now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

We know that our udc points to our gadget and our
gadget_driver, simplify the interface by passing
a single argument.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The drivers should use dmaengine_terminate_all() or dmaengine_slave_config()
API instead of accessing the device_control which will be deprecated soon
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

Some gadget/function drivers might want to do
improper request recycling by allocating a single
request from one particular endpoint and queueing
it to another completely unrelated endpoint.

One such case was found with f_loopback.c.

To prevent such cases from happening again, let's
WARN() so we get a loud enough failure and persuade
users to report errors.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

whenever we get a Disconnect Interrupt, we should
make sure to update out udc state to NOT_ATTACHED,
otherwise sysfs will show wrong values.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

I noticed that this has been missing for quite
some time so I decided it was about time to
document it.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>