- 27 Jul, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It only uses vfs inode for assigning it to the async_chunk function. Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It only really uses btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It really wants btrfs_inode and is prepration to converting run_delalloc_nocow to taking btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It just forwards its argument to __btrfs_qgroup_release_data. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
All but 3 uses require vfs_inode so convert the logic to have btrfs_inode be the main inode struct. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Majority of its uses are for btrfs_inode so take it as an argument directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It simpy forwards its inode argument to __btrfs_add_ordered_extent which already takes btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
All its children functions take btrfs_inode so convert it to taking btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Preparation to converting its callers to taking btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It has only 2 uses for the vfs_inode - insert_inline_extent and i_size_read. On the flipside it will allow converting its callers to btrfs_inode, so convert it to taking btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It passes btrfs_inode to its callee so change the interface. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It uses vfs_inode only for a tracepoint so convert its interface to take btrfs_inode directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It only uses btrfs_inode so can just as easily take it as an argument. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Only 6 out of all flush states were being printed correctly since only they were exported via the TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM macro. This patch converts all flush states to use the newly introduced EM macro so that they can all be printed correctly. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This fixes correct pint out of the extent io tree owner in btrfs_set_extent_bit/btrfs_clear_extent_bit/btrfs_convert_extent_bit tracepoints. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Since qgroup's reservation types are define in a macro they must be exported to user space in order for user space tools to convert raw binary data to symbolic names. Currently trace-cmd report produces the following output: kworker/u8:2-459 [003] 1208.543587: qgroup_update_reserve: 2b742cae-e0e5-4def-9ef7-28a9b34a951e: qgid=5 type=0x2 cur_reserved=54870016 diff=-32768 With this fix the output is: kworker/u8:2-459 [003] 1208.543587: qgroup_update_reserve: 2b742cae-e0e5-4def-9ef7-28a9b34a951e: qgid=5 type=BTRFS_QGROUP_RSV_META_PREALLOC cur_reserved=54870016 diff=-32768 Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Since all enums used in btrfs' tracepoints are going to be redefined to allow proper parsing of their values by userspace tools let's rearrange when they are defined. This will allow to use only a single set of #define EM/#undef EM sequence. No functional changes. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
extent's type is an enum and this requires that the enum values be exported to user space so that user space tools can correctly map raw binary data to the symbolic name. Currently tracepoints using btrfs__file_extent_item_regular or btrfs__file_extent_item_inline result in the following output: fio-443 [002] 586.609450: btrfs_get_extent_show_fi_regular: f0c3bf8e-0174-4bcc-92aa-6c2d62430420:i root=5(FS_TREE) inode=258 size=2136457216 disk_isize=0 file extent range=[2126946304 2136457216] (num_bytes=9510912 ram_bytes=9510912 disk_bytenr=0 disk_num_bytes=0 extent_offset=0 type=0x1 compression=0 E.g type is 0x1 . With this patch applie the output is: <ommitted for brevity> disk_bytenr=141348864 disk_num_bytes=4096 extent_offset=0 type=REG compression=0 Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
When tracepoints use __print_symbolic to print textual representation of a value that comes from an ENUM each enum value needs to be exported to user space so that user space tools can convert the binary value data to the trings as user space does not know what those enums are about. Doing a trace-cmd record && trace-cmd report currently results in: kworker/u8:1-61 [000] 66.299527: btrfs_flush_space: 5302ee13-c65e-45bb-98ef-8fe3835bd943: state=3(0x3) flags=4(METADATA) num_bytes=2621440 ret=0 I.e state is not translated to its symbolic counterpart. With this patch applied the output is: fio-370 [002] 56.762402: btrfs_trigger_flush: d04cd7ac-38e2-452f-a7f5-8157529fd5f0: preempt: flush=3(BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL) flags=4(METADATA) bytes=655360 See also 190f0b76 ("mm: tracing: Export enums in tracepoints to user space"). Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
On a filesystem with exhausted metadata, but still enough to start balance, it's possible to hit this error: [324402.053842] BTRFS info (device loop0): 1 enospc errors during balance [324402.060769] BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -28 [324402.172295] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in reset_balance_state:3321: errno=-28 No space left It fails inside reset_balance_state and turns the filesystem to read-only, which is unnecessary and should be fixed too, but the problem is caused by lack for space when the balance item is deleted. This is a one-time operation and from the same rank as unlink that is allowed to use the global block reserve. So do the same for the balance item. Status of the filesystem (100GiB) just after the balance fails: $ btrfs fi df mnt Data, single: total=80.01GiB, used=38.58GiB System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=16.00KiB Metadata, single: total=19.99GiB, used=19.48GiB GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=50.11MiB CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The function btrfs_check_can_nocow() now has two completely different call patterns. For nowait variant, callers don't need to do any cleanup. While for wait variant, callers need to release the lock if they can do nocow write. This is somehow confusing, and is already a problem for the exported btrfs_check_can_nocow(). So this patch will separate the different patterns into different functions. For nowait variant, the function will be called check_nocow_nolock(). For wait variant, the function pair will be btrfs_check_nocow_lock() btrfs_check_nocow_unlock(). Reviewed-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
