- 29 Apr, 2019 40 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There is a report in kernel bugzilla about mismatch file type in dir item and inode item. This inspires us to check inode mode in inode item. This patch will check the following members: - inode key objectid Should be ROOT_DIR_DIR or [256, (u64)-256] or FREE_INO. - inode key offset Should be 0 - inode item generation - inode item transid No newer than sb generation + 1. The +1 is for log tree. - inode item mode No unknown bits. No invalid S_IF* bit. NOTE: S_IFMT check is not enough, need to check every know type. - inode item nlink Dir should have no more link than 1. - inode item flags Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Btrfs-progs already have a comprehensive type checker, to ensure there is only 0 (SINGLE profile) or 1 (DUP/RAID0/1/5/6/10) bit set for chunk profile bits. Do the same work for kernel. Reported-by:
Yoon Jungyeon <jungyeon@gatech.edu> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202765Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] For fuzzed image whose DEV_ITEM has invalid total_bytes as 0, then kernel will just panic: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000098 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] PGD 800000022b2bd067 P4D 800000022b2bd067 PUD 22b2bc067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 1106 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #9 RIP: 0010:btrfs_verify_dev_extents+0x2a5/0x5a0 Call Trace: open_ctree+0x160d/0x2149 btrfs_mount_root+0x5b2/0x680 [CAUSE] If device extent verification finds a deivce with 0 total_bytes, then it assumes it's a seed dummy, then search for seed devices. But in this case, there is no seed device at all, causing NULL pointer. [FIX] Since this is caused by fuzzed image, let's go the tree-check way, just add a new verification for device item. Reported-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since we have btrfs_check_chunk_valid() in tree-checker, let's do chunk item verification in tree-checker too. Since the tree-checker is run at endio time, if one chunk leaf fails chunk verification, we can still retry the other copy, making btrfs more robust to fuzzed image as we may still get a good chunk item. Also since we have done chunk verification in tree block read time, skip the btrfs_check_chunk_valid() call in read_one_chunk() if we're reading chunk items from leaf. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
To follow the standard behavior of tree-checker. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Old error message would be something like: BTRFS error (device dm-3): invalid chunk num_stipres: 0 New error message would be: Btrfs critical (device dm-3): corrupt superblock syschunk array: chunk_start=2097152, invalid chunk num_stripes: 0 Or Btrfs critical (device dm-3): corrupt leaf: root=3 block=8388608 slot=3 chunk_start=2097152, invalid chunk num_stripes: 0 And for certain error message, also output expected value. The error message levels are changed from error to critical. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
By function, chunk item verification is more suitable to be done inside tree-checker. So move btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to tree-checker.c and export it. And since it's now moved to tree-checker, also add a better comment for what this function is doing. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The commit fcebe456 ("Btrfs: rework qgroup accounting") reworked qgroups and added some new structures. Another rework of qgroup mechanics e69bcee3 ("btrfs: qgroup: Cleanup the old ref_node-oriented mechanism.") stopped using them and left uncleaned. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. As all callsites are updated, add the btrfs_ prefix as the function is exported. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
Phillip Potter authored
Deduplicate the btrfs file type conversion implementation - file systems that use the same file types as defined by POSIX do not need to define their own versions and can use the common helper functions decared in fs_types.h and implemented in fs_types.c Common implementation can be found via commit: bbe7449e "fs: common implementation of file type" Reviewed-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk> Reviewed-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
Move code to make it more readable, so as locking and unlocking is done in the same function. The generic checks that are now performed in the locked section are unaffected. Signed-off-by:
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
BUG_ON(1) leads to bogus warnings from clang when CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES is set: fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5041:3: error: variable 'max_chunk_size' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized] BUG_ON(1); ^~~~~~~~~ include/asm-generic/bug.h:61:36: note: expanded from macro 'BUG_ON' #define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (unlikely(condition)) BUG(); } while (0) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/compiler.h:48:23: note: expanded from macro 'unlikely' # define unlikely(x) (__branch_check__(x, 0, __builtin_constant_p(x))) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5046:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here max_chunk_size); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/kernel.h:860:36: note: expanded from macro 'min' #define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <) ^ include/linux/kernel.h:853:17: note: expanded from macro '__careful_cmp' __cmp_once(x, y, __UNIQUE_ID(__x), __UNIQUE_ID(__y), op)) ^ include/linux/kernel.h:847:25: note: expanded from macro '__cmp_once' typeof(y) unique_y = (y); \ ^ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5041:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true BUG_ON(1); ^ include/asm-generic/bug.h:61:32: note: expanded from macro 'BUG_ON' #define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (unlikely(condition)) BUG(); } while (0) ^ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4993:20: note: initialize the variable 'max_chunk_size' to silence this warning u64 max_chunk_size; ^ = 0 Change it to BUG() so clang can see that this code path can never continue. Reviewed-by:Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The wrapper names better describe what's happening so they're not deleted though they're trivial, but at least moved closer to their place of use. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Long time ago (2008), the extent buffers were organized in a LRU list and switched to rb-tree in 6af118ce ("Btrfs: Index extent buffers in an rbtree"). There was one stale macro definition left. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
- make the messages more visually consistent and use same format "running ... test", any error or other warning can be easily spotted - move some message to the test entry function - add message to the inode tests Example output: [ 8.187391] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-generic, assert=on, integrity-checker=on, ref-verify=on [ 8.189476] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096 nodesize: 4096 [ 8.190761] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests [ 8.192245] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests [ 8.193573] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests [ 8.194876] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests [ 8.196166] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests [ 8.198026] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer operation tests [ 8.199328] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_split_item tests [ 8.200653] BTRFS: selftest: running extent I/O tests [ 8.201808] BTRFS: selftest: running find delalloc tests [ 8.320733] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer bitmap tests [ 8.340795] BTRFS: selftest: running inode tests [ 8.341766] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_get_extent tests [ 8.342981] BTRFS: selftest: running hole first btrfs_get_extent test [ 8.344342] BTRFS: selftest: running outstanding_extents tests [ 8.345575] BTRFS: selftest: running qgroup tests [ 8.346537] BTRFS: selftest: running qgroup add/remove tests [ 8.347725] BTRFS: selftest: running qgroup multiple refs test [ 8.354982] BTRFS: selftest: running free space tree tests [ 8.372175] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096 nodesize: 8192 [ 8.373539] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests [ 8.374989] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests [ 8.376236] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests [ 8.377483] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests [ 8.378854] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests ... Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The messages like 'extent I/O tests finished' are redundant, if the test fails it's quite obvious in the log and hang is also noticeable. No other then extent_io and free space tree tests print that so make it consistent. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Comments about ranges did not match the code, the correct calculation is to use start and start+len as the interval boundaries. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
There are a few unconverted constants that are not powers of two and haven't been converted. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The way the extent map tests handle errors does not conform to the rest of the suite, where the first failure is reported and then it stops. Do the same now that we have the errors returned from all the functions. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Replace asserts with error messages and return errors. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Replace asserts with error messages and return errors. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Replace asserts with error messages and return errors. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Replace asserts with error messages and return errors. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The individual testcases for extent maps do not return an error on allocation failures. This is not a big problem as the allocation don't fail in general but there are functional tests handled with ASSERTS. This makes tests dependent on them and it's not reliable. This patch adds the allocation failure handling and allows for the conversion of the asserts to proper error handling and reporting. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The fs_info is supposed to be valid, even though it's not used right now and the test does not crash. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by:
-
