- 13 Mar, 2004 2 commits
-
-
James Bottomley authored
The actual problem reported was because there wasn't a corresponding check on transport_classdev.class in the unregister. However, on closer inspection I also turned up a nasty thinko in the reference counting. For reasons best known to the class code authors, class devices have to obtain their own references to the devices they're attached to which they release again in their .release routines, so you have to remember to do a get_device() in the correct place after the class_device_add(). I put comments in the code so that, hopefully, we can avoid the problem in future.
-
James Bottomley authored
Domain Validation is a fairly essential element to the SCSI Parallel Interface (although if you look very few drivers actually do it). The premise is that the Parallel Bus, being a transmission line, might not be correctly tuned to the transfers you want do perform. DV probes the parameters of the transport until it finds a setting that works (for the interested, see http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/sdv/sdv-r08b.pdf) The current code employs rather simplistic DV heuristics, although those can be improved over time. The change in scsi_scan.c is so that DV may be done easily from the slave_configure routine, which is the most natural place to begin.
-
- 12 Mar, 2004 38 commits
-
-
James Bottomley authored
This patch just brings it up to date with the previous transport attribute patch, moving it to the model where it sets the min/max of the attribute if asked for something outside its range. It also only makes period and offset visible (it doesn't care about any of the others).
-
James Bottomley authored
This does three things - Fix the signedness of the bit attributes (otherwise they show up as -1 when on, not 1) - Make the period adjust to the closest value rather than ignoring values it doesn't understand. - Add a visibility field to attributes, so drivers can get rid of attributes they're never going to care about
-
James Bottomley authored
This patch adds the ability to quiesce a SCSI device. The idea is that user issued commands (including filesystem ones) would get blocked, while mid-layer and device issued ones would be allowed to proceed. This is for things like Domain Validation which like to operate on an otherwise quiet device. There is one big change: to get all of this to happen correctly, scsi_do_req() has to queue on the *head* of the request queue, not the tail as it was doing previously. The reason is that deferred requests block the queue, so anything needing executing after a deferred request has to go in front of it. I don't think there are any untoward consequences of this.
-
Mark Haverkamp authored
Mark S. said that there was another adapter added, and that they changed the names of some boards. Here is the updated version.
-
Matthew Wilcox authored
- Correct a typo "mvram" -> "nvram". - Re-do the PQS/PDS support which I'd #if 0 out. Should even work on multiple-domain boxes now ;-) - Move all the nvram definitions to sym_nvram.h (from Gerard's 2.1.19-pre3) - hcb_p -> struct sym_hcb * - sdev_p -> struct sym_device * - Delete a lot of unused macros from sym_misc.h - Move READ_BARRIER and WRITE_BARRIER definitions to sym_glue.h - SYM_CONF_NVRAM_WRITE_SUPPORT (from Gerard's 2.1.19-pre3). Not enabled yet. - Fix some -W warnings (some courtesy of Adrian Bunk).
-
Mark Haverkamp authored
I submitted a patch last month for the aacraid driver's reset handler. I left out setting function pointers in the adapter_ops structure for the adapter_check_health element.
-
James Bottomley authored
From: Moore, Eric Dean <Emoore@lsil.com> This is an update for the MPT Fusion drivers 2.6 kernel. Version 3.01.01. This is a fix for poor performance in RAID Volumes. The dvStatus was being cleared for hidden physical disks when mptscsih_slave_destroy is called. Also, I have fixed the warning comming from mptscsih_reset_timeouts.
-
bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/libata-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into ppc970.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Jeff Garzik authored
into redhat.com:/spare/repo/libata-2.5
-
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/jgarzik/netconsole-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into ppc970.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Jeff Garzik authored
into redhat.com:/spare/repo/netconsole-2.5
-
Jeff Garzik authored
-
bk://gkernel.bkbits.net/prism54-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into ppc970.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Jeff Garzik authored
-
Jeff Garzik authored
-
bk://linux-scsi.bkbits.net/scsi-for-linus-2.6Linus Torvalds authored
into ppc970.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
http://lia64.bkbits.net/to-linus-2.5Linus Torvalds authored
into ppc970.osdl.org:/home/torvalds/v2.5/linux
-
Linus Torvalds authored
Cset exclude: akpm@osdl.org|ChangeSet|20040312161945|47751
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> At present slab is using 2-order allocations for the size-2048 cache. Of course, this can affect networking quite seriously. The patch ensures that slab will never use more than a 1-order allocation for objects which have a size of less than 2*PAGE_SIZE.
