675208>] set_record_extent_bits+0x19/0x20 [btrfs]
      [<00000000b96137b1>] qgroup_reserve_data+0x274/0x310 [btrfs]
      [<0000000057e9dcbb>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x5c/0xa0 [btrfs]
      [<0000000019c4511d>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1b/0xa0 [btrfs]
      [<000000006d37e007>] btrfs_dio_iomap_begin+0x415/0x970 [btrfs]
      [<00000000fb8a74b8>] iomap_iter+0x161/0x1e0
      [<0000000071dff6ff>] __iomap_dio_rw+0x1df/0x700
      [<000000002567ba53>] iomap_dio_rw+0x5/0x20
      [<0000000072e555f8>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x290/0x530 [btrfs]
      [<000000005eb3d845>] new_sync_write+0x106/0x180
      [<000000003fb505bf>] vfs_write+0x24d/0x2f0
      [<000000009bb57d37>] __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x69/0xa0
      [<000000003eba3fdf>] do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90

In case brtfs_qgroup_reserve_data() or btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata()
fail the allocated extent_changeset will not be freed.

So in btrfs_check_data_free_space() and btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space()
free the allocated extent_changeset to get rid of the allocated memory.

The issue currently only happens in the direct IO write path, but only
after 65b3c08606e5 ("btrfs: fix ENOSPC failure when attempting direct IO
write into NOCOW range"), and also at defrag_one_locked_target(). Every
other place is always calling extent_changeset_free() even if its call
to btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() or btrfs_check_data_free_space() has
failed.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There is a report of a transaction abort of -EAGAIN with the following
script.

  #!/bin/sh

  for d in sda sdb; do
          mkfs.btrfs -d single -m single -f /dev/\${d}
  done

  mount /dev/sda /mnt/test
  mount /dev/sdb /mnt/scratch

  for dir in test scratch; do
          echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
          fio --directory=/mnt/\${dir} --name=fio.\${dir} --rw=read --size=50G --bs=64m \
                  --numjobs=$(nproc) --time_based --ramp_time=5 --runtime=480 \
                  --group_reporting |& tee /dev/shm/fio.\${dir}
          echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
  done

  for d in sda sdb; do
          umount /dev/\${d}
  done

The stack trace is shown in below.

  [3310.967991] BTRFS: error (device sda) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2341: errno=-11 unknown (Error while writing out transaction)
  [3310.968060] BTRFS info (device sda): forced readonly
  [3310.968064] BTRFS warning (device sda): Skipping commit of aborted transaction.
  [3310.968065] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [3310.968066] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -11)
  [3310.968074] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 1684 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1946 btrfs_commit_transaction.cold+0x209/0x2c8
  [3310.968131] CPU: 14 PID: 1684 Comm: fio Not tainted 5.14.10-300.fc35.x86_64 #1
  [3310.968135] Hardware name: DIAWAY Tartu/Tartu, BIOS V2.01.B10 04/08/2021
  [3310.968137] RIP: 0010:btrfs_commit_transaction.cold+0x209/0x2c8
  [3310.968144] RSP: 0018:ffffb284ce393e10 EFLAGS: 00010282
  [3310.968147] RAX: 0000000000000026 RBX: ffff973f147b0f60 RCX: 0000000000000027
  [3310.968149] RDX: ffff974ecf098a08 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff974ecf098a00
  [3310.968150] RBP: ffff973f147b0f08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffb284ce393c48
  [3310.968151] R10: ffffb284ce393c40 R11: ffffffff84f47468 R12: ffff973f101bfc00
  [3310.968153] R13: ffff971f20cf2000 R14: 00000000fffffff5 R15: ffff973f147b0e58
  [3310.968154] FS:  00007efe65468740(0000) GS:ffff974ecf080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [3310.968157] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [3310.968158] CR2: 000055691bcbe260 CR3: 000000105cfa4001 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
  [3310.968160] PKRU: 55555554
  [3310.968161] Call Trace:
  [3310.968167]  ? dput+0xd4/0x300
  [3310.968174]  btrfs_sync_file+0x3f1/0x490
  [3310.968180]  __x64_sys_fsync+0x33/0x60
  [3310.968185]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
  [3310.968190]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
  [3310.968194] RIP: 0033:0x7efe6557329b
  [3310.968200] RSP: 002b:00007ffe0236ebc0 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
  [3310.968203] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007efe6557329b
  [3310.968204] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007efe58d77010 RDI: 0000000000000006
  [3310.968205] RBP: 0000000004000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007efe58d77010
  [3310.968207] R10: 0000000016cacc0c R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 00007efe5ce95980
  [3310.968208] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007efe6447c790 R15: 0000000c80000000
  [3310.968212] ---[ end trace 1a346f4d3c0d96ba ]---
  [3310.968214] BTRFS: error (device sda) in cleanup_transaction:1946: errno=-11 unknown

The abort occurs because of a write hole while writing out freeing tree
nodes of a tree-log tree. For zoned btrfs, we re-dirty a freed tree
node to ensure btrfs can write the region and does not leave a hole on
write on a zoned device. The current code fails to re-dirty a node
when the tree-log tree's depth is greater or equal to 2. That leads to
a transaction abort with -EAGAIN.

