Provide msi_alloc_msi_desc() which takes a template MSI descriptor for
initializing a newly allocated descriptor. This allows to simplify various
usage sites of alloc_msi_entry() and moves the storage handling into the
core code.

For simple cases where only a linear vector space is required provide
msi_add_simple_msi_descs() which just allocates a linear range of MSI
descriptors and fills msi_desc::msi_index accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206210747.873833567@linutronix.de

In preparation for dynamic handling of MSI-X interrupts provide a new set
of MSI descriptor accessor functions and iterators. They are benefitial per
se as they allow to cleanup quite some code in various MSI domain
implementations.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206210747.818635078@linutronix.de

Usage sites which do allocations of the MSI descriptors before invoking
msi_domain_alloc_irqs() require to lock the MSI decriptors accross the
operation.

Provide entry points which can be called with the MSI mutex held and lock
the mutex in the existing entry points.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206210747.765371053@linutronix.de

For upcoming runtime extensions of MSI-X interrupts it's required to
protect the MSI descriptor list. Add a mutex to struct msi_device_data and
provide lock/unlock functions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206210747.708877269@linutronix.de

It's only required when MSI is in use.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206210747.650487479@linutronix.de

There is no reason to walk the MSI descriptors to retrieve the interrupt
number for a device. Use msi_get_virq() instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.329792721@linutronix.de

Just use the core function msi_get_virq().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.269468319@linutronix.de

Storing a pointer to the MSI descriptor just to track the Linux interrupt
number is daft. Just store the interrupt number and be done with it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.207838579@linutronix.de

No point in retrieving the MSI descriptors. Just query the Linux interrupt
number.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.148331680@linutronix.de

Let the core code fiddle with the MSI descriptor retrieval.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.089008198@linutronix.de

Let the core code fiddle with the MSI descriptor retrieval.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221815.029143589@linutronix.de

Storing a pointer to the MSI descriptor just to keep track of the Linux
interrupt number is daft. Use msi_get_virq() instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.970099984@linutronix.de

Replace open coded MSI descriptor chasing and use the proper accessor
functions instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.900929381@linutronix.de

Use msi_get_vector() and handle the return value to be compatible.

No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.841243231@linutronix.de

This allows drivers to retrieve the Linux interrupt number instead of
fiddling with MSI descriptors.

msi_get_virq() returns the Linux interrupt number or 0 in case that there
is no entry for the given MSI index.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.780824745@linutronix.de

Set the domain info flag and remove the check.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.720998720@linutronix.de

Provide a domain info flag which makes the core code check for a contiguous
MSI-X index on allocation. That's simpler than checking it at some other
domain callback in architecture code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.662401116@linutronix.de

The usage of msi_desc::pci::entry_nr is confusing at best. It's the index
into the MSI[X] descriptor table.

Use msi_desc::msi_index which is shared between all MSI incarnations
instead of having a PCI specific storage for no value.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.602911509@linutronix.de

Use the common msi_index member and get rid of the pointless wrapper struct.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.540704224@linutronix.de

Use the common msi_index member and get rid of the pointless wrapper struct.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.477386185@linutronix.de

Use the common msi_index member and get rid of the pointless wrapper struct.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.413638645@linutronix.de

All non PCI/MSI usage variants have data structures in struct msi_desc with
only one member: xxx_index. PCI/MSI has a entry_nr member.

Add a common msi_index member to struct msi_desc so all implementations can
share it which allows further consolidation.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.350967317@linutronix.de

Storing the platform private data in a MSI descriptor is sloppy at
best. The data belongs to the device and not to the descriptor.
Add a pointer to struct msi_device_data and store the pointer there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.287680528@linutronix.de

It's hard to distinguish what platform_msi_domain_alloc() and
platform_msi_domain_alloc_irqs() are about. Make the distinction more
explicit and add comments which explain the use cases properly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.228706214@linutronix.de

No more users. Refactor the core code accordingly and move the global
interface under CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.168362229@linutronix.de

Set the domain info flag and remove the local sysfs code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.109408832@linutronix.de

Set the domain info flag which makes the core code handle sysfs groups and
put an explicit invocation into the legacy code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221814.048612053@linutronix.de

Add new allocation functions which can be activated by domain info
flags. They store the groups pointer in struct msi_device_data.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.988659194@linutronix.de

Allocate the MSI device data on first invocation of the allocation function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.928842960@linutronix.de

Allocate the MSI device data on first invocation of the allocation function.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.867985931@linutronix.de

Allocate the MSI device data on first invocation of the allocation function
for platform MSI private data.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.805529729@linutronix.de

Allocate MSI device data on first use, i.e. when a PCI driver invokes one
of the PCI/MSI enablement functions.

Add a wrapper function to ensure that the ordering vs. pcim_msi_release()
is correct.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r1adrdje.ffs@tglx

The MSI core will introduce runtime allocation of MSI related data. This
data will be devres managed and has to be set up before enabling
PCI/MSI[-X]. This would introduce an ordering issue vs. pcim_release().

The setup order is:

   pcim_enable_device()
	devres_alloc(pcim_release...);
	...
	pci_irq_alloc()
	  msi_setup_device_data()
	     devres_alloc(msi_device_data_release, ...)

and once the device is released these release functions are invoked in the
opposite order:

    msi_device_data_release()
    ...
    pcim_release()
       pci_disable_msi[x]()

which is obviously wrong, because pci_disable_msi[x]() requires the MSI
data to be available to tear down the MSI[-X] interrupts.

Remove the MSI[-X] teardown from pcim_release() and add an explicit action
to be installed on the attempt of enabling PCI/MSI[-X].

This allows the MSI core data allocation to be ordered correctly in a
subsequent step.
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87tuf9rdoj.ffs@tglx

Create struct msi_device_data and add a pointer of that type to struct
dev_msi_info, which is part of struct device. Provide an allocator function
which can be invoked from the MSI interrupt allocation code pathes.

Add a properties field to the data structure as a first member so the
allocation size is not zero bytes. The field will be uses later on.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.676660809@linutronix.de

The only unconditional part of MSI data in struct device is the irqdomain
pointer. Everything else can be allocated on demand. Create a data
structure and move the irqdomain pointer into it. The other MSI specific
parts are going to be removed from struct device in later steps.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.617178827@linutronix.de

instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.556202506@linutronix.de

instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.493922179@linutronix.de

to determine whether this is MSI or MSIX instead of consulting MSI
descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.434156196@linutronix.de

instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.372357371@linutronix.de

instead of fiddling with MSI descriptors.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210221813.311410967@linutronix.de