Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 24 Dec, 2010 5 commits
  3. 20 Dec, 2010 1 commit
    • Tejun Heo's avatar
      workqueue: allow chained queueing during destruction · c8efcc25
      Tejun Heo authored 
      Currently, destroy_workqueue() makes the workqueue deny all new
queueing by setting WQ_DYING and flushes the workqueue once before
proceeding with destruction; however, there are cases where work items
queue more related work items.  Currently, such users need to
explicitly flush the workqueue multiple times depending on the
possible depth of such chained queueing.

This patch updates the queueing path such that a work item can queue
further work items on the same workqueue even when WQ_DYING is set.
The flush on destruction is automatically retried until the workqueue
is empty.  This guarantees that the workqueue is empty on destruction
while allowing chained queueing.

The flush retry logic whines if it takes too many retries to drain the
workqueue.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
      c8efcc25
  5. 15 Dec, 2010 2 commits
  7. 14 Dec, 2010 2 commits
    • Steven Rostedt's avatar
      workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true · 2d64672e
      Steven Rostedt authored 
      Running the annotate branch profiler on three boxes, including my
main box that runs firefox, evolution, xchat, and is part of the distcc farm,
showed this with the likelys in the workqueue code:

 correct incorrect  %        Function                  File              Line
 ------- ---------  -        --------                  ----              ----
      96   996253  99 wq_worker_sleeping             workqueue.c          703
      96   996247  99 wq_worker_waking_up            workqueue.c          677

The likely()s in this case were assuming that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING will
most likely be false. But this is not the case. The reason is
(and shown by adding trace_printks and testing it) that most of the time
WORKER_PREP is set.

In worker_thread() we have:

	worker_clr_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP);

	[ do work stuff ]

	worker_set_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP, false);

(that 'false' means not to wake up an idle worker)

The wq_worker_sleeping() is called from schedule when a worker thread
is putting itself to sleep. Which happens most of the time outside
of that [ do work stuff ].

The wq_worker_waking_up is called by the wakeup worker code, which
is also callod outside that [ do work stuff ].

Thus, the likely and unlikely used by those two functions are actually
backwards.

Remove the annotation and let gcc figure it out.
Acked-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      2d64672e
    • Tejun Heo's avatar
      MAINTAINERS: Add workqueue entry · 3e6cd7a4
      Tejun Heo authored 
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      3e6cd7a4
  9. 26 Nov, 2010 1 commit
  11. 24 Nov, 2010 29 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7