Backtracking information is very verbose, don't print it in log
level 1 to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216213358.3374427-4-christylee@fb.com

Make the verifier logs more readable, print the verifier states
on the corresponding instruction line. If the previous line was
not a bpf instruction, then print the verifier states on its own
line.

Before:

Validating test_pkt_access_subprog3() func#3...
86: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int test_pkt_access_subprog3(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb)
86: (bf) r6 = r2
87: R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
87: (bc) w7 = w1
88: R1=invP(id=0) R7_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123));
88: (bf) r1 = r6
89: R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
89: (85) call pc+9
Func#4 is global and valid. Skipping.
90: R0_w=invP(id=0)
90: (bc) w8 = w0
91: R0_w=invP(id=0) R8_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123));
91: (b7) r1 = 123
92: R1_w=invP123
92: (85) call pc+65
Func#5 is global and valid. Skipping.
93: R0=invP(id=0)

After:

86: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int test_pkt_access_subprog3(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb)
86: (bf) r6 = r2                      ; R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
87: (bc) w7 = w1                      ; R1=invP(id=0) R7_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123));
88: (bf) r1 = r6                      ; R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
89: (85) call pc+9
Func#4 is global and valid. Skipping.
90: R0_w=invP(id=0)
90: (bc) w8 = w0                      ; R0_w=invP(id=0) R8_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123));
91: (b7) r1 = 123                     ; R1_w=invP123
92: (85) call pc+65
Func#5 is global and valid. Skipping.
93: R0=invP(id=0)
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

When printing verifier state for any log level, print full verifier
state only on function calls or on errors. Otherwise, only print the
registers and stack slots that were accessed.

Log size differences:

verif_scale_loop6 before: 234566564
verif_scale_loop6 after: 72143943
69% size reduction

kfree_skb before: 166406
kfree_skb after: 55386
69% size reduction

Before:

156: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
157: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=00000000 fp-16_w=00\
000000 fp-24_w=00000000 fp-32_w=00000000 fp-40_w=00000000 fp-48_w=00000000 fp-56_w=00000000 fp-64_w=00000000 fp-72_w=00000000 fp-80_w=00000\
000 fp-88_w=00000000 fp-96_w=00000000 fp-104_w=00000000 fp-112_w=00000000 fp-120_w=00000000 fp-128_w=00000000 fp-136_w=00000000 fp-144_w=00\
000000 fp-152_w=00000000 fp-160_w=00000000 fp-168_w=00000000 fp-176_w=00000000 fp-184_w=00000000 fp-192_w=00000000 fp-200_w=00000000 fp-208\
_w=00000000 fp-216_w=00000000 fp-224_w=00000000 fp-232_w=00000000 fp-240_w=00000000 fp-248_w=00000000 fp-256_w=00000000 fp-264_w=00000000 f\
p-272_w=00000000 fp-280_w=00000000 fp-288_w=00000000 fp-296_w=00000000 fp-304_w=00000000 fp-312_w=00000000 fp-320_w=00000000 fp-328_w=00000\
000 fp-336_w=00000000 fp-344_w=00000000 fp-352_w=00000000 fp-360_w=00000000 fp-368_w=00000000 fp-376_w=00000000 fp-384_w=00000000 fp-392_w=\
00000000 fp-400_w=00000000 fp-408_w=00000000 fp-416_w=00000000 fp-424_w=00000000 fp-432_w=00000000 fp-440_w=00000000 fp-448_w=00000000
; return skb->len;
157: (95) exit
Func#4 is safe for any args that match its prototype
Validating get_constant() func#5...
158: R1=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
; int get_constant(long val)
158: (bf) r0 = r1
159: R0_w=invP(id=1) R1=invP(id=1) R10=fp0
; return val - 122;
159: (04) w0 += -122
160: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=invP(id=1) R10=fp0
; return val - 122;
160: (95) exit
Func#5 is safe for any args that match its prototype
Validating get_skb_ifindex() func#6...
161: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
; int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var)
161: (bc) w0 = w3
162: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0

