- 12 Mar, 2010 40 commits
-
-
Peter Tyser authored
Add support to scrub DRAM using the e752x integrated memory scrubbing engine. The e7320/7520/e7525 chipsets support scrubbing at one rate while the i3100 chipset supports a normal and fast rate. A similar patch was originally sent back in 2008: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1204835866.25206.70.camel@localhost.localdomain&forum_name=bluesmoke-devel This version has the following updates: - Use 16-bit PCI config cycles to access MCHSCRB register e7320/7520/e7525 docs say register is 16bits wide, i3100 says 8. I tested 16bits on the i3100 to be safe. - Recalcuate and round actual scrub rates The changes have been tested on an i3100-based board. Signed-off-by:
Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com> Signed-off-by:
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Konstantin Olifer authored
FSB parity is only supported on the Xeon processor. Previously it was incorrectly enabled for the Celeron as well. Signed-off-by:
Konstantin Olifer <kolifer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
H Hartley Sweeten authored
Use resource_size() instead of arithmetic. Signed-off-by:
H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com> Signed-off-by:
Dave Jiang <djiang@mvista.com> Cc: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@gate.crashing.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Peter Tyser authored
Add the ability to detect the specific data line or ECC line which failed when printing out SDRAM single-bit errors. An example of a single-bit SDRAM ECC error is below: EDAC MPC85xx MC1: Err Detect Register: 0x80000004 EDAC MPC85xx MC1: Faulty data bit: 59 EDAC MPC85xx MC1: Expected Data / ECC: 0x7f80d000_409effa0 / 0x6d EDAC MPC85xx MC1: Captured Data / ECC: 0x7780d000_409effa0 / 0x6d EDAC MPC85xx MC1: Err addr: 0x00031ca0 EDAC MPC85xx MC1: PFN: 0x00000031 Knowning which specific data or ECC line caused an error can be useful in tracking down hardware issues such as improperly terminated signals, loose pins, etc. Note that this feature is only currently enabled for 64-bit wide data buses, 32-bit wide bus support should be added. I don't have any 32-bit wide systems to test on. If someone has one and is willing to give this patch a shot with the check for a 64-bit data bus removed it would be much appreciated and I can re-submit with both 32 and 64 bit buses supported. Signed-off-by:
-
Peter Tyser authored
With a 64-bit wide data bus only the lowest 8-bits of the ECC syndrome are relevant. With a 32-bit wide data bus only the lowest 16-bits are relevant on most architectures. Without this change, the ECC syndrome displayed can be mildly confusing, eg: EDAC MPC85xx MC1: syndrome: 0x25252525 When in reality the ECC syndrome is 0x25. A variety of Freescale manuals say a variety of different things about how to decode the CAPTURE_ECC (syndrome) register. I don't have a system with a 32-bit bus to test on, but I believe the change is correct. It'd be good to get an ACK from someone at Freescale about this change though. Signed-off-by:
-
Alexey Dobriyan authored
Remove INIT_NSPROXY(), use C99 initializer. Remove INIT_IPC_NS(), INIT_NET_NS() while I'm at it. Note: headers trim will be done later, now it's quite pointless because results will be invalidated by merge window. Signed-off-by:
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Acked-by:
Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
zap_pid_ns_processes() uses force_sig(SIGKILL) to ensure SIGKILL will be delivered to sub-namespace inits as well. This is correct, but we are going to change force_sig_info() semantics. See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15395#c31 We can use send_sig_info(SEND_SIG_NOINFO) instead, since 614c517d ("signals: SEND_SIG_NOINFO should be considered as SI_FROMUSER()") SEND_SIG_NOINFO means "from user" and therefore send_signal() will get the correct from_ancestor_ns = T flag. Signed-off-by:
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by:
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Corey Minyard authored
There is no need for linux/ipmi_smi.h to include itself. Signed-off-by:
Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Bela Lubkin authored
Actually use the slave_addrs module parameter if it is specified, and make things consistent about passing zero in for the slave address for the default. Signed-off-by:
Bela Lubkin <blubkin@vmware.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Martin Wilck authored
In some cases kipmid can use a lot of CPU. This adds a way to tune the CPU used by kipmid to help in those cases. By setting kipmid_max_busy_us to a value between 100 and 500, it is possible to bring down kipmid CPU load to practically 0 without loosing too much ipmi throughput performance. Not setting the value, or setting the value to zero, operation is unaffected. Signed-off-by:
Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
Make sure compiler won't do weird things with limits. E.g. fetching them twice may return 2 different values after writable limits are implemented. I.e. either use rlimit helpers added in 3e10e716 ("resource: add helpers for fetching rlimits") or ACCESS_ONCE if not applicable. Signed-off-by:
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Veaceslav Falico authored
Remove unneeded initialization in tty_audit_fork(). It is called only via copy_signal() and is useless after the kmem_cache_zalloc() was used. Signed-off-by:
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Veaceslav Falico authored