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> Add a little helper macro for a common list extraction operation in vmscan.c
-
Andrew Morton authored
The current refill logic in refill_inactive_zone() takes an arbitrarily large number of pages and chops it down to SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX*4, regardless of the size of the zone. This has the effect of reducing the amount of refilling of large zones proportionately much more than of small zones. We made this change in may 2003 and I'm damned if I remember why. let's put it back so we don't truncate the refill count and see what happens.
-
Andrew Morton authored
- prevent nr_scan_inactive from going negative - compare `count' with SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, not `max_scan' - Use ">= SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX", not "> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX".
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> Use a "refill_counter" for inactive list scanning, similar to the one used for active list scanning. This batches up scanning now that we precisely balance ratios, and don't round up the amount to be done. No observed benefits, but I imagine it would lower the acquisition frequency of the lru locks in some cases, and make codepaths more efficient in general due to cache niceness.
-
Andrew Morton authored
This is just a random unsubstantiated tuning tweak: don't immediately throttle page allocators and kwapd when the going is getting heavier: scan a bit more of the LRU before throttling.
-
Andrew Morton authored
This removes a vestige of the old algorithm. We don't want to skip zones if all_zones_ok is true: we've already precalculated which zones need scanning and this just stops us from ever performing kswapd reclaim from the DMA zone.
-
Andrew Morton authored
As kswapd is now scanning zones in the highmem->normal->dma direction it can get into competition with the page allocator: kswapd keep on trying to free pages from highmem, then kswapd moves onto lowmem. By the time kswapd has done proportional scanning in lowmem, someone has come in and allocated a few pages from highmem. So kswapd goes back and frees some highmem, then some lowmem again. But nobody has allocated any lowmem yet. So we keep on and on scanning lowmem in response to highmem page allocations. With a simple `dd' on a 1G box we get: r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy wa id 0 3 0 59340 4628 922348 0 0 4 28188 1072 808 0 10 46 44 0 3 0 29932 4660 951760 0 0 0 30752 1078 441 1 6 30 64 0 3 0 57568 4556 924052 0 0 0 30748 1075 478 0 8 43 49 0 3 0 29664 4584 952176 0 0 0 30752 1075 472 0 6 34 60 0 3 0 5304 4620 976280 0 0 4 40484 1073 456 1 7 52 41 0 3 0 104856 4508 877112 0 0 0 18452 1074 97 0 7 67 26 0 3 0 70768 4540 911488 0 0 0 35876 1078 746 0 7 34 59 1 2 0 42544 4568 939680 0 0 0 21524 1073 556 0 5 43 51 0 3 0 5520 4608 976428 0 0 4 37924 1076 836 0 7 41 51 0 2 0 4848 4632 976812 0 0 32 12308 1092 94 0 1 33 66 Simple fix: go back to scanning the zones in the dma->normal->highmem direction so we meet the page allocator in the middle somewhere. r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy wa id 1 3 0 5152 3468 976548 0 0 4 37924 1071 650 0 8 64 28 1 2 0 4888 3496 976588 0 0 0 23576 1075 726 0 6 66 27 0 3 0 5336 3532 976348 0 0 0 31264 1072 708 0 8 60 32 0 3 0 6168 3560 975504 0 0 0 40992 1072 683 0 6 63 31 0 3 0 4560 3580 976844 0 0 0 18448 1073 233 0 4 59 37 0 3 0 5840 3624 975712 0 0 4 26660 1072 800 1 8 46 45 0 3 0 4816 3648 976640 0 0 0 40992 1073 526 0 6 47 47 0 3 0 5456 3672 976072 0 0 0 19984 1070 320 0 5 60 35
-
Andrew Morton authored
Currently kswapd walks across all zones in dma->normal->highmem order, performing proportional scanning until all zones are OK. This means that pressure against ZONE_NORMAL causes unnecessary reclaim of ZONE_HIGHMEM. To fix that up we change kswapd so that it walks the zones in the high->normal->dma direction, skipping zones which are OK. Once it encounters a zone which needs some reclaim kswapd will perform proportional scanning against that zone as well as all the succeeding lower zones. We scan the lower zones even if they have sufficient free pages. This is because a) the lower zone may be above pages_high, but because of the incremental min, the lower zone may still not be eligible for allocations. That's bad because cache in that lower zone will then not be scanned at the correct rate. b) pages in this lower zone are usable for allocations against the higher zone. So we do want to san all the relevant zones at an equal rate.
