- 13 Sep, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Namhyung Kim authored
So that it can call perf_callchain() only if needed. Historically it used __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY but we can do that with sample_flags in the struct perf_sample_data. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220908214104.3851807-1-namhyung@kernel.org
-
- 07 Sep, 2022 14 commits
-
-
Kan Liang authored
All the fixed counters share a fixed control register. The current perf reads and re-writes the fixed control register for each fixed counter disable/enable, which is unnecessary. When changing the fixed control register, the entire PMU must be disabled via the global control register. The changing cannot be taken effect until the entire PMU is re-enabled. Only updating the fixed control register once right before the entire PMU re-enabling is enough. The read of the fixed control register is not necessary either. The value can be cached in the per CPU cpu_hw_events. Test results: Counting all the fixed counters with the perf bench sched pipe as below on a SPR machine. $perf stat -e cycles,instructions,ref-cycles,slots --no-inherit -- taskset -c 1 perf bench sched pipe The Total elapsed time reduces from 5.36s (without the patch) to 4.99s (with the patch), which is ~6.9% improvement. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220804140729.2951259-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Now that we have a x86_pmu::set_period() method, use it to remove the perfctr_second_write quirk from the generic code. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829101321.839502514@infradead.org
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Now that it is all internal to the intel driver, remove x86_pmu::update_topdown_event. Assumes that is_topdown_count(event) can only be true when the hardware has topdown stuff and the function is set. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829101321.771635301@infradead.org
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Now that it is all internal to the intel driver, remove x86_pmu::set_topdown_event_period. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829101321.706354189@infradead.org
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Avoid a branch and indirect call. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829101321.640658334@infradead.org
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
In preparation for making it a static_call, change the signature. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829101321.573713839@infradead.org
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Use the new x86_pmu::{set_period,update}() methods to push the topdown stuff into the Intel driver, where it belongs. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829101321.505933457@infradead.org
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
In order to clean up x86_perf_event_{set_period,update)() start by adding them as x86_pmu methods. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220829101321.440196408@infradead.org
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
While auditing 6b959ba2 ("perf/core: Fix reentry problem in perf_output_read_group()") a few spots were found that wanted assertions. Notable for_each_sibling_event() relies on exclusion from modification. This would normally be holding either ctx->lock or ctx->mutex, however due to how things are constructed disabling IRQs is a valid and sufficient substitute for ctx->lock. Another possible site to add assertions would be the various pmu::{add,del,read,..}() methods, but that's not trivially expressable in C -- the best option is wrappers, but those are easy enough to forget. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
Ensure all platform specific event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907091924.439193-5-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
Ensure all platform specific event flags are within PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907091924.439193-4-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
This just ensures that PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH does not overlap with generic hardware event flags. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907091924.439193-3-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
Two hardware event flags on x86 platform has overshot PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH (0x0000ffff). These flags are PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LAT_HYBRID (0x20000) and PERF_X86_EVENT_AMD_BRS (0x10000). Lets expand PERF_EVENT_FLAG_ARCH mask to accommodate those flags, and also create room for two more in the future. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907091924.439193-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
Besides the branch type filtering requests, 'event.attr.branch_sample_type' also contains various flags indicating which additional information should be captured, along with the base branch record. These flags help configure the underlying hardware, and capture the branch records appropriately when required e.g after PMU interrupt. But first, this moves an existing helper perf_sample_save_hw_index() into the header before adding some more helpers for other branch sample filter flags. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220906084414.396220-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
- 06 Sep, 2022 6 commits
-
-
Kan Liang authored
Use the new sample_flags to indicate whether the txn field is filled by the PMU driver. Remove the txn field from the perf_sample_data_init() to minimize the number of cache lines touched. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130959.1285717-7-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
