- 16 Nov, 2021 3 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
Often some test cases like btrfs/161 trigger lockdep splats that complain about possible unsafe lock scenario due to the fact that during mount, when reading the chunk tree we end up calling blkdev_get_by_path() while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree. That produces a lockdep splat like the following: [ 3653.683975] ====================================================== [ 3653.685148] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3653.686301] 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 Not tainted [ 3653.687239] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3653.688400] mount/447465 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3653.689320] ffff8c6b0c76e528 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.691054] but task is already holding lock: [ 3653.692155] ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.693978] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3653.695510] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3653.696915] -> #3 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3653.698053] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 3653.698893] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.699988] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 3653.701205] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 3653.702234] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x32/0x70 [btrfs] [ 3653.703332] btrfs_init_new_device+0x563/0x15b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.704439] btrfs_ioctl+0x2110/0x3530 [btrfs] [ 3653.705405] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.706215] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.706990] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.708040] -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3653.708994] lock_release+0x13d/0x4a0 [ 3653.709533] up_write+0x18/0x160 [ 3653.710017] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x5b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.710699] __loop_update_dio+0xbd/0x170 [loop] [ 3653.711360] lo_ioctl+0x3b1/0x8a0 [loop] [ 3653.711929] block_ioctl+0x48/0x50 [ 3653.712442] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.712991] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.713519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.714233] -> #1 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.715026] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.715648] lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] [ 3653.716275] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0x90 [ 3653.716867] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x142/0x320 [ 3653.717537] blkdev_open+0x5e/0xa0 [ 3653.718043] do_dentry_open+0x163/0x390 [ 3653.718604] path_openat+0x3f0/0xa80 [ 3653.719128] do_filp_open+0xa9/0x150 [ 3653.719652] do_sys_openat2+0x97/0x160 [ 3653.720197] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 [ 3653.720766] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.721285] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.721986] -> #0 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.722775] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.723348] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.723867] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.724394] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.725041] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.725614] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726332] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726999] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.727739] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.728384] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.729130] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.729676] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.730192] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.730800] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.731427] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.731970] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.732486] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.732997] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.733560] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.734080] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.734782] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3653.735784] Chain exists of: &disk->open_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-chunk-00 [ 3653.737123] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3653.737865] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3653.738435] ---- ---- [ 3653.739007] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.739449] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 3653.740193] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.740955] lock(&disk->open_mutex); [ 3653.741431] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3653.742176] 3 locks held by mount/447465: [ 3653.742739] #0: ffff8c6acf85c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#44/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xd5/0x3b0 [ 3653.744114] #1: ffffffffc0b28f70 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x59/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.745563] #2: ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.747066] stack backtrace: [ 3653.747723] CPU: 4 PID: 447465 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 [ 3653.748873] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3653.750592] Call Trace: [ 3653.750967] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 3653.751526] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 3653.752136] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 3653.752748] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.753356] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.753898] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.754596] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 