Fix the issue by properly re-dirtying a node on walking up the tree.

Fixes: d3575156 ("btrfs: zoned: redirty released extent buffers")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+
Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/415Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

generic/484 fails sometimes with compression on because the write ends
up small enough that it goes into the btree.  This means that we never
call mapping_set_error() on the inode itself, because the page gets
marked as fine when we inline it into the metadata.  When the metadata
writeback happens we see it and abort the transaction properly and mark
the fs as readonly, however we don't do the mapping_set_error() on
anything.  In syncfs() we will simply return 0 if the sb is marked
read-only, so we can't check for this in our syncfs callback.  The only
way the error gets returned if we called mapping_set_error() on
something.  Fix this by calling mapping_set_error() on the btree inode
mapping.  This allows us to properly return an error on syncfs and pass
generic/484 with compression on.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I got dmesg errors on generic/281 on our overnight fstests.  Looking at
the history this happens occasionally, with errors like this

  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 673217 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:6848 assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50
  CPU: 0 PID: 673217 Comm: kworker/u4:13 Tainted: G        W         5.16.0-rc2+ #469
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_work_helper
  RIP: 0010:assert_eb_page_uptodate+0x3f/0x50
  RSP: 0018:ffffae598230bc60 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0017ffffc0002112 RBX: ffffebaec4100900 RCX: 0000000000001000
  RDX: ffffebaec45733c7 RSI: ffffebaec4100900 RDI: ffff9fd98919f340
  RBP: 0000000000000d56 R08: ffff9fd98e300000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0001207370a91c50 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000000007b0
  R13: ffff9fd98919f340 R14: 0000000001500000 R15: 0000000001cb0000
  FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9fd9fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007f549fcf8940 CR3: 0000000114908004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
  Call Trace:

   extent_buffer_test_bit+0x3f/0x70
   free_space_test_bit+0xa6/0xc0
   load_free_space_tree+0x1d6/0x430
   caching_thread+0x454/0x630
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x12/0x60
   ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0
   btrfs_work_helper+0xf2/0x3e0
   ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2d0
   ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xf9/0x3a0
   process_one_work+0x270/0x5a0
   worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
   ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0
   kthread+0x174/0x1a0
   ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

This happens because we're trying to read from a extent buffer page that
is !PageUptodate.  This happens because we will clear the page uptodate
when we have an IO error, but we don't clear the extent buffer uptodate.
If we do a read later and find this extent buffer we'll think its valid
and not return an error, and then trip over this warning.

Fix this by also clearing uptodate on the extent buffer when this
happens, so that we get an error when we do a btrfs_search_slot() and
find this block later.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We've always been failing generic/260 because it's testing things we
actually don't care about and thus won't fail for.  However we probably
should fail for fstrim_range->start == U64_MAX since we clearly can't
trim anything past that.  This in combination with an update to
generic/260 will allow us to pass this test properly.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If memdup_user() fails the error handing will crash when it tries
to kfree() an error pointer.  Just return directly because there is
no cleanup required.

Fixes: 1a15eb72 ("btrfs: use btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path in dev removal ioctls")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[BUG]
Fstests generic/027 is pretty easy to trigger a slow but steady memory
leak if run with "-o compress=lzo" mount option.

Normally one single run of generic/027 is enough to eat up at least 4G ram.

[CAUSE]
In commit d4088803 ("btrfs: subpage: make lzo_compress_pages()
compatible") we changed how @page_in is released.

But that refactoring makes @page_in only released after all pages being
compressed.

This leaves error path not releasing @page_in. And by "error path"
things like incompressible data will also be treated as an error
(-E2BIG).

Thus it can cause a memory leak if even nothing wrong happened.

[FIX]
Add check under @out label to release @page_in when needed, so when we
hit any error, the input page is properly released.
Reported-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Fixes: d4088803 ("btrfs: subpage: make lzo_compress_pages() compatible")
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The v2 balance ioctl has been introduced more than 9 years ago. Users of
the old v1 ioctl should have long been migrated to it. It's time we
deprecate it and eventually remove it.

The only known user is in btrfs-progs that tries v1 as a fallback in
case v2 is not supported. This is not necessary anymore.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The bitfields have_csum and io_error are currently signed which is not
recommended as the representation is an implementation defined
behaviour. Fix this by making the bit-fields unsigned ints.

