1. 11 Jul, 2019 1 commit
    • Matt Roper's avatar
      drm/i915/gen11: Start distinguishing 'phy' from 'port' · 358633e7
      Matt Roper authored
      Our past DDI-based Intel platforms have had a fixed DDI<->PHY mapping.
      Because of this, both the bspec documentation and our i915 code has used
      the term "port" when talking about either DDI's or PHY's; it was always
      easy to tell what terms like "Port A" were referring to from the
      context.
      
      Unfortunately this is starting to break down now that EHL allows PHY-A
      to be driven by either DDI-A or DDI-D.  Is a setup with DDI-D driving
      PHY-A considered "Port A" or "Port D?"  The answer depends on which
      register we're working with, and even the bspec doesn't do a great job
      of clarifying this.
      
      Let's try to be more explicit about whether we're talking about the DDI
      or the PHY on gen11+ by using 'port' to refer to the DDI and creating a
      new 'enum phy' namespace to refer to the PHY in use.
      
      This patch just adds the new PHY namespace, new phy-based versions of
      intel_port_is_*(), and a helper to convert a port to a PHY.
      Transitioning various areas of the code over to using the PHY namespace
      will be done in subsequent patches to make review easier.  We'll remove
      the intel_port_is_*() functions at the end of the series when we
      transition all callers over to using the PHY-based versions.
      
      v2:
       - Convert a few more 'port' uses to 'phy.' (Sparse)
      
      v3:
       - Switch DDI_CLK_SEL() back to 'port.' (Jose)
       - Add a code comment clarifying why DPCLKA_CFGCR0_ICL needs to use PHY
         for its bit definitions, even though the register description is
         given in terms of DDI.
       - To avoid confusion, switch CNL's DPCLKA_CFGCR0 defines back to using
         port and create separate ICL+ definitions that work in terms of PHY.
      
      v4:
       - Rebase and resolve conflicts with Imre's TC series.
       - This patch now just adds the namespace and a few convenience
         functions; the important changes are now split out into separate
         patches to make review easier.
      Suggested-by: default avatarVille Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
      Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
      Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
      Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190709183934.445-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
      358633e7
  2. 10 Jul, 2019 9 commits
  3. 09 Jul, 2019 18 commits
  4. 08 Jul, 2019 3 commits
  5. 07 Jul, 2019 1 commit
  6. 06 Jul, 2019 4 commits
  7. 05 Jul, 2019 4 commits