3653.755125] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.755729] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.756338] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.756794] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.757400] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 3653.757930] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 3653.758437] ? bd_prepare_to_claim+0x129/0x150 [ 3653.758999] ? trace_module_get+0x2b/0xd0 [ 3653.759508] ? try_module_get.part.0+0x50/0x80 [ 3653.760072] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.760661] ? devcgroup_check_permission+0xc1/0x1f0 [ 3653.761288] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.761797] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.762454] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.763055] ? clone_fs_devices+0x8f/0x170 [btrfs] [ 3653.763689] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.764370] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40 [ 3653.764922] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.765493] ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0 [ 3653.766043] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.766780] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.767488] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.767979] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.768548] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.769076] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.769718] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.770381] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.771086] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.771574] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.772136] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.772673] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.773201] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.773793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.774333] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.775094] RIP: 0033:0x7f648bc45aaa This happens because through btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), which is called only during mount, ends up acquiring the mutex open_mutex of a block device while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree while other paths need to acquire other locks before locking extent buffers of the chunk tree. Since at mount time when we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() we know that we don't have other tasks running in parallel and modifying the chunk tree, we can simply skip locking of chunk tree extent buffers. So do that and move the assertion that checks the fs is not yet mounted to the top block of btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), with a comment before doing it. Signed-off-by:Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Ordered work functions aren't guaranteed to be handled by the same thread which executed the normal work functions. The only way execution between normal/ordered functions is synchronized is via the WORK_DONE_BIT, unfortunately the used bitops don't guarantee any ordering whatsoever. This manifested as seemingly inexplicable crashes on ARM64, where async_chunk::inode is seen as non-null in async_cow_submit which causes submit_compressed_extents to be called and crash occurs because async_chunk::inode suddenly became NULL. The call trace was similar to: pc : submit_compressed_extents+0x38/0x3d0 lr : async_cow_submit+0x50/0xd0 sp : ffff800015d4bc20 <registers omitted for brevity> Call trace: submit_compressed_extents+0x38/0x3d0 async_cow_submit+0x50/0xd0 run_ordered_work+0xc8/0x280 btrfs_work_helper+0x98/0x250 process_one_work+0x1f0/0x4ac worker_thread+0x188/0x504 kthread+0x110/0x114 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Fix this by adding respective barrier calls which ensure that all accesses preceding setting of WORK_DONE_BIT are strictly ordered before setting the flag. At the same time add a read barrier after reading of WORK_DONE_BIT in run_ordered_work which ensures all subsequent loads would be strictly ordered after reading the bit. This in turn ensures are all accesses before WORK_DONE_BIT are going to be strictly ordered before any access that can occur in ordered_func. Reported-by:Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Fixes: 08a9ff32 ("btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered execution based on kernel workqueue") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011928Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Tested-by:
Chris Murphy <chris@colorremedies.com> Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] The following script can cause btrfs to crash: $ mount -o compress-force=lzo $DEV /mnt $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/foo bs=4k count=1 $ sync The call trace looks like this: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe04b37fccce3b000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 5 PID: 164 Comm: kworker/u20:3 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-custom+ #4 Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] RIP: 0010:__memcpy+0x12/0x20 Call Trace: lzo_compress_pages+0x236/0x540 [btrfs] btrfs_compress_pages+0xaa/0xf0 [btrfs] compress_file_range+0x431/0x8e0 [btrfs] async_cow_start+0x12/0x30 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0xf6/0x3e0 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x294/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 ---[ end trace 63c3c0f131e61982 ]--- [CAUSE] In lzo_compress_pages(), parameter @out_pages is not only an output parameter (for the number of compressed pages), but also an input parameter, as the upper limit of compressed pages we can utilize. In commit d4088803 ("btrfs: subpage: make lzo_compress_pages() compatible"), the refactoring doesn't take @out_pages as an input, thus completely ignoring the limit. And for compress-force case, we could hit incompressible data that compressed size would go beyond the page limit, and cause the above crash. [FIX] Save @out_pages as @max_nr_page, and pass it to lzo_compress_pages(), and check if we're beyond the limit before accessing the pages. Note: this also fixes crash on 32bit architectures that was suspected to be caused by merge of btrfs patches to 5.16-rc1. Reported in https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211104115001.GU20319@twin.jikos.cz/ . Reported-by:
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Fixes: d4088803 ("btrfs: subpage: make lzo_compress_pages() compatible") Reviewed-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- 29 Oct, 2021 7 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
The root argument passed to check_item_in_log() always matches the root of the given directory, so it can be eliminated. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The root argument for tree-log.c:add_link() always matches the root of the given directory and the given inode, so it can eliminated. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The root argument passed to btrfs_unlink_inode() and its callee, __btrfs_unlink_inode(), always matches the root of the given directory and the given inode. So remove the argument and make __btrfs_unlink_inode() use the root of the directory. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The root argument for drop_one_dir_item() always matches the root of the given directory inode, since each log tree is associated to one and only one subvolume/root, so remove the argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zhang authored
Reported bug: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/389 There's a problem with scrub reporting aborted status but returning error code 0, on a filesystem with missing and readded device. Roughly these steps: - mkfs -d raid1 dev1 dev2 - fill with data - unmount - make dev1 disappear - mount -o degraded - copy more data - make dev1 appear again Running scrub afterwards reports that the command was aborted, but the system log message says the exit code was 0. It seems that the cause of the error is decrementing fs_devices->missing_devices but not clearing device->dev_state. Every time we umount filesystem, it would call close_ctree, And it would eventually involve btrfs_close_one_device to close the device, but it only decrements fs_devices->missing_devices but does not clear the device BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING bit. Worse, this bug will cause Integer Overflow, because every time umount, fs_devices->missing_devices will decrease. If fs_devices->missing_devices value hit 0, it would overflow. With added debugging: loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 1 transid 21 /dev/loop1 scanned by systemd-udevd (2311) loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 2 transid 17 /dev/loop2 scanned by systemd-udevd (2313) BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 0 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 18446744073709551615 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 18446744073709551615 If fs_devices->missing_devices is 0, next time it would be 18446744073709551615 After apply this patch, the fs_devices->missing_devices seems to be right: $ truncate -s 10g test1 $ truncate -s 10g test2 $ losetup /dev/loop1 test1 $ losetup /dev/loop2 test2 $ mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 -f $ losetup -d /dev/loop2 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ dmesg loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 1 transid 5 /dev/loop1 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863) BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 2 transid 5 /dev/loop2 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863) BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): checking UUID tree BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by:
Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
In open_ctree() in btrfs_check_rw_degradable() [1], we check each block group individually if at least the minimum number of devices is available for that profile. If all the devices are available, then we don't have to check degradable. [1] open_ctree() :: 3559 if (!sb_rdonly(sb) && !btrfs_check_rw_degradable(fs_info, NULL)) { Also before calling btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctee() at the line number shown below [2] we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() and down to add_missing_dev() to record number of missing devices. [2] open_ctree() :: 3454 ret = btrfs_read_chunk_tree(fs_info); btrfs_read_chunk_tree() read_one_chunk() / read_one_dev() add_missing_dev() So, check if there is any missing device before btrfs_check_rw_degradable() in open_ctree(). Also, with this the mount command could save ~16ms.[3] in the most common case, that is no device is missing. [3] 1) * 16934.96 us | btrfs_check_rw_degradable [btrfs](); CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by:Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
This is preparatory work for send protocol update to version 2 and higher. We have many pending protocol update requests but still don't have the basic protocol rev in place, the first thing that must happen is to do the actual versioning support. The protocol version is u32 and is a new member in the send ioctl struct. Validity of the version field is backed by a new flag bit. Old kernels would fail when a higher version is requested. Version protocol 0 will pick the highest supported version, BTRFS_SEND_STREAM_VERSION, that's also exported in sysfs. The version is still unchanged and will be increased once we have new incompatible commands or stream updates. Reviewed-by:
-
- 26 Oct, 2021 30 commits
-
-
Anand Jain authored
Commit 95ea0486 ("btrfs: allow read-write for 4K sectorsize on 64K page size systems") added write support for 4K sectorsize on a 64K systems. Fix the now stale comments. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Christoph pointed out that I'm updating bdev->bd_inode for the device time when we remove block devices from a btrfs file system, however this isn't actually exposed to anything. The inode we want to update is the one that's associated with the path to the device, usually on devtmpfs, so that blkid notices the difference. We still don't want to do the blkdev_open, so use kern_path() to get the path to the given device and do the update time on that inode. Fixes: 8f96a5bf ("btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing") Reported-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
