1. 13 Feb, 2020 1 commit
  2. 12 Feb, 2020 4 commits
  3. 11 Feb, 2020 16 commits
  4. 10 Feb, 2020 9 commits
  5. 09 Feb, 2020 3 commits
  6. 08 Feb, 2020 4 commits
  7. 07 Feb, 2020 3 commits
    • Chris Wilson's avatar
      drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL · 5ba32c7b
      Chris Wilson authored
      If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we
      must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly
      handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind
      the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted
      RING_TAIL, as it turns out that timeslicing was causing unexpected
      rewinds.
      
         <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851190us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: expired last=130:4698, prio=3, hint=3
         <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851192us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 66:119966, current 119964
         <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851195us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4698, current 4695
         <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851198us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695
      ^----  Note we unwind 2 requests from the same context
      
         <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851208us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695
         <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851213us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 134:1508, current 1506
      ^---- But to apply the new timeslice, we have to replay the first request
            before the new client can start -- the unexpected RING_TAIL rewind
      
         <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851219us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: submit { 130:4696*, 134:1508 }
       synmark2-5425    2..s. 1280851239us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=5, tail=0
       synmark2-5425    2..s. 1280851240us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[0]: status=0x00008002:0x00000000
      ^---- Preemption event for the ELSP update; note the lite-restore
      
       synmark2-5425    2..s. 1280851243us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: preempted { 130:4698, 66:119966 }
       synmark2-5425    2..s. 1280851246us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: promote { 130:4696*, 134:1508 }
       synmark2-5425    2.... 1280851462us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4700, current 4695
       synmark2-5425    2.... 1280852111us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4702, current 4695
       synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852296us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=0, tail=2
       synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852297us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[1]: status=0x00000814:0x00000000
       synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852299us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 130:4696!, 134:1508 }
       synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852301us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[2]: status=0x00000818:0x00000040
       synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852302us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 134:1508, 0:0 }
       synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852313us : process_csb: process_csb:2336 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(*execlists->active) && !reset_in_progress(execlists))
      
      Fixes: 8ee36e04 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing")
      Referenecs: 82c69bf5 ("drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestore")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207211452.2860634-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      5ba32c7b
    • Chris Wilson's avatar
      drm/i915/gt: Only ignore already reset requests · 6e17ae73
      Chris Wilson authored
      If a request is being re-run after an innocent reset, it is marked as
      -EAGAIN. So only skip an engine reset if the request is marked as -EIO.
      
      Testcase: igt/gem_ctx_exec/basic-nohangcheck
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207161602.2838218-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      6e17ae73
    • Mika Kuoppala's avatar
      drm/i915: Implement Wa_1607090982 · 0db1a5f8
      Mika Kuoppala authored
      SIMD16 with Src0 scalar might conflict between Src1/Src2 and cause
      GRF read issue. Workaround this issue by setting bit 14 in 0xe4f4
      which will disable early read/src swap of Src0.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207155138.30978-2-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
      0db1a5f8