Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c1d14f3748105f4caeda01716d47af2fa41d11c.1615809009.git.metze@samba.orgSigned-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We never want to generate any SIGPIPE, -EPIPE only is much better.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/38961085c3ec49fd21550c7788f214d1ff02d2d4.1615908477.git.metze@samba.orgSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Running sqpoll cancellations via task_work_run() is a bad idea because
it depends on other task works to be run, but those may be locked in
currently running task_work_run() because of how it's (splicing the list
in batches).

Enqueue and run them through a separate callback head, namely
struct io_sq_data::park_task_work. As a nice bonus we now precisely
control where it's run, that's much safer than guessing where it can
happen as it was before.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We already have helpers to run/add callback_head but taking ctx and
working with ctx->exit_task_work. Extract generic versions of them
implemented in terms of struct callback_head, it will be used later.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

If io_sq_thread_park() of one task got rescheduled right after
set_bit(), before it gets back to mutex_lock() there can happen
park()/unpark() by another task with SQPOLL locking again and
continuing running never seeing that first set_bit(SHOULD_PARK),
so won't even try to put the mutex down for parking.

It will get parked eventually when SQPOLL drops the lock for reschedule,
but may be problematic and will get in the way of further fixes.

Account number of tasks waiting for parking with a new atomic variable
park_pending and adjust SHOULD_PARK accordingly. It doesn't entirely
replaces SHOULD_PARK bit with this atomic var because it's convenient
to have it as a bit in the state and will help to do optimisations
later.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io_sq_thread_finish() is called in io_ring_ctx_free(), so SQPOLL task is
potentially running submitting new requests. It's not a disaster because
of using a "try" variant of percpu_ref_get, but is far from nice.

Remove ctx from the sqd ctx list earlier, before cancellation loop, so
SQPOLL can't find it and so won't submit new requests.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

The only user of read-locking of sqd->rw_lock is sq_thread itself, which
is by definition alone, so we don't really need rw_semaphore, but mutex
will do. Replace it with a mutex, and kill read-to-write upgrading and
extra task_work handling in io_sq_thread().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

If io_req_complete_post() put not a final ref, we can't rely on the
request's ctx ref, and so ctx may potentially be freed while
complete_post() is in io_cqring_ev_posted()/etc.

In that case get an additional ctx reference, and put it in the end, so
protecting following io_cqring_ev_posted(). And also prolong ctx
lifetime until spin_unlock happens, as we do with mutexes, so added
percpu_ref_get() doesn't race with ctx free.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

It's racy to modify req->flags from a not owning context, e.g. linked
timeout calling req_set_fail_links() for the master request might race
with that request setting/clearing flags while being executed
concurrently. Just remove req_set_fail_links(prev) from
io_link_timeout_fn(), io_async_find_and_cancel() and functions down the
line take care of setting the fail bit.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Like we did for the personality idr, convert the IO buffer idr to use
XArray. This avoids a use-after-free on removal of entries, since idr
doesn't like doing so from inside an iterator, and it nicely reduces
the amount of code we need to support this feature.

Fixes: 5a2e745d ("io_uring: buffer registration infrastructure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

With the freezer using the proper signaling to notify us of when it's
time to freeze a thread, we can re-enable normal freezer usage for the
IO threads. Ensure that SQPOLL, io-wq, and the io-wq manager call
try_to_freeze() appropriately, and remove the default setting of
PF_NOFREEZE from create_io_thread().
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Don't send fake signals to PF_IO_WORKER threads, they don't accept
signals. Just treat them like kthreads in this regard, all they need
is a wakeup as no forced kernel/user transition is needed.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

IORING_OP_ASYNC_CANCEL tries io-wq cancellation only for current task.
If it fails go over tctx_list and try it out for every single tctx.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

1) The first problem is io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() ->
io_uring_cancel_task_requests() basically doing park(); park(); and so
hanging.

2) Another one is more subtle, when the master task is doing cancellations,
but SQPOLL task submits in-between the end of the cancellation but
before finish() requests taking a ref to the ctx, and so eternally
locking it up.

3) Yet another is a dying SQPOLL task doing io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() and
same io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() from the owner task, they race for
tctx->wait events. And there probably more of them.

