Skip to content

L
linux
An error occurred fetching the project authors.
Switch branch/tag
  1. 23 Dec, 2018 2 commits
    • Dave Watson's avatar
      crypto: aesni - support 256 byte keys in avx asm · 5350b0f5
      Dave Watson authored 
      Add support for 192/256-bit keys using the avx gcm/aes routines.
The sse routines were previously updated in e31ac32d (Add support
for 192 & 256 bit keys to AESNI RFC4106).

Instead of adding an additional loop in the hotpath as in e31ac32d,
this diff instead generates separate versions of the code using macros,
and the entry routines choose which version once.   This results
in a 5% performance improvement vs. adding a loop to the hot path.
This is the same strategy chosen by the intel isa-l_crypto library.

The key size checks are removed from the c code where appropriate.

Note that this diff depends on using gcm_context_data - 256 bit keys
require 16 HashKeys + 15 expanded keys, which is larger than
struct crypto_aes_ctx, so they are stored in struct gcm_context_data.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      5350b0f5
    • Dave Watson's avatar
      crypto: aesni - Introduce gcm_context_data · de85fc46
      Dave Watson authored 
      Add the gcm_context_data structure to the avx asm routines.
This will be necessary to support both 256 bit keys and
scatter/gather.

The pre-computed HashKeys are now stored in the gcm_context_data
struct, which is expanded to hold the greater number of hashkeys
necessary for avx.

Loads and stores to the new struct are always done unlaligned to
avoid compiler issues, see e5b954e8 "Use unaligned loads from
gcm_context_data"
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      de85fc46
  3. 08 Oct, 2018 1 commit
  5. 05 Oct, 2018 1 commit
  7. 14 Sep, 2018 1 commit
  9. 22 Feb, 2018 3 commits
  11. 25 Jan, 2018 1 commit
    • Stephan Mueller's avatar
      crypto: aesni - handle zero length dst buffer · 9c674e1e
      Stephan Mueller authored 
      GCM can be invoked with a zero destination buffer. This is possible if
the AAD and the ciphertext have zero lengths and only the tag exists in
the source buffer (i.e. a source buffer cannot be zero). In this case,
the GCM cipher only performs the authentication and no decryption
operation.

When the destination buffer has zero length, it is possible that no page
is mapped to the SG pointing to the destination. In this case,
sg_page(req->dst) is an invalid access. Therefore, page accesses should
only be allowed if the req->dst->length is non-zero which is the
indicator that a page must exist.

This fixes a crash that can be triggered by user space via AF_ALG.

CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      9c674e1e
  13. 22 Dec, 2017 2 commits
  15. 22 Sep, 2017 2 commits
  17. 04 Aug, 2017 1 commit
    • Ard Biesheuvel's avatar
      crypto: algapi - make crypto_xor() take separate dst and src arguments · 45fe93df
      Ard Biesheuvel authored 
      There are quite a number of occurrences in the kernel of the pattern

  if (dst != src)
          memcpy(dst, src, walk.total % AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
  crypto_xor(dst, final, walk.total % AES_BLOCK_SIZE);

or

  crypto_xor(keystream, src, nbytes);
  memcpy(dst, keystream, nbytes);

where crypto_xor() is preceded or followed by a memcpy() invocation
that is only there because crypto_xor() uses its output parameter as
one of the inputs. To avoid having to add new instances of this pattern
in the arm64 code, which will be refactored to implement non-SIMD
fallbacks, add an alternative implementation called crypto_xor_cpy(),
taking separate input and output arguments. This removes the need for
the separate memcpy().
Signed-off-by: default avatarArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      45fe93df
  19. 18 May, 2017 1 commit
  21. 03 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  23. 30 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  25. 27 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  27. 28 Nov, 2016 1 commit
  29. 11 Nov, 2016 1 commit
    • Arnd Bergmann's avatar
      crypto: aesni: shut up -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning · beae2c9e
      Arnd Bergmann authored 
      The rfc4106 encrypy/decrypt helper functions cause an annoying
false-positive warning in allmodconfig if we turn on
-Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings again:

  arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c: In function ‘helper_rfc4106_decrypt’:
  include/linux/scatterlist.h:67:31: warning: ‘dst_sg_walk.sg’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

The problem seems to be that the compiler doesn't track the state of the
'one_entry_in_sg' variable across the kernel_fpu_begin/kernel_fpu_end
section.

This takes the easy way out by adding a bogus initialization, which
should be harmless enough to get the patch into v4.9 so we can turn on
this warning again by default without producing useless output.  A
follow-up patch for v4.10 rearranges the code to make the warning go
away.
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      beae2c9e
  31. 01 Jul, 2016 1 commit
    • Herbert Xu's avatar
      crypto: aesni - Use crypto_cipher to derive rfc4106 subkey · 02fa472a
      Herbert Xu authored 
      Currently aesni uses an async ctr(aes) to derive the rfc4106
subkey, which was presumably copied over from the generic rfc4106
code.  Over there it's done that way because we already have a
ctr(aes) spawn.  But it is simply overkill for aesni since we
have to go get a ctr(aes) from scratch anyway.

