- 19 Jan, 2023 40 commits
-
-
Kefeng Wang authored
Introduce damon_get_folio(), and the temporary wrapper function damon_get_page(), which help us to convert damon related functions to use folios, and it will be dropped once the conversion is completed. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221230070849.63358-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
Kefeng Wang authored
Firstly, make page_idle_get_page() return a folio, also rename it to page_idle_get_folio(), then, use it to convert page_idle_bitmap_read() and page_idle_bitmap_write() functions. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221230070849.63358-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Matthew Wilcox authored
Patch series "mm: convert page_idle/damon to use folios", v4. This patch (of 8): Convert page_memcg_check() into folio_memcg_check() and add a page_memcg_check() wrapper. The behaviour of page_memcg_check() is unchanged; tail pages always had a NULL ->memcg_data. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221230070849.63358-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221230070849.63358-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
JeongHyeon Lee authored
- The double `range` is duplicated in comment, remove one. - change `syfs` to `sysfs` Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223040331.4194-1-jhs2.lee@samsung.comSigned-off-by:
JeongHyeon Lee <jhs2.lee@samsung.com> Reviewed-by:
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Kefeng Wang authored
Straightforwardly convert split_huge_pages_all() to use a folio. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221229122503.149083-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.comSigned-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Now that all external callers are gone, just fold it into do_writepages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221229161031.391878-7-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc is a fairly thing wrapper around do_writepages, and the big difference there is support for cgroup writeback, which is not supported by ocfs2, and the potential to use ->writepages instead of ->writepage, which ocfs2 does not currently implement but eventually should. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221229161031.391878-6-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
jbd2_journal_submit_inode_data_buffers is only used by ocfs2, so move it there to prepare for removing generic_writepages. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221229161031.391878-5-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
->writepage is a very inefficient method to write back data, and only used through write_cache_pages or a a fallback when no ->migrate_folio method is present. Set ->migrate_folio to the generic buffer_head based helper, and remove the ->writepage implementation. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221229161031.391878-4-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Open code the resident inode handling in ntfs_writepages by directly using write_cache_pages to prepare removing the ->writepage handler in ntfs3. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221229161031.391878-3-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Patch series "remove generic_writepages" This series removes generic_writepages by open coding the current functionality in the three remaining callers. Besides removing some code the main benefit is that one of the few remaining ->writepage callers from outside the core page cache code go away. This patch (of 6): mpage_writepages doesn't do any of the page locking itself, so remove and outdated comment on the locking pattern there. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221229161031.391878-1-hch@lst.de Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221229161031.391878-2-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by:
-
Yin Fengwei authored
Kernel build regression with LLVM was reported here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1GCYXGtEVZbcv%2F5@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/ with commit f35b5d7d ("mm: align larger anonymous mappings on THP boundaries"). And the commit f35b5d7d was reverted. It turned out the regression is related with madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) was used by ld.lld. But with none PMD_SIZE aligned parameter len. trace-bpfcc captured: 531607 531732 ld.lld do_madvise.part.0 start: 0x7feca9000000, len: 0x7fb000, behavior: 0x4 531607 531793 ld.lld do_madvise.part.0 start: 0x7fec86a00000, len: 0x7fb000, behavior: 0x4 If the underneath physical page is THP, the madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) can trigger split_queue_lock contention raised significantly. perf showed following data: 14.85% 0.00% ld.lld [kernel.kallsyms] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe 11.52% entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe do_syscall_64 __x64_sys_madvise do_madvise.part.0 zap_page_range unmap_single_vma unmap_page_range page_remove_rmap deferred_split_huge_page __lock_text_start native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath If THP can't be removed from rmap as whole THP, partial THP will be removed from rmap by removing sub-pages from rmap. Even the THP head page is added to deferred queue already, the split_queue_lock will be acquired and check whether the THP head page is in the queue already. Thus, the contention of split_queue_lock is raised. Before acquire split_queue_lock, check and bail out early if the THP head page is in the queue already. The checking without holding split_queue_lock could race with deferred_split_scan, but it doesn't impact the correctness here. Test result of building kernel with ld.lld: commit 7b5a0b66 (parent commit of f35b5d7d): time -f "\t%E real,\t%U user,\t%S sys" make LD=ld.lld -skj96 allmodconfig all 6:07.99 real, 26367.77 user, 5063.35 sys commit f35b5d7d: time -f "\t%E real,\t%U user,\t%S sys" make LD=ld.lld -skj96 allmodconfig all 7:22.15 real, 26235.03 user, 12504.55 sys commit f35b5d7d with the fixing patch: time -f "\t%E real,\t%U user,\t%S sys" make LD=ld.lld -skj96 allmodconfig all 6:08.49 real, 26520.15 user, 5047.91 sys Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223135207.2275317-1-fengwei.yin@intel.comSigned-off-by:
Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com> Tested-by:
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Acked-by:
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Reviewed-by:
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
SeongJae Park authored
Page reporting fetches pr_dev_info using rcu_access_pointer(), which is for safely fetching a pointer that will not be dereferenced but could concurrently updated. The code indeed does not dereference pr_dev_info after fetching it using rcu_access_pointer(), but it fetches the pointer while concurrent updates to the pointer is avoided by holding the update side lock, page_reporting_mutex. In the case, rcu_dereference_protected() should be used instead because it provides better readability and performance on some cases, as rcu_dereference_protected() avoids use of READ_ONCE(). Replace the rcu_access_pointer() calls with rcu_dereference_protected(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221228175942.149491-1-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 36e66c55 ("mm: introduce Reported pages") Signed-off-by:
-
Kele Huang authored
Commit af5b0f6a ("mm: consolidate page table accounting") consolidates page table accounting to a single counter in struct mm_struct {} as mm->pgtables_bytes. So the meanning of this counter should be the size of all page tables now. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221224060233.417827-1-kele.huang@columbia.eduSigned-off-by:
Kele Huang <kele.huang@columbia.edu> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Being able to provide a custom protection opens the door for inconsistencies and BUGs: for example, accidentally allowing for more permissions than desired by other mechanisms (e.g., softdirty tracking). vma->vm_page_prot should be the single source of truth. Only PROT_NUMA is special: there is no way we can erroneously allow for more permissions when removing all permissions. Special-case using the MM_CP_PROT_NUMA flag. [david@redhat.com: PAGE_NONE might not be defined without CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5084ff1c-ebb3-f918-6a60-bacabf550a88@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-3-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Patch series "mm: uffd-wp + change_protection() cleanups". Cleanup page protection handling in uffd-wp when calling change_protection() and improve unprotecting uffd=wp in private mappings, trying to set PTEs writable again if possible just like we do during mprotect() when upgrading write permissions. Make the change_protection() interface harder to get wrong :) I consider both pages primarily cleanups, although patch #1 fixes a corner case with uffd-wp and softdirty tracking for shmem. @Peter, please let me know if we should flag patch #1 as pure cleanup -- I have no idea how important softdirty tracking on shmem is. This patch (of 2): uffd_wp_range() currently calculates page protection manually using vm_get_page_prot(). This will ignore any other reason for active writenotify: one mechanism applicable to shmem is softdirty tracking. For example, the following sequence 1) Write to mapped shmem page 2) Clear softdirty 3) Register uffd-wp covering the mapped page 4) Unregister uffd-wp covering the mapped page 5) Write to page again will not set the modified page softdirty, because uffd_wp_range() will ignore that writenotify is required for softdirty tracking and simply map the page writable again using change_protection(). Similarly, instead of unregistering, protecting followed by un-protecting the page using uffd-wp would result in the same situation. Now that we enable writenotify whenever enabling uffd-wp on a VMA, vma->vm_page_prot will already properly reflect our requirements: the default is to write-protect all PTEs. However, for shared mappings we would now not remap the PTEs writable if possible when unprotecting, just like for private mappings (COW). To compensate, set MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE just like mprotect() does to try mapping individual PTEs writable. For private mappings, this change implies that we will now always try setting PTEs writable when un-protecting, just like when upgrading write permissions using mprotect(), which is an improvement. For shared mappings, we will only set PTEs writable if can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() indicates that it's ok. For ordinary shmem, this will be the case when PTEs are dirty, which should usually be the case -- otherwise we could special-case shmem in can_change_pte_writable()/can_change_pmd_writable() easily, because shmem itself doesn't require writenotify. Note that hugetlb does not yet implement MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE, so we won't try setting PTEs writable when unprotecting or when unregistering uffd-wp. This can be added later on top by implementing MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE. While commit ffd05793 ("userfaultfd: wp: support write protection for userfault vma range") introduced that code, it should only be applicable to uffd-wp on shared mappings -- shmem (hugetlb does not support softdirty tracking). I don't think this corner cases justifies to cc stable. Let's just handle it correctly and prepare for change_protection() cleanups. [david@redhat.com: o need for additional harmless checks if we're wr-protecting either way] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/71412742-a71f-9c74-865f-773ad83db7a5@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-1-david@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221223155616.297723-2-david@redhat.com Fixes: b1f9e876 ("mm/uffd: enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs") Signed-off-by:
-
Xu Panda authored
Fix a typo of "comaring" which should be "comparing". Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202212231050245952617@zte.com.cnSigned-off-by:
Xu Panda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by:
xu xin <xu.xin16@zte.com.cn> Reviewed-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
Scanning page tables when hardware does not set the accessed bit has no real use cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-9-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Michael Larabel <Michael@MichaelLarabel.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
Among the flags in scan_control: 1. sc->may_swap, which indicates swap constraint due to memsw.max, is supported as usual. 2. sc->proactive, which indicates reclaim by memory.reclaim, may not opportunistically skip the aging path, since it is considered less latency sensitive. 3. !(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO), which indicates IO constraint, lowers swappiness to prioritize file LRU, since clean file folios are more likely to exist. 4. sc->may_writepage and sc->may_unmap, which indicates opportunistic reclaim, are rejected, since unmapped clean folios are already prioritized. Scanning for more of them is likely futile and can cause high reclaim latency when there is a large number of memcgs. The rest are handled by the existing code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-8-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
For each node, memcgs are divided into two generations: the old and the young. For each generation, memcgs are randomly sharded into multiple bins to improve scalability. For each bin, an RCU hlist_nulls is virtually divided into three segments: the head, the tail and the default. An onlining memcg is added to the tail of a random bin in the old generation. The eviction starts at the head of a random bin in the old generation. The per-node memcg generation counter, whose reminder (mod 2) indexes the old generation, is incremented when all its bins become empty. There are four operations: 1. MEMCG_LRU_HEAD, which moves an memcg to the head of a random bin in its current generation (old or young) and updates its "seg" to "head"; 2. MEMCG_LRU_TAIL, which moves an memcg to the tail of a random bin in its current generation (old or young) and updates its "seg" to "tail"; 3. MEMCG_LRU_OLD, which moves an memcg to the head of a random bin in the old generation, updates its "gen" to "old" and resets its "seg" to "default"; 4. MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG, which moves an memcg to the tail of a random bin in the young generation, updates its "gen" to "young" and resets its "seg" to "default". The events that trigger the above operations are: 1. Exceeding the soft limit, which triggers MEMCG_LRU_HEAD; 2. The first attempt to reclaim an memcg below low, which triggers MEMCG_LRU_TAIL; 3. The first attempt to reclaim an memcg below reclaimable size threshold, which triggers MEMCG_LRU_TAIL; 4. The second attempt to reclaim an memcg below reclaimable size threshold, which triggers MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG; 5. Attempting to reclaim an memcg below min, which triggers MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG; 6. Finishing the aging on the eviction path, which triggers MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG; 7. Offlining an memcg, which triggers MEMCG_LRU_OLD. Note that memcg LRU only applies to global reclaim, and the round-robin incrementing of their max_seq counters ensures the eventual fairness to all eligible memcgs. For memcg reclaim, it still relies on mem_cgroup_iter(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-7-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
Move should_run_aging() next to its only caller left. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-6-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
Recall that the aging produces the youngest generation: first it scans for accessed folios and updates their gen counters; then it increments lrugen->max_seq. The current aging fairness safeguard for kswapd uses two passes to ensure the fairness to multiple eligible memcgs. On the first pass, which is shared with the eviction, it checks whether all eligible memcgs are low on cold folios. If so, it requires a second pass, on which it ages all those memcgs at the same time. With memcg LRU, the aging, while ensuring eventual fairness, will run when necessary. Therefore the current aging fairness safeguard for kswapd will not be needed. Note that memcg LRU only applies to global reclaim. For memcg reclaim, the aging can be unfair to different memcgs, i.e., their lrugen->max_seq can be incremented at different paces. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-5-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
Recall that the eviction consumes the oldest generation: first it bucket-sorts folios whose gen counters were updated by the aging and reclaims the rest; then it increments lrugen->min_seq. The current eviction fairness safeguard for global reclaim has a dilemma: when there are multiple eligible memcgs, should it continue or stop upon meeting the reclaim goal? If it continues, it overshoots and increases direct reclaim latency; if it stops, it loses fairness between memcgs it has taken memory away from and those it has yet to. With memcg LRU, the eviction, while ensuring eventual fairness, will stop upon meeting its goal. Therefore the current eviction fairness safeguard for global reclaim will not be needed. Note that memcg LRU only applies to global reclaim. For memcg reclaim, the eviction will continue, even if it is overshooting. This becomes unconditional due to code simplification. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-4-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