After:

156: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0)
157: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
; return skb->len;
157: (95) exit
Func#4 is safe for any args that match its prototype
Validating get_constant() func#5...
158: R1=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
; int get_constant(long val)
158: (bf) r0 = r1
159: R0_w=invP(id=1) R1=invP(id=1)
; return val - 122;
159: (04) w0 += -122
160: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; return val - 122;
160: (95) exit
Func#5 is safe for any args that match its prototype
Validating get_skb_ifindex() func#6...
161: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0
; int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var)
161: (bc) w0 = w3
162: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R3=invP(id=0)
Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <christylee@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216213358.3374427-2-christylee@fb.com

Jakub Kicinski says:

====================

Changes to bpf.h tend to clog up our build systems. The netdev/bpf
build bot does incremental builds to save time (reusing the build
directory to only rebuild changed objects).

This is the rough breakdown of how many objects needs to be rebuilt
based on file touched:

kernel.h      40633
bpf.h         17881
bpf-cgroup.h  17875
skbuff.h      10696
bpf-netns.h    7604
netdevice.h    7452
filter.h       5003
sock.h         4959
tcp.h          4048

As the stats show touching bpf.h is _very_ expensive.

Bulk of the objects get rebuilt because MM includes cgroup headers.
Luckily bpf-cgroup.h does not fundamentally depend on bpf.h so we
can break that dependency and reduce the number of objects.

With the patches applied touching bpf.h causes 5019 objects to be rebuilt
(17881 / 5019 = 3.56x). That's pretty much down to filter.h plus noise.

v2:
Try to make the new headers wider in scope. Collapse bpf-link and
bpf-cgroup-types into one header, which may serve as "BPF kernel
API" header in the future if needed. Rename bpf-cgroup-storage.h
to bpf-inlines.h.

Add a fix for the s390 build issue.

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211215061916.715513-1-kuba@kernel.org/
Merge bpf-includes.h into bpf.h.

v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211215181231.1053479-1-kuba@kernel.org/
Change course - break off cgroup instead of breaking off bpf.

v5:
Add forward declaration of struct bpf_prog to perf_event.h
when !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL (kbuild bot).
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Remove the dependency from cgroup-defs.h to bpf-cgroup.h and bpf.h.
This reduces the incremental build size of x86 allmodconfig after
bpf.h was touched from ~17k objects rebuilt to ~5k objects.
bpf.h is 2.2kLoC and is modified relatively often.

We need a new header with just the definition of struct cgroup_bpf
and enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type, this is akin to cgroup-defs.h.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216025538.1649516-4-kuba@kernel.org

We're about to break the cgroup-defs.h -> bpf-cgroup.h dependency,
make sure those who actually need more than the definition of
struct cgroup_bpf include bpf-cgroup.h explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216025538.1649516-3-kuba@kernel.org

cgroup pulls in BPF which pulls in a lot of includes.
We're about to break that chain so fix those who were
depending on it.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216025538.1649516-2-kuba@kernel.org

Jean-Philippe Brucker says:

====================

Since v1 [1], I added Quentin's acks and applied Andrii's suggestions:
* Pass CFLAGS to libbpf link in patch 3
* Substitute CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS whole in HOST_CFLAGS to avoid accidents,
  patch 4

Add support for cross-building BPF tools and selftests with clang, by
passing LLVM=1 or CC=clang to make, as well as CROSS_COMPILE. A single
clang toolchain can generate binaries for multiple architectures, so
instead of having prefixes such as aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc, clang uses the
-target parameter: `clang -target aarch64-linux-gnu'.

