Hardware contexts reference a ppgtt, not the other way round. And the
only user of this (in debugfs) actually only cares about which file
the ppgtt is associated with. So give it what it wants.

While at it give the ppgtt create function a proper name&place.
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

So when reviewing Michel's patch I've noticed a few things and cleaned
them up:
- The early checks in ppgtt_release are now redundant: The inactive
  list should always be empty now, so we can ditch these checks. Even
  for the aliasing ppgtt (though that's a different confusion) since
  we tear that down after all the objects are gone.
- The ppgtt handling functions are splattered all over. Consolidate
  them in i915_gem_gtt.c, give them OCD prefixes and add wrappers for
  get/put.
- There was a bit a confusion in ppgtt_release about whether it cares
  about the active or inactive list. It should care about them both,
  so augment the WARNINGs to check for both.

There's still create_vm_for_ctx left to do, put that is blocked on the
removal of ppgtt->ctx. Once that's done we can rename it to
i915_ppgtt_create and move it to its siblings for handling ppgtts.

v2: Move the ppgtt checks into the inline get/put functions as
suggested by Chris.

v3: Inline the now redundant ppgtt local variable.

Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

VMAs should take a reference of the address space they use.

Now, when the fd is closed, it will release the ref that the context was
holding, but it will still be referenced by any vmas that are still
active.

ppgtt_release() should then only be called when the last thing referencing
it releases the ref, and it can just call the base cleanup and free the
ppgtt.

Note that with this we will extend the lifetime of ppgtts which
contain shared objects. But all the non-shared objects will get
removed as soon as they drop of the active list and for the shared
ones the shrinker can eventually reap them. Since we currently can't
evict ppgtt pagetables either I don't think that temporary leak is
important.
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
[danvet: Add note about potential ppgtt leak with this approach.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The normal flip function places things in the ring in the legacy
way, so we either fix that or force MMIO flips always as we do in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Checkpatch. Fucking again.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This is what i915_gem_do_execbuffer calls when it wants to execute some
worload in an Execlists world.

v2: Check arguments before doing stuff in intel_execlists_submission. Also,
get rel_constants parsing right.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop the chipset flush, that's pre-gen6. And appease
checkpatch a bit .... again!]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Dispatch_execbuffer's evil twin.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Ditch the check for aliasing ppgtt. It'll break soon and
execlists requires full ppgtt anyway.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We need to attend context switch interrupts from all rings. Also, fixed writing
IMR/IER and added HWSTAM at ring init time.

Notice that, if added to irq_enable_mask, the context switch interrupts would
be incorrectly masked out when the user interrupts are due to no users waiting
on a sequence number. Therefore, this commit adds a bitmask of interrupts to
be kept unmasked at all times.

v2: Disable HWSTAM, as suggested by Damien (nobody listens to these interrupts,
anyway).

v3: Add new get/put_irq functions.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> (v2 & v3)
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop the GEN8_ prefix from the context switch interrupt
define and move it to its brethren.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This is a hard one, since there is no direct hardware ring to
control when in Execlists.

We reuse intel_ring_idle here, but it should be fine as long
as i915_add_request does the ring thing.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Same as the legacy-style ring->flush.

v2: The BSD invalidate bit still exists in GEN8! Add it for the VCS
rings (but still consolidate the blt and bsd ring flushes into one).
This was noticed by Brad Volkin.

v3: The command for BSD and for other rings is slightly different:
get it exactly the same as in gen6_ring_flush + gen6_bsd_ring_flush
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Checkpatch.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Very similar to the legacy add_request, only modified to account for
logical ringbuffer.

v2: Use MI_GLOBAL_GTT, as suggested by Brad Volkin.

v3: Unify render and non-render in the same function, as noticed by
Brad Volkin.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Well, new-ish: if all this code looks familiar, that's because it's
a clone of the existing submission mechanism (with some modifications
here and there to adapt it to LRCs and Execlists).

And why did we do this instead of reusing code, one might wonder?
Well, there are some fears that the differences are big enough that
they will end up breaking all platforms.

