- 29 Apr, 2019 40 commits
-
-
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by:David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] When accessing a file on a crafted image, btrfs can crash in block layer: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 PGD 136501067 P4D 136501067 PUD 124519067 PMD 0 CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8-default #252 RIP: 0010:end_bio_extent_readpage+0x144/0x700 Call Trace: <IRQ> blk_update_request+0x8f/0x350 blk_mq_end_request+0x1a/0x120 blk_done_softirq+0x99/0xc0 __do_softirq+0xc7/0x467 irq_exit+0xd1/0xe0 call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> RIP: 0010:default_idle+0x1e/0x170 [CAUSE] The crafted image has a tricky corruption, the INODE_ITEM has a different type against its parent dir: item 20 key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 2808 itemsize 160 generation 13 transid 13 size 1048576 nbytes 1048576 block group 0 mode 121644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 9 flags 0x0(none) This mode number 0120000 means it's a symlink. But the dir item think it's still a regular file: item 8 key (264 DIR_INDEX 5) itemoff 3707 itemsize 32 location key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE transid 13 data_len 0 name_len 2 name: f4 item 40 key (264 DIR_ITEM 51821248) itemoff 1573 itemsize 32 location key (268 INODE_ITEM 0) type FILE transid 13 data_len 0 name_len 2 name: f4 For symlink, we don't set BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.ops and leave it empty, as symlink is only designed to have inlined extent, all handled by tree block read. Thus no need to trigger btrfs_submit_bio_hook() for inline file extent. However end_bio_extent_readpage() expects tree->ops populated, as it's reading regular data extent. This causes NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] This patch fixes the problem in two ways: - Verify inode mode against its dir item when looking up inode So in btrfs_lookup_dentry() if we find inode mode mismatch with dir item, we error out so that corrupted inode will not be accessed. - Verify inode mode when getting extent mapping Only regular file should have regular or preallocated extent. If we found regular/preallocated file extent for symlink or the rest, we error out before submitting the read bio. With this fix that crafted image can be rejected gracefully: BTRFS critical (device loop0): inode mode mismatch with dir: inode mode=0121644 btrfs type=7 dir type=1 Reported-by:Yoon Jungyeon <jungyeon@gatech.edu> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202763Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
There is a report in kernel bugzilla about mismatch file type in dir item and inode item. This inspires us to check inode mode in inode item. This patch will check the following members: - inode key objectid Should be ROOT_DIR_DIR or [256, (u64)-256] or FREE_INO. - inode key offset Should be 0 - inode item generation - inode item transid No newer than sb generation + 1. The +1 is for log tree. - inode item mode No unknown bits. No invalid S_IF* bit. NOTE: S_IFMT check is not enough, need to check every know type. - inode item nlink Dir should have no more link than 1. - inode item flags Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Btrfs-progs already have a comprehensive type checker, to ensure there is only 0 (SINGLE profile) or 1 (DUP/RAID0/1/5/6/10) bit set for chunk profile bits. Do the same work for kernel. Reported-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] For fuzzed image whose DEV_ITEM has invalid total_bytes as 0, then kernel will just panic: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000098 #PF error: [normal kernel read fault] PGD 800000022b2bd067 P4D 800000022b2bd067 PUD 22b2bc067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 0 PID: 1106 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #9 RIP: 0010:btrfs_verify_dev_extents+0x2a5/0x5a0 Call Trace: open_ctree+0x160d/0x2149 btrfs_mount_root+0x5b2/0x680 [CAUSE] If device extent verification finds a deivce with 0 total_bytes, then it assumes it's a seed dummy, then search for seed devices. But in this case, there is no seed device at all, causing NULL pointer. [FIX] Since this is caused by fuzzed image, let's go the tree-check way, just add a new verification for device item. Reported-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since we have btrfs_check_chunk_valid() in tree-checker, let's do chunk item verification in tree-checker too. Since the tree-checker is run at endio time, if one chunk leaf fails chunk verification, we can still retry the other copy, making btrfs more robust to fuzzed image as we may still get a good chunk item. Also since we have done chunk verification in tree block read time, skip the btrfs_check_chunk_valid() call in read_one_chunk() if we're reading chunk items from leaf. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
To follow the standard behavior of tree-checker. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Old error message would be something like: BTRFS error (device dm-3): invalid chunk num_stipres: 0 New error message would be: Btrfs critical (device dm-3): corrupt superblock syschunk array: chunk_start=2097152, invalid chunk num_stripes: 0 Or Btrfs critical (device dm-3): corrupt leaf: root=3 block=8388608 slot=3 chunk_start=2097152, invalid chunk num_stripes: 0 And for certain error message, also output expected value. The error message levels are changed from error to critical. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