Patch 1 adds the parameter in Makefile.include so tools can easily
support this. Patch 2 prepares for the libbpf change from patch 3 (keep
building resolve_btfids's libbpf in the host arch, when cross-building
the kernel with clang). Patches 3-6 enable cross-building BPF tools with
clang.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211122192019.1277299-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org/
====================
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Cross building using clang requires passing the "-target" flag rather
than using the CROSS_COMPILE prefix. Makefile.include transforms
CROSS_COMPILE into CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS. Clear CROSS_COMPILE for bpftool
and the host libbpf, and use the clang flags for urandom_read and bench.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216163842.829836-7-jean-philippe@linaro.org

Cross-building using clang requires passing the "-target" flag rather
than using the CROSS_COMPILE prefix. Makefile.include transforms
CROSS_COMPILE into CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS. Add them to CFLAGS, and erase
CROSS_COMPILE for the bpftool build, since it needs to be executed on
the host.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216163842.829836-6-jean-philippe@linaro.org

Cross-building using clang requires passing the "-target" flag rather
than using the CROSS_COMPILE prefix. Makefile.include transforms
CROSS_COMPILE into CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS, and adds that to CFLAGS. Remove
the cross flags for the bootstrap bpftool, and erase the CROSS_COMPILE
flag for the bootstrap libbpf.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216163842.829836-5-jean-philippe@linaro.org

Cross-building using clang requires passing the "-target" flag rather
than using the CROSS_COMPILE prefix. Makefile.include transforms
CROSS_COMPILE into CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS. Add them to the CFLAGS.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216163842.829836-4-jean-philippe@linaro.org

The CROSS_COMPILE variable may be present during resolve_btfids build if
the kernel is being cross-built. Since resolve_btfids is always executed
on the host, we set CC to HOSTCC in order to use the host toolchain when
cross-building with GCC. But instead of a toolchain prefix, cross-build
with clang uses a "-target" parameter, which Makefile.include deduces
from the CROSS_COMPILE variable. In order to avoid cross-building
libbpf, clear CROSS_COMPILE before building resolve_btfids.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216163842.829836-3-jean-philippe@linaro.org

Cross-compilation with clang uses the -target parameter rather than a
toolchain prefix. Just like the kernel Makefile, add that parameter to
CFLAGS when CROSS_COMPILE is set.

Unlike the kernel Makefile, we use the --sysroot and --gcc-toolchain
options because unlike the kernel, tools require standard libraries.
Commit c91d4e47 ("Makefile: Remove '--gcc-toolchain' flag") provides
some background about --gcc-toolchain. Normally clang finds on its own
the additional utilities and libraries that it needs (for example GNU ld
or glibc). On some systems however, this autodetection doesn't work.
There, our only recourse is asking GCC directly, and pass the result to
--sysroot and --gcc-toolchain. Of course that only works when a cross
GCC is available.

Autodetection worked fine on Debian, but to use the aarch64-linux-gnu
toolchain from Archlinux I needed both --sysroot (for crt1.o) and
--gcc-toolchain (for crtbegin.o, -lgcc). The --prefix parameter wasn't
needed there, but it might be useful on other distributions.

Use the CLANG_CROSS_FLAGS variable instead of CLANG_FLAGS because it
allows tools such as bpftool, that need to build both host and target
binaries, to easily filter out the cross-build flags from CFLAGS.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Acked-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216163842.829836-2-jean-philippe@linaro.org

Fix possible read beyond ELF "license" data section if the license
string is not properly zero-terminated. Use the fact that libbpf_strlcpy
never accesses the (N-1)st byte of the source string because it's
replaced with '\0' anyways.

If this happens, it's a violation of contract between libbpf and a user,
but not handling this more robustly upsets CIFuzz, so given the fix is
trivial, let's fix the potential issue.

Fixes: 9fc205b4 ("libbpf: Add sane strncpy alternative and use it internally")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214232054.3458774-1-andrii@kernel.org

Kui-Feng Lee says:

====================

bpf_object__find_program_by_title is going to be deprecated since
v0.7.  Replace all use cases with bpf_object__find_program_by_name if
possible, or use bpf_object__for_each_program to iterate over
programs, matching section names.

V3 fixes a broken test case, fexit_bpf2bpf, in selftests/bpf, using
bpf_obj__for_each_program API instead.