Fixes: 2c363954 ("btrfs: scrub: remove the anonymous structure from scrub_page")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When a disk has write caching disabled, we skip submission of a bio with
flush and sync requests before writing the superblock, since it's not
needed. However when the integrity checker is enabled, this results in
reports that there are metadata blocks referred by a superblock that
were not properly flushed. So don't skip the bio submission only when
the integrity checker is enabled for the sake of simplicity, since this
is a debug tool and not meant for use in non-debug builds.

fstests/btrfs/220 trigger a check-integrity warning like the following
when CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY=y and the disk with WCE=0.

  btrfs: attempt to write superblock which references block M @5242880 (sdb2/5242880/0) which is not flushed out of disk's write cache (block flush_gen=1, dev->flush_gen=0)!
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: CPU: 28 PID: 843680 at fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c:2196 btrfsic_process_written_superblock+0x22a/0x2a0 [btrfs]
  CPU: 28 PID: 843680 Comm: umount Not tainted 5.15.0-0.rc5.39.el8.x86_64 #1
  Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision T7610/0NK70N, BIOS A18 09/11/2019
  RIP: 0010:btrfsic_process_written_superblock+0x22a/0x2a0 [btrfs]
  RSP: 0018:ffffb642afb47940 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 0000000000000000
  RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: ffff8b722fc97d00 RDI: ffff8b722fc97d00
  RBP: ffff8b5601c00000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: c0000000ffff7fff
  R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffb642afb476f8 R12: ffffffffffffffff
  R13: ffffb642afb47974 R14: ffff8b5499254c00 R15: 0000000000000003
  FS:  00007f00a06d4080(0000) GS:ffff8b722fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 00007fff5cff5ff0 CR3: 00000001c0c2a006 CR4: 00000000001706e0
  Call Trace:
   btrfsic_process_written_block+0x2f7/0x850 [btrfs]
   __btrfsic_submit_bio.part.19+0x310/0x330 [btrfs]
   ? bio_associate_blkg_from_css+0xa4/0x2c0
   btrfsic_submit_bio+0x18/0x30 [btrfs]
   write_dev_supers+0x81/0x2a0 [btrfs]
   ? find_get_pages_range_tag+0x219/0x280
   ? pagevec_lookup_range_tag+0x24/0x30
   ? __filemap_fdatawait_range+0x6d/0xf0
   ? __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock+0x11/0x1e
   ? find_first_extent_bit+0x9b/0x160 [btrfs]
   ? __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock+0x11/0x1e
   write_all_supers+0x1b3/0xa70 [btrfs]
   ? __raw_callee_save___native_queued_spin_unlock+0x11/0x1e
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0x59d/0xac0 [btrfs]
   close_ctree+0x11d/0x339 [btrfs]
   generic_shutdown_super+0x71/0x110
   kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
   btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
   deactivate_locked_super+0x31/0x70
   cleanup_mnt+0xb8/0x140
   task_work_run+0x6d/0xb0
   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1f0/0x200
   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12/0x30
   do_syscall_64+0x46/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
  RIP: 0033:0x7f009f711dfb
  RSP: 002b:00007fff5cff7928 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
  RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000055b68c6c9970 RCX: 00007f009f711dfb
  RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000055b68c6c9b50
  RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000055b68c6ca900 R09: 00007f009f795580
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055b68c6c9b50
  R13: 00007f00a04bf184 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000ffffffff
  ---[ end trace 2c4b82abcef9eec4 ]---
  S-65536(sdb2/65536/1)
   -->
  M-1064960(sdb2/1064960/1)
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Often some test cases like btrfs/161 trigger lockdep splats that complain
about possible unsafe lock scenario due to the fact that during mount,
when reading the chunk tree we end up calling blkdev_get_by_path() while
holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree. That produces a lockdep
splat like the following:

