- 14 Feb, 2017 40 commits
-
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <n.borisov.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function is internal to btrfs and doesn't really deal with any VFS members, as such it needn't take a struct inode refrence but btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Currently btrfs_ino takes a struct inode and this causes a lot of internal btrfs functions which consume this ino to take a VFS inode, rather than btrfs' own struct btrfs_inode. In order to fix this "leak" of VFS structs into the internals of btrfs first it's necessary to eliminate all uses of struct inode for the purpose of inode. This patch does that by using BTRFS_I to convert an inode to btrfs_inode. With this problem eliminated subsequent patches will start eliminating the passing of struct inode altogether, eventually resulting in a lot cleaner code. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The expression is open-coded in several places, this asks for a wrapper. As we know the MAX_EXTENT fits to u32, we can use the appropirate division helper. This cascades to the result type updates. Compiler is clever enough to use shift instead of integer division, so there's no change in the generated assembly. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
A proposed patch in https://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=147859791003837 pointed out bad limit threshold in cow_file_range_async, but it turned out that the whole logic is not necessary and is done by writeback. We agreed to remove it. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
As of now writes smaller than 64k for non compressed extents and 16k for compressed extents inside eof are considered as candidate for auto defrag, put them together at a place. Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Since btrfs_defrag_leaves() does not support extent_root, remove its corresponding call. The user can use the file based defrag to defrag extents as of now. No change in behaviour as extent_root is explicitly skipped in btrfs_defrag_leaves and this has never worked as expected. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref is always called with a NULL extent_op, so let's drop the argument. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Colin Ian King authored
The check for a null inode is redundant since the function is a callback for exportfs, which will itself crash if dentry->d_inode or parent->d_inode is NULL. Removing the null check makes this consistent with other file systems. Also remove the redundant null dir check too. Found with static analysis by CoverityScan, CID 1389472 Kudos to Jeff Mahoney for reviewing and explaining the error in my original patch (most of this explanation went into the above commit message) and David Sterba for pointing out that the dir check is also redundant. Signed-off-by:
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Seraphime Kirkovski authored
This replaces ACCESS_ONCE macro with the corresponding READ|WRITE macros Signed-off-by:
Seraphime Kirkovski <kirkseraph@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Seraphime Kirkovski authored
This cleans up the cases where the min/max macros were used with a cast rather than using directly min_t/max_t. Signed-off-by:
-
Geliang Tang authored
To make the code clearer, use rb_entry() instead of container_of() to deal with rbtree. Signed-off-by:
Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Signed-off-by:
-