[v2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211211003608.2764928-1-kuifeng@fb.com/
[v1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211210190855.1369060-1-kuifeng@fb.com/T/
====================
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Deprecate this API since v0.7.  All callers should move to
bpf_object__find_program_by_name if possible, otherwise use
bpf_object__for_each_program to find a program out from a given
section.

[0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/292Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214035931.1148209-5-kuifeng@fb.com

bpf_obj__find_program_by_title() in libbpf is going to be deprecated.
Call bpf_object_for_each_program to find a program in the section with
a given name instead.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214035931.1148209-4-kuifeng@fb.com

bpf_object__find_program_by_title is going to be deprecated.
Replace use cases of bpf_object__find_program_by_title in samples/bpf/
with bpf_object__for_each_program.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214035931.1148209-3-kuifeng@fb.com

bpf_object__find_program_by_title is going to be deprecated.  Replace
all use cases in tools/testing/selftests/bpf with
bpf_object__find_program_by_name or bpf_object__for_each_program.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214035931.1148209-2-kuifeng@fb.com

As libbpf now is able to automatically take care of RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
increase (or skip it altogether on recent enough kernels), remove
explicit setrlimit() invocations in bench, test_maps, test_verifier, and
test_progs.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214195904.1785155-3-andrii@kernel.org

The need to increase RLIMIT_MEMLOCK to do anything useful with BPF is
one of the first extremely frustrating gotchas that all new BPF users go
through and in some cases have to learn it a very hard way.

Luckily, starting with upstream Linux kernel version 5.11, BPF subsystem
dropped the dependency on memlock and uses memcg-based memory accounting
instead. Unfortunately, detecting memcg-based BPF memory accounting is
far from trivial (as can be evidenced by this patch), so in practice
most BPF applications still do unconditional RLIMIT_MEMLOCK increase.

As we move towards libbpf 1.0, it would be good to allow users to forget
about RLIMIT_MEMLOCK vs memcg and let libbpf do the sensible adjustment
automatically. This patch paves the way forward in this matter. Libbpf
will do feature detection of memcg-based accounting, and if detected,
will do nothing. But if the kernel is too old, just like BCC, libbpf
will automatically increase RLIMIT_MEMLOCK on behalf of user
application ([0]).

As this is technically a breaking change, during the transition period
applications have to opt into libbpf 1.0 mode by setting
LIBBPF_STRICT_AUTO_RLIMIT_MEMLOCK bit when calling
libbpf_set_strict_mode().

Libbpf allows to control the exact amount of set RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit
with libbpf_set_memlock_rlim_max() API. Passing 0 will make libbpf do
nothing with RLIMIT_MEMLOCK. libbpf_set_memlock_rlim_max() has to be
called before the first bpf_prog_load(), bpf_btf_load(), or
bpf_object__load() call, otherwise it has no effect and will return
-EBUSY.

  [0] Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/369Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214195904.1785155-2-andrii@kernel.org

strncpy() has a notoriously error-prone semantics which makes GCC
complain about it a lot (and quite often completely completely falsely
at that). Instead of pleasing GCC all the time (-Wno-stringop-truncation
is unfortunately only supported by GCC, so it's a bit too messy to just
enable it in Makefile), add libbpf-internal libbpf_strlcpy() helper
which follows what FreeBSD's strlcpy() does and what most people would
expect from strncpy(): copies up to N-1 first bytes from source string
into destination string and ensures zero-termination afterwards.

Replace all the relevant uses of strncpy/strncat/memcpy in libbpf with
libbpf_strlcpy().

This also fixes the issue reported by Emmanuel Deloget in xsk.c where
memcpy() could access source string beyond its end.

Fixes: 2f6324a3 (libbpf: Support shared umems between queues and devices)
Reported-by: Emmanuel Deloget <emmanuel.deloget@eho.link>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211211004043.2374068-1-andrii@kernel.org

In case of BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL we fill out target result explicitly.
But targ_res itself isn't initialized in such a case, and subsequent
call to bpf_core_patch_insn() might read uninitialized field (like
fail_memsz_adjust in this case). So ensure that targ_res is
zero-initialized for BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL case.