-
Kan Liang authored
Use the new sample_flags to indicate whether the data_src field is filled by the PMU driver. Remove the data_src field from the perf_sample_data_init() to minimize the number of cache lines touched. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130959.1285717-6-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
-
Kan Liang authored
Use the new sample_flags to indicate whether the weight field is filled by the PMU driver. Remove the weight field from the perf_sample_data_init() to minimize the number of cache lines touched. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130959.1285717-5-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
-
Kan Liang authored
Use the new sample_flags to indicate whether the branch stack is filled by the PMU driver. Remove the br_stack from the perf_sample_data_init() to minimize the number of cache lines touched. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130959.1285717-4-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
-
Kan Liang authored
The PEBS TSC-based timestamps do not appear correctly in the final perf.data output file from perf record. The data->time field setup by PEBS in the setup_pebs_fixed_sample_data() is later overwritten by perf_events generic code in perf_prepare_sample(). There is an ordering problem. Set the sample flags when the data->time is updated by PEBS. The data->time field will not be overwritten anymore. Reported-by: Andreas Kogler <andreas.kogler.0x@gmail.com> Reported-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130959.1285717-3-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
-
Kan Liang authored
On some platforms, some data e.g., timestamps, can be retrieved from the PMU driver. Usually, the data from the PMU driver is more accurate. The current perf kernel should output the PMU-filled sample data if it's available. To check the availability of the PMU-filled sample data, the current perf kernel initializes the related fields in the perf_sample_data_init(). When outputting a sample, the perf checks whether the field is updated by the PMU driver. If yes, the updated value will be output. If not, the perf uses an SW way to calculate the value or just outputs the initialized value if an SW way is unavailable either. With more and more data being provided by the PMU driver, more fields has to be initialized in the perf_sample_data_init(). That will increase the number of cache lines touched in perf_sample_data_init() and be harmful to the performance. Add new "sample_flags" to indicate the PMU-filled sample data. The PMU driver should set the corresponding PERF_SAMPLE_ flag when the field is updated. The initialization of the corresponding field is not required anymore. The following patches will make use of it and remove the corresponding fields from the perf_sample_data_init(), which will further minimize the number of cache lines touched. Only clear the sample flags that have already been done by the PMU driver in the perf_prepare_sample() for the PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE. For the other PERF_RECORD_ event type, the sample data is not available. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220901130959.1285717-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
-
- 30 Aug, 2022 14 commits
-
-
Marco Elver authored
We can still see that a majority of the time is spent hashing task pointers: ... 16.98% [kernel] [k] rhashtable_jhash2 ... Doing the bookkeeping in toggle_bp_slots() is currently O(#cpus), calling task_bp_pinned() for each CPU, even if task_bp_pinned() is CPU-independent. The reason for this is to update the per-CPU 'tsk_pinned' histogram. To optimize the CPU-independent case to O(1), keep a separate CPU-independent 'tsk_pinned_all' histogram. The major source of complexity are transitions between "all CPU-independent task breakpoints" and "mixed CPU-independent and CPU-dependent task breakpoints". The code comments list all cases that require handling. After this optimization: | $> perf bench -r 100 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 128 -t 512 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 100 threads with 4 breakpoints and 128 parallelism | Total time: 1.758 [sec] | | 34.336621 usecs/op | 4395.087500 usecs/op/cpu 38.08% [kernel] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath 10.81% [kernel] [k] smp_cfm_core_cond 3.01% [kernel] [k] update_sg_lb_stats 2.58% [kernel] [k] osq_lock 2.57% [kernel] [k] llist_reverse_order 1.45% [kernel] [k] find_next_bit 1.21% [kernel] [k] flush_tlb_func_common 1.01% [kernel] [k] arch_install_hw_breakpoint Showing that the time spent hashing keys has become insignificant. With the given benchmark parameters, that's an improvement of 12% compared with the old O(#cpus) version. And finally, using the less aggressive parameters from the preceding changes, we now observe: | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism | Total time: 0.067 [sec] | | 35.292187 usecs/op | 2258.700000 usecs/op/cpu Which is an improvement of 12% compared to without the histogram optimizations (baseline is 40 usecs/op). This is now on par with the theoretical ideal (constraints disabled), and only 12% slower than no breakpoints at all. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-15-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Running the perf benchmark with (note: more aggressive parameters vs. preceding changes, but same 256 CPUs host): | $> perf bench -r 100 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 128 -t 512 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 100 threads with 4 breakpoints and 128 parallelism | Total time: 1.989 [sec] | | 38.854160 usecs/op | 4973.332500 usecs/op/cpu 20.43% [kernel] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath 18.75% [kernel] [k] osq_lock 16.98% [kernel] [k] rhashtable_jhash2 8.34% [kernel] [k] task_bp_pinned 4.23% [kernel] [k] smp_cfm_core_cond 3.65% [kernel] [k] bcmp 2.83% [kernel] [k] toggle_bp_slot 1.87% [kernel] [k] find_next_bit 1.49% [kernel] [k] __reserve_bp_slot We can see that a majority of the time is now spent hashing task pointers to index into task_bps_ht in task_bp_pinned(). Obtaining the max_bp_pinned_slots() for CPU-independent task targets currently is O(#cpus), and calls task_bp_pinned() for each CPU, even if the result of task_bp_pinned() is CPU-independent. The loop in max_bp_pinned_slots() wants to compute the maximum slots across all CPUs. If task_bp_pinned() is CPU-independent, we can do so by obtaining the max slots across all CPUs and adding task_bp_pinned(). To do so in O(1), use a bp_slots_histogram for CPU-pinned slots. After this optimization: | $> perf bench -r 100 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 128 -t 512 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 100 threads with 4 breakpoints and 128 parallelism | Total time: 1.930 [sec] | | 37.697832 usecs/op | 4825.322500 usecs/op/cpu 19.13% [kernel] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath 18.21% [kernel] [k] rhashtable_jhash2 15.46% [kernel] [k] osq_lock 6.27% [kernel] [k] toggle_bp_slot 5.91% [kernel] [k] task_bp_pinned 5.05% [kernel] [k] smp_cfm_core_cond 1.78% [kernel] [k] update_sg_lb_stats 1.36% [kernel] [k] llist_reverse_order 1.34% [kernel] [k] find_next_bit 1.19% [kernel] [k] bcmp Suggesting that time spent in task_bp_pinned() has been reduced. However, we're still hashing too much, which will be addressed in the subsequent change. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-14-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Factor out the existing `atomic_t count[N]` into its own struct called 'bp_slots_histogram', to generalize and make its intent clearer in preparation of reusing elsewhere. The basic idea of bucketing "total uses of N slots" resembles a histogram, so calling it such seems most intuitive. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-13-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
While optimizing task_bp_pinned()'s runtime complexity to O(1) on average helps reduce time spent in the critical section, we still suffer due to serializing everything via 'nr_bp_mutex'. Indeed, a profile shows that now contention is the biggest issue: 95.93% [kernel] [k] osq_lock 0.70% [kernel] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner 0.22% [kernel] [k] smp_cfm_core_cond 0.18% [kernel] [k] task_bp_pinned 0.18% [kernel] [k] rhashtable_jhash2 0.15% [kernel] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath when running the breakpoint benchmark with (system with 256 CPUs): | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism | Total time: 0.207 [sec] | | 108.267188 usecs/op | 6929.100000 usecs/op/cpu The main concern for synchronizing the breakpoint constraints data is that a consistent snapshot of the per-CPU and per-task data is observed. The access pattern is as follows: 1. If the target is a task: the task's pinned breakpoints are counted, checked for space, and then appended to; only bp_cpuinfo::cpu_pinned is used to check for conflicts with CPU-only breakpoints; bp_cpuinfo::tsk_pinned are incremented/decremented, but otherwise unused. 2. If the target is a CPU: bp_cpuinfo::cpu_pinned are counted, along with bp_cpuinfo::tsk_pinned; after a successful check, cpu_pinned is incremented. No per-task breakpoints are checked. Since rhltable safely synchronizes insertions/deletions, we can allow concurrency as follows: 1. If the target is a task: independent tasks may update and check the constraints concurrently, but same-task target calls need to be serialized; since bp_cpuinfo::tsk_pinned is only updated, but not checked, these modifications can happen concurrently by switching tsk_pinned to atomic_t. 2. If the target is a CPU: access to the per-CPU constraints needs to be serialized with other CPU-target and task-target callers (to stabilize the bp_cpuinfo::tsk_pinned snapshot). We can allow the above concurrency by introducing a per-CPU constraints data reader-writer lock (bp_cpuinfo_sem), and per-task mutexes (reuses task_struct::perf_event_mutex): 1. If the target is a task: acquires perf_event_mutex, and acquires bp_cpuinfo_sem as a reader. The choice of percpu-rwsem minimizes contention in the presence of many read-lock but few write-lock acquisitions: we assume many orders of magnitude more task target breakpoints creations/destructions than CPU target breakpoints. 2. If the target is a CPU: acquires bp_cpuinfo_sem as a writer. With these changes, contention with thousands of tasks is reduced to the point where waiting on locking no longer dominates the profile: | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism | Total time: 0.077 [sec] | | 40.201563 usecs/op | 2572.900000 usecs/op/cpu 21.54% [kernel] [k] task_bp_pinned 20.18% [kernel] [k] rhashtable_jhash2 6.81% [kernel] [k] toggle_bp_slot 5.47% [kernel] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath 3.75% [kernel] [k] smp_cfm_core_cond 3.48% [kernel] [k] bcmp On this particular setup that's a speedup of 2.7x. We're also getting closer to the theoretical ideal performance through optimizations in hw_breakpoint.c -- constraints accounting disabled: | perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism | Total time: 0.067 [sec] | | 35.286458 usecs/op | 2258.333333 usecs/op/cpu Which means the current implementation is ~12% slower than the theoretical ideal. For reference, performance without any breakpoints: | $> bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 0 -p 64 -t 64 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 30 threads with 0 breakpoints and 64 parallelism | Total time: 0.060 [sec] | | 31.365625 usecs/op | 2007.400000 usecs/op/cpu On a system with 256 CPUs, the theoretical ideal is only ~12% slower than no breakpoints at all; the current implementation is ~28% slower. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-12-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Implement simple accessors to probe percpu-rwsem's locked state: percpu_is_write_locked(), percpu_is_read_locked(). Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-11-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Internal data structures (cpu_bps, task_bps) of powerpc's hw_breakpoint implementation have relied on nr_bp_mutex serializing access to them. Before overhauling synchronization of kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c, introduce 2 spinlocks to synchronize cpu_bps and task_bps respectively, thus avoiding reliance on callers synchronizing powerpc's hw_breakpoint. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-10-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Flexible breakpoints have never been implemented, with bp_cpuinfo::flexible always being 0. Unfortunately, they still occupy 4 bytes in each bp_cpuinfo and bp_busy_slots, as well as computing the max flexible count in fetch_bp_busy_slots(). This again causes suboptimal code generation, when we always know that `!!slots.flexible` will be 0. Just get rid of the flexible "placeholder" and remove all real code related to it. Make a note in the comment related to the constraints algorithm but don't remove them from the algorithm, so that if in future flexible breakpoints need supporting, it should be trivial to revive them (along with reverting this change). Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-9-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Due to being a __weak function, hw_breakpoint_weight() will cause the compiler to always emit a call to it. This generates unnecessarily bad code (register spills etc.) for no good reason; in fact it appears in profiles of `perf bench -r 100 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 128 -t 512`: ... 0.70% [kernel] [k] hw_breakpoint_weight ... While a small percentage, no architecture defines its own hw_breakpoint_weight() nor are there users outside hw_breakpoint.c, which makes the fact it is currently __weak a poor choice. Change hw_breakpoint_weight()'s definition to follow a similar protocol to hw_breakpoint_slots(), such that if <asm/hw_breakpoint.h> defines hw_breakpoint_weight(), we'll use it instead. The result is that it is inlined and no longer shows up in profiles. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-8-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Optimize internal hw_breakpoint state if the architecture's number of breakpoint slots is constant. This avoids several kmalloc() calls and potentially unnecessary failures if the allocations fail, as well as subtly improves code generation and cache locality. The protocol is that if an architecture defines hw_breakpoint_slots via the preprocessor, it must be constant and the same for all types. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-7-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Mark read-only data after initialization as __ro_after_init. While we are here, turn 'constraints_initialized' into a bool. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-6-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
On a machine with 256 CPUs, running the recently added perf breakpoint benchmark results in: | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism | Total time: 236.418 [sec] | | 123134.794271 usecs/op | 7880626.833333 usecs/op/cpu The benchmark tests inherited breakpoint perf events across many threads. Looking at a perf profile, we can see that the majority of the time is spent in various hw_breakpoint.c functions, which execute within the 'nr_bp_mutex' critical sections which then results in contention on that mutex as well: 37.27% [kernel] [k] osq_lock 34.92% [kernel] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner 12.15% [kernel] [k] toggle_bp_slot 11.90% [kernel] [k] __reserve_bp_slot The culprit here is task_bp_pinned(), which has a runtime complexity of O(#tasks) due to storing all task breakpoints in the same list and iterating through that list looking for a matching task. Clearly, this does not scale to thousands of tasks. Instead, make use of the "rhashtable" variant "rhltable" which stores multiple items with the same key in a list. This results in average runtime complexity of O(1) for task_bp_pinned(). With the optimization, the benchmark shows: | $> perf bench -r 30 breakpoint thread -b 4 -p 64 -t 64 | # Running 'breakpoint/thread' benchmark: | # Created/joined 30 threads with 4 breakpoints and 64 parallelism | Total time: 0.208 [sec] | | 108.422396 usecs/op | 6939.033333 usecs/op/cpu On this particular setup that's a speedup of ~1135x. While one option would be to make task_struct a breakpoint list node, this would only further bloat task_struct for infrequently used data. Furthermore, after all optimizations in this series, there's no evidence it would result in better performance: later optimizations make the time spent looking up entries in the hash table negligible (we'll reach the theoretical ideal performance i.e. no constraints). Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-5-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Clean up headers: - Remove unused <linux/kallsyms.h> - Remove unused <linux/kprobes.h> - Remove unused <linux/module.h> - Remove unused <linux/smp.h> - Add <linux/export.h> for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). - Add <linux/mutex.h> for mutex. - Sort alphabetically. - Move <linux/hw_breakpoint.h> to top to test it compiles on its own. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-4-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Provide hw_breakpoint_is_used() to check if breakpoints are in use on the system. Use it in the KUnit test to verify the global state before and after a test case. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-3-elver@google.com