[ 3653.683975] ======================================================
[ 3653.685148] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 3653.686301] 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 Not tainted
[ 3653.687239] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 3653.688400] mount/447465 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 3653.689320] ffff8c6b0c76e528 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320
[ 3653.691054]
               but task is already holding lock:
[ 3653.692155] ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 3653.693978]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[ 3653.695510]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 3653.696915]
               -> #3 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}:
[ 3653.698053]        down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140
[ 3653.698893]        __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 3653.699988]        btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs]
[ 3653.701205]        btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs]
[ 3653.702234]        btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x32/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 3653.703332]        btrfs_init_new_device+0x563/0x15b0 [btrfs]
[ 3653.704439]        btrfs_ioctl+0x2110/0x3530 [btrfs]
[ 3653.705405]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 3653.706215]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 3653.706990]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 3653.708040]
               -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 3653.708994]        lock_release+0x13d/0x4a0
[ 3653.709533]        up_write+0x18/0x160
[ 3653.710017]        btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x5b0 [btrfs]
[ 3653.710699]        __loop_update_dio+0xbd/0x170 [loop]
[ 3653.711360]        lo_ioctl+0x3b1/0x8a0 [loop]
[ 3653.711929]        block_ioctl+0x48/0x50
[ 3653.712442]        __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0
[ 3653.712991]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 3653.713519]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 3653.714233]
               -> #1 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 3653.715026]        __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900
[ 3653.715648]        lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
[ 3653.716275]        blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0x90
[ 3653.716867]        blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x142/0x320
[ 3653.717537]        blkdev_open+0x5e/0xa0
[ 3653.718043]        do_dentry_open+0x163/0x390
[ 3653.718604]        path_openat+0x3f0/0xa80
[ 3653.719128]        do_filp_open+0xa9/0x150
[ 3653.719652]        do_sys_openat2+0x97/0x160
[ 3653.720197]        __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90
[ 3653.720766]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 3653.721285]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 3653.721986]
               -> #0 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 3653.722775]        __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 3653.723348]        lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 3653.723867]        __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900
[ 3653.724394]        blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320
[ 3653.725041]        blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0
[ 3653.725614]        btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 3653.726332]        open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs]
[ 3653.726999]        btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs]
[ 3653.727739]        open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs]
[ 3653.728384]        btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs]
[ 3653.729130]        legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 3653.729676]        vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 3653.730192]        vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
[ 3653.730800]        btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[ 3653.731427]        legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 3653.731970]        vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 3653.732486]        path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0
[ 3653.732997]        __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140
[ 3653.733560]        do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 3653.734080]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 3653.734782]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[ 3653.735784] Chain exists of:
                 &disk->open_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-chunk-00

[ 3653.737123]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[ 3653.737865]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 3653.738435]        ----                    ----
[ 3653.739007]   lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
[ 3653.739449]                                lock(sb_internal#2);
[ 3653.740193]                                lock(btrfs-chunk-00);
[ 3653.740955]   lock(&disk->open_mutex);
[ 3653.741431]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[ 3653.742176] 3 locks held by mount/447465:
[ 3653.742739]  #0: ffff8c6acf85c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#44/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xd5/0x3b0
[ 3653.744114]  #1: ffffffffc0b28f70 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x59/0x870 [btrfs]
[ 3653.745563]  #2: ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 3653.747066]
               stack backtrace:
[ 3653.747723] CPU: 4 PID: 447465 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1
[ 3653.748873] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 3653.750592] Call Trace:
[ 3653.750967]  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
[ 3653.751526]  check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110
[ 3653.752136]  ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70
[ 3653.752748]  __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210
[ 3653.753356]  lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310
[ 3653.753898]  ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320
[ 3653.754596]  ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
[ 3653.755125]  ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320
[ 3653.755729]  ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320
[ 3653.756338]  __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900
[ 3653.756794]  ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320
[ 3653.757400]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0
[ 3653.757930]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
[ 3653.758437]  ? bd_prepare_to_claim+0x129/0x150
[ 3653.758999]  ? trace_module_get+0x2b/0xd0
[ 3653.759508]  ? try_module_get.part.0+0x50/0x80
[ 3653.760072]  blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320
[ 3653.760661]  ? devcgroup_check_permission+0xc1/0x1f0
[ 3653.761288]  blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0
[ 3653.761797]  btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 3653.762454]  open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs]
[ 3653.763055]  ? clone_fs_devices+0x8f/0x170 [btrfs]
[ 3653.763689]  btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs]
[ 3653.764370]  ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40
[ 3653.764922]  open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs]
[ 3653.765493]  ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0
[ 3653.766043]  btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs]
[ 3653.766780]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[ 3653.767488]  ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0
[ 3653.767979]  legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 3653.768548]  vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 3653.769076]  vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0
[ 3653.769718]  btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[ 3653.770381]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
[ 3653.771086]  ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0
[ 3653.771574]  legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50
[ 3653.772136]  vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0
[ 3653.772673]  path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0
[ 3653.773201]  __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140
[ 3653.773793]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[ 3653.774333]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 3653.775094] RIP: 0033:0x7f648bc45aaa

This happens because through btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), which is called only
during mount, ends up acquiring the mutex open_mutex of a block device
while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree while other paths
need to acquire other locks before locking extent buffers of the chunk
tree.

Since at mount time when we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() we know that
we don't have other tasks running in parallel and modifying the chunk
tree, we can simply skip locking of chunk tree extent buffers. So do
that and move the assertion that checks the fs is not yet mounted to the
top block of btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), with a comment before doing it.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Ordered work functions aren't guaranteed to be handled by the same thread
which executed the normal work functions. The only way execution between
normal/ordered functions is synchronized is via the WORK_DONE_BIT,
unfortunately the used bitops don't guarantee any ordering whatsoever.