If you already have an inode and need to update the time on the inode there is no way to do this properly. Export this helper to allow file systems to update time on the inode so the appropriate handler is called, either ->update_time or generic_update_time. Signed-off-by:
-
Omar Sandoval authored
Attempting to defragment a Btrfs file containing a transparent huge page immediately deadlocks with the following stack trace: #0 context_switch (kernel/sched/core.c:4940:2) #1 __schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:6287:8) #2 schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:6366:3) #3 io_schedule (kernel/sched/core.c:8389:2) #4 wait_on_page_bit_common (mm/filemap.c:1356:4) #5 __lock_page (mm/filemap.c:1648:2) #6 lock_page (./include/linux/pagemap.h:625:3) #7 pagecache_get_page (mm/filemap.c:1910:4) #8 find_or_create_page (./include/linux/pagemap.h:420:9) #9 defrag_prepare_one_page (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1068:9) #10 defrag_one_range (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1326:14) #11 defrag_one_cluster (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1421:9) #12 btrfs_defrag_file (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1523:9) #13 btrfs_ioctl_defrag (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3117:9) #14 btrfs_ioctl (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4872:10) #15 vfs_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:51:10) #16 __do_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:874:11) #17 __se_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:860:1) #18 __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:860:1) #19 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50:14) #20 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:80:7) #21 entry_SYSCALL_64+0x7c/0x15b (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113) A huge page is represented by a compound page, which consists of a struct page for each PAGE_SIZE page within the huge page. The first struct page is the "head page", and the remaining are "tail pages". Defragmentation attempts to lock each page in the range. However, lock_page() on a tail page actually locks the corresponding head page. So, if defragmentation tries to lock more than one struct page in a compound page, it tries to lock the same head page twice and deadlocks with itself. Ideally, we should be able to defragment transparent huge pages. However, THP for filesystems is currently read-only, so a lot of code is not ready to use huge pages for I/O. For now, let's just return ETXTBUSY. This can be reproduced with the following on a kernel with CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS=y: $ cat create_thp_file.c #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdbool.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdint.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/mman.h> static const char zeroes[1024 * 1024]; static const size_t FILE_SIZE = 2 * 1024 * 1024; int main(int argc, char **argv) { if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s PATH\n", argv[0]); return EXIT_FAILURE; } int fd = creat(argv[1], 0777); if (fd == -1) { perror("creat"); return EXIT_FAILURE; } size_t written = 0; while (written < FILE_SIZE) { ssize_t ret = write(fd, zeroes, sizeof(zeroes) < FILE_SIZE - written ? sizeof(zeroes) : FILE_SIZE - written); if (ret < 0) { perror("write"); return EXIT_FAILURE; } written += ret; } close(fd); fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY); if (fd == -1) { perror("open"); return EXIT_FAILURE; } /* * Reserve some address space so that we can align the file mapping to * the huge page size. */ void *placeholder_map = mmap(NULL, FILE_SIZE * 2, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0); if (placeholder_map == MAP_FAILED) { perror("mmap (placeholder)"); return EXIT_FAILURE; } void *aligned_address = (void *)(((uintptr_t)placeholder_map + FILE_SIZE - 1) & ~(FILE_SIZE - 1)); void *map = mmap(aligned_address, FILE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_EXEC, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, fd, 0); if (map == MAP_FAILED) { perror("mmap"); return EXIT_FAILURE; } if (madvise(map, FILE_SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE) < 0) { perror("madvise"); return EXIT_FAILURE; } char *line = NULL; size_t line_capacity = 0; FILE *smaps_file = fopen("/proc/self/smaps", "r"); if (!smaps_file) { perror("fopen"); return EXIT_FAILURE; } for (;;) { for (size_t off = 0; off < FILE_SIZE; off += 4096) ((volatile char *)map)[off]; ssize_t ret; bool this_mapping = false; while ((ret = getline(&line, &line_capacity, smaps_file)) > 0) { unsigned long start, end, huge; if (sscanf(line, "%lx-%lx", &start, &end) == 2) { this_mapping = (start <= (uintptr_t)map && (uintptr_t)map < end); } else if (this_mapping && sscanf(line, "FilePmdMapped: %ld", &huge) == 1 && huge > 0) { return EXIT_SUCCESS; } } sleep(6); rewind(smaps_file); fflush(smaps_file); } } $ ./create_thp_file huge $ btrfs fi defrag -czstd ./huge Reviewed-by: -
Anand Jain authored
Commit 2efc459d ("sysfs: Add sysfs_emit and sysfs_emit_at to format sysfs out") merged in 5.10 introduced two new functions sysfs_emit() and sysfs_emit_at() which are aware of the PAGE_SIZE limit of the output buffer. Use the above two new functions instead of scnprintf() and snprintf() in various sysfs show(). Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