Also, Execlists offer several advantages, like control over when the
GPU is done with a given workload, that can help simplify the
submission mechanism, no doubt. I am interested in getting Execlists
to work first and foremost, but in the future this parallel submission
mechanism will help us to fine tune the mechanism without affecting
old gens.

v2: Pass the ringbuffer only (whenever possible).
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Appease checkpatch. Again. And drop the legacy sarea gunk
that somehow crept in.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Don't print raw numbers, use port_name() and tell the user whether it's
long or short without having to figure out what the other magic number
means.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

No mistery here: the seqno is still retrieved from the engine's
HW status page (the one in the default context. For the moment,
I see no reason to worry about other context's HWS page).
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Logical rings do not need most of the initialization their
legacy ringbuffer counterparts do: we just need the pipe
control object for the render ring, enable Execlists on the
hardware and a few workarounds.

v2: Squash with: "drm/i915: Extract pipe control fini & make
init outside accesible".
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: Make checkpatch happy.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Allocate and populate the default LRC for every ring, call
gen-specific init/cleanup, init/fini the command parser and
set the status page (now inside the LRC object). These are
things all engines/rings have in common.

Stopping the ring before cleanup and initializing the seqnos
is left as a TODO task (we need more infrastructure in place
before we can achieve this).

v2: Check the ringbuffer backing obj for ring_is_initialized,
instead of the context backing obj (similar, but not exactly
the same).
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Execlists are indeed a brave new world with respect to workload
submission to the GPU.

In previous version of these series, I have tried to impact the
legacy ringbuffer submission path as little as possible (mostly,
passing the context around and using the correct ringbuffer when I
needed one) but Daniel is afraid (probably with a reason) that
these changes and, especially, future ones, will end up breaking
older gens.

This commit and some others coming next will try to limit the
damage by creating an alternative path for workload submission.
The first step is here: laying out a new ring init/fini.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

As suggested by Daniel Vetter. The idea, in subsequent patches, is to
provide an alternative to these vfuncs for the Execlists submission
mechanism.

v2: Splitted into two and reordered to illustrate our intentions, instead
of showing it off. Also, remove the add_request vfunc and added the
stop_ring one.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet:
- Make checkpatch happy.
- Be grumpy about the excessive vtable.
- Ditch gt->is_ring_initialized.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The backing objects and ringbuffers for contexts created via open
fd are actually empty until the user starts sending execbuffers to
them. At that point, we allocate & populate them. We do this because,
at create time, we really don't know which engine is going to be used
with the context later on (and we don't want to waste memory on
objects that we might never use).

v2: As contexts created via ioctl can only be used with the render
ring, we have enough information to allocate & populate them right
away.

v3: Defer the creation always, even with ioctl-created contexts, as
requested by Daniel Vetter.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For the most part, logical ring context objects are similar to hardware
contexts in that the backing object is meant to be opaque. There are
some exceptions where we need to poke certain offsets of the object for
initialization, updating the tail pointer or updating the PDPs.

For our basic execlist implementation we'll only need our PPGTT PDs,
and ringbuffer addresses in order to set up the context. With previous
patches, we have both, so start prepping the context to be load.

Before running a context for the first time you must populate some
fields in the context object. These fields begin 1 PAGE + LRCA, ie. the
first page (in 0 based counting) of the context  image. These same
fields will be read and written to as contexts are saved and restored
once the system is up and running.

Many of these fields are completely reused from previous global
registers: ringbuffer head/tail/control, context control matches some
previous MI_SET_CONTEXT flags, and page directories. There are other
fields which we don't touch which we may want in the future.

v2: CTX_LRI_HEADER_0 is MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(14) for render and (11)
for other engines.

v3: Several rebases and general changes to the code.

v4: Squash with "Extract LR context object populating"
Also, Damien's review comments:
- Set the Force Posted bit on the LRI header, as the BSpec suggest we do.
- Prevent warning when compiling a 32-bits kernel without HIGHMEM64.
- Add a clarifying comment to the context population code.

