- 14 Oct, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Mike Rapoport authored
Instead of traversing memblock.memory regions to find memory_start and memory_end, simply query memblock_{start,end}_of_DRAM(). Signed-off-by:Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by:
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-6-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Mike Rapoport authored
dummy_numa_init() loops over memblock.memory and passes nid=0 to numa_add_memblk() which essentially wraps memblock_set_node(). However, memblock_set_node() can cope with entire memory span itself, so the loop over memblock.memory regions is redundant. Using a single call to memblock_set_node() rather than a loop also fixes an issue with a buggy ACPI firmware in which the SRAT table covers some but not all of the memory in the EFI memory map. Jonathan Cameron says: This issue can be easily triggered by having an SRAT table which fails to cover all elements of the EFI memory map. This firmware error is detected and a warning printed. e.g. "NUMA: Warning: invalid memblk node 64 [mem 0x240000000-0x27fffffff]" At that point we fall back to dummy_numa_init(). However, the failed ACPI init has left us with our memblocks all broken up as we split them when trying to assign them to NUMA nodes. We then iterate over the memblocks and add them to node 0. numa_add_memblk() calls memblock_set_node() which merges regions that were previously split up during the earlier attempt to add them to different nodes during parsing of SRAT. This means elements are moved in the memblock array and we can end up in a different memblock after the call to numa_add_memblk(). Result is: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000003a40 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x96000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 CM = 0, WnR = 0 [0000000000003a40] user address but active_mm is swapper Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP ... Call trace: sparse_init_nid+0x5c/0x2b0 sparse_init+0x138/0x170 bootmem_init+0x80/0xe0 setup_arch+0x2a0/0x5fc start_kernel+0x8c/0x648 Replace the loop with a single call to memblock_set_node() to the entire memory. Signed-off-by:Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Acked-by:
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-5-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
free_highpages() in both arm and xtensa essentially open-code for_each_free_mem_range() loop to detect high memory pages that were not reserved and that should be initialized and passed to the buddy allocator. Replace open-coded implementation of for_each_free_mem_range() with usage of memblock API to simplify the code. Signed-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
The memory size calculation in cma_early_percent_memory() traverses memblock.memory rather than simply call memblock_phys_mem_size(). The comment in that function suggests that at some point there should have been call to memblock_analyze() before memblock_phys_mem_size() could be used. As of now, there is no memblock_analyze() at all and memblock_phys_mem_size() can be used as soon as cold-plug memory is registered with memblock. Replace loop over memblock.memory with a call to memblock_phys_mem_size(). Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk> Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-3-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Rapoport authored
Patch series "memblock: seasonal cleaning^w cleanup", v3. These patches simplify several uses of memblock iterators and hide some of the memblock implementation details from the rest of the system. This patch (of 17): The memory size calculation in kvm_cma_reserve() traverses memblock.memory rather than simply call memblock_phys_mem_size(). The comment in that function suggests that at some point there should have been call to memblock_analyze() before memblock_phys_mem_size() could be used. As of now, there is no memblock_analyze() at all and memblock_phys_mem_size() can be used as soon as cold-plug memory is registered with memblock. Replace loop over memblock.memory with a call to memblock_phys_mem_size(). Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Add else to split mutually exclusive case and avoid some unnecessary check. It doesn't seem to change code generation (compiler is smart), but I think it helps readability. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment location] Signed-off-by:
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
No one use this macro anymore. Also fix code style of policy_node(). Signed-off-by:
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
It is not necessary to hold the lock of current when setting nodemask of a new policy. Signed-off-by:
-
John Hubbard authored
This patch reduces the running time for compaction_test from about 27 sec, to 3.3 sec, which is about an 8x speedup. These numbers are for an Intel x86_64 system with 32 GB of DRAM. The compaction_test.c program was spending most of its time doing mmap(), 1 MB at a time, on about 25 GB of memory. Instead, do the mmaps 100 MB at a time. (Going past 100 MB doesn't make things go much faster, because other parts of the program are using the remaining time.) Signed-off-by:
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by:
Sri Jayaramappa <sjayaram@akamai.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201002080621.551044-2-jhubbard@nvidia.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mateusz Nosek authored
The enum value 'COMPACT_INACTIVE' is never used so can be removed. Signed-off-by:
Mateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mateusz Nosek authored
The same code can work both for 'zone->compact_considered > defer_limit' and 'zone->compact_considered >= defer_limit'. In the latter there is one branch less which is more effective considering performance. Signed-off-by:
-
Xiang Chen authored
zhdr is already initialized in the front of the function, so remove redundant initialization here. Signed-off-by:
Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1600419885-191907-1-git-send-email-chenxiang66@hisilicon.comSigned-off-by:
-
Hui Su authored
alloc_slots() allocates memory for slots using kmem_cache_alloc(), then memsets it. We can just use kmem_cache_zalloc(). Signed-off-by:
Hui Su <sh_def@163.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Hui Su authored