It's a common practice to avoid use sizeof(struct btrfs_super_block) (3531), but to use BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE (4096). The problem is that, sizeof(struct btrfs_super_block) doesn't match BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE from the very beginning. Furthermore, for all call sites except selftests, we always allocate BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE space for super block, there isn't any real reason to use the smaller value, and it doesn't really save any space. So let's get rid of such confusing behavior, and unify those two values. This modification also adds a new static_assert() to verify the size, and moves the BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_* macros to the definition of btrfs_super_block for the static_assert(). Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Update the comments at btrfs_chunk_alloc() and do_chunk_alloc() that describe which cases can lead to a failure to allocate metadata and system space despite having previously reserved space. This adds one more reason that I previously forgot to mention. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by:Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd3712 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
Currently auto reclaim of unusable zones reclaims the block-groups in the order they have been added to the reclaim list. Change this to a greedy algorithm by sorting the list so we have the block-groups with the least amount of valid bytes reclaimed first. Note: we can't splice the block groups from reclaim_bgs to let the sort happen outside of the lock. The block groups can be still in use by other parts eg. via bg_list and we must hold unused_bgs_lock while processing them. Signed-off-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Just use the %pg format specifier in all the debug printks previously using it. Note that both bdevname and the %pg specifier never print a pathname, so the kbasename call wasn't needed to start with. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
For device removal and replace we call btrfs_find_device_by_devspec, which if we give it a device path and nothing else will call btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path, which opens the block device and reads the super block and then looks up our device based on that. However at this point we're holding the sb write "lock", so reading the block device pulls in the dependency of ->open_mutex, which produces the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #405 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11576 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9bbe8cded938 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff9bbe88e4fc68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0x98/0xa0 btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 btrfs_find_device_by_devspec+0x12b/0x1c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x127/0x610 btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11576: #0: ffff9bbe88e4fc68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11576 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #405 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f31b02404cb Instead what we want to do is populate our device lookup args before we grab any locks, and then pass these args into btrfs_rm_device(). From there we can find the device and do the appropriate removal. Suggested-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
We are going to want to populate our device lookup args outside of any locks and then do the actual device lookup later, so add a helper to do this work and make btrfs_find_device_by_devspec() use this helper for now. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have a lot of device lookup functions that all do something slightly different. Clean this up by adding a struct to hold the different lookup criteria, and then pass this around to btrfs_find_device() so it can do the proper matching based on the lookup criteria. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
There's a subtle case where if we're removing the seed device from a file system we need to free its private copy of the fs_devices. However we do not need to call close_fs_devices(), because at this point there are no devices left to close as we've closed the last one. The only thing that close_fs_devices() does is decrement ->opened, which should be 1. We want to avoid calling close_fs_devices() here because it has a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex), and we are going to stop holding the uuid_mutex in this path. So simply decrement the ->opened counter like we should, and then clean up like normal. Also add a comment explaining what we're doing here as I initially removed this code erroneously. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
A bug was was checking a wrong device count before we delete the struct btrfs_fs_devices in btrfs_rm_device(). To avoid future confusion and easy reference add a comment about the various device counts that we have in the struct btrfs_fs_devices. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
For both sprout and seed fsids, btrfs_fs_devices::num_devices provides device count including missing btrfs_fs_devices::open_devices provides device count excluding missing We create a dummy struct btrfs_device for the missing device, so num_devices != open_devices when there is a missing device. In btrfs_rm_devices() we wrongly check for %cur_devices->open_devices before freeing the seed fs_devices. Instead we should check for %cur_devices->num_devices. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
At replay_dir_deletes(), if find_dir_range() returns an error we break out of the main while loop and then assign a value of 0 (success) to the 'ret' variable, resulting in completely ignoring that an error happened. Fix that by jumping to the 'out' label when find_dir_range() returns an error (negative value). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The member btrfs_bio::logical is only initialized by two call sites: - btrfs_repair_one_sector() No corresponding site to utilize it. - btrfs_submit_direct() The corresponding site to utilize it is btrfs_check_read_dio_bio(). However for btrfs_check_read_dio_bio(), we can grab the file_offset from btrfs_dio_private::file_offset directly. Thus it turns out we don't really need that btrfs_bio::logical member at all. For btrfs_bio, the logical bytenr can be fetched from its bio->bi_iter.bi_sector directly. So let's just remove the member to save 8 bytes for structure btrfs_bio. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The naming of "logical_offset" can be confused with logical bytenr of the dio range. In fact it's file offset, and the naming "file_offset" is already widely used in all other sites. Just do the rename to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Using local kmaps slightly reduces the chances to stray writes, and the bvec interface cleans up the code a little bit. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_update_block_group() accounts for the number of bytes allocated or freed. Argument @alloc specifies whether the call is for alloc or free. Convert the argument @alloc type from int to bool. Reviewed-by:
Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Now that real_root is only used in ref-verify core gate it behind CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_REF_VERIFY ifdef. This shrinks the size of pending delayed refs by 8 bytes per ref, of which we can have many at any one time depending on intensity of the workload. Also change the comment about the member as it no longer deals with qgroups. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Instead of checking whether qgroup processing for a dealyed ref has to happen in the core of delayed ref, simply pull the check at init time of respective delayed ref structures. This eliminates the final use of real_root in delayed-ref core paving the way to making this member optional. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
In order to make 'real_root' used only in ref-verify it's required to have the necessary context to perform the same checks that this member is used for. So add 'mod_root' which will contain the root on behalf of which a delayed ref was created and a 'skip_group' parameter which will contain callsite-specific override of skip_qgroup. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The real_root field is going to be used only by ref-verify tool so limit its use outside of it. Blocks belonging to the chunk root will always have it as an owner so the check is equivalent. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Both data and metadata delayed ref structures have fields named root/ref_root respectively. Those are somewhat cryptic and don't really convey the real meaning. In fact those roots are really the original owners of the respective block (i.e in case of a snapshot a data delayed ref will contain the original root that owns the given block). Rename those fields accordingly and adjust comments. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Error injection stressing uncovered a busy loop in our data reclaim loop. There are two cases here, one where we loop creating block groups until space_info->full is set, or in the main loop we will skip erroring out any tickets if space_info->full == 0. Unfortunately if we aborted the transaction then we will never allocate chunks or reclaim any space and thus never get ->full, and you'll see stack traces like this: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [kworker/u4:4:139] CPU: 0 PID: 139 Comm: kworker/u4:4 Tainted: G W 5.13.0-rc1+ #328 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space RIP: 0010:btrfs_join_transaction+0x12/0x20 RSP: 0018:ffffb2b780b77de0 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffffb2b781863d58 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000801 RSI: ffff987952b57400 RDI: ffff987940aa3000 RBP: ffff987954d55000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff98795539e8f0 R10: 000000000000000f R11: 000000000000000f R12: ffffffffffffffff R13: ffff987952b574c8 R14: ffff987952b57400 R15: 0000000000000008 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9879bbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f0703da4000 CR3: 0000000113398004 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 Call Trace: flush_space+0x4a8/0x660 btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x55/0x130 process_one_work+0x1e9/0x380 worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0 ? process_one_work+0x380/0x380 kthread+0x118/0x140 ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Fix this by checking to see if we have a btrfs fs error in either of the reclaim loops, and if so fail the tickets and bail. In addition to this, fix maybe_fail_all_tickets() to not try to grant tickets if we've aborted, simply fail everything. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have a few flags that are inconsistently used to describe the fs in different states of failure. As of 5963ffca ("btrfs: always abort the transaction if we abort a trans handle") we will always set BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR if we abort, so we don't have to check both ABORTED and ERROR to see if things have gone wrong. Add a helper to check BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR and then convert all checkers of FS_STATE_ERROR to use the helper. The TRANS_ABORTED bit check was added in af722733 ("Btrfs: clean up resources during umount after trans is aborted") but is not actually specific. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Currently we will abort the transaction if we get a random error (like -EIO) while trying to remove the directory entries from the root log during rename. However since these are simply log tree related errors, we can mark the trans as needing a full commit. Then if the error was truly catastrophic we'll hit it during the normal commit and abort as appropriate. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
During inspection of the return path for replay I noticed that we don't actually abort the transaction if we get a failure during replay. This isn't a problem necessarily, as we properly return the error and will fail to mount. However we still leave this dangling transaction that could conceivably be committed without thinking there was an error. We were using btrfs_handle_fs_error() here, but that pre-dates the transaction abort code. Simply replace the btrfs_handle_fs_error() calls with transaction aborts, so we still know where exactly things went wrong, and add a few in some other un-handled error cases. Reviewed-by:
-