This manifested as seemingly inexplicable crashes on ARM64, where
async_chunk::inode is seen as non-null in async_cow_submit which causes
submit_compressed_extents to be called and crash occurs because
async_chunk::inode suddenly became NULL. The call trace was similar to:

    pc : submit_compressed_extents+0x38/0x3d0
    lr : async_cow_submit+0x50/0xd0
    sp : ffff800015d4bc20

    <registers omitted for brevity>

    Call trace:
     submit_compressed_extents+0x38/0x3d0
     async_cow_submit+0x50/0xd0
     run_ordered_work+0xc8/0x280
     btrfs_work_helper+0x98/0x250
     process_one_work+0x1f0/0x4ac
     worker_thread+0x188/0x504
     kthread+0x110/0x114
     ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

Fix this by adding respective barrier calls which ensure that all
accesses preceding setting of WORK_DONE_BIT are strictly ordered before
setting the flag. At the same time add a read barrier after reading of
WORK_DONE_BIT in run_ordered_work which ensures all subsequent loads
would be strictly ordered after reading the bit. This in turn ensures
are all accesses before WORK_DONE_BIT are going to be strictly ordered
before any access that can occur in ordered_func.
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Fixes: 08a9ff32 ("btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered execution based on kernel workqueue")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011928Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Tested-by: Chris Murphy <chris@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[BUG]
The following script can cause btrfs to crash:

  $ mount -o compress-force=lzo $DEV /mnt
  $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/foo bs=4k count=1
  $ sync

The call trace looks like this:

  general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe04b37fccce3b000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
  CPU: 5 PID: 164 Comm: kworker/u20:3 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-custom+ #4
  Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
  RIP: 0010:__memcpy+0x12/0x20
  Call Trace:
   lzo_compress_pages+0x236/0x540 [btrfs]
   btrfs_compress_pages+0xaa/0xf0 [btrfs]
   compress_file_range+0x431/0x8e0 [btrfs]
   async_cow_start+0x12/0x30 [btrfs]
   btrfs_work_helper+0xf6/0x3e0 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x294/0x5d0
   worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
   kthread+0x140/0x170
   ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
  ---[ end trace 63c3c0f131e61982 ]---

[CAUSE]
In lzo_compress_pages(), parameter @out_pages is not only an output
parameter (for the number of compressed pages), but also an input
parameter, as the upper limit of compressed pages we can utilize.

In commit d4088803 ("btrfs: subpage: make lzo_compress_pages()
compatible"), the refactoring doesn't take @out_pages as an input, thus
completely ignoring the limit.

And for compress-force case, we could hit incompressible data that
compressed size would go beyond the page limit, and cause the above
crash.

[FIX]
Save @out_pages as @max_nr_page, and pass it to lzo_compress_pages(),
and check if we're beyond the limit before accessing the pages.

Note: this also fixes crash on 32bit architectures that was suspected to
be caused by merge of btrfs patches to 5.16-rc1. Reported in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211104115001.GU20319@twin.jikos.cz/ .
Reported-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Fixes: d4088803 ("btrfs: subpage: make lzo_compress_pages() compatible")
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add note ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The root argument passed to check_item_in_log() always matches the root
of the given directory, so it can be eliminated.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The root argument for tree-log.c:add_link() always matches the root of the
given directory and the given inode, so it can eliminated.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The root argument passed to btrfs_unlink_inode() and its callee,
__btrfs_unlink_inode(), always matches the root of the given directory and
the given inode. So remove the argument and make __btrfs_unlink_inode()
use the root of the directory.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The root argument for drop_one_dir_item() always matches the root of the
given directory inode, since each log tree is associated to one and only
one subvolume/root, so remove the argument.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Reported bug: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/389

There's a problem with scrub reporting aborted status but returning
error code 0, on a filesystem with missing and readded device.

Roughly these steps:

- mkfs -d raid1 dev1 dev2
- fill with data
- unmount
- make dev1 disappear
- mount -o degraded
- copy more data
- make dev1 appear again

Running scrub afterwards reports that the command was aborted, but the
system log message says the exit code was 0.

It seems that the cause of the error is decrementing
fs_devices->missing_devices but not clearing device->dev_state.  Every
time we umount filesystem, it would call close_ctree, And it would
eventually involve btrfs_close_one_device to close the device, but it
only decrements fs_devices->missing_devices but does not clear the
device BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING bit. Worse, this bug will cause Integer
Overflow, because every time umount, fs_devices->missing_devices will
decrease. If fs_devices->missing_devices value hit 0, it would overflow.