These two functions have extra conditions that their callers need to meet, and some not-that-common parameters used for return value. So adding some comments may save reviewers some time. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] When the data space is exhausted, even if the inode has NOCOW attribute, we will still refuse to truncate unaligned range due to ENOSPC. The following script can reproduce it pretty easily: #!/bin/bash dev=/dev/test/test mnt=/mnt/btrfs umount $dev &> /dev/null umount $mnt &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f $dev -b 1G mount -o nospace_cache $dev $mnt touch $mnt/foobar chattr +C $mnt/foobar xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 4k" $mnt/foobar > /dev/null xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 1G" $mnt/padding &> /dev/null sync xfs_io -c "fpunch 0 2k" $mnt/foobar umount $mnt Currently this will fail at the fpunch part. [CAUSE] Because btrfs_truncate_block() always reserves space without checking the NOCOW attribute. Since the writeback path follows NOCOW bit, we only need to bother the space reservation code in btrfs_truncate_block(). [FIX] Make btrfs_truncate_block() follow btrfs_buffered_write() to try to reserve data space first, and fall back to NOCOW check only when we don't have enough space. Such always-try-reserve is an optimization introduced in btrfs_buffered_write(), to avoid expensive btrfs_check_can_nocow() call. This patch will export check_can_nocow() as btrfs_check_can_nocow(), and use it in btrfs_truncate_block() to fix the problem. Reported-by:
Martin Doucha <martin.doucha@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Estimated time of removal of the functionality is 5.11, the option will be still parsed but will have no effect. Reasons for deprecation and removal: - very poor naming choice of the mount option, it's supposed to cache and reuse the inode _numbers_, but it sounds a some generic cache for inodes - the only known usecase where this option would make sense is on a 32bit architecture where inode numbers in one subvolume would be exhausted due to 32bit inode::i_ino - the cache is stored on disk, consumes space, needs to be loaded and written back - new inode number allocation is slower due to lookups into the cache (compared to a simple increment which is the default) - uses the free-space-cache code that is going to be deprecated as well in the future Known problems: - since 2011, returning EEXIST when there's not enough space in a page to store all checksums, see commit 4b9465cb ("Btrfs: add mount -o inode_cache") Remaining issues: - if the option was enabled, new inodes created, the option disabled again, the cache is still stored on the devices and there's currently no way to remove it Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Last touched in 2013 by commit de78b51a ("btrfs: remove cache only arguments from defrag path") that was the only code that used the value. Now it's only set but never used for anything, so we can remove it. Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The fiemap callback is not part of UAPI interface and the prototypes don't have the __u64 types either. Reviewed-by:
-
Denis Efremov authored
num_extents is already checked in the next if condition and can be safely removed. Signed-off-by:
Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Johannes Thumshirn authored
In btrfs_put_root() we're freeing a btrfs_root's 'node' and 'commit_root' extent buffers manually via kfree(), while we're using free_root_extent_buffers() in the free_root_pointers() function above. free_root_extent_buffers() also NULLs the pointers after freeing, which mitigates potential double frees. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function iterates all extents in the extent cluster, make this intention obvious by using a for loop. No functional chanes. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand and btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota don't really use the guts of the inodes being passed to them. This implies it's not required to call them under extent lock. Move code around in prealloc_file_extent_cluster to do the heavy, data alloc/free operations outside of the lock. This also makes the 'out' label unnecessary, so remove it. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Extents in the extent cluster are guaranteed to be contiguous as such the hole check inside the loop can never trigger. In fact this check was never functional since it was added in 18513091 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely") which came after the commit introducing clustered/contiguous extents 0257bb82 ("Btrfs: relocate file extents in clusters"). Let's just remove it as it adds noise to the source. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It has only 4 uses of a vfs_inode for inode_sub_bytes but unifies the interface with the non __ prefixed version. Will also makes converting its callers to btrfs_inode easier. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Will enable converting btrfs_submit_compressed_write to btrfs_inode more easily. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It has one VFS and 1 btrfs inode usages but converting it to btrfs_inode interface will allow seamless conversion of its callers. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It really wants a btrfs_inode and will allow submit_compressed_extents to be completely converted to btrfs_inode in follow up patches. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It really wants btrfs_inode and not a vfs inode. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It doesn't use the generic vfs inode for anything use btrfs_inode directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It doesn't use the vfs inode for anything, can just as easily take btrfs_inode. Follow up patches will convert callers as well. Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This is internal btrfs function what really needs the vfs_inode only for igrab and a tracepoint. Signed-off-by:
-