This was reported by Coverity static analyzer.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211214010032.3843804-1-andrii@kernel.org

zero_copy_allocator has been removed back when Bjorn Topel introduced
xsk_buff_pool. Remove references to it that were dangling in the tree.
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211210171511.11574-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com

This adds doc comments for the two bpf_program pinning functions,
bpf_program__pin() and bpf_program__unpin()
Signed-off-by: Grant Seltzer <grantseltzer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211209232222.541733-1-grantseltzer@gmail.com

Since commit ad9a7f96 ("libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program
loading"), libbpf_debug_print() gets an additional prog_name parameter
but doesn't pass it to printf(). Since the format string now expects two
arguments, printf() may read uninitialized data and segfault. Pass
prog_name through.

Fixes: ad9a7f96 ("libbpf: Improve logging around BPF program loading")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211213183058.346066-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org

In non trivial scenarios, the action id alone is not sufficient to
identify the program causing the warning. Before the previous patch,
the generated stack-trace pointed out at least the involved device
driver.

Let's additionally include the program name and id, and the relevant
device name.

If the user needs additional infos, he can fetch them via a kernel
probe, leveraging the arguments added here.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ddb96bb975cbfddb1546cf5da60e77d5100b533c.1638189075.git.pabeni@redhat.com

The WARN_ONCE() in bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action() can be triggered by
any bugged program, and even attaching a correct program to a NIC
not supporting the given action.

The resulting splat, beyond polluting the logs, fouls automated tools:
e.g. a syzkaller reproducers using an XDP program returning an
unsupported action will never pass validation.

Replace the WARN_ONCE with a less intrusive pr_warn_once().
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/016ceec56e4817ebb2a9e35ce794d5c917df572c.1638189075.git.pabeni@redhat.com

Jiri Olsa says:

====================
Add new helpers to access traced function arguments that
came out of the trampoline batch changes [1].

  Get n-th argument of the traced function:
    long bpf_get_func_arg(void *ctx, u32 n, u64 *value)

  Get return value of the traced function:
    long bpf_get_func_ret(void *ctx, u64 *value)

  Get arguments count of the traced funtion:
    long bpf_get_func_arg_cnt(void *ctx)

v2 changes:
  - added acks
  - updated stack diagram
  - return -EOPNOTSUPP instead of -EINVAL in bpf_get_func_ret
  - removed gpl_only for all helpers
  - added verifier fix to allow proper arguments checks,
    Andrii asked for checking also 'int *b' argument in
    bpf_modify_return_test programs and it turned out that it's currently
    not supported by verifier - we can't read argument that is int pointer,
    so I had to add verifier change to allow that + adding verifier selftest
  - checking all arguments in bpf_modify_return_test test programs
  - moved helpers proto gets in tracing_prog_func_proto with attach type check

thanks,
jirka

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211118112455.475349-1-jolsa@kernel.org/
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Adding tests for get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers.
Using these helpers in fentry/fexit/fmod_ret programs.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-6-jolsa@kernel.org

Adding following helpers for tracing programs:

Get n-th argument of the traced function:
  long bpf_get_func_arg(void *ctx, u32 n, u64 *value)

Get return value of the traced function:
  long bpf_get_func_ret(void *ctx, u64 *value)

Get arguments count of the traced function:
  long bpf_get_func_arg_cnt(void *ctx)

The trampoline now stores number of arguments on ctx-8
address, so it's easy to verify argument index and find
return value argument's position.

Moving function ip address on the trampoline stack behind
the number of functions arguments, so it's now stored on
ctx-16 address if it's needed.

All helpers above are inlined by verifier.

Also bit unrelated small change - using newly added function
bpf_prog_has_trampoline in check_get_func_ip.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-5-jolsa@kernel.org

As suggested by Andrii, adding variables for registers and ip
address offsets, which makes the code more clear, rather than
abusing single stack_size variable for everything.