Remove unneeded initializations in thread_group_cputime_init() and in posix_cpu_timers_init_group(). They are useless after kmem_cache_zalloc() was used in copy_signal(). Signed-off-by:
-
Veaceslav Falico authored
Kill unused functions taskstats_tgid_init() and acct_init_pacct() because we don't use them anywhere after using kmem_cache_zalloc() in copy_signal(). Signed-off-by:
-
Veaceslav Falico authored
Use kmem_cache_zalloc() on signal creation and remove unneeded initialization lines in copy_signal(). Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which could be considered a bug fix. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't, which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. The old code only disables the breakpoints on PTRACE_KILL, while after this patch this also happens for PTRACE_CONT and PTRACE_SYSCALL which matches the behaviour of the other architetures. I think this is a bugfixes, but please double verify this is correct. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which could be considered a bug fix. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. The way breakpoints are disabled is entirely inconsistent currently, I tried to make some sense of it, but I suspect all of the content of ptrace_disable should be moved into user_disable_single_step, this defintively needs some revisting as the current patch changes behaviour in not quite designed ways. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT and PTRACE_KILL. This also makes PTRACE_SINGLESTEP return -EIO while it previously succeeded despite not actually causing any kind of single stepping. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which could be considered a bug fix. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which could be considered a bug fix. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. XXX: I'm not sure arch_has_single_step() is placed in the exactly correct location, please verify in which of the ptrace headers it should really be. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT and PTRACE_KILL. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Signed-off-by:
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT and PTRACE_KILL. This also makes PTRACE_SINGLESTEP return -EIO while it previously succeeded despite not actually causing any kind of single stepping. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Signed-off-by:
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: John Williams <john.williams@petalogix.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. m68knommu already defines the nessecary user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions for this. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Signed-off-by:
Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which could be considered a bug fix. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which could be considered a bug fix. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Currently avr32 doesn't implement any code to disable single stepping when one of the non-syscall requests is called which seems wrong, but I've left it as-is for now. Signed-off-by:
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which could be considered a bug fix. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't and the single stepping disable only happens if the tracee process isn't a zombie yet, which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use the generic ptrace_resume code for PTRACE_SYSCALL, PTRACE_CONT, PTRACE_KILL and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. This implies defining arch_has_single_step in <asm/ptrace.h> and implementing the user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions, which also causes the breakpoint information to be cleared on fork, which could be considered a bug fix. Also the TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE thread flag is now cleared on PTRACE_KILL which it previously wasn't, which is consistent with all architectures using the modern ptrace code. Signed-off-by:
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
While in theory user_enable_single_step/user_disable_single_step/ user_enable_blockstep could also be provided as an inline or macro there's no good reason to do so, and having the prototype in one places keeps code size and confusion down. Roland said: The original thought there was that user_enable_single_step() et al might well be only an instruction or three on a sane machine (as if we have any of those!), and since there is only one call site inlining would be beneficial. But I agree that there is no strong reason to care about inlining it. As to the arch changes, there is only one thought I'd add to the record. It was always my thinking that for an arch where PTRACE_SINGLESTEP does text-modifying breakpoint insertion, user_enable_single_step() should not be provided. That is, arch_has_single_step()=>true means that there is an arch facility with "pure" semantics that does not have any unexpected side effects. Inserting a breakpoint might do very unexpected strange things in multi-threaded situations. Aside from that, it is a peculiar side effect that user_{enable,disable}_single_step() should cause COW de-sharing of text pages and so forth. For PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, all these peculiarities are the status quo ante for that arch, so having arch_ptrace() itself do those is one thing. But for building other things in the future, it is nicer to have a uniform "pure" semantics that arch-independent