- 10 Mar, 2014 29 commits
-
-
Liu Bo authored
So after transaction is aborted, we need to cleanup inode resources by calling btrfs_invalidate_inodes(), and btrfs_invalidate_inodes() hopes roots' refs to be zero in old times and sets a WARN_ON(), however, this is not always true within cleaning up transaction, so we get to detect transaction abortion and not warn at all. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
[13654.480669] ====================================================== [13654.480905] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [13654.481003] 3.12.0+ #4 Tainted: G W O [13654.481060] ------------------------------------------------------- [13654.481060] btrfs-transacti/9347 is trying to acquire lock: [13654.481060] (&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa02d30a1>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x271/0x570 [btrfs] [13654.481060] but task is already holding lock: [13654.481060] (&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa02d3015>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x1e5/0x570 [btrfs] [13654.481060] which lock already depends on the new lock. [13654.481060] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [13654.481060] -> #1 (&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [13654.481060] [<ffffffff810c4103>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x130 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81689991>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50 [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f011b>] __btrfs_add_ordered_extent+0x39b/0x450 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f0202>] btrfs_add_ordered_extent+0x32/0x40 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02df6aa>] run_delalloc_nocow+0x78a/0x9d0 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02dfc0d>] run_delalloc_range+0x31d/0x390 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f7c00>] __extent_writepage+0x310/0x780 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f830a>] extent_write_cache_pages.isra.29.constprop.48+0x29a/0x410 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f879d>] extent_writepages+0x4d/0x70 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d9f68>] btrfs_writepages+0x28/0x30 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffff8114be91>] do_writepages+0x21/0x50 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81140d49>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x59/0x60 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81140e13>] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x13/0x20 [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02f1db9>] btrfs_wait_ordered_range+0x49/0x140 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa0318fe2>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x682/0x8b0 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa031952d>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8d/0xe0 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02c7083>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x593/0x680 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa0345307>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x14b/0x20d [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d7c1a>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x43a/0x9d0 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa030061a>] btrfs_create_uuid_tree+0x5a/0x100 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d5a8a>] open_ctree+0x21da/0x2210 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02ab6fe>] btrfs_mount+0x68e/0x870 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffff811b2409>] mount_fs+0x39/0x1b0 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff811cd653>] vfs_kern_mount+0x63/0xf0 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff811cfcce>] do_mount+0x23e/0xa90 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff811d05a3>] SyS_mount+0x83/0xc0 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81692b52>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [13654.481060] -> #0 (&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [13654.481060] [<ffffffff810c340a>] __lock_acquire+0x150a/0x1a70 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff810c4103>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x130 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81689991>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50 [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d30a1>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x271/0x570 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffffa02d35ce>] transaction_kthread+0x22e/0x270 [btrfs] [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81079efa>] kthread+0xea/0xf0 [13654.481060] [<ffffffff81692aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [13654.481060] other info that might help us debug this: [13654.481060] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [13654.481060] CPU0 CPU1 [13654.481060] ---- ---- [13654.481060] lock(&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock); [13654.481060] lock(&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock); [13654.481060] lock(&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock); [13654.481060] lock(&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock); [13654.481060] *** DEADLOCK *** [...] ====================================================== btrfs_destroy_all_ordered_extents() gets &fs_info->ordered_root_lock __BEFORE__ acquiring &root->ordered_extent_lock, while btrfs_[add,remove]_ordered_extent() acquires &fs_info->ordered_root_lock __AFTER__ getting &root->ordered_extent_lock. This patch fixes the above problem. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