-
Marco Elver authored
Add KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting, with various interesting mixes of breakpoint targets (some care was taken to catch interesting corner cases via bug-injection). The test cannot be built as a module because it requires access to hw_breakpoint_slots(), which is not inlinable or exported on all architectures. Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220829124719.675715-2-elver@google.com
-
- 29 Aug, 2022 4 commits
-
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
BRBE captured branch types will overflow perf_branch_entry.type and generic branch types in perf_branch_entry.new_type. So override each available arch specific branch type in the following manner to comprehensively process all reported branch types in BRBE. PERF_BR_ARM64_FIQ PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_1 PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_HALT PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_2 PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_EXIT PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_3 PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_INST PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_4 PERF_BR_ARM64_DEBUG_DATA PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_5 Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220824044822.70230-5-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
Platforms like arm64 could capture privilege level information for all the branch records. Hence this adds a new element in the struct branch_entry to record the privilege level information, which could be requested through a new event.attr.branch_sample_type based flag PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PRIV_SAVE. This flag helps user choose whether privilege information is captured. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220824044822.70230-4-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
branch_entry.type now has ran out of space to accommodate more branch types classification. This will prevent perf branch stack implementation on arm64 (via BRBE) to capture all available branch types. Extending this bit field i.e branch_entry.type [4 bits] is not an option as it will break user space ABI both for little and big endian perf tools. Extend branch classification with a new field branch_entry.new_type via a new branch type PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI in branch_entry.type. Perf tools which could decode PERF_BR_EXTEND_ABI, will then parse branch_entry.new_type as well. branch_entry.new_type is a 4 bit field which can hold upto 16 branch types. The first three branch types will hold various generic page faults followed by five architecture specific branch types, which can be overridden by the platform for specific use cases. These architecture specific branch types gets overridden on arm64 platform for BRBE implementation. New generic branch types - PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_ALGN - PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_DATA - PERF_BR_NEW_FAULT_INST New arch specific branch types - PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_1 - PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_2 - PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_3 - PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_4 - PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_5 Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220824044822.70230-3-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
Anshuman Khandual authored
This expands generic branch type classification by adding two more entries there in i.e system error and not in transaction. This also updates the x86 implementation to process X86_BR_NO_TX records as appropriate. This changes branch types reported to user space on x86 platform but it should not be a problem. The possible scenarios and impacts are enumerated here. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | kernel | perf tool | Impact | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | old | old | Works as before | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | old | new | PERF_BR_UNKNOWN is processed | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | new | old | PERF_BR_NO_TX is blocked via old PERF_BR_MAX | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | new | new | PERF_BR_NO_TX is recognized | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- When PERF_BR_NO_TX is blocked via old PERF_BR_MAX (new kernel with old perf tool) the user space might throw up an warning complaining about an unrecognized branch types being reported, but it's expected. PERF_BR_SERROR & PERF_BR_NO_TX branch types will be used for BRBE implementation on arm64 platform. PERF_BR_NO_TX complements 'abort' and 'in_tx' elements in perf_branch_entry which represent other transaction states for a given branch record. Because this completes the transaction state classification. Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220824044822.70230-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
-
- 26 Aug, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Sandipan Das authored
Provide branch speculation information captured via AMD Last Branch Record Extension Version 2 (LbrExtV2) by setting the speculation info in branch records. The info is based on the "valid" and "spec" bits in the Branch To registers. Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ddc02f6320464cad0e3ff5bdb2314531568a91bc.1660211399.git.sandipan.das@amd.com
-