fix comments for isolate_lru_page(): s/fundamentnal/fundamental Signed-off-by:
-
Chunxin Zang authored
We have observed that drop_caches can take a considerable amount of time (<put data here>). Especially when there are many memcgs involved because they are adding an additional overhead. It is quite unfortunate that the operation cannot be interrupted by a signal currently. Add a check for fatal signals into the main loop so that userspace can control early bailout. There are two reasons: 1. We have too many memcgs, even though one object freed in one memcg, the sum of object is bigger than 10. 2. We spend a lot of time in traverse memcg once. So, the memcg who traversed at the first have been freed many objects. Traverse memcg next time, the freed count bigger than 10 again. We can get the following info through 'ps': root:~# ps -aux | grep drop root 357956 ... R Aug25 21119854:55 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root 1771385 ... R Aug16 21146421:17 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root 1986319 ... R 18:56 117:27 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root 2002148 ... R Aug24 5720:39 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root 2564666 ... R 18:59 113:58 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root 2639347 ... R Sep03 2383:39 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root 3904747 ... R 03:35 993:31 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches root 4016780 ... R Aug21 7882:18 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches Use bpftrace follow 'freed' value in drop_slab_node: root:~# bpftrace -e 'kprobe:drop_slab_node+70 {@ret=hist(reg("bp")); }' Attaching 1 probe... ^B^C @ret: [64, 128) 1 | | [128, 256) 28 | | [256, 512) 107 |@ | [512, 1K) 298 |@@@ | [1K, 2K) 613 |@@@@@@@ | [2K, 4K) 4435 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@| [4K, 8K) 442 |@@@@@ | [8K, 16K) 299 |@@@ | [16K, 32K) 100 |@ | [32K, 64K) 139 |@ | [64K, 128K) 56 | | [128K, 256K) 26 | | [256K, 512K) 2 | | In the while loop, we can check whether the TASK_KILLABLE signal is set, if so, we should break the loop. Signed-off-by:Chunxin Zang <zangchunxin@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200909152047.27905-1-zangchunxin@bytedance.comSigned-off-by:
-
Mike Kravetz authored
As a debugging aid, huge_pmd_share should make sure i_mmap_rwsem is held if necessary. To clarify the 'if necessary', expand the comment block at the beginning of huge_pmd_share. No functional change. The added i_mmap_assert_locked() call is only enabled if CONFIG_LOCKDEP. Ideally, this should have been included with commit 34ae204f ("hugetlbfs: remove call to huge_pte_alloc without i_mmap_rwsem"). Signed-off-by:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
Function dequeue_huge_page_node_exact() iterates the free list and return the first valid free hpage. Instead of break and check the loop variant, we could return in the loop directly. This could reduce some redundant check. [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: points out a logic error] [richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com: v4] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200901014636.29737-8-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.comSigned-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
set_hugetlb_cgroup_[rsvd] just manipulate page local data, which is not necessary to be protected by hugetlb_lock. Let's take this out. Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
The page allocated from buddy is not on any list, so just use list_add() is enough. Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
There are only two cases of function add_reservation_in_range() * count file_region and return the number in regions_needed * do the real list operation without counting This means it is not necessary to have two parameters to classify these two cases. Just use regions_needed to separate them. Signed-off-by: -
Wei Yang authored
Instead of add allocated file_region one by one to region_cache, we could use list_splice to merge two list at once. Also we know the number of entries in the list, increase the number directly. Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
We are sure to get a valid file_region, otherwise the VM_BUG_ON(resv->region_cache_count <= 0) at the very beginning would be triggered. Let's remove the redundant one. Signed-off-by:
-
Wei Yang authored
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: code refine and simplification", v4. Following are some cleanups for hugetlb. Simple testing with tools/testing/selftests/vm/map_hugetlb passes. This patch (of 7): Per my understanding, we keep the regions ordered and would always coalesce regions properly. So the task to keep this property is just to coalesce its neighbour. Let's simplify this. Signed-off-by:
-
Baoquan He authored
Change 'pecify' to 'Specify'. Signed-off-by:
-
Baoquan He authored
If a swap entry tests positive for either is_[migration|hwpoison]_entry(), then its swap_type() is among SWP_MIGRATION_READ, SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE and SWP_HWPOISON. All these types >= MAX_SWAPFILES, exactly what is asserted with non_swap_entry(). So the checking non_swap_entry() in is_hugetlb_entry_migration() and is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned() is redundant. Let's remove it to optimize code. Signed-off-by:
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200723032248.24772-3-bhe@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
Baoquan He authored
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: Small cleanup and improvement", v2. This patch (of 3): Just like its neighbour is_hugetlb_entry_migration() has done. Signed-off-by:
-
Michal Hocko authored
There is a general understanding that GFP_ATOMIC/GFP_NOWAIT are to be used from atomic contexts. E.g. from within a spin lock or from the IRQ context. This is correct but there are some atomic contexts where the above doesn't hold. One of them would be an NMI context. Page allocator has never supported that and the general fear of this context didn't let anybody to actually even try to use the allocator there. Good, but let's be more specific about that. Another such a context, and that is where people seem to be more daring, is raw_spin_lock. Mostly because it simply resembles regular spin lock which is supported by the allocator and there is not any implementation difference with !RT kernels in the first place. Be explicit that such a context is not supported by the allocator. The underlying reason is that zone->lock would have to become raw_spin_lock as well and that has turned out to be a problem for RT (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mu305c1w.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de). Signed-off-by:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by:
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929123010.5137-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) authored
Here is a very rare race which leaks memory: Page P0 is allocated to the page cache. Page P1 is free. Thread A Thread B Thread C find_get_entry(): xas_load() returns P0 Removes P0 from page cache P0 finds its buddy P1 alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 1) returns P0 P0 has refcount 1 page_cache_get_speculative(P0) P0 has refcount 2 __free_pages(P0) P0 has refcount 1 put_page(P0) P1 is not freed Fix this by freeing all the pages in __free_pages() that won't be freed by the call to put_page(). It's usually not a good idea to split a page, but this is a very unlikely scenario. Fixes: e286781d ("mm: speculative page references") Signed-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Ralph Campbell authored
The function is_huge_zero_page() doesn't call compound_head() to make sure the page pointer is a head page. The call to is_huge_zero_page() in release_pages() is made before compound_head() is called so the test would fail if release_pages() was called with a tail page of the huge_zero_page and put_page_testzero() would be called releasing the page. This is unlikely to be happening in normal use or we would be seeing all sorts of process data corruption when accessing a THP zero page. Looking at other places where is_huge_zero_page() is called, all seem to only pass a head page so I think the right solution is to move the call to compound_head() in release_pages() to a point before calling is_huge_zero_page(). Signed-off-by:
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mateusz Nosek authored
Previously 'for_next_zone_zonelist_nodemask' macro parameter 'zlist' was unused so this patch removes it. Signed-off-by:
-
Yanfei Xu authored
__perform_reclaim()'s single caller expects it to return 'unsigned long', hence change its return value and a local variable to 'unsigned long'. Suggested-by:
Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mateusz Nosek authored
finalise_ac() is just 'epilogue' for 'prepare_alloc_pages'. Therefore there is no need to keep them both so 'finalise_ac' content can be merged into prepare_alloc_pages() code. It would make __alloc_pages_nodemask() cleaner when it comes to readability. Signed-off-by:
-
Mateusz Nosek authored
Previously in '__init early_init_on_alloc' and '__init early_init_on_free' the return values from 'kstrtobool' were not handled properly. That caused potential garbage value read from variable 'bool_result'. Introduced patch fixes error handling. Signed-off-by:
-
Mateusz Nosek authored
Previously flags check was separated into two separated checks with two separated branches. In case of presence of any of two mentioned flags, the same effect on flow occurs. Therefore checks can be merged and one branch can be avoided. Signed-off-by:
-
Mateusz Nosek authored
Previously variable 'tmp' was initialized, but was not read later before reassigning. So the initialization can be removed. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove `tmp' altogether] Signed-off-by:
-
Li Xinhai authored
In has_unmovable_pages(), the page parameter would not always be the first page within a pageblock (see how the page pointer is passed in from start_isolate_page_range() after call __first_valid_page()), so that would cause checking unmovable pages span two pageblocks. After this patch, the checking is enforced within one pageblock no matter the page is first one or not, and obey the semantics of this function. This issue is found by code inspection. Michal said "this might lead to false negatives when an unrelated block would cause an isolation failure". Signed-off-by:
Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's document what ZONE_MOVABLE means, how it's used, and which special cases we have regarding unmovable pages (memory offlining vs. migration / allocations). Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
When introducing virtio-mem, the semantics of ZONE_MOVABLE were rather unclear, which is why we special-cased ZONE_MOVABLE such that partially plugged blocks would never end up in ZONE_MOVABLE. Now that the semantics are much clearer (and will be documented in a follow-up patch including the new virtio-mem behavior), let's allow to online partially plugged memory blocks to ZONE_MOVABLE and also consider memory blocks that were onlined to ZONE_MOVABLE when unplugging memory. While unplugged memory pages are, in general, unmovable, they can be skipped when offlining memory. virtio-mem only unplugs fairly big chunks (in the megabyte range) and rather tries to shrink the memory region than randomly choosing memory. In theory, if all other pages in the movable zone would be movable, virtio-mem would only shrink that zone and not create any kind of fragmentation. In the future, we might want to remember the zone again and use the information when (un)plugging memory. For now, let's keep it simple. Note: Support for defragmentation is planned, to deal with fragmentation after unplug due to memory chunks within memory blocks that could not get unplugged before (e.g., somebody pinning pages within ZONE_MOVABLE for a longer time). Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's clean it up a bit, simplifying the exit paths. Signed-off-by:
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-5-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Inside has_unmovable_pages(), we have a comment describing how unmovable data could end up in ZONE_MOVABLE - via "movablecore". Also, besides checking if the first page in the pageblock is reserved, we don't perform any further checks in case of ZONE_MOVABLE. In case of memory offlining, we set REPORT_FAILURE, properly dump_page() the page and handle the error gracefully. alloc_contig_pages() users currently never allocate from ZONE_MOVABLE. E.g., hugetlb uses alloc_contig_pages() for the allocation of gigantic pages only, which will never end up on the MOVABLE zone (see htlb_alloc_mask()). Signed-off-by:
-