Instead do SQPOLL cancellations from within SQPOLL task context via
task_work, see io_sqpoll_cancel_sync(). With that we don't need temporal
park()/unpark() during cancellation, which is ugly, subtle and anyway
doesn't allow to do io_run_task_work() properly.

io_uring_cancel_sqpoll() is called only from SQPOLL task context and
under sqd locking, so all parking is removed from there. And so,
io_sq_thread_[un]park() and io_sq_thread_stop() are not used now by
SQPOLL task, and that spare us from some headache.

Also remove ctx->sqd_list early to avoid 2). And kill tctx->sqpoll,
which is not used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

SQPOLL thread to which we're trying to attach may be going away, it's
not nice but a more serious problem is if io_sq_offload_create() sees
sqd->thread==NULL, and tries to init it with a new thread. There are
tons of ways it can be exploited or fail.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We always do complete(&sqd->startup) almost right after sqd->thread
creation, either in the success path or in io_sq_thread_finish(). It's
specifically created not started for us to be able to set some stuff
like sqd->thread and io_uring_alloc_task_context() before following
right after wake_up_new_task().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

As io_uring_cancel_files() and others let SQO to run between
io_uring_try_cancel_requests(), SQO may generate new deferred requests,
so it's safer to try to cancel them in it.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We bypass IOPOLL completion polling (and reaping) for the SQPOLL thread,
but if it's the thread itself invoking cancelations, then we still need
to perform it or no one will.

Fixes: 9936c7c2 ("io_uring: deduplicate core cancellations sequence")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Earlier kernels had SQPOLL threads that could share across anything, as
we grabbed the context we needed on a per-ring basis. This is no longer
the case, so only allow attaching directly if we're in the same thread
group. That is the common use case. For non-group tasks, just setup a
new context and thread as we would've done if sharing wasn't set. This
isn't 100% ideal in terms of CPU utilization for the forked and share
case, but hopefully that isn't much of a concern. If it is, there are
plans in motion for how to improve that. Most importantly, we want to
avoid app side regressions where sharing worked before and now doesn't.
With this patch, functionality is equivalent to previous kernels that
supported IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ with SQPOLL.
Reported-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We use ->ctx_new_list to notify sqo about new ctx pending, then sqo
should stop and splice it to its sqd->ctx_list, paired with
->sq_thread_comp.

The last one is broken because nobody reinitialises it, and trying to
fix it would only add more complexity and bugs. And the first isn't
really needed as is done under park(), that protects from races well.
Add ctx into sqd->ctx_list directly (under park()), it's much simpler
and allows to kill both, ctx_new_list and sq_thread_comp.

note: apparently there is no real problem at the moment, because
sq_thread_comp is used only by io_sq_thread_finish() followed by
parking, where list_del(&ctx->sqd_list) removes it well regardless
whether it's in the new or the active list.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We have to set ctx->sq_thread_idle before adding a ring to an SQ task,
otherwise sqd races for seeing zero and accounting it as such.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

The io-wq threads were already marked as no-freeze, but the manager was
not. On resume, we perpetually have signal_pending() being true, and
hence the manager will loop and spin 100% of the time.

Just mark the tasks created by create_io_thread() as PF_NOFREEZE by
default, and remove any knowledge of it in io-wq and io_uring.
Reported-by: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
Tested-by: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We have a tiny race where io_put_sq_data() calls io_sq_thead_stop()
and finds the thread gone, but the thread has indeed not fully
exited or called complete() yet. Close it up by always having
io_sq_thread_stop() wait on completion of the exit event.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Fix the following coccicheck warning:
./fs/io_uring.c:8984:5-8: Unneeded variable: "ret". Return "0" on line
8998
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1615271441-33649-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

If we hit an error path in the function, make sure that the io_kiocb is
fully initialized at that point so that freeing the request always sees
a valid state.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

do_work such as io_wq_submit_work that cancel the work may leave a ref of
req as 1 if we have links. Fix it by call io_run_cancel.

Fixes: 4fb6ac32 ("io-wq: improve manager/worker handling over exec")
Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210309030410.3294078-1-yangerkun@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Calling io_queue_next() after spin_unlock in io_req_complete_post()
races with the other side extracting and reusing this request. Hand
coded parts of io_req_find_next() considering that io_disarm_next()
and io_req_task_queue() have (and safe) to be called with
completion_lock held.

