This is mainly to solve a lock ordering issue, and also simplifies the
code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Soon we'll be able to modify existing stripes - replacing empty blocks
with new blocks and new p/q blocks. This patch updates the trigger code
to handle pointers changing in an existing stripe; also, it
significantly improves how the stripes heap works, which means we can
get rid of the stripe creation/deletion lock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

The trigger for stripe keys is shortly going to need both the old and
the new key passed to the trigger - this patch does that rework.

For now, this just changes the in memory triggers, and this doesn't
change how extent triggers work.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This is prep work for reworking the triggers machinery - we have
triggers that need to know both the old and the new key.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This fixes a bug where recovery fails when one of the devices is read
only.

Also - consolidate the "must rewrite this node to insert it" behind a
new btree node flag.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Improved error messages are always a good thing
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

It appears this was erronious, a different bug was responsible
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This fixes a bug where the BCH_WRITE_SKIP_CLOSURE_PUT was set
incorrectly, causing the completion to be delivered multiple times.
oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

It's supposed to check whether we're splitting a compressed extent and
if so get a bigger disk reservation - hence this fixes a "disk usage
increased by x without a reservaiton" bug.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

We use sentinal values that aren't NULL to indicate there's a btree node
at a higher level; occasionally, this may result in
btree_iter_up_until_good_node() stopping at one of those sentinal
values.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Whenever we're doing an update that has pointers, that generally means
we need to do the update in order to release open bucket references - so
we should be using the btree open bucket reserve.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Turns out it's possible during shutdown for the allocator to get stuck
spinning on bch2_invalidate_buckets() without hitting any of the other
checks.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

The code that checks lock ordering was recently changed to go off of the
pos of the btree node, rather than the iterator, but the btree cache
code didn't update to handle iterators that point to cached bkeys. Oops

Also, update various debug code.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

state lock isn't held at startup
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Also tweak the allocator to be more aggressive about keeping it full.
The recent changes to make updates to interior nodes transactional (and
thus generate updates to the alloc btree) all put more stress on the
btree node reserves.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This introduces a new kind of btree iterator, cached iterators, which
point to keys cached in a hash table. The cache also acts as a write
cache - in the update path, we journal the update but defer updating the
btree until the cached entry is flushed by journal reclaim.

Cache coherency is for now up to the users to handle, which isn't ideal
but should be good enough for now.

These new iterators will be used for updating inodes and alloc info (the
alloc and stripes btrees).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Full mark and sweep gc doesn't (yet?) work with the new btree key cache
code, but it also blocks updates to interior btree nodes for the
duration and isn't really necessary in practice; we aren't currently
attempting to repair errors in allocation info at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

To be used the debug tool that dumps the contents of the journal.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Btree node lock ordering is based on the logical key. However, 'struct
btree' may be reused for a different btree node under memory pressure.
This patch uses the new six lock callback to check if a btree node is no
longer the node we wanted to lock before blocking.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

__bch2_btree_node_lock() was incorrectly using iter->pos as a proxy for
btree node lock ordering, this caused an off by one error that was
triggered by bch2_btree_node_get_sibling() getting the previous node.

This refactors the code to compare against btree node keys directly.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This splits out the journalling code from the btree update code; prep
work for the btree key cache.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This is better than skipping the journal pre-reservation if we already
have one - we should still acount for the journal reservation we're
going to have to get.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

We need a larger open bucket reserve now that the btree interior update
path holds onto open bucket references; filesystems with many high
through devices may need more open buckets now.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

The btree cache lock is needed for reclaiming from the btree node cache,
and memory allocation can potentially spin and sleep (for 100 ms at a
time), so.. don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Also, in the btree_update_start() path, if we already have a journal
pre-reservation we don't want to take another - that's a deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

bch2_btree_node_mem_alloc() uses memalloc_nofs_save()/GFP_NOFS, but
GFP_NOFS does include __GFP_IO - oops. We used to use GFP_NOIO, but as
we're a filesystem now GFP_NOFS makes more sense now and is looser.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

bch2_btree_iter_downgrade() was looping over all iterators in a
transaction; bch2_trans_downgrade() should be doing that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

This will help narrow down which code is at fault when this happens.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

Not doing so confuses copygc
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>

It's not needed anymore since we can now write to buckets before
updating the alloc btree.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>