- 04 Jan, 2012 40 commits
-
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Pass perm to v9fs_vfs_mkspecial() instead of passing mode; calculate in caller when done for mknod(), use known value for link() and symlink(). As the result, we avoid a bit of work *and* stop mixing mode_t with P9_DMLINK. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
it's a just a wrapper for vfs_create() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
both proc_dir_entry ->mode and populating functions Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
both callers of device_get_devnode() are only interested in lower 16bits and nobody tries to return anything wider than 16bit anyway. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... rather than open-coding it Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
vfs_create() ignores everything outside of 16bit subset of its mode argument; switching it to umode_t is obviously equivalent and it's the only caller of the method Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
vfs_mkdir() gets int, but immediately drops everything that might not fit into umode_t and that's the only caller of ->mkdir()... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
unfortunately, just checking MS_BORN after having grabbed ->s_umount in sget() is not enough; places that pick superblock from a list and grab s_umount shared need the same check in addition to checking for ->s_root; otherwise three-way race between failing mount, sget() and such list-walker can leave us with list-walker coming *second*, when temporary active ref grabbed by sget() (to be dropped when sget() notices that original mount has failed by checking MS_BORN) has lead to deactivate_locked_super() from failing ->mount() *not* doing ->kill_sb() and just releasing ->s_umount. Once sget() gets through and notices that MS_BORN had never been set it will drop the active ref and fs will be shut down and kicked out of all lists, but it's too late for something like sync_supers(). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... and bury user_get_super()/statfs_by_dentry() - they are purely internal now. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... and clean it up a bit, while we are at it Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... so no exitcalls there. Not much would work if pipe(2) would stop working, after all... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Seeing that just about every destructor got that INIT_LIST_HEAD() copied into it, there is no point whatsoever keeping this INIT_LIST_HEAD in inode_init_once(); the cost of taking it into inode_init_always() will be negligible for pipes and sockets and negative for everything else. Not to mention the removal of boilerplate code from ->destroy_inode() instances... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
new helper (wrapper around mnt_drop_write()) to be used in pair with mnt_want_write_file(). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
the only user outside of fs/namespace.c has died Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... rather than duplicating that in callers Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
it's not needed anymore; we used to, back when we had to do mount_subtree() by hand, complete with put_mnt_ns() in it. No more... Apparmor didn't need it since the __d_path() fix. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
tomoyo/realpath.c needs exactly one include - that of common.h. It pulls everything the thing needs, without doing ridiculous garbage such as trying to include ../../fs/internal.h. If that alone doesn't scream "layering violation", I don't know what does; and these days it's all for nothing, since it fortunately does not use any symbols defined in there... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
lose it Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
a) mount --move is checking that ->mnt_parent is non-NULL before looking if that parent happens to be shared; ->mnt_parent is never NULL and it's not even an misspelled !mnt_has_parent() b) pivot_root open-codes is_path_reachable(), poorly. c) so does path_is_under(), while we are at it. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
vfsmounts have ->mnt_parent pointing either to a different vfsmount or to itself; it's never NULL and termination condition in loops traversing the tree towards root is mnt == mnt->mnt_parent. At least one place (see the next patch) is confused about what's going on; let's add an explicit helper checking it right way and use it in all places where we need it. Not that there had been too many, but... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
mnt_{inc,dec}_count() is not cleaner than doing the corresponding mnt_add_count() directly and mnt_set_count() is not used at all. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-