-
Andrew Morton authored
- If max_scan evaluates to zero due to a very small inactive list and high `priority' numbers, we don't want to thrlttle yet. - In balance_pgdat(), we may end up not scanning any pages because all zones happened to be above pages_high. Avoid throttling in this case too.
-
Andrew Morton authored
When page reclaim is working out how many pages to san in a zone (max-scan) it presently rounds that number up if it looks too small - for work batching. Problem is, this can result in excessive scanning against small zones which have few inactive pages. So remove it. Not that it is possible for max_scan to be zero. That's OK - it'll become non-zero as the priority increases.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Page reclaim is currently a bit schitzo: sometimes we say "go and scan this many pages and tell me how many pages were freed" and at other times we say "go and scan this many pages, but stop if you freed this many". It makes the logic harder to control and to understand. This patch coverts everything into the "go and scan this many pages and tell me how many pages were freed" model. It doesn't seem to affect performance much either way.
-
Andrew Morton authored
We currently have a problem with the balancing of reclaim between zones: much more reclaim happens against highmem than against lowmem. This patch partially fixes this by changing the direct reclaim path so it does not bale out of the zone walk after having reclaimed sufficient pages from highmem: go on to reclaim from lowmem regardless of how many pages we reclaimed from lowmem.
-
Andrew Morton authored
The patch which went in six months or so back which said "only reclaim slab if we're scanning lowmem pagecache" was wrong. I must have been asleep at the time. We do need to scan slab in response to highmem page reclaim as well. Because all the math is based around the total amount of memory in the machine, and we know that if we're performing highmem page reclaim then the lower zones have no free memory.
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> The logic which calculates the numberof pages which were scanned is mucked up. Fix.
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> In try_to_free_pages(), put even pressure on the slab even if we have reclaimed enough pages from the LRU.
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> In shrink_slab(), do the multiply before the divide to avoid losing precision.
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> If refill_inactive_zone() is running in its dont-reclaim-mapped-memory mode we are tossing away the referenced infomation on active mapped pages. So put that info back if we're not going to deactivate the page.
-
Andrew Morton authored
The logic in balance_pgdat() is all bollixed up. - the incoming arg `nr_pages' should be used to determine if we're being asked to free a specific number of pages, not `to_free'. - local variable `to_free' is not appropriate for the determination of whether we failed to bring all zones to appropriate free pages levels. Fix this by correctly calculating `all_zones_ok' and then use all_zones_ok to determine whether we need to throttle kswapd. So the logic now is: for (increasing priority) { all_zones_ok = 1; for (all zones) { to_reclaim = number of pages to try to reclaim from this zone; max_scan = number of pages to scan in this pass (gets larger as `priority' decreases) /* * set `reclaimed' to the number of pages which were * actually freed up */ reclaimed = scan(max_scan pages); reclaimed += shrink_slab(); to_free -= reclaimed; /* for the `nr_pages>0' case */ /* * If this scan failed to reclaim `to_reclaim' or more * pages, we're getting into trouble. Need to scan * some more, and throttle kswapd. Note that this * zone may now have sufficient free pages due to * freeing activity by some other process. That's * OK - we'll pick that info up on the next pass * through the loop. */ if (reclaimed < to_reclaim) all_zones_ok = 0; } if (to_free > 0) continue; /* swsusp: need to do more work */ if (all_zones_ok) break; /* kswapd is done */ /* * OK, kswapd is getting into trouble. Take a nap, then take * another pass across the zones. */ blk_congestion_wait(); }
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@Namesys.COM> Now that decision to reclaim mapped memory is taken on the basis of zone->prev_priority, priority argument is no longer needed.
-