With added debugging:

   loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520
   BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 1 transid 21 /dev/loop1 scanned by systemd-udevd (2311)
   loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520
   BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 2 transid 17 /dev/loop2 scanned by systemd-udevd (2313)
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 0
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 18446744073709551615
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 18446744073709551615

If fs_devices->missing_devices is 0, next time it would be 18446744073709551615

After apply this patch, the fs_devices->missing_devices seems to be
right:

  $ truncate -s 10g test1
  $ truncate -s 10g test2
  $ losetup /dev/loop1 test1
  $ losetup /dev/loop2 test2
  $ mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 -f
  $ losetup -d /dev/loop2
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1
  $ umount /mnt/1
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1
  $ umount /mnt/1
  $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1
  $ umount /mnt/1
  $ dmesg

   loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520
   loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520
   BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 1 transid 5 /dev/loop1 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863)
   BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 2 transid 5 /dev/loop2 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863)
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1
   BTRFS info (device loop1): checking UUID tree
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1
   BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature
   BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts
   BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled
   BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0
   BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing
   BTRFS info (device loop1):  before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

In open_ctree() in btrfs_check_rw_degradable() [1], we check each block
group individually if at least the minimum number of devices is available
for that profile. If all the devices are available, then we don't have to
check degradable.

[1]
open_ctree()
::
3559 if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) {

Also before calling btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctee() at the
line number shown below [2] we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() and down to
add_missing_dev() to record number of missing devices.

[2]
open_ctree()
::
3454         ret = btrfs_read_chunk_tree(fs_info);

btrfs_read_chunk_tree()
  read_one_chunk() / read_one_dev()
    add_missing_dev()

So, check if there is any missing device before btrfs_check_rw_degradable()
in open_ctree().

Also, with this the mount command could save ~16ms.[3] in the most
common case, that is no device is missing.

[3]
 1) * 16934.96 us | btrfs_check_rw_degradable [btrfs]();

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This is preparatory work for send protocol update to version 2 and
higher.

We have many pending protocol update requests but still don't have the
basic protocol rev in place, the first thing that must happen is to do
the actual versioning support.

The protocol version is u32 and is a new member in the send ioctl
struct. Validity of the version field is backed by a new flag bit. Old
kernels would fail when a higher version is requested. Version protocol
0 will pick the highest supported version, BTRFS_SEND_STREAM_VERSION,
  that's also exported in sysfs.

The version is still unchanged and will be increased once we have new
incompatible commands or stream updates.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Commit 95ea0486 ("btrfs: allow read-write for 4K sectorsize on 64K
page size systems") added write support for 4K sectorsize on a 64K
systems. Fix the now stale comments.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Christoph pointed out that I'm updating bdev->bd_inode for the device
time when we remove block devices from a btrfs file system, however this
isn't actually exposed to anything.  The inode we want to update is the
one that's associated with the path to the device, usually on devtmpfs,
so that blkid notices the difference.

We still don't want to do the blkdev_open, so use kern_path() to get the
path to the given device and do the update time on that inode.

Fixes: 8f96a5bf ("btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing")
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If you already have an inode and need to update the time on the inode
there is no way to do this properly.  Export this helper to allow file
systems to update time on the inode so the appropriate handler is
called, either ->update_time or generic_update_time.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Attempting to defragment a Btrfs file containing a transparent huge page
immediately deadlocks with the following stack trace:

  #0  context_switch (kernel/sched/core.c:4940:2)
  #1  __schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:6287:8)
  #2  schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:6366:3)
  #3  io_schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:8389:2)
  #4  wait_on_page_bit_common (mm/filemap.c:1356:4)
  #5  __lock_page (mm/filemap.c:1648:2)
  #6  lock_page (./include/linux/pagemap.h:625:3)
  #7  pagecache_get_page (mm/filemap.c:1910:4)
  #8  find_or_create_page (./include/linux/pagemap.h:420:9)
  #9  defrag_prepare_one_page (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1068:9)
  #10 defrag_one_range (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1326:14)
  #11 defrag_one_cluster (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1421:9)
  #12 btrfs_defrag_file (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1523:9)
  #13 btrfs_ioctl_defrag (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3117:9)
  #14 btrfs_ioctl (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4872:10)
  #15 vfs_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:51:10)
  #16 __do_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:874:11)
  #17 __se_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:860:1)
  #18 __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:860:1)
  #19 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50:14)
  #20 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:80:7)
  #21 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x15b (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113)

A huge page is represented by a compound page, which consists of a
struct page for each PAGE_SIZE page within the huge page. The first
struct page is the "head page", and the remaining are "tail pages".

Defragmentation attempts to lock each page in the range. However,
lock_page() on a tail page actually locks the corresponding head page.
So, if defragmentation tries to lock more than one struct page in a
compound page, it tries to lock the same head page twice and deadlocks
with itself.

Ideally, we should be able to defragment transparent huge pages.
However, THP for filesystems is currently read-only, so a lot of code is
not ready to use huge pages for I/O. For now, let's just return
ETXTBUSY.