By function, chunk item verification is more suitable to be done inside tree-checker. So move btrfs_check_chunk_valid() to tree-checker.c and export it. And since it's now moved to tree-checker, also add a better comment for what this function is doing. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The commit fcebe456 ("Btrfs: rework qgroup accounting") reworked qgroups and added some new structures. Another rework of qgroup mechanics e69bcee3 ("btrfs: qgroup: Cleanup the old ref_node-oriented mechanism.") stopped using them and left uncleaned. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. As all callsites are updated, add the btrfs_ prefix as the function is exported. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
We can read fs_info from extent buffer and can drop it from the parameters. Signed-off-by: -
Phillip Potter authored
Deduplicate the btrfs file type conversion implementation - file systems that use the same file types as defined by POSIX do not need to define their own versions and can use the common helper functions decared in fs_types.h and implemented in fs_types.c Common implementation can be found via commit: bbe7449e "fs: common implementation of file type" Reviewed-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk> Reviewed-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
Move code to make it more readable, so as locking and unlocking is done in the same function. The generic checks that are now performed in the locked section are unaffected. Signed-off-by:
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Arnd Bergmann authored
BUG_ON(1) leads to bogus warnings from clang when CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES is set: fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5041:3: error: variable 'max_chunk_size' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized] BUG_ON(1); ^~~~~~~~~ include/asm-generic/bug.h:61:36: note: expanded from macro 'BUG_ON' #define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (unlikely(condition)) BUG(); } while (0) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/compiler.h:48:23: note: expanded from macro 'unlikely' # define unlikely(x) (__branch_check__(x, 0, __builtin_constant_p(x))) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5046:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here max_chunk_size); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/kernel.h:860:36: note: expanded from macro 'min' #define min(x, y) __careful_cmp(x, y, <) ^ include/linux/kernel.h:853:17: note: expanded from macro '__careful_cmp' __cmp_once(x, y, __UNIQUE_ID(__x), __UNIQUE_ID(__y), op)) ^ include/linux/kernel.h:847:25: note: expanded from macro '__cmp_once' typeof(y) unique_y = (y); \ ^ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5041:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true BUG_ON(1); ^ include/asm-generic/bug.h:61:32: note: expanded from macro 'BUG_ON' #define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (unlikely(condition)) BUG(); } while (0) ^ fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4993:20: note: initialize the variable 'max_chunk_size' to silence this warning u64 max_chunk_size; ^ = 0 Change it to BUG() so clang can see that this code path can never continue. Reviewed-by:Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The wrapper names better describe what's happening so they're not deleted though they're trivial, but at least moved closer to their place of use. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Long time ago (2008), the extent buffers were organized in a LRU list and switched to rb-tree in 6af118ce ("Btrfs: Index extent buffers in an rbtree"). There was one stale macro definition left. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
- make the messages more visually consistent and use same format "running ... test", any error or other warning can be easily spotted - move some message to the test entry function - add message to the inode tests Example output: [ 8.187391] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-generic, assert=on, integrity-checker=on, ref-verify=on [ 8.189476] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096 nodesize: 4096 [ 8.190761] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests [ 8.192245] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests [ 8.193573] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests [ 8.194876] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests [ 8.196166] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests [ 8.198026] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer operation tests [ 8.199328] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_split_item tests [ 8.200653] BTRFS: selftest: running extent I/O tests [ 8.201808] BTRFS: selftest: running find delalloc tests [ 8.320733] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer bitmap tests [ 8.340795] BTRFS: selftest: running inode tests [ 8.341766] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_get_extent tests [ 8.342981] BTRFS: selftest: running hole first btrfs_get_extent test [ 8.344342] BTRFS: selftest: running outstanding_extents tests [ 8.345575] BTRFS: selftest: running qgroup tests [ 8.346537] BTRFS: selftest: running qgroup add/remove tests [ 8.347725] BTRFS: selftest: running qgroup multiple refs test [ 8.354982] BTRFS: selftest: running free space tree tests [ 8.372175] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096 nodesize: 8192 [ 8.373539] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests [ 8.374989] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests [ 8.376236] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests [ 8.377483] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests [ 8.378854] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests ... Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
The messages like 'extent I/O tests finished' are redundant, if the test fails it's quite obvious in the log and hang is also noticeable. No other then extent_io and free space tree tests print that so make it consistent. Signed-off-by:
-
