- 02 Nov, 2017 40 commits
-
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Adds support for: - Selection of a 64KiB big page size (NvFbBigPage=16). - System-memory PDs. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Adds support for: - Selection of a 64KiB big page size (NvFbBigPage=16). - System-memory PDs. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
This is the first chunk of the new VMM code that provides the structures needed to describe a GPU virtual address-space layout, as well as common interfaces to handle VMM creation, and connecting instances to a VMM. The constructor now allocates the PD itself, rather than having the user handle that manually. This won't/can't be used until after all backends have been ported to these interfaces, so a little bit of memory will be wasted on Fermi and newer for a couple of commits in the series. Compatibility has been hacked into the old code to allow each GPU backend to be ported individually. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
GP100 "big" (which is a funny name, when it supports "even bigger") page tables are small enough that we want to be able to suballocate them from a larger block of memory. This builds on the previous page table cache interfaces so that the VMM code doesn't need to know the difference. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Builds up and maintains a small cache of each page table size in order to reduce the frequency of expensive allocations, particularly in the pathological case where an address range ping-pongs between allocated and free. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Removes the need to expose internals outside of MMU, and GP100 is both different, and a lot harder to deal with. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
This will cause a subtle behaviour change on GPUs that are in mixed-memory configurations in that VRAM in the degraded section of VRAM will no longer be used for TTM buffer objects. That section of VRAM is not meant to be used for displayable/compressed surfaces, and we have no reliable way with the current interfaces to be able to make that decision properly. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Another transition step to allow finer-grained patches transitioning to new MMU backends. Old backends will continue operate as before (accessing nvkm_mem::tag), and new backends will get a reference to the tags allocated here. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
This is a transition step, to enable finer-grained commits while transitioning to new MMU interfaces. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Upcoming MMU changes use nvkm_memory as its basic representation of memory, so we need to be able to allocate VRAM like this. The code is basically identical to the current chipset-specific allocators, minus support for compression tags (which will be handled elsewhere anyway). Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Adds support for 64-bit writes, and optimised filling of buffers with fixed 32/64-bit values. These will all be used by the upcoming MMU changes. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
We need to be able to prevent memory from being freed while it's still mapped in a GPU's address-space. Will be used by upcoming MMU changes. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Needed by VMM code to determine whether an allocation is compatible with a given page size (ie. you can't map 4KiB system memory pages into 64KiB GPU pages). Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Map flags (access, kind, etc) are currently defined in either the VMA, or the memory object, which turns out to not be ideal for things like suballocated buffers, etc. These will become per-map flags instead, so we need to support passing these arguments in nvkm_memory_map(). Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
nvkm_memory is going to be used by the upcoming mmu rework for the basic representation of a memory allocation, as such, this commit adds support for comptag allocation to nvkm_memory. This is very simple for now, in that it requires comptags for the entire memory allocation even if only certain ranges are compressed. Support for tracking ranges will be added at a later date. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
A single location for the MM allows us to share allocation logic. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
We probably don't want to destroy compression data when doing multiple mappings of a memory object. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
We're moving towards having a central place to handle comptag allocation, and as some GPUs don't have a ram submodule (ie. Tegra), we need to move the mm somewhere else. It probably never belonged in ram anyways. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
These will be used in upcoming patches. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Different sections of VRAM may have different properties (ie. can't be used for compression/display, can't be mapped, etc). We currently already support this, but it's a bit magic. This change makes it more obvious where we're allocating from. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
TTM memory allocations will be hanging off the DRM's client, but the locking needed to do so gets really tricky with all the other use of the DRM's object tree. To solve this, we make the normal DRM client a child of a new master, where the memory allocations will be done from instead. This also solves a potential race with client creation. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-