Also describing the stack layout in the comment.

There is no function change.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-4-jolsa@kernel.org

Adding verifier test for accessing int pointer argument in
tracing programs.

The test program loads 2nd argument of bpf_modify_return_test
function which is int pointer and checks that verifier allows
that.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-3-jolsa@kernel.org

Adding support to access arguments with int pointer arguments
in tracing programs.

Currently we allow tracing programs to access only pointers to
string (char pointer), void pointers and pointers to structs.

If we try to access argument which is pointer to int, verifier
will fail to load the program with;

  R1 type=ctx expected=fp
  ; int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test, int _a, __u64 _b, int _ret)
  0: (bf) r6 = r1
  ; int BPF_PROG(fmod_ret_test, int _a, __u64 _b, int _ret)
  1: (79) r9 = *(u64 *)(r6 +8)
  func 'bpf_modify_return_test' arg1 type INT is not a struct

There is no harm for the program to access int pointer argument.
We are already doing that for string pointer, which is pointer
to int with 1 byte size.

Changing the is_string_ptr to generic integer check and renaming
it to btf_type_is_int.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211208193245.172141-2-jolsa@kernel.org

During linking, type IDs in the resulting linked BPF object file can
change, and so ldimm64 instructions corresponding to
BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_TARGET and BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL CO-RE relos can get
their imm value out of sync with actual CO-RE relocation information
that's updated by BPF linker properly during linking process.

We could teach BPF linker to adjust such instructions, but it feels
a bit too much for linker to re-implement good chunk of
bpf_core_patch_insns logic just for this. This is a redundant safety
check for TYPE_ID relocations, as the real validation is in matching
CO-RE specs, so if that works fine, it's very unlikely that there is
something wrong with the instruction itself.

So, instead, teach libbpf (and kernel) to ignore insn->imm for
BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_TARGET and BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL relos.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211213010706.100231-1-andrii@kernel.org

bpf_create_map_xattr() call was reintroduced after merging bpf tree into
bpf-next tree. Convert the last instance into bpf_map_create() call.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211212191341.2529573-1-andrii@kernel.org

Coverity issued the following warning:
6685            cands = bpf_core_add_cands(cands, main_btf, 1);
6686            if (IS_ERR(cands))
>>>     CID 1510300:    (RETURN_LOCAL)
>>>     Returning pointer "cands" which points to local variable "local_cand".
6687                    return cands;

It's a false positive.
Add ERR_CAST() to silence it.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

Eliminate the follow coccicheck warning:

./kernel/bpf/btf.c:6537:13-20: WARNING opportunity for kmemdup.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1639030882-92383-1-git-send-email-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com

Hou Tao says:

====================

Hi,

The motivation for introducing bpf_strncmp() helper comes from
two aspects:

(1) clang doesn't always replace strncmp() automatically
In tracing program, sometimes we need to using a home-made
strncmp() to check whether or not the file name is expected.

(2) the performance of home-made strncmp is not so good
As shown in the benchmark in patch #4, the performance of
bpf_strncmp() helper is 18% or 33% better than home-made strncmp()
under x86-64 or arm64 when the compared string length is 64. When
the string length grows to 4095, the performance win will be
179% or 600% under x86-64 or arm64.

Any comments are welcome.
Regards,
Tao

Change Log:
v2:
 * rebased on bpf-next
 * drop patch "selftests/bpf: factor out common helpers for benchmarks"
   (suggested by Andrii)
 * remove unnecessary inline functions and add comments for programs which
   will be rejected by verifier in patch 4 (suggested by Andrii)
 * rename variables used in will-fail programs to clarify the purposes.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130142215.1237217-1-houtao1@huawei.com
 * change API to bpf_strncmp(const char *s1, u32 s1_sz, const char *s2)
 * add benchmark refactor and benchmark between bpf_strncmp() and strncmp()

RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211106132822.1396621-1-houtao1@huawei.com/
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>