lru_gen_folio will be chained into per-node lists by the coming lrugen->list. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-3-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Yu Zhao authored
Patch series "mm: multi-gen LRU: memcg LRU", v3. Overview ======== An memcg LRU is a per-node LRU of memcgs. It is also an LRU of LRUs, since each node and memcg combination has an LRU of folios (see mem_cgroup_lruvec()). Its goal is to improve the scalability of global reclaim, which is critical to system-wide memory overcommit in data centers. Note that memcg reclaim is currently out of scope. Its memory bloat is a pointer to each lruvec and negligible to each pglist_data. In terms of traversing memcgs during global reclaim, it improves the best-case complexity from O(n) to O(1) and does not affect the worst-case complexity O(n). Therefore, on average, it has a sublinear complexity in contrast to the current linear complexity. The basic structure of an memcg LRU can be understood by an analogy to the active/inactive LRU (of folios): 1. It has the young and the old (generations), i.e., the counterparts to the active and the inactive; 2. The increment of max_seq triggers promotion, i.e., the counterpart to activation; 3. Other events trigger similar operations, e.g., offlining an memcg triggers demotion, i.e., the counterpart to deactivation. In terms of global reclaim, it has two distinct features: 1. Sharding, which allows each thread to start at a random memcg (in the old generation) and improves parallelism; 2. Eventual fairness, which allows direct reclaim to bail out at will and reduces latency without affecting fairness over some time. The commit message in patch 6 details the workflow: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-7-yuzhao@google.com/ The following is a simple test to quickly verify its effectiveness. Test design: 1. Create multiple memcgs. 2. Each memcg contains a job (fio). 3. All jobs access the same amount of memory randomly. 4. The system does not experience global memory pressure. 5. Periodically write to the root memory.reclaim. Desired outcome: 1. All memcgs have similar pgsteal counts, i.e., stddev(pgsteal) over mean(pgsteal) is close to 0%. 2. The total pgsteal is close to the total requested through memory.reclaim, i.e., sum(pgsteal) over sum(requested) is close to 100%. Actual outcome [1]: MGLRU off MGLRU on stddev(pgsteal) / mean(pgsteal) 75% 20% sum(pgsteal) / sum(requested) 425% 95% #################################################################### MEMCGS=128 for ((memcg = 0; memcg < $MEMCGS; memcg++)); do mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memcg$memcg done start() { echo $BASHPID > /sys/fs/cgroup/memcg$memcg/cgroup.procs fio -name=memcg$memcg --numjobs=1 --ioengine=mmap \ --filename=/dev/zero --size=1920M --rw=randrw \ --rate=64m,64m --random_distribution=random \ --fadvise_hint=0 --time_based --runtime=10h \ --group_reporting --minimal } for ((memcg = 0; memcg < $MEMCGS; memcg++)); do start & done sleep 600 for ((i = 0; i < 600; i++)); do echo 256m >/sys/fs/cgroup/memory.reclaim sleep 6 done for ((memcg = 0; memcg < $MEMCGS; memcg++)); do grep "pgsteal " /sys/fs/cgroup/memcg$memcg/memory.stat done #################################################################### [1]: This was obtained from running the above script (touches less than 256GB memory) on an EPYC 7B13 with 512GB DRAM for over an hour. This patch (of 8): The new name lru_gen_folio will be more distinct from the coming lru_gen_memcg. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-1-yuzhao@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222041905.2431096-2-yuzhao@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
Currently a vm_unmap_ram() functions triggers a BUG() if an area is not found. Replace it by the WARN_ON_ONCE() error message and keep machine alive instead of stopping it. The worst case is a memory leaking. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222190022.134380-3-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) authored
Currently the __vunmap() path calls __find_vmap_area() twice. Once on entry to check that the area exists, then inside the remove_vm_area() function which also performs a new search for the VA. In order to improvie it from a performance point of view we split remove_vm_area() into two new parts: - find_unlink_vmap_area() that does a search and unlink from tree; - __remove_vm_area() that removes without searching. In this case there is no any functional change for remove_vm_area() whereas vm_remove_mappings(), where a second search happens, switches to the __remove_vm_area() variant where the already detached VA is passed as a parameter, so there is no need to find it again. Performance wise, i use test_vmalloc.sh with 32 threads doing alloc free on a 64-CPUs-x86_64-box: perf without this patch: - 31.41% 0.50% vmalloc_test/10 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __vunmap - 30.92% __vunmap - 17.67% _raw_spin_lock native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath - 12.33% remove_vm_area - 11.79% free_vmap_area_noflush - 11.18% _raw_spin_lock native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath 0.76% free_unref_page perf with this patch: - 11.35% 0.13% vmalloc_test/14 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __vunmap - 11.23% __vunmap - 8.28% find_unlink_vmap_area - 7.95% _raw_spin_lock 7.44% native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath - 1.93% free_vmap_area_noflush - 0.56% _raw_spin_lock 0.53% native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath 0.60% __vunmap_range_noflush __vunmap() consumes around ~20% less CPU cycles on this test. Also, switch from find_vmap_area() to find_unlink_vmap_area() to prevent a double access to the vmap_area_lock: one for finding area, second time is for unlinking from a tree. [urezki@gmail.com: switch to find_unlink_vmap_area() in vm_unmap_ram()] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222190022.134380-2-urezki@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221222190022.134380-1-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by:Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Reviewed-by:
-
David Howells authored
Move FOLL_* definitions to linux/mm_types.h to make them more accessible without having to drag in all of linux/mm.h and everything that drags in too[1]. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2161258.1671657894@warthog.procyon.org.ukSigned-off-by:
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Suggested-by:
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Hao Sun authored
Similar to kmemdup(), but support large amount of bytes with kvmalloc() and does *not* guarantee that the result will be physically contiguous. Use only in cases where kvmalloc() is needed and free it with kvfree(). Also adapt policy_unpack.c in case someone bisect into this. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221144245.27164-1-sunhao.th@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Suggested-by:
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com> Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vishal Moola (Oracle) authored
Deactivate_page() has already been converted to use folios, this change converts it to take in a folio argument instead of calling page_folio(). It also renames the function folio_deactivate() to be more consistent with other folio functions. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix left-over comments, per Yu Zhao] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221180848.20774-5-vishal.moola@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Vishal Moola (Oracle) authored
This change replaces 2 calls to compound_head() from put_page() and 1 call from mark_page_accessed() with one from page_folio(). This is in preparation for the conversion of deactivate_page() to folio_deactivate(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221180848.20774-4-vishal.moola@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vishal Moola (Oracle) authored
This change removes a number of calls to compound_head(), and saves 1729 bytes of kernel text. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221180848.20774-3-vishal.moola@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vishal Moola (Oracle) authored
Patch series "Convert deactivate_page() to folio_deactivate()", v4. Deactivate_page() has already been converted to use folios. This patch series modifies the callers of deactivate_page() to use folios. It also introduces vm_normal_folio() to assist with folio conversions, and converts deactivate_page() to folio_deactivate() which takes in a folio. This patch (of 4): Introduce a wrapper function called vm_normal_folio(). This function calls vm_normal_page() and returns the folio of the page found, or null if no page is found. This function allows callers to get a folio from a pte, which will eventually allow them to completely replace their struct page variables with struct folio instead. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221180848.20774-1-vishal.moola@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221180848.20774-2-vishal.moola@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vernon Yang authored
Invert the conditional judgment of the mid_split, to focus the return statement in the last statement, which is easier to understand and for better readability. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221060058.609003-8-vernon2gm@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vernon Yang authored
If mas->node is an MAS_START, there are three cases, and they all assign different values to mas->node and mas->offset. So there is no need to set them to a default value before updating. Update them directly to make them easier to understand and for better readability. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221060058.609003-7-vernon2gm@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vernon Yang authored
The macros CONFIG_DEBUG_MAPLE_TREE_VERBOSE no one uses, functions mas_dup_tree() and mas_dup_store() are not implemented, just function declaration, so drop it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221060058.609003-6-vernon2gm@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vernon Yang authored
When you need to compare whether node->parent is parent of the root node, using macro MA_ROOT_PARENT is easier to understand and for better readability. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221060058.609003-5-vernon2gm@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vernon Yang authored
Use mt_node_max() to get the maximum number of slots for a node, rather than direct operations mt_max[], makes it better portability. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221060058.609003-4-vernon2gm@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vernon Yang authored
For functions with a return type of void, it is unnecessary to add a reurn statement at the end of the function, so drop it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221060058.609003-3-vernon2gm@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
Vernon Yang authored
Patch series "Clean up and refinement for maple tree", v2. This patchset cleans up and refines some maple tree code. A few small changes make the code easier to understand and for better readability. This patch (of 7): These extra space and blank lines are unnecessary, so drop them. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221060058.609003-1-vernon2gm@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221060058.609003-2-vernon2gm@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
-