This patch simplifies the subkey derivation by using a straight
aes cipher instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      02fa472a
  33. 23 Jun, 2016 1 commit
  35. 13 Apr, 2016 1 commit
  37. 16 Feb, 2016 1 commit
    • Stephan Mueller's avatar
      crypto: xts - consolidate sanity check for keys · 28856a9e
      Stephan Mueller authored 
      The patch centralizes the XTS key check logic into the service function
xts_check_key which is invoked from the different XTS implementations.
With this, the XTS implementations in ARM, ARM64, PPC and S390 have now
a sanity check for the XTS keys similar to the other arches.

In addition, this service function received a check to ensure that the
key != the tweak key which is mandated by FIPS 140-2 IG A.9. As the
check is not present in the standards defining XTS, it is only enforced
in FIPS mode of the kernel.
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      28856a9e
  39. 17 Aug, 2015 1 commit
  41. 14 Jul, 2015 1 commit
  43. 29 Jun, 2015 1 commit
  45. 03 Jun, 2015 2 commits
  47. 19 May, 2015 1 commit
    • Ingo Molnar's avatar
      x86/fpu: Rename i387.h to fpu/api.h · df6b35f4
      Ingo Molnar authored 
      We already have fpu/types.h, move i387.h to fpu/api.h.

The file name has become a misnomer anyway: it offers generic FPU APIs,
but is not limited to i387 functionality.
Reviewed-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      df6b35f4
  49. 13 May, 2015 1 commit
  51. 31 Mar, 2015 1 commit
  53. 13 Mar, 2015 1 commit
    • Stephan Mueller's avatar
      crypto: aesni - fix memory usage in GCM decryption · ccfe8c3f
      Stephan Mueller authored 
      The kernel crypto API logic requires the caller to provide the
length of (ciphertext || authentication tag) as cryptlen for the
AEAD decryption operation. Thus, the cipher implementation must
calculate the size of the plaintext output itself and cannot simply use
cryptlen.

The RFC4106 GCM decryption operation tries to overwrite cryptlen memory
in req->dst. As the destination buffer for decryption only needs to hold
the plaintext memory but cryptlen references the input buffer holding
(ciphertext || authentication tag), the assumption of the destination
buffer length in RFC4106 GCM operation leads to a too large size. This
patch simply uses the already calculated plaintext size.

In addition, this patch fixes the offset calculation of the AAD buffer
pointer: as mentioned before, cryptlen already includes the size of the
tag. Thus, the tag does not need to be added. With the addition, the AAD
will be written beyond the already allocated buffer.

Note, this fixes a kernel crash that can be triggered from user space
via AF_ALG(aead) -- simply use the libkcapi test application
from [1] and update it to use rfc4106-gcm-aes.

Using [1], the changes were tested using CAVS vectors to demonstrate
that the crypto operation still delivers the right results.

[1] http://www.chronox.de/libkcapi.html

CC: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      ccfe8c3f
  55. 28 Feb, 2015 1 commit
  57. 14 Jan, 2015 1 commit
    • Timothy McCaffrey's avatar
      crypto: aesni - Add support for 192 & 256 bit keys to AESNI RFC4106 · e31ac32d
      Timothy McCaffrey authored 
      These patches fix the RFC4106 implementation in the aesni-intel
module so it supports 192 & 256 bit keys.

Since the AVX support that was added to this module also only
supports 128 bit keys, and this patch only affects the SSE
implementation, changes were also made to use the SSE version
if key sizes other than 128 are specified.

RFC4106 specifies that 192 & 256 bit keys must be supported (section
8.4).

Also, this should fix Strongswan issue 341 where the aesni module
needs to be unloaded if 256 bit keys are used:

http://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/341

This patch has been tested with Sandy Bridge and Haswell processors.
With 128 bit keys and input buffers > 512 bytes a slight performance
degradation was noticed (~1%).  For input buffers of less than 512
bytes there was no performance impact.  Compared to 128 bit keys,
256 bit key size performance is approx. .5 cycles per byte slower
on Sandy Bridge, and .37 cycles per byte slower on Haswell (vs.
SSE code).

This patch has also been tested with StrongSwan IPSec connections
where it worked correctly.

I created this diff from a git clone of crypto-2.6.git.

Any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTimothy McCaffrey <timothy.mccaffrey@unisys.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      e31ac32d
  59. 24 Nov, 2014 1 commit
  61. 06 Nov, 2014 1 commit
    • Valentin Rothberg's avatar
      crypto: aesni - remove unnecessary #define · 304576a7
      Valentin Rothberg authored 
      The CPP identifier 'HAS_PCBC' is defined when the Kconfig
option CRYPTO_PCBC is set as 'y' or 'm', and is further
used in two ifdef blocks to conditionally compile source
code. This indirection hides the actual Kconfig dependency
and complicates readability. Moreover, it's inconsistent
with the rest of the ifdef blocks in the file, which
directly reference Kconfig options.