code can expect. OTOH, all such arch issues are really up to the arch maintainer. As of today, there is nothing but ptrace using user_enable_single_step() et al so it's a distinction without a practical difference. If/when there are other facilities that use user_enable_single_step() and might care, the affected arch's can revisit the question when someone cares about the quality of the arch support for said new facility. Signed-off-by:David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Use ptrace_request() in the three remaining architectures that didn't use it (m68knommu, h8300, microblaze). This means: - ptrace_request now handles PTRACE_{PEEK,POKE}{TEXT,DATA} and PTRACE_DETATCH calls that were previously called directly, or in case of h8300 even open coded. - adds new support for PTRACE_SETOPTIONS/PTRACE_GETEVENTMSG/ PTRACE_GETSIGINFO/PTRACE_SETSIGINFO Signed-off-by: -
Miao Xie authored
we can't declarate two variable at the same scope by NODEMASK_ALLOC(). This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by:
-
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki authored
Nishimura-san have been working for memcg very good. His review and tests give us much improvements and account migraiton which he is now challenging is really important. He is a stakeholder. Signed-off-by:
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by:
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by:
-
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki authored
In current page-fault code, handle_mm_fault() -> ... -> mem_cgroup_charge() -> map page or handle error. -> check return code. If page fault's return code is VM_FAULT_OOM, page_fault_out_of_memory() is called. But if it's caused by memcg, OOM should have been already invoked. Then, I added a patch: a636b327. That patch records last_oom_jiffies for memcg's sub-hierarchy and prevents page_fault_out_of_memory from being invoked in near future. But Nishimura-san reported that check by jiffies is not enough when the system is terribly heavy. This patch changes memcg's oom logic as. * If memcg causes OOM-kill, continue to retry. * remove jiffies check which is used now. * add memcg-oom-lock which works like perzone oom lock. * If current is killed(as a process), bypass charge. Something more sophisticated can be added but this pactch does fundamental things. TODO: - add oom notifier - add permemcg disable-oom-kill flag and freezer at oom. - more chances for wake up oom waiter (when changing memory limit etc..) Reviewed-by:
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Tested-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
Signed-off-by:
Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Reviewed-by:
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
Decription of sanity check for memory thresholds. Signed-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
An example of cgroup notification API usage. Signed-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
Events should be removed after rmdir of cgroup directory, but before destroying subsystem state objects. Let's take reference to cgroup directory dentry to do that. Signed-off-by:
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hioryu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com> Acked-by:
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Cc: Dan Malek <dan@embeddedalley.com> Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Signed-off-by:
-
Kirill A. Shutemov authored
Notify userspace about cgroup removing only after rmdir of cgroup directory to avoid race between userspace and kernelspace. eventfd are used to notify about two types of event: - control file-specific, like crossing memory threshold; - cgroup removing. To understand what really happen, userspace can check if the cgroup still exists. To avoid race beetween userspace and kernelspace we have to notify userspace about cgroup removing only after rmdir of cgroup directory. Signed-off-by:
-
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki authored
Presently, if panic_on_oom=2, the whole system panics even if the oom happend in some special situation (as cpuset, mempolicy....). Then, panic_on_oom=2 means painc_on_oom_always. Now, memcg doesn't check panic_on_oom flag. This patch adds a check. BTW, how it's useful ? kdump+panic_on_oom=2 is the last tool to investigate what happens in oom-ed system. When a task is killed, the sysytem recovers and there will be few hint to know what happnes. In mission critical system, oom should never happen. Then, panic_on_oom=2+kdump is useful to avoid next OOM by knowing precise information via snapshot. TODO: - For memcg, it's for isolate system's memory usage, oom-notiifer and freeze_at_oom (or rest_at_oom) should be implemented. Then, management daemon can do similar jobs (as kdump) or taking snapshot per cgroup. Signed-off-by:
-
Daisuke Nishimura authored
Update memcg_test.txt to describe how to test the move-charge feature. Signed-off-by:
-
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki authored
Memcg has 2 eventcountes which counts "the same" event. Just usages are different from each other. This patch tries to reduce event counter. Now logic uses "only increment, no reset" counter and masks for each checks. Softlimit chesk was done per 1000 evetns. So, the similar check can be done by !(new_counter & 0x3ff). Threshold check was done per 100 events. So, the similar check can be done by (!new_counter & 0x7f) ALL event checks are done right after EVENT percpu counter is updated. Signed-off-by:
-