This can be reproduced with the following on a kernel with
CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS=y:

  $ cat create_thp_file.c
  #include <fcntl.h>
  #include <stdbool.h>
  #include <stdio.h>
  #include <stdint.h>
  #include <stdlib.h>
  #include <unistd.h>
  #include <sys/mman.h>

  static const char zeroes[1024 * 1024];
  static const size_t FILE_SIZE = 2 * 1024 * 1024;

  int main(int argc, char **argv)
  {
          if (argc != 2) {
                  fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s PATH\n", argv[0]);
                  return EXIT_FAILURE;
          }
          int fd = creat(argv[1], 0777);
          if (fd == -1) {
                  perror("creat");
                  return EXIT_FAILURE;
          }
          size_t written = 0;
          while (written < FILE_SIZE) {
                  ssize_t ret = write(fd, zeroes,
                                      sizeof(zeroes) < FILE_SIZE - written ?
                                      sizeof(zeroes) : FILE_SIZE - written);
                  if (ret < 0) {
                          perror("write");
                          return EXIT_FAILURE;
                  }
                  written += ret;
          }
          close(fd);
          fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
          if (fd == -1) {
                  perror("open");
                  return EXIT_FAILURE;
          }

          /*
           * Reserve some address space so that we can align the file mapping to
           * the huge page size.
           */
          void *placeholder_map = mmap(NULL, FILE_SIZE * 2, PROT_NONE,
                                       MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
          if (placeholder_map == MAP_FAILED) {
                  perror("mmap (placeholder)");
                  return EXIT_FAILURE;
          }

          void *aligned_address =
                  (void *)(((uintptr_t)placeholder_map + FILE_SIZE - 1) & ~(FILE_SIZE - 1));

          void *map = mmap(aligned_address, FILE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_EXEC,
                           MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, fd, 0);
          if (map == MAP_FAILED) {
                  perror("mmap");
                  return EXIT_FAILURE;
          }
          if (madvise(map, FILE_SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE) < 0) {
                  perror("madvise");
                  return EXIT_FAILURE;
          }

          char *line = NULL;
          size_t line_capacity = 0;
          FILE *smaps_file = fopen("/proc/self/smaps", "r");
          if (!smaps_file) {
                  perror("fopen");
                  return EXIT_FAILURE;
          }
          for (;;) {
                  for (size_t off = 0; off < FILE_SIZE; off += 4096)
                          ((volatile char *)map)[off];

                  ssize_t ret;
                  bool this_mapping = false;
                  while ((ret = getline(&line, &line_capacity, smaps_file)) > 0) {
                          unsigned long start, end, huge;
                          if (sscanf(line, "%lx-%lx", &start, &end) == 2) {
                                  this_mapping = (start <= (uintptr_t)map &&
                                                  (uintptr_t)map < end);
                          } else if (this_mapping &&
                                     sscanf(line, "FilePmdMapped: %ld", &huge) == 1 &&
                                     huge > 0) {
                                  return EXIT_SUCCESS;
                          }
                  }

                  sleep(6);
                  rewind(smaps_file);
                  fflush(smaps_file);
          }
  }
  $ ./create_thp_file huge
  $ btrfs fi defrag -czstd ./huge
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Commit 2efc459d ("sysfs: Add sysfs_emit and sysfs_emit_at to format
sysfs out") merged in 5.10 introduced two new functions sysfs_emit() and
sysfs_emit_at() which are aware of the PAGE_SIZE limit of the output
buffer.

Use the above two new functions instead of scnprintf() and snprintf()
in various sysfs show().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

It's a common practice to avoid use sizeof(struct btrfs_super_block)
(3531), but to use BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE (4096).

The problem is that, sizeof(struct btrfs_super_block) doesn't match
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE from the very beginning.

Furthermore, for all call sites except selftests, we always allocate
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE space for super block, there isn't any real reason
to use the smaller value, and it doesn't really save any space.

So let's get rid of such confusing behavior, and unify those two values.

This modification also adds a new static_assert() to verify the size,
and moves the BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_* macros to the definition of
btrfs_super_block for the static_assert().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Update the comments at btrfs_chunk_alloc() and do_chunk_alloc() that
describe which cases can lead to a failure to allocate metadata and system
space despite having previously reserved space. This adds one more reason
that I previously forgot to mention.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in
the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with
another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk.

These contexts are the following:

* When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers
  that belong to the chunk btree;

* When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item
  to the chunk btree;

* When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item
  from the chunk btree;

* When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in
  the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond
  the new device size when shrinking a device.

The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following:

1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the
   chunk mutex;

2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent
   buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as
   well as its parent extent buffer;

3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none
   of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because
   the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation,
   task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to
   acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A;

4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert
   the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device
   items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer
   that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B
   is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A,
   therefore resulting in a deadlock.