This patch removes 'HAS_PCBC' and replaces its occurrences
with the actual dependency on 'CRYPTO_PCBC' being set as
'y' or 'm'.
Signed-off-by: default avatarValentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      304576a7
  63. 02 Oct, 2014 1 commit
  65. 24 Sep, 2014 1 commit
  67. 20 Jun, 2014 1 commit
    • chandramouli narayanan's avatar
      crypto: aes - AES CTR x86_64 "by8" AVX optimization · 22cddcc7
      chandramouli narayanan authored 
      This patch introduces "by8" AES CTR mode AVX optimization inspired by
Intel Optimized IPSEC Cryptograhpic library. For additional information,
please see:
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=Y&DwnldID=22972

The functions aes_ctr_enc_128_avx_by8(), aes_ctr_enc_192_avx_by8() and
aes_ctr_enc_256_avx_by8() are adapted from
Intel Optimized IPSEC Cryptographic library. When both AES and AVX features
are enabled in a platform, the glue code in AESNI module overrieds the
existing "by4" CTR mode en/decryption with the "by8"
AES CTR mode en/decryption.

On a Haswell desktop, with turbo disabled and all cpus running
at maximum frequency, the "by8" CTR mode optimization
shows better performance results across data & key sizes
as measured by tcrypt.

The average performance improvement of the "by8" version over the "by4"
version is as follows:

For 128 bit key and data sizes >= 256 bytes, there is a 10-16% improvement.
For 192 bit key and data sizes >= 256 bytes, there is a 20-22% improvement.
For 256 bit key and data sizes >= 256 bytes, there is a 20-25% improvement.

A typical run of tcrypt with AES CTR mode encryption of the "by4" and "by8"
optimization shows the following results:

tcrypt with "by4" AES CTR mode encryption optimization on a Haswell Desktop:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 343 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 336 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 491 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1130 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7309 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 346 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 361 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 543 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1321 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9649 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 369 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 366 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 595 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1531 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 10522 cycles (8192 bytes)

testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 336 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 350 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 487 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1129 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7287 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 350 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 359 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 635 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1324 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9595 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 364 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 377 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 604 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1527 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 10549 cycles (8192 bytes)

tcrypt with "by8" AES CTR mode encryption optimization on a Haswell Desktop:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 340 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 330 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 450 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1043 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6597 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 339 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 352 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 539 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1153 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8458 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 353 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 360 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 512 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1277 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8745 cycles (8192 bytes)

testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 348 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 335 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 451 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1030 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 6611 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 354 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 346 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 488 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1154 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8390 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 357 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 362 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 515 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1284 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 8681 cycles (8192 bytes)

crypto: Incorporate feed back to AES CTR mode optimization patch

Specifically, the following:
a) alignment around main loop in aes_ctrby8_avx_x86_64.S
b) .rodata around data constants used in the assembely code.
c) the use of CONFIG_AVX in the glue code.
d) fix up white space.
e) informational message for "by8" AES CTR mode optimization
f) "by8" AES CTR mode optimization can be simply enabled
if the platform supports both AES and AVX features. The
optimization works superbly on Sandybridge as well.

Testing on Haswell shows no performance change since the last.

Testing on Sandybridge shows that the "by8" AES CTR mode optimization
greatly improves performance.

tcrypt log with "by4" AES CTR mode optimization on Sandybridge
--------------------------------------------------------------

testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 383 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 408 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 707 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1864 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 12813 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 395 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 432 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 780 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2132 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 15765 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 416 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 438 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 842 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2383 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 16945 cycles (8192 bytes)

testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 389 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 409 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 704 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1865 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 12783 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 409 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 434 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 792 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2151 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 15804 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 421 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 444 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 840 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2394 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 16928 cycles (8192 bytes)

tcrypt log with "by8" AES CTR mode optimization on Sandybridge
--------------------------------------------------------------

testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni encryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 383 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 401 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 522 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1136 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7046 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 394 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 418 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 559 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1263 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9072 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 408 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 428 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 595 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1385 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9224 cycles (8192 bytes)

testing speed of __ctr-aes-aesni decryption
test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 390 cycles (16 bytes)
test 1 (128 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 402 cycles (64 bytes)
test 2 (128 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 530 cycles (256 bytes)
test 3 (128 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1135 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 4 (128 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 7079 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 5 (192 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 414 cycles (16 bytes)
test 6 (192 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 417 cycles (64 bytes)
test 7 (192 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 572 cycles (256 bytes)
test 8 (192 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1312 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 9 (192 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9073 cycles (8192 bytes)
test 10 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 415 cycles (16 bytes)
test 11 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 1 operation in 454 cycles (64 bytes)
test 12 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 1 operation in 598 cycles (256 bytes)
test 13 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 1 operation in 1407 cycles (1024 bytes)
test 14 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1 operation in 9288 cycles (8192 bytes)

crypto: Fix redundant checks

a) Fix the redundant check for cpu_has_aes
b) Fix the key length check when invoking the CTR mode "by8"
encryptor/decryptor.

crypto: fix typo in AES ctr mode transform
Signed-off-by: default avatarChandramouli Narayanan <mouli@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarMathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      22cddcc7
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7