This is an extension to my previous commit titled: "Btrfs: faster file extent item replace operations" (hash 1acae57b) Instead of inserting the new file extent item if we deleted existing file extent items covering our target file range, also allow to insert the new file extent item if we didn't find any existing items to delete and replace_extent != 0, since in this case our caller would do another tree search to insert the new file extent item anyway, therefore just combine the two tree searches into a single one, saving cpu time, reducing lock contention and reducing btree node/leaf COW operations. This covers the case where applications keep doing tail append writes to files, which for example is the case of Apache CouchDB (its database and view index files are always open with O_APPEND). Signed-off-by:
Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Stanislaw Gruszka authored
In case we do not refill, we can overwrite cur pointer from prio_head by one from not prioritized head, what looks as something that was not intended. This change make we always take works from prio_head first until it's not empty. Signed-off-by:
Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
This reverts commit 41ce9970. Previously i was thinking we can use readonly root's commit root safely while it is not true, readonly root may be cowed with the following cases. 1.snapshot send root will cow source root. 2.balance,device operations will also cow readonly send root to relocate. So i have two ideas to make us safe to use commit root. -->approach 1: make it protected by transaction and end transaction properly and we research next item from root node(see btrfs_search_slot_for_read()). -->approach 2: add another counter to local root structure to sync snapshot with send. and add a global counter to sync send with exclusive device operations. So with approach 2, send can use commit root safely, because we make sure send root can not be cowed during send. Unfortunately, it make codes *ugly* and more complex to maintain. To make snapshot and send exclusively, device operations and send operation exclusively with each other is a little confusing for common users. So why not drop into previous way. Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Btrfs send is assuming readonly root won't change, let's skip readonly root. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Since we have introduced btrfs_previous_extent_item() to search previous extent item, just switch into it. Signed-off-by:
-
Hidetoshi Seto authored
I got an error on v3.13: BTRFS error (device sdf1) in write_all_supers:3378: errno=-5 IO failure (errors while submitting device barriers.) how to reproduce: > mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdf2 > wipefs -a /dev/sdf2 > mount -o degraded /dev/sdf1 /mnt > btrfs balance start -f -sconvert=single -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt The reason of the error is that barrier_all_devices() failed to submit barrier to the missing device. However it is clear that we cannot do anything on missing device, and also it is not necessary to care chunks on the missing device. This patch stops sending/waiting barrier if device is missing. Signed-off-by:
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
When I converted the BUG_ON() for the free_space_cache_inode in cow_file_range I made it so we just return an error instead of unlocking all of our various stuff. This is a mistake and causes us to hang when we run into this. This patch fixes this problem. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
While trying to reproduce a delayed ref problem I noticed the box kept falling over using all 80gb of my ram with btrfs_inode's and btrfs_delayed_node's. Turns out this is because we only throttle delayed inode updates in btrfs_dirty_inode, which doesn't actually get called that often, especially when all you are doing is creating a bunch of files. So balance delayed inode updates everytime we create a new inode. With this patch we no longer use up all of our ram with delayed inode updates. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
Help during debugging to export various interesting infromation and tunables without the need of extra mount options or ioctls. Usage: * declare your variable in sysfs.h, and include where you need it * define the variable in sysfs.c and make it visible via debugfs_create_TYPE Depends on CONFIG_DEBUG_FS. Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The fs_path structure uses an inline buffer and falls back to a chain of allocations, but vmalloc is not necessary because PATH_MAX fits into PAGE_SIZE. The size of fs_path has been reduced to 256 bytes from PAGE_SIZE, usually 4k. Experimental measurements show that most paths on a single filesystem do not exceed 200 bytes, and these get stored into the inline buffer directly, which is now 230 bytes. Longer paths are kmalloced when needed. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
We have this pattern where we do search for a contiguous group of items in a tree and everytime we find an item, we process it, then we release our path, increment the offset of the search key, do another full tree search and repeat these steps until a tree search can't find more items we're interested in. Instead of doing these full tree searches after processing each item, just process the next item/slot in our leaf and don't release the path. Since all these trees are read only and we always use the commit root for a search and skip node/leaf locks, we're not affecting concurrency on the trees. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
This was a leftover from the commit: 74dd17fb (Btrfs: fix btrfs send for inline items and compression) Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
If cleaning the name cache fails, we could try to proceed at the cost of some memory leak. This is not expected to happen often. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