One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation:

  INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
        Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
  "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  task:kworker/u9:5    state:D stack:25936 pid:  546 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
  Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space
  Call Trace:
   context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
   __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
   schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
   rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993
   __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline]
   __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline]
   down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47
   btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline]
   btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191
   btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline]
   btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728
   btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794
   btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504
   do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline]
   btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653
   flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670
   btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953
   process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297
   worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444
   kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
   ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
  INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds.
        Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1
  "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
  task:syz-executor    state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid:  7792 flags:0x00004004
  Call Trace:
   context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline]
   __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287
   schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366
   schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425
   __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline]
   __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729
   btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631
   find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline]
   find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335
   btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415
   btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813
   __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415
   btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570
   btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768
   relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline]
   relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757
   relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181
   __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline]
   btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137
   btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline]
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree
and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove
context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree.
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 79bd3712 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Currently auto reclaim of unusable zones reclaims the block-groups in
the order they have been added to the reclaim list.

Change this to a greedy algorithm by sorting the list so we have the
block-groups with the least amount of valid bytes reclaimed first.

Note: we can't splice the block groups from reclaim_bgs to let the sort
happen outside of the lock. The block groups can be still in use by
other parts eg. via bg_list and we must hold unused_bgs_lock while
processing them.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ write note and comment why we can't splice the list ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Just use the %pg format specifier in all the debug printks previously
using it.  Note that both bdevname and the %pg specifier never print
a pathname, so the kbasename call wasn't needed to start with.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ adjust messages and indentation ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

For device removal and replace we call btrfs_find_device_by_devspec,
which if we give it a device path and nothing else will call
btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path, which opens the block device and reads the
super block and then looks up our device based on that.

However at this point we're holding the sb write "lock", so reading the
block device pulls in the dependency of ->open_mutex, which produces the
following lockdep splat

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.14.0-rc2+ #405 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
losetup/11576 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff9bbe8cded938 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0

but task is already holding lock:
ffff9bbe88e4fc68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop]
       blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0
       blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0
       do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390
       path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20
       do_filp_open+0x96/0x120
       do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130
       __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750
       blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0
       blkdev_get_by_path+0x98/0xa0
       btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0
       btrfs_find_device_by_devspec+0x12b/0x1c0
       btrfs_rm_device+0x127/0x610
       btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop]
       loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop]
       process_one_work+0x26b/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       process_one_work+0x245/0x560
       worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0
       kthread+0x140/0x160
       ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30

-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}:
       __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
       lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
       flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
       drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
       destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
       __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
       block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
       do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
                               lock(&disk->open_mutex);
                               lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
  lock((wq_completion)loop0);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by losetup/11576:
 #0: ffff9bbe88e4fc68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 11576 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #405
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0
 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50
 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90
 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220
 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0
 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0
 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100
 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110
 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250
 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop]
 ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0
 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7f31b02404cb

Instead what we want to do is populate our device lookup args before we
grab any locks, and then pass these args into btrfs_rm_device().  From
there we can find the device and do the appropriate removal.
Suggested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We are going to want to populate our device lookup args outside of any
locks and then do the actual device lookup later, so add a helper to do
this work and make btrfs_find_device_by_devspec() use this helper for
now.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We have a lot of device lookup functions that all do something slightly
different.  Clean this up by adding a struct to hold the different
lookup criteria, and then pass this around to btrfs_find_device() so it
can do the proper matching based on the lookup criteria.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There's a subtle case where if we're removing the seed device from a
file system we need to free its private copy of the fs_devices.  However
we do not need to call close_fs_devices(), because at this point there
are no devices left to close as we've closed the last one.  The only
thing that close_fs_devices() does is decrement ->opened, which should
be 1.  We want to avoid calling close_fs_devices() here because it has a
lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex), and we are going to stop holding the
uuid_mutex in this path.

So simply decrement the  ->opened counter like we should, and then clean
up like normal.  Also add a comment explaining what we're doing here as
I initially removed this code erroneously.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

A bug was was checking a wrong device count before we delete the struct
btrfs_fs_devices in btrfs_rm_device(). To avoid future confusion and
easy reference add a comment about the various device counts that we have
in the struct btrfs_fs_devices.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

For both sprout and seed fsids,
 btrfs_fs_devices::num_devices provides device count including missing
 btrfs_fs_devices::open_devices provides device count excluding missing

We create a dummy struct btrfs_device for the missing device, so
num_devices != open_devices when there is a missing device.

In btrfs_rm_devices() we wrongly check for %cur_devices->open_devices
before freeing the seed fs_devices. Instead we should check for
%cur_devices->num_devices.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>