The recent rework of the NVS saving/restoring code introduced two
build issues for !CONFIG_ACPI, a warning in drivers/acpi/internal.h
and an error in arch/x86/kernel/e820.c.

Fix them by providing suitable static inline definitions of the
relevant functions.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

printk("%pR",...)
is for formatting struct resource only.
But the list built up in drivers/acpi/osl.c uses it's own struct:
struct acpi_res_list {}

Without this patch you can see wrongly formatted resources (SMRG is of IO type):

ACPI: resource 0000:00:1f.3 [io  0x0400-0x041f] conflicts with AC
      PI region SMRG [mem 0x00000400-0x0000040f 64bit pref disabled]

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26342Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

A notification event 0x81 from an ACPI battery device requires us to
re-read the battery information structure.  Follow this requirement
and remove and re-create the battery's attibutes in sysfs so that
they reflect the reporting units used by the battery at the moment
(those units may actually change sometimes at run time, which happens
on some Thinkpads).

The approach used in this patch was suggested by Matthew Garrett.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The wake_capable ACPI device flag is not necessary, because it is
only used in scan.c for recording the information that _PRW is
present for the given device.  That information is only used by
acpi_add_single_object() to decide whether or not to call
acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(), so the flag may be dropped
if the _PRW check is moved to acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags().
Moreover, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags() always returns 0,
so it really should be void.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Before evaluating _PRW for devices that are reported as inactive or
not present by their _STA control methods we should check if those
methods are actually present (otherwise the evaulation of _PRW will
obviously fail and a scary message will be printed unnecessarily).
Reported-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Reported-by: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

It certainly is not a good idea to execute _ON or _OFF and _STA
for the same power resource at the same time which may happen in
some circumstances in theory.  To prevent that from happening,
read the power state of each power resource under its mutex, as
that will prevent the state from being changed at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Rename acpi_power_off_device() to acpi_power_off() in analogy with
acpi_power_on().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Since acpi_bus_set_power() should not use __acpi_bus_get_power() to
update the device's device->power.state field before changing its
power state (this may cause device->power.state to be inconsistent
with the device power resources' reference counters), remove this
call from it.  In consequence, the acpi_power_nocheck variable is not
necessary any more, so it can be dropped along with the DMI table
used for setting that variable for HP Pavilion 05.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

There are no more users of acpi_bus_get_power(), so it can be
dropped.  Moreover, it should be dropped, because it modifies
the device->power.state field of an ACPI device without updating
the reference counters of the device's power resources, which is
wrong.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power(), which is safer than
acpi_bus_get_power(), for getting device power state in
acpi_fujitsu_add() and acpi_fujitsu_hotkey_add().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reported-and-Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Use the new function acpi_bus_update_power() for manipulating power
resources used by ACPI fan devices, which allows them to be put into
the right state during initialization and resume.  Consequently,
remove the flags.force_power_state field from struct acpi_device,
which is not necessary any more.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Depending on the organization of the ACPI namespace, power resource
device objects may generally be scanned after the "regular" device
objects that they are referred from through _PRn.  This, in turn, may
cause acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to attempt to access them through
acpi_bus_init_power() before they are registered (and initialized by
acpi_power_driver).  [This is not a theoretical issue, it actually
happens for one PnP device on my testbed HP nx6325.]

To fix this problem, make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() attempt to
register power resource devices as soon as they have been found in
the _PRn output for any other devices.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The ACPI device driver used for handling power resources,
acpi_power_driver, creates a struct acpi_power_resource object for
each ACPI device representing a power resource.  These objects are
then used when setting and reading the power states of devices using
the corresponding power resources.  Unfortunately, acpi_power_driver
is registered after acpi_scan_init() that may add devices using the
power resources before acpi_power_driver has a chance to create
struct acpi_power_resource objects for them (specifically, the power
resources may be referred to during the scanning process through
acpi_bus_get_power() before they have been initialized).

As the first step towards fixing this issue, move the registration
of acpi_power_driver into acpi_scan_init() so that power resource
devices can be initialized by it as soon as they have been found in
the namespace.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Add function acpi_bus_update_power() for reading the actual power
state of an ACPI device and updating its device->power.state field
in such a way that its power resources' reference counters will
remain consistent with that field.

For this purpose introduce __acpi_bus_set_power() setting the
power state of an ACPI device without updating its
device->power.state field and make acpi_bus_set_power() and
acpi_bus_update_power() use it (acpi_bus_set_power() retains the
current behavior for now).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Add function acpi_bus_init_power() for getting the initial power
state of an ACPI device and reference counting its power resources
as appropriate.

Make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() use the new function instead of
acpi_bus_get_power() that updates device->power.state without
reference counting the device's power resources.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

It sometimes is necessary to get the power state of an ACPI device
without updating its device->power.state field, for example to
avoid inconsistencies between device->power.state and the reference
counters of the device's power resources.  For this purpose introduce
__acpi_bus_get_power() that will return the given device's power
state via a pointer (instead of modifying device->power.state)
and make acpi_bus_get_power() use it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Introduce function acpi_power_on_resources() that reference counts
and possibly turns on ACPI power resources for a given device and
a given power state of it.

This function will be used for reference counting device power
resources during initialization.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

ACPI device power resources should be reference counted during
device initialization, so that their reference counters are always
up to date.  It is convenient to do that with the help of a function
that will reference count and possibly turn on power resources in
a given list, so introduce that function, acpi_power_on_list().
For symmetry, introduce acpi_power_off_list() for performing the
reverse operation and use the both of them to simplify
acpi_power_transition().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

acpi_power_get_inferred_state() should not update
device->power.state behind the back of its caller, so make it return
the state via a pointer instead.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Version 20101209.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Modify/add some comments to minimize ACPICA/linux GPE code divergence.
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The global event handler is called whenever a general purpose
or fixed ACPI event occurs.

Also update Linux OSL to collect events counter with
global event handler.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

This feature provides an automatic device notification for wake devices
when a wakeup GPE occurs and there is no corresponding GPE method or
handler. Rather than ignoring such a GPE, an implicit AML Notify
operation is performed on the parent device object.
This feature is not part of the ACPI specification and is provided for
Windows compatibility only.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Change the local variable in acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method()
back into a pointer as ACPICA code base does.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>