v5: Damien's review comments:
- The third MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM in the context does not set Force Posted.
- Remove dead code.

v6: Add a note about the (presumed) differences between BDW and CHV state
contexts. Also, Brad's review comments:
- Use the _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE, upper_32_bits and lower_32_bits macros.
- Be less magical about how we set the ring size in the context.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Rafael Barbalho <rafael.barbalho@intel.com> (v2)
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Any given ringbuffer is unequivocally tied to one context and one engine.
By setting the appropriate pointers to them, the ringbuffer struct holds
all the infromation you might need to submit a workload for processing,
Execlists style.

v2: Drop ring->ctx since that looks terribly ill-defined for legacy
ringbuffer submission.

Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> (v1)
Acked-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> (v2)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

As we have said a couple of times by now, logical ring contexts have
their own ringbuffers: not only the backing pages, but the whole
management struct.

In a previous version of the series, this was achieved with two separate
patches:
drm/i915/bdw: Allocate ringbuffer backing objects for default global LRC
drm/i915/bdw: Allocate ringbuffer for user-created LRCs
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Now that we have the ability to allocate our own context backing objects
and we have multiplexed one of them per engine inside the context structs,
we can finally allocate and free them correctly.

Regarding the context size, reading the register to calculate the sizes
can work, I think, however the docs are very clear about the actual
context sizes on GEN8, so just hardcode that and use it.

v2: Rebased on top of the Full PPGTT series. It is important to notice
that at this point we have one global default context per engine, all
of them using the aliasing PPGTT (as opposed to the single global
default context we have with legacy HW contexts).

v3:
- Go back to one single global default context, this time with multiple
  backing objects inside.
- Use different context sizes for non-render engines, as suggested by
  Damien (still hardcoded, since the information about the context size
  registers in the BSpec is, well, *lacking*).
- Render ctx size is 20 (or 19) pages, but not 21 (caught by Damien).
- Move default context backing object creation to intel_init_ring (so
  that we don't waste memory in rings that might not get initialized).

v4:
- Reuse the HW legacy context init/fini.
- Create a separate free function.
- Rename the functions with an intel_ preffix.

v5: Several rebases to account for the changes in the previous patches.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

A context backing object only makes sense for a given engine (because
it holds state data specific to that engine).

In legacy ringbuffer sumission mode, the only MI_SET_CONTEXT we really
perform is for the render engine, so one backing object is all we nee.

With Execlists, however, we need backing objects for every engine, as
contexts become the only way to submit workloads to the GPU. To tackle
this problem, we multiplex the context struct to contain <no-of-engines>
objects.

Originally, I colored this code by instantiating one new context for
every engine I wanted to use, but this change suggested by Brad Volkin
makes it more elegant.

v2: Leave the old backing object pointer behind. Daniel Vetter suggested
using a union, but it makes more sense to keep rcs_state as a NULL
pointer behind, to make sure no one uses it incorrectly when Execlists
are enabled, similar to what he suggested for ring->buffer (Rusty's API
level 5).

v3: Use the name "state" instead of the too-generic "obj", so that it
mirrors the name choice for the legacy rcs_state.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For the moment this is just a placeholder, but it shows one of the
main differences between the good ol' HW contexts and the shiny
new Logical Ring Contexts: LR contexts allocate  and free their
own backing objects. Another difference is that the allocation is
deferred (as the create function name suggests), but that does not
happen in this patch yet, because for the moment we are only dealing
with the default context.

Early in the series we had our own gen8_gem_context_init/fini
functions, but the truth is they now look almost the same as the
legacy hw context init/fini functions. We can always split them
later if this ceases to be the case.

Also, we do not fall back to legacy ringbuffers when logical ring
context initialization fails (not very likely to happen and, even
if it does, hw contexts would probably fail as well).

v2: Daniel says "explain, do not showcase".
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
[danvet: s/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Depending upon one module option to be sanitized (through USES_PPGTT)
for the other is a bit too fragile for my taste. At least WARN about
this.

Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

GEN8 brings an expansion of the HW contexts: "Logical Ring Contexts".
These expanded contexts enable a number of new abilities, especially
"Execlists".

The macro is defined to off until we have things in place to hope to
work.

v2: Rename "advanced contexts" to the more correct "logical ring
contexts".

v3: Add a module parameter to enable execlists. Execlist are relatively
new, and so it'd be wise to be able to switch back to ring submission
to debug subtle problems that will inevitably arise.

v4: Add an intel_enable_execlists function.

v5: Sanitize early, as suggested by Daniel. Remove lrc_enabled.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> (v3)
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> (v2, v4 & v5)
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Some legacy HW context code assumptions don't make sense for this new
submission method, so we will place this stuff in a separate file.

Note for reviewers: I've carefully considered the best name for this file
and this was my best option (other possibilities were intel_lr_context.c
or intel_execlist.c). I am open to a certain bikeshedding on this matter,
anyway.

And some point in time, it would be a good idea to split intel_lrc.c/.h
even further, but for the moment just shove everything together.

v2: Change to intel_lrc.c

v3: Squash together with the header file addition
Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Even though we should not try to use 4+GiB GTTs on 32-bit systems, by
using a local variable we can future proof the code whilst making it
easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Appease checkpatch a bit.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Part of the pre-validation for an execbuffer call is that there is at
least one object in the execlist. As we bail if we fail to lookup any
object, we can be sure that after the eb_lookup_vma() there is at least
one object in the vma list and so we do not need to assert.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We have an implementation requirement that precludes the user from
requesting a ggtt entry when the device is operating in ppgtt mode. Move
the current check from inside the execbuffer object collation to the
prevalidation phase.

v2: Roll both invalid flags checks into one
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Based upon a hunk from a patch from Chris Wilson, but augmented to:
- Process the batch in the full ppgtt vm so that self-relocations
  match again with userspace's expectations..
- Add a comment why plain pin for the global gtt binding is safe at
  that point.

v2: Drop local bind_vm variable (Chris).

v3: Explain why this works despite the lack of proper active tracking
for the ggtt batch vma.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Adapt the macro so that we can pass either the struct drm_device or the
struct drm_i915_private pointers and get the answer we want. Over time,
my plan is to convert all users over to using drm_i915_private and so
trimming down the pointer dance. Having spent a few hours chasing that
goal and achieved over 8k of object code saving, it appears to be a
worthwhile target. This interim macro allows us to slowly convert over.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Drop the (struct drm_device *) cast per the m-l discussion.
Also explain the seemingly unecessary first cast.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

During ring initialisation, sometimes we observe, though not in
production hardware, that the idle flag is not set even though the ring
is empty. Double check before giving up.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Found with sparse.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This is so that we can make the drm_i915_private->info always the
preferred source for chipset type and feature queries.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This migrates the fence tracking onto the existing seqno
infrastructure so that the later conversion to tracking via requests is
simplified.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Move the decision on whether we need to have a mappable object during
execbuffer to the fore and then reuse that decision by propagating the
flag through to reservation. As a corollary, before doing the actual
relocation through the GTT, we can make sure that we do have a GTT
mapping through which to operate.

Note that the key to make this work is to ditch the
obj->map_and_fenceable unbind optimization - with full ppgtt it
doesn't make a lot of sense any more anyway.

v2: Revamp and resend to ease future patches.
v3: Refresh patch rationale

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81094Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
[danvet: Explain why obj->map_and_fenceable is key and split out the
secure batch fix.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If an object is not bound into the global GTT, then it cannot be
accessed via the GTT. This restores the original code that was muddled
by ppGTT. In the process, we remove a WARN that had long outlived its
usefulness and was simply being coded around instead.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I keep telling myself that those tables aren't great because their size
is the number of dwords we need to program and not the number of entries
(number of dwords = number of entries * 2).

And... I got it wrong when I refactored the code. Fortunately, it was
only wrong when the VBT table (or the code parsing it) is itself
erroneous. Long story short, it shouldn't matter, but still, there's a
potential array overflow and random programming of the DDI translation
tables.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>