There are only 2 static callers, the BUG would normally be never reached, but let's be nice. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
We know that buf_len is at most PATH_MAX, 4k, and can merge it with the reversed member. This saves 3 bytes in favor of inline_buf. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
We don't need to keep track of that, it's available via is_vmalloc_addr. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The member is used only to return value back from fs_path_prepare_for_add, we can do it locally and save 8 bytes for the inline_buf path. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The buffer passed to snprintf can hold the fully expanded format string, 64 = 3x largest ULL + 3x char + trailing null. I don't think that removing the check entirely is a good idea, hence the ASSERT. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
The commit titled "Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send" didn't cover a particular case where the parent-child relationship inversion of directories doesn't imply a rename of the new parent directory. This was due to a simple logic mistake, a logical and instead of a logical or. Steps to reproduce: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3/bar2/k11 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers this case, will be submitted soon. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
This fixes a case that the commit titled: Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send didn't cover. If the parent-child relationship between 2 directories is inverted, both get renamed, and the former parent has a file that got renamed too (but remains a child of that directory), the incremental send operation would use the file's old path after sending an unlink operation for that old path, causing receive to fail on future operations like changing owner, permissions or utimes of the corresponding inode. This is not a regression from the commit mentioned before, as without that commit we would fall into the issues that commit fixed, so it's just one case that wasn't covered before. Simple steps to reproduce this issue are: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3 $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d $ touch /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/file $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2 $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file2 $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers this case, will be submitted soon. Signed-off-by: -
Wang Shilong authored
find_all_leafs() dosen't need add all roots actually, add roots only if we need, this can avoid unnecessary ulist dance. Signed-off-by:
-
Hugo Mills authored
The structure for BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_IOCTL packs differently on 32-bit and 64-bit systems. This means that it is impossible to use btrfs receive on a system with a 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userspace, because the structure size (and hence the ioctl number) is different. This patch adds a compatibility structure and ioctl to deal with the above case. Signed-off-by:
Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
Function wait_for_parent_move() returns negative value if an error happened, 0 if we don't need to wait for the parent's move, and 1 if the wait is needed. Before this change an error return value was being treated like the return value 1, which was not correct. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio scsi driver). There were two bugs that caused this problem: - We might allocate new chunks on the replaced device after we updated the mapping tree. And we forgot to replace the source device in those mapping of the new chunks. - We might get the mapping information which including the source device before the mapping information update. And then submit the bio which was based on that mapping information after we freed the source device. For the first bug, we can fix it by doing mapping tree update and source device remove in the same context of the chunk mutex. The chunk mutex is used to protect the allocable device list, the above method can avoid the new chunk allocation, and after we remove the source device, all the new chunks will be allocated on the new device. So it can fix the first bug. For the second bug, we need make sure all flighting bios are finished and no new bios are produced during we are removing the source device. To fix this problem, we introduced a global @bio_counter, we not only inc/dec @bio_counter outsize of map_blocks, but also inc it before submitting bio and dec @bio_counter when ending bios. Since Raid56 is a little different and device replace dosen't support raid56 yet, it is not addressed in the patch and I add comments to make sure we will fix it in the future. Reported-by:
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
the alloc list of the filesystem is protected by ->chunk_mutex, we need get that mutex when we insert the new device into the list. Signed-off-by:
-
Kusanagi Kouichi authored
EXDEV seems an appropriate error if an operation fails bacause it crosses file system boundaries. Reviewed-by:
Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@ac.auone-net.jp> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
There was a problem in the old code: If we failed to log the csum, we would free all the ordered extents in the log list including those ordered extents that were logged successfully, it would make the log committer not to wait for the completion of the ordered extents. This patch doesn't insert the ordered extents that is about to be logged into a global list, instead, we insert them into a local list. If we log the ordered extents successfully, we splice them with the global list, or we will throw them away, then do full sync. It can also reduce the lock contention and the traverse time of list. Signed-off-by:
-
- 15 Feb, 2014 2 commits
-
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
For non compressed extents, iterate_extent_inodes() gives us offsets that take into account the data offset from the file extent items, while for compressed extents it doesn't. Therefore we have to adjust them before placing them in a send clone instruction. Not doing this adjustment leads to the receiving end requesting for a wrong a file range to the clone ioctl, which results in different file content from the one in the original send root. Issue reproducible with the following excerpt from the test I made for xfstests: _scratch_mkfs _scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo" $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 118811" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x0d -b 39987 92267 39987" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x3e -b 80000 200000 80000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xdc -b 10000 250000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10000 300000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo # will be used for incremental send to be able to issue clone operations $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/2.fssum -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/mysnap1 \ -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap \ -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap1 -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap2 $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap -f $tmp/clones.snap $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \ -c $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 -f $tmp/2.snap _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs _scratch_mount $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>> $seqres.full $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/clones.snap $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap 2>> $seqres.full $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 2>> $seqres.full Signed-off-by:Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Anand Jain authored
bdev is null when disk has disappeared and mounted with the degrade option stack trace --------- btrfs_sysfs_add_one+0x105/0x1c0 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x15f3/0x1fe0 [btrfs] btrfs_mount+0x5db/0x790 [btrfs] ? alloc_pages_current+0xa4/0x160 mount_fs+0x34/0x1b0 vfs_kern_mount+0x62/0xf0 do_mount+0x22e/0xa80 ? __get_free_pages+0x9/0x40 ? copy_mount_options+0x31/0x170 SyS_mount+0x7e/0xc0 system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b --------- reproducer: ------- mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd (detach a disk) devmgt detach /dev/sdc [1] mount -o degrade /dev/sdd /btrfs ------- [1] github.com/anajain/devmgt.git Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com> Tested-by:
-
- 14 Feb, 2014 4 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
A user was running into errors from an NFS export of a subvolume that had a default subvol set. When we mount a default subvol we will use d_obtain_alias() to find an existing dentry for the subvolume in the case that the root subvol has already been mounted, or a dummy one is allocated in the case that the root subvol has not already been mounted. This allows us to connect the dentry later on if we wander into the path. However if we don't ever wander into the path we will keep DCACHE_DISCONNECTED set for a long time, which angers NFS. It doesn't appear to cause any problems but it is annoying nonetheless, so simply unset DCACHE_DISCONNECTED in the get_default_root case and switch btrfs_lookup() to use d_materialise_unique() instead which will make everything play nicely together and reconnect stuff if we wander into the defaul subvol path from a different way. With this patch I'm no longer getting the NFS errors when exporting a volume that has been mounted with a default subvol set. Thanks, cc: bfields@fieldses.org cc: ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by:
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mitch Harder authored
Currently, the only mount option for max_inline that has any effect is max_inline=0. Any other value that is supplied to max_inline will be adjusted to a minimum of 4k. Since max_inline has an effective maximum of ~3900 bytes due to page size limitations, the current behaviour only has meaning for max_inline=0. This patch will allow the the max_inline mount option to accept non-zero values as indicated in the documentation. Signed-off-by:
Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Given now we have 2 spinlock for management of delayed refs, CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y helped me find this, [ 4723.413809] BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#1, btrfs-transacti/2258 [ 4723.414882] lock: 0xffff880048377670, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: btrfs-transacti/2258, .owner_cpu: 2 [ 4723.417146] CPU: 1 PID: 2258 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G W O 3.12.0+ #4 [ 4723.421321] Call Trace: [ 4723.421872] [<ffffffff81680fe7>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74 [ 4723.422753] [<ffffffff81681093>] spin_dump+0x8c/0x91 [ 4723.424979] [<ffffffff816810b9>] spin_bug+0x21/0x26 [ 4723.425846] [<ffffffff81323956>] do_raw_spin_unlock+0x66/0x90 [ 4723.434424] [<ffffffff81689bf7>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40 [ 4723.438747] [<ffffffffa015da9e>] btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction+0x35e/0x710 [btrfs] [ 4723.443321] [<ffffffffa015df54>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x104/0x570 [btrfs] [ 4723.444692] [<ffffffff810c1b5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0 [ 4723.450336] [<ffffffff810c1c2d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 