It already does io_commit_cqring() and io_cqring_ev_posted(), so just
reuse it for post io_disarm_next().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5672a62f3150ee7c55849f40c0037655c4f2840f.1615250156.git.asml.silence@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

A preparation patch placing all preparations before extracting a next
request into a separate helper io_disarm_next().

Also, don't spuriously do ev_posted in a rare case where REQ_F_FAIL_LINK
is set but there are no requests linked (i.e. after cancelling a linked
timeout or setting IOSQE_IO_LINK on a last request of a submission
batch).
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/44ecff68d6b47e1c4e6b891bdde1ddc08cfc3590.1615250156.git.asml.silence@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Don't set IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP when io_sq_offload_create() has
failed on io_uring_alloc_task_context() but leave everything to
io_sq_thread_finish(), because currently io_sq_thread_finish()
hangs on trying to park it. That's great it stalls there, because
otherwise the following io_sq_thread_stop() would be skipped on
IO_SQ_THREAD_SHOULD_STOP check and the sqo would race for sqd with
freeing ctx.

A simple error injection gives something like this.

[  245.463955] INFO: task sqpoll-test-hang:523 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
[  245.463983] Call Trace:
[  245.463990]  __schedule+0x36b/0x950
[  245.464005]  schedule+0x68/0xe0
[  245.464013]  schedule_timeout+0x209/0x2a0
[  245.464032]  wait_for_completion+0x8b/0xf0
[  245.464043]  io_sq_thread_finish+0x44/0x1a0
[  245.464049]  io_uring_setup+0x9ea/0xc80
[  245.464058]  __x64_sys_io_uring_setup+0x16/0x20
[  245.464064]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x50
[  245.464073]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Previous patches killed the last user of this, now it's just a dead member
in the struct. Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

You can't call idr_remove() from within a idr_for_each() callback,
but you can call xa_erase() from an xa_for_each() loop, so switch the
entire personality_idr from the IDR to the XArray.  This manifests as a
use-after-free as idr_for_each() attempts to walk the rest of the node
after removing the last entry from it.

Fixes: 071698e1 ("io_uring: allow registering credentials")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.6+
Reported-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
[Pavel: rebased (creds load was moved into io_init_req())]
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7ccff36e1375f2b0ebf73d957f037b43becc0dde.1615212806.git.asml.silence@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

There are enough of problems with IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED, including the
burden of checking and kicking off the SQO task all over the codebase --
for exit/cancel/etc.

Rework it, always start the thread but don't do submit unless the flag
is gone, that's much easier.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io-wq now is per-task, so cancellations now should match against
request's ctx.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We keep running into weird dependency issues between the sqd lock and
the parking state. Disentangle the SQPOLL thread from the last bits of
the kthread parking inheritance, and just replace the parking state,
and two associated locks, with a single rw mutex. The SQPOLL thread
keeps the mutex for read all the time, except if someone has marked us
needing to park. Then we drop/re-acquire and try again.

This greatly simplifies the parking state machine (by just getting rid
of it), and makes it a lot more obvious how it works - if you need to
modify the ctx list, then you simply park the thread which will grab
the lock for writing.

Fold in fix from Hillf Danton on not setting STOP on a fatal signal.

Fixes: e54945ae ("io_uring: SQPOLL stop error handling fixes")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

This brings the behavior back in line with what 5.11 and earlier did,
and this is no longer needed with the improved handling of creds
not needing to do unshare().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

With IORING_SETUP_ATTACH_WQ we should let __io_sq_thread() use the
initial creds from each ctx.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

Add a simple warning making sure that nobody tries to create a new
manager while we're under IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT. That can potentially happen
due to racy work submission after final put.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

io_ring_exit_work() have to cancel all requests, including those staying
in io-wq, however it tries only cancellation of current tctx, which is
NULL. If we've got task==NULL, use the ctx-to-tctx map to go over all
tctx/io-wq and try cancellations on them.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We use system_unbound_wq to run io_ring_exit_work(), so it's hard to
monitor whether removal hang or not. Add WARN_ONCE to catch hangs.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

We don't use task file notes anymore, and no need left in indexing
task->io_uring->xa by file, and replace it with ctx. It's better
design-wise, especially since we keep a dangling file, and so have to
keep an eye on not dereferencing it.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>