4723.451332] [<ffffffffa015e5ee>] transaction_kthread+0x22e/0x270 [btrfs] [ 4723.452543] [<ffffffffa015e3c0>] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x570/0x570 [btrfs] [ 4723.457833] [<ffffffff81079efa>] kthread+0xea/0xf0 [ 4723.458990] [<ffffffff81079e10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140 [ 4723.460133] [<ffffffff81692aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 4723.460865] [<ffffffff81079e10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140 [ 4723.496521] ------------[ cut here ]------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The reason is that we get to call cond_resched_lock(&head_ref->lock) while still holding @delayed_refs->lock. So it's different with __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(), where we do drop-acquire dance before and after actually processing delayed refs. Here we don't drop the lock, others are not able to add new delayed refs to head_ref, so cond_resched_lock(&head_ref->lock) is not necessary here. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
This reverts commit 01e219e8. David Sterba found a different way to provide these features without adding a new ioctl. We haven't released any progs with this ioctl yet, so I'm taking this out for now until we finalize things. Signed-off-by:
-
- 09 Feb, 2014 5 commits
-
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
When using a mix of compressed file extents and prealloc extents, it is possible to fill a page of a file with random, garbage data from some unrelated previous use of the page, instead of a sequence of zeroes. A simple sequence of steps to get into such case, taken from the test case I made for xfstests, is: _scratch_mkfs _scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo" $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 18670 266978 18670" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc 26450 665194" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar $XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 542872" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar This results in the following file items in the fs tree: item 4 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 15879 itemsize 160 inode generation 6 transid 6 size 542872 block group 0 mode 100600 item 5 key (257 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 15863 itemsize 16 inode ref index 2 namelen 6 name: foobar item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15810 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 gen 6 extent data offset 0 nr 24576 ram 266240 extent compression 0 item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 24576) itemoff 15757 itemsize 53 prealloc data disk byte 12849152 nr 241664 gen 6 prealloc data offset 0 nr 241664 item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 266240) itemoff 15704 itemsize 53 extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 4096 gen 6 extent data offset 0 nr 20480 ram 20480 extent compression 2 item 9 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 286720) itemoff 15651 itemsize 53 prealloc data disk byte 13090816 nr 405504 gen 6 prealloc data offset 0 nr 258048 The on disk extent at offset 266240 (which corresponds to 1 single disk block), contains 5 compressed chunks of file data. Each of the first 4 compress 4096 bytes of file data, while the last one only compresses 3024 bytes of file data. Therefore a read into the file region [285648 ; 286720[ (length = 4096 - 3024 = 1072 bytes) should always return zeroes (our next extent is a prealloc one). The solution here is the compression code path to zero the remaining (untouched) bytes of the last page it uncompressed data into, as the information about how much space the file data consumes in the last page is not known in the upper layer fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:__do_readpage(). In __do_readpage we were correctly zeroing the remainder of the page but only if it corresponds to the last page of the inode and if the inode's size is not a multiple of the page size. This would cause not only returning random data on reads, but also permanently storing random data when updating parts of the region that should be zeroed. For the example above, it means updating a single byte in the region [285648 ; 286720[ would store that byte correctly but also store random data on disk. A test case for xfstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
A user reported a 100% cpu hang with my new delayed ref code. Turns out I forgot to increase the count check when we can't run a delayed ref because of the tree mod log. If we can't run any delayed refs during this there is no point in continuing to look, and we need to break out. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Added in patch "btrfs: add ioctls to query/change feature bits online" modifications to superblock don't need to reserve metadata blocks when starting a transaction. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
The set_fslabel ioctl uses btrfs_end_transaction, which means it's possible that the change will be lost if the system crashes, same for the newly set features. Let's use btrfs_commit_transaction instead. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Wang noticed that he was failing btrfs/030 even though me and Filipe couldn't reproduce. Turns out this is because Wang didn't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT set, which meant that a key part of Filipe's original patch was not being built in. This appears to be a mess up with merging Filipe's patch as it does not exist in his original patch. Fix this by changing how we make sure del_waiting_dir_move asserts that it did not error and take the function out of the ifdef check. This makes btrfs/030 